CX3 for APHA-final
Document Sample


Communities of Excellence3
A Blueprint for Community Action
Valerie Quinn, M.Ed.
Cancer Prevention & Nutrition Section
California Department of Health Services
APHA, December 2005
Picture of traffic,
sprawl
Schools
FOOD DESERTS
Food deserts $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
! $
$
$
$
$
! $
$
!
! $
$$
$ !
$
$
$
$
$
Role for Public Health
Provide data
Convene interested parties
Conduct needs assessments &
evaluation
Educate public
Advocate for specific policy and
environmental change
Policy and Environmental Change: New Directions for Public Health,
ASTDHPPHE & CDC, 2001
Technology Transfer
Built environment
Healthy foods
Physical activity
Reduce TV viewing
Reduce hunger/food
insecurity
Breastfeeding
Health care
CX3 Defined
A planning model that involves assessing
communities in relation to a variety of obesity
prevention benchmarks known as community
indicators and assets.
3 = nutrition, physical activity and obesity
prevention
Standardized indicators & assets – big plus!
Key Vision
CX3 Goal
Empower communities!!!
Assess a community’s strengths, assets,
gaps & weaknesses
Set priorities based on data
Strategic local data-driven action plans
Broaden participation
Evaluate progress
Indicators & Assets
Community Indicators
Specific, observable characteristics
of a community’s environments &
norms.
Example
“Supermarkets and grocery stores offering
healthy, affordable food choices are
located in low-income neighborhoods
and readily accessible to residents.”
Indicators & Assets
Assets
A community’s “readiness”
for addressing policy and
environmental change.
Example
“Extent of local officials who
advocate for local government
action to promote
environments that support
healthy eating… “
Creating CX3
Gather all possible
indicators &
assets. Refine.
Total:
151 Indicators
44 Assets
Creating CX3
Indicators organized Assets organized into:
in 6 Community
Environments:
Health department
Neighborhood infrastructure
Preschool Political will
School Community
After-school infrastructure
Worksite
Government
Creating CX3
Creating CX3 -- Cont.
Raters by Type of Organization
(n=142)
Local Health Department
30 School
State Government
25 23.9
Non profit/Community Based
Organization
Percent of Raters
Other*
20
16.216.2 Community Clinics/Hospital
15 University
10.6 UC Cooperative Extension
10 7.7 Federal Government
6.3
4.9 4.9 Advocacy Organization
4.2
5
2.1 2.1 Voluntary Health Organization
0.7
Faith Based Organization
0
Organization Type
CX3 Top Picks
Community Indicators Community Assets
Neighborhood: 12 indicators Local Health Dept.
(42 total)
Infrastructure: 3 assets (14
Preschool: 5 indicators (14 total) total)
School: XX indicators (45 total) Political Will: 3 assets (10 total)
After-school: 6 indicators (11 Community Infrastructure:
total)
11 assets (20 total)
Worksite: 6 indicators (20 total)
Government: 4 indicators (19
total)
CX3 Focus
Neighborhood Environment
Supermarkets in low income neighborhoods
If not, do small neighborhood stores offer healthy food?
Transportation available
CA 5 a Day program
Nutrition info provided
Limit unhealthy advertising & displays aimed at kids
Food banks provide healthy food
Farmers’ markets accept EBT cards
Alternative sources of health food available
Density of FF outlets restricted
Outdoor “unhealthy” advertising restricted
Neighborhoods safe and walk-able
CX3 Focus – Cont.
Community Assets:
Local Health Department Infrastructure
Obesity prevention… formal or expressed dept
priority (Report Card)
Actively develops collaborative relationships
Dedicated staff with expertise
Political Will
Local elected officials supportive
Extent of supportive media coverage
State/federal elected officials supportive
CX3 – What’s Next?
1. Assessment tools; strategies outlined
Start: Focus within Neighborhood, Local Health
Dept, Political Will
Eventually -- all Top Picks in all environments
CX3 – What’s Next?
1. Assessment tools; strategies outlined
2. Pilot Projects test tools
CX3 – What’s Next?
1. Assessment tools; strategies outlined
2. Pilot Projects
3. Materials/training provided &
implemented by local health
departments and others
CX3 – What’s Next?
1. Assessment tools; strategies outlined
2. Pilot Projects
3. Implemented by local health
departments and others
4. Breastfeeding indicators and WIC assets
coming soon
Benefits to Participation
Advances local policy change – Proven!
Puts local groups at forefront for
obesity prevention
Gives standardized indicators for ALL
types of work in obesity prevention
Appealing to funders
Challenges – so far…
Dynamic environment – build to grow
Growing research base + limitations
Narrowing the “Top Picks”
Funding changes
ID instruments – practical for local
level, limited resources
Change the
environment,
do not try to
change the
person.
Buckminister Fuller, architect, engineer,
mathematician, poet and
cosmologist.
For more information
List of Top Picks, etc.:
Valerie Quinn
vquinn@dhs.ca.gov
916-552-9908
Get documents about "