Chapter 20 Annex 3
Document Sample


Annex 3
EXAMPLE 2
In this example the bankrupt has excluded his interest in a property from the
FTVA but is agreeing to a higher monthly payment over a longer period.
Bankruptcy FTVA
Assets £ Assets £
Monthly IPO/IPA £50 1620 Monthly payment 75
Over 3 years Over 5 years 4500
(net of agents collection fee
of 10%)
Other available assets (list) Other available assets 0
Interest in property 1000 (list)(property excluded)
Total Assets 2620 Total Assets 4500
Expenses Expenses
Case administration fee 1625 Refund 50% of case 812
administration fee
Petitioning creditors costs 1000 Petitioning creditors costs 1000
Estimated disbursements Estimated disbursements 0
Costs re: interest in
property
250
Distribution (time and rate) 0 Supervisor’s fee (15% - 675
plus VAT of 17.5% Fee IVA3)
Secretary of State fee 17% 136
Total Expenses 3011 Total Expenses 2487
Available for creditors -391 Available for creditors 2013
Notes
1. This example calculates the FTVA income from monthly payments as 60
times the monthly amount, assuming a 5 year arrangement.
2. This example assumes that the nominee fee is paid by a third party, or
from assets excluded from the bankruptcy.
3. In this example there are no assets available for distribution to creditors in
the bankruptcy.
4. The Secretary of State’s administration fee (Fee B2) is calculated as 17%
of total chargeable receipts up to £100,000 (excluding the first £2000).
5. The bankruptcy deposit is excluded from both calculations above for the
following reasons -
a) The deposit is not included in the bankruptcy side of the calculation,
as it does not make a significant difference.
b) In an FTVA the bankruptcy deposit would be repaid to the person
who made it. If it was a debtor’s petition it would be repaid to the
bankrupt and the bankrupt should account for this in his proposal,
but it is excluded from the above calculation as a specific item.
ASSUMPTIONS
Bankruptcy assumptions –
1) Creditor’s petition
2) Bankrupt is assessed for an IPO/IPA of £50 per month. Agents collection
fee of 10% is charged on this and the agents account to the Official
Receiver net of this fee.
3) Bankrupt also has an interest in property at the de minimis level (below
which an application to court to realise would be dismissed).
4) A disbursement of £180 is payable to the official receiver’s contract agent
for the collection of the IPO/IPA – currently 10% of monies collected.
5) Secretary of State administration fee of 17% only charged on assets of
more than £2000.
FTVA assumptions –
1) Bankrupt does not want to include his interest in property in his FTVA.
2) The bankrupt is willing to increase monthly payments to £75 over 5 years.
3) Refund of 50% of the case administration fee.
4) Supervisor’s Fee (Fee IVA3) – calculated as 15% of any monies realised.
CONCLUSION
This example is below the guideline figure of £5,000 worth of assets (see
paragraph 20.56).
However, other considerations to be taken into account when considering if an
FTVA is financially viable include –
• The level of liabilities. The higher the liabilities, the lower the p in the £
available for distribution. e.g. If, in this case, there are liabilities of £20,000,
creditors would only get 10p in the £ in the FTVA. If the liabilities are
£200,000, then creditors would get 1p in the £. However, if the liabilities were
significantly less, say £8,000, creditors would get 25p in the £ in the FTVA,
but receive nothing in the bankruptcy.
• The number of creditors. If there is only 1 creditor, the creditor might be
willing to accept this proposal, as £2404 more is available in the FTVA than in
the bankruptcy. However, if there are 20 creditors, it probably wouldn’t be
worthwhile. The Supervisor’s fee of 15% on asset realisation has been set
based on an average number of creditors and liabilities so it will be necessary
to consider the economic viability of a case which has a lot of creditors.
The key considerations are -
• Will creditors be better off than they are in the bankruptcy?
• Are creditors likely to accept the proposal (p in £)?
• Is it economically viable for the OR to manage the distribution (number of
creditors)?
Get documents about "