Vermont Council of Developmental by mpU5Fw1Y

VIEWS: 3 PAGES: 9

									                  Vermont Council of Developmental
                      & Mental Health Services
                 Legislative Update for March 20, 2012
Legislators Informally Concur on Bill to Reform Mental Health System
On Friday the Conference Committee informally agreed to complete their negotiations on H.630
the bill to reform Vermont’s mental health system. On Tuesday they will review the final draft
with their proposed changes and formally sign off on it. The legislation will then be voted on by
the House and Senate before the Governor signs it to enact it into law.

The key sticking point had been the number of beds of the state operated facility in central
Vermont. The final language calls for building 25 beds, but allows for downsizing the facility to
16 beds if federal requirements impact funding. If the facility is downsized the 9 beds will be
replaced, if necessary.

Legislators had a strong interest in holding the department accountable to achieve the goals of
the plan and called for an independent consultant to report to them. The consultant will be
contracted by a special committee consisting of members of the joint fiscal committee and the
chairs and vice chairs of the senate committee on health and welfare and the house committee on
human services in consultation with the commissioner of mental health. The consultant will
report on December 1st on whether the proposed mental health system appropriately serves the
needs of individuals with mental health conditions and, if any unmet needs are identified, how
they may be addressed. Additionally, they will report on the data and evaluation mechanisms
necessary to manage and improve the quality of care and outcomes.

The bill also calls for the Department of Mental Health to report to the senate committee on
health and welfare and the house committee on human services regarding the efforts to plan for
implementation, quality improvement, and innovation of the mental health system and how it
recommends improving the system. The recommendations shall be based on assessment of
outcome and financial measures to include:
    1. development of sufficient capacity for inpatient and community psychiatric services and
        peer supports across the continuum of care;
    2. the support of individuals in accessing the services nearest to their homes;
    3. the reduction in emergency department usage and law enforcement intervention;
    4. the reduction in hospital admissions and length of inpatient stays, including any impact
        on readmissions;
    5. the implementation of quality assessment tools for evaluation of services at all levels,
        including those needed to measure the effectiveness of the care management system;
    6. the department’s use of current financial data to conduct a fiscal analysis of the capital
        and annual operating costs associated with the plan;
    7. Individuals’ satisfaction with provided services.
The Senate wanted to assure that hospitals would receive adequate reimbursement.
Representative Pugh suggested that the community providers should receive that, too. In the end
they agreed that state rate setting office would review the hospital costs.

House Appropriations Committee Approves Fiscal Year 2013 Budget
The House Appropriations Committee completed their work on the budget bill and it will now go
to the full House of Representatives for review and approval. The Council had testified in
support of the Governor's proposed budget, while advocating for continued funding for the Light
House public inebriate program and questioning the proposed reduction in funding for
developmental services while individuals who receive waiver services are hospitalized. The
committee vice chair Mitzi Johnson worked with the administration to secure ongoing funding
for the Light House. The estimated savings from hospitalizations were adjusted and the new
caseload funds for developmental services were reduced, leaving the net funding request for
developmental services the same. Recommendations to reduce funding in mental health by the
House Human Services Committee were not incorporated into the budget.

Senate Appropriations Committee Hears Mental Health Budget
Patrick Flood spoke about how quickly mental health services are changing. Morrisville’s
temporary hospital is going to be funded with general funds and this was not in the original
budget request. Patrick spoke highly about the success of the Challenges for Change pilots which
will receive continued funding in the FY'13 budget.

Jane expressed her interest that The Light House program receives full funding - she knows that
the house has addressed it with Patrick's support. In reference to the enhanced community mental
health services Committee Chair Jane Kitchel asked, “How will we know we are doing a good
job? DAs will tell us they are doing a good job.” Patrick explained that the language is being
developed by the conference committee. He is interested in what the customers think about
whether they are getting what they need.

Senator Hinda Miller asked about DAs being subject to public records law. Patrick said once
DAs send information to State government, then it is public. He assured the committee that they
will receive more robust data than ever.

Senator Kitchel then asked about the outcomes of success beyond six. Is it overseen? Are
interventions working? Are children well served? DMH Finance Director Heidi Hall spoke about
outcomes contract with CSAC as a model for the behavioral intervention services. They will be
expanded to a few other communities.

