Engineering Writing/Writing Engineering
Shared by: HC120915214942
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 9/15/2012
- language:
- Unknown
- pages:
- 2
Document Sample


The Technical Communicator as Author
Ryan K. Mears
ryan@crashpod.net
Abstract popularity. The transmission view of
Section 11 of Central Works in Technical communication, our first model, focuses on
Writing “The Technical Communicator as moving information from one person to the next.
Author”, discusses the role technical The second model, known as the translation view
communicators play in existing academic focus of communication seeks to convey meaning with
of communication. the transfer of information. Our third and final
model is that of the articulation view of
Specifically, this article discusses how technical communication: with a goal of refinement and
communication is implemented in the three re-articulation, it is the newest of the
communications models of Transmission, communications models.
Translation, and Articulation.
2.3 Transmission communication
Class Readings Referenced “Of the three views of communication, the
Jennifer Daryl Slack, David James Miller, and transmission view has to be the most clearly
Jeffrey Doak. Technical Communicator as delineated”. This statement opens Slack, Miller,
Author. Central Works in Techincal and Doak’s discussion of transmission
Communication. Page 160 - 173 communication in a technical setting.
Transmission communication is the most basic
of the discussed concepts for propagating
1. Introduction information. In the technical realm, it is literally
The authors of this work attempt to integrate the telling someone what to do. For example: the
concept of a technical communication author instruction manual for a video camera might tell
into the accepted standards of the us: “insert the battery into the charger “.
communication field. By providing descriptions
and examples of how technical communicators This straightforward quality gives the author
manifest themselves in each of the three given great power in the transmission model. His or
communication models, Slack, Miller, and Doak her reader will be following the written
hope to create a roadmap that can be used to commands closely, so being specific is of great
define the curriculum of undergraduate students importance.
studying technical communications.
2.4 Translation communication
This response will examine the rationales for In translation communication, the author’s goal
each model the authors present and provide is to lead their reader to understand the meaning
commentary on the argument’s validity. of the subject content. For instance, in our video
camera example, we could say “placing the
2. Analysis of Readings battery on the charger will allow an electrical
2.1 Opening Discussion circuit to be established”.
“The Technical Communicator as Author” is
opened with a brief discussion on the position of Translation communication does not often find
author, and privileges and powers awarded it’s way into technical writing in a purely
therein. Slack, Miller, and Doak argue that the instructional form. More often it is called upon
credibility granted to an author is manifested to describe concepts and practices that need
differently given the communication model that clarification for proper understanding.
is in play.
2.5 Articulation communication
2.2 Communications Models Communication via articulation seeks to refine
According to this document, the field of and recycle it’s content in ways that improve the
communications recognizes two main models for meaning it is attempting to portray. Finishing off
information transfer, with a third quickly gaining our video camera example, the articulate version
of the statement would be “setting the battery on
the charger allows it to be fully charged when
plugged in”. Here articulation communication
not only gave an order to the reader, it explained
why they would want to follow through with the
direction.
3. Conclusion
3.1 Communication model
understanding leads to success
Covering content that is of great importance to
the technical writing community, this article was
very enlightening. As technical writers we must
be aware of how we are addressing our audience.
All three models discussed in this article are of
use to our field in their own respects.
It would be counter productive to use translation
communication to explain the physics and
architectural history behind the screw that is
holding up a reader’s bookshelf. Similarly, it
would be pointless to attempt explanation of a
fiber optic communications network simply by
offering “this little thing plugs into that hole”.
As technical communicators, we are faced with
the daunting task of providing both results and
meaning to our readers. Understanding of the
concepts presented in this article is a worthwhile
step towards fulfilling this goal.
Get documents about "