Patrick explained that the Governor's plan calls for an $8 million enhancement of community
services. Individual agencies are developing plans for DMH on how to best use the resources. It
is his expectation that it will take time to roll out services so DMH is planning for expenditure
levels of $7 million for FY'13. Patrick explained that Hilltop will focus more on step up than
step down. Crisis beds will go to Lamoille and Orange Counties.
The commissioner explained that he is still discussing where the 15 intensive residential beds
will be in the northwest and central parts of the state. When he spoke about the secure
residential facility, he noted that DMH is still looking for community placements.

The House is expected to pass a budget to the Senate this week. The total budget for DMH is
$173 Million.

Commissioner Wehry Presents DAIL Budget to Senate Appropriations Committee
On March 14th Commissioner Wehry provided an overview of DAIL programs and shared the
budget proposal for FY’13 with the Senate Appropriations Committee. The budget proposal for
DS includes $4,163,857 in new caseload, which is inclusive of graduates and $1,976,292
for those who meet public safety criteria. There is a reduction of $475,000 that will be achieved
though changing reimbursement practices during hospitalization. The Commissioner said that
CMS does not allow to double bill; however, in 2002 or 2003 a waiver or variance was sought to
bill waiver services for a period of time. DAIL revisited the interpretation of that a year ago and
determined that billing should not be allowed for all services. Senator Kitchel noted that there are
fixed costs and the Commissioner indicated that providers will be paid for what they are
providing, but not for employment, community supports, therapies, transportation, etc.

Though not shared in the written budget document or verbally with the Committee, the proposal
shared with Senate Appropriations reduces new caseload funds by $350,000 from the Governor's
budget proposal. This $350,000 reduction would make whole the $850,000 reduction anticipated
from no longer allowing billing during hospitalization. The result of the reduction is that the
proposed overall increase for DS remains the same as proposed in the Governor's budget at
$4,915,149.

The FY’13 budget will provide $1.55 million less in caseload funding than is available for
FY’12, although half of the FY’12 new caseload funds were achieved through a reduction to
existing services.

House Health Committee Supports Equal Cost-sharing for Mental Health & Primary Care
Representative Anne Donahue, the lead sponsor of the H.498, gave a brief history of the mental
health parity discussion on whether mental health would be considered primary or specialty care.
BISHCA determined that it should be considered specialty care since it is provided based on
referral from primary care. The federal mental health parity, by rule, considers some mental
health care as primary care in relation to co-pay requirements. However, BISHCA says small
employers do not have to meet federal parity requirements. Anne would like to have state law
consistent with federal parity for all employers and insurance. State law does state that there
should be no greater burden on an insured for access to mental health condition than for access to
treatment for other health conditions. Anne suggests that basic counseling by masters level
clinicians should be considered primary care.

Health Committee Chair Michael Fisher thinks the standard for health reform is being set now.
So this is an important issue to resolve.
Ralph Provenza, Executive Director of United Counseling Services (UCS), spoke about the
impact of high co-pays. In FY'11 UCS served 2,200 people with a variety of insurance
coverages in their outpatient programs. Co-pays range from $10 - 50. The average is $25. A
growing number of people served have high deductible insurance and a growing number of
people cannot pay their fees. This appears to correspond with a growing number of people
leaving after 2 sessions. Anecdotal information indicates that clients leave service and complain
about high co-pays. UCS lost $273,000 in their outpatient program in fiscal year 2011.

Ralph thinks people who do specialized evaluations; neuropsychological testing, etc should be
considered specialists. He suggested looking at the scope of practice to determine primary care:
e.g. social work, counselors; psychologists. He was clear that community mental health is
primary care. With the blueprint PCPs walk clients down the hall to receive primary mental
health services.

He personally sees higher co-pays for mental health services as discriminatory. Medicare will be
shifting its co-pays for mental health care in the future to bring them to a more reasonable level.

Julie Tessler of the Council gave a broader perspective on why mental health care should be
considered primary care.
     If mental health conditions go unaddressed they result in very high co-morbidity with
       physical health problems.
     As many as 70% of the reasons for visits to the doctor are due to mental health and
       substance use disorders.
     Underlying and unaddressed mental health concerns negatively effects treatment
       outcomes for physical health.
     As in all health care, if we have sufficient mental health capacity to address
       psychological issues early on we can prevent the escalation of the illness or condition
       resulting in better outcomes and less expensive care.
     High numbers of individuals served in the community mental health system do not have
       primary care doctors. The uninsured, in particular, often don't have access to primary
       care. Therefore, their primary care often takes place first within services provided by
       mental health.
     Community mental health makes referrals and communicates to primary care physicians
       about issues that may be barriers to care. We also assist with medication compliance, and
       support clients in being successful with their medical treatments.
     For some, community mental health is their primary care; the medical care is their
       specialty care.

The Vermont Council supports H. 498 because equal cost-sharing for mental health services with
primary care services will improve access to mental health care as an important primary care
service. The overall health of Vermonters will benefit from this legislation.

Alexandra Forbes testified on behalf of the Vermont Psychological Association (VPA) in support
of H.498 to address the financial barriers for Vermonters seeking mental health and substance
abuse treatments. VPA sees high co-pays as creating enormous disincentives for seeking and
completing medically necessary mental health or substance abuse treatment and sited research on
this phenomenon. [Excerpted from Medicaid Co-Pays: An Impact Analysis for New Jersey,
Coalition for a Moral Budget, 2009] “A substantial body of research shows that higher co-
payments are likely to cause low-income people to decrease their use of necessary health care
services.” This triggers the subsequent use of more expensive services including hospital
emergency rooms and hospitalization. Based on this evidence, when the State of Vermont shifts
Vermonters covered by VHAP to a Catamount plan, Alex expects to see a reduction in the use of
preventive services like mental health and substance abuse treatments because of the co-payment
requirement.

MVP Health Plan opposed the plan siting increased costs to its members and because it could set
a precedent for other types of health care.

In the end the Committee voted unanimously for the bill and requested Banking, Insurance,
Securities and Health Care Administration (BISHCA) to adopt rules clarifying “primary” and
“specialty” mental health services.

House General, Housing and Military Affairs Takes up Bill on Union Organizing
On March 15th the House General, Housing and Military Affairs took up H.389 on use of public
funds in relation to union organizing. The first witness was Judith Hayward, executive director
of HCRS. She gave background information on her agency which is a comprehensive
community mental health center. Representative Stevens asked about the relationship between
HCRS and state government. Judith spoke about the state oversight role. Funding sources:
Medicaid is 80%, while local revenue and donations and other revenues add up to approximately
$1.5 million. The Committee asked about legal fees in relationship to working with the union.
Representative Bouchard however, pointed out that union negotiations do not fall into the realm
of the bill which is about union organizing. Judith explained that they always work to have a
positive relationship with the union and that it is helpful to have expert legal counsel for
grievances and negotiations.

Chris Callacci, spoke for UNAP, a labor union which represents hundreds of health workers in
the state including some workers at HCRS. He said the language in the bill relies on a decision
by the state rate setting office which denied use of state funding to Berlin Health and Rehab for
activities they were engaged in to prevent union organizing. H.389 would apply this rule to other
health care settings like community mental health. He said it is upsetting that client care dollars
are being diverted to legal fees. HCRS employee and union member Jeanne Dionne seconded
this statement.

Rep Bouchard asked, “Don’t you expect an agency to use a lawyer to defend itself regarding an
unfair labor practice? Don't they need an attorney for negotiations?” Chris Callacci agreed but
noted that the law firm used by HCRS is a notorious “union dampening firm”.

Christine Oliver Deputy Secretary of the Agency of Human Services expressed understanding of
the concerns expressed, but noted that the Agency sees the bill as written as pre-empting federal
law. AHS recommended that the committee hears from the attorney general’s office.
Monitoring and enforcement by AHS would be difficult and not necessary since these issues
could be redressed elsewhere.
Representative John Moran asked, “Don’t we deserve a way to know how state dollars are
used?” Christine replied that there are many ways that monitoring the financials of the agency
can take place, but not generally by each expense.

Committee Chair Helen Head asked, “If we could reframe the bill to avoid preemption of federal
law then would you support the bill?” Christine noted that the purpose of the bill is already
supported by federal government in the prohibition against illegal activity, such as unfair labor
practices. AHS expects there are legitimate legal fees. “There are not going to be line items that
say bust union.”

The bill asks for certification that funds will not be used for union busting. Christine explained
that even if they received such certification, the state does not have the administrative ability to
then go in and do an inspection. It is the breadth of the bill that creates concerns for the
administration. AHS is happy to look into single instances of legislator concerns.

Michal Sirotkin on behalf of UNAP testified that he heard HCRS has no problem with disclosing
more about their expenditures. Acknowledging that there are many statutes not aggressively
enforced, he believes that certification by the agency will go a long way to achieve the purpose
of the bill.

House Human Services Committee Approves Opioid Treatment Bill
H.627 supports the regionalization and more uniform application of assessment protocols to
more accurately determine the treatment needs of clients seeking/needing medication assisted
treatment, including both methadone and buprenorphine. In its current form the bill appears to
propose to expand who can provide assessment and treatment. However, it is vague about the
actual addictions training and experience necessary for this broad base of added providers. This
may result in uncontrolled Medicaid billings. Barbara Cimaglio in a phone conversation with
House Human Services on Friday indicated she supported the expansion.

Although Bob Bick was able to attend the testimony on behalf of the Council, he recommends
further analysis of impact of the bill will be necessary to determine the Council’s position when
the bill is considered by the Senate.

Recovery Day at the State House
On Friday March 16 VAMAR and NAMI-VT held Recovery Day at the State House.
Individuals in recovery from mental health conditions and addictive disorders came from around
the state and shared their stories and perspectives. A number of legislators spoke to the large
audience and Senator Snelling received an award. A coalition of advocacy groups and
individuals, including the Vermont Council circulated a flyer highlighting the importance of
quality mental health services for individuals who are incarcerated.


This week’s schedule

                          House Committee on Appropriations
Monday, March 19, 2012
      1:00 PM               FY2013 State Budget
                            Committee Discussion/Vote
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
      9:00 AM               TBA


      2:30 PM               TBA
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
      9:00 AM               TBA


      1:15 PM               TBA

Thursday, March 22, 2012
      8:30 AM               FY2013 State Budget
                            Floor Amendments
      9:00 AM               House Convenes

Friday, March 23, 2012
      8:30 AM               FY2013 State Budget
                            Floor Amendments
      9:00 AM               House Convenes



                         House Committee on Human Services


Wednesday, March 21, 2012
      9:00 AM               Disability Awareness Day
                            Other TBA
      9:15 AM               Agency of Human Services Strategic Plan
                                  Doug Racine, Secretary, Agency of Human Services
                                  Monica Hutt, Director of Operations, Department for
                                    Children & Families


      10:45 AM              TBA
                    (Disability Awareness Cafeteria Supper from 5-6)

                    Senate Committee on Health and Welfare

Tuesday, March 20, 2012
      9:30 AM              Senate Floor


      After Floor          H. 559 - An act relating to health care reform implementation
                           Act 48 Overview
                                  Robin Lunge, Director of Health Care Reform, Agency of
                                     Administration
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
      11:30 AM             Disability Awareness
                                  Kate McCarthy-Barnett, MD, Disability Integration
                                     Specialist, FEMA Region I

Thursday, March 22, 2012
      10:00 AM             H. 559 - An act relating to health care reform implementation
                           Waivers, Section 33-35a, 40c
                                  Mark Larson, Commissioner, Department of Vermont
                                     Health Access (DVHA)
                                  Robin Lunge, Director of Health Care Reform, Agency of
                                     Administration


      11:00 AM             H. 559 - An act relating to health care reform implementation
                           Blueprint, Sections 28, 28a, 37
                                  Mark Larson, Commissioner, Department of Vermont
                                     Health Access (DVHA)
                                  Robin Lunge, Director of Health Care Reform, Agency of
                                     Administration
                                  Georgia Maheras, Executive Director, Green Mountain
                                     Care Board
                                  Dr. Craig Jones, Director, Blueprint for Health, Department
                                      of Health Access



                           Senate Committee on Judiciary
Thursday, March 22, 2012
       9:00 AM              H. 765 - An act relating to the mental health needs of the
                            corrections population
                                    Rep. Joan Lenes, Reporter of the Bill
                                    Kasey Bryan, Legislative Counsel, Office of Legislative
                                       Council
                                    Doug Racine, Secretary, Agency of Human Services
                                    Patrick Flood, Commissioner, Department of Mental
                                        Health
                                    Andy Pallito, Commissioner, Department of Corrections


       10:45 AM             Break


For more information or to take action:
           Legislative home page: http://www.leg.state.vt.us
           Sergeant-at-Arms Office: (802) 828-2228 or (800) 322-5616
           State House fax (to reach any member): (802) 828-2424
           State House mailing address (to reach any member):
                     Your Legislator
                     State House
                     115 State Street, Drawer 33
                     Montpelier, VT 05633-5501
           Email, home address and phone: Legislators' email addresses and home contacts
          may be found on the Legislature home page at http://www.leg.state.vt.us
           Governor Peter Shumlin (802) 828-3333 or http://governor.vermont.gov/

The purpose of the legislative update is to inform individuals who are interested in
developmental, mental health and substance abuse services about legislative advocacy, policy
development and activities that occur in the State Legislature. The Vermont Council is a non-
profit trade association whose membership consists of 16 designated developmental and mental
health agencies.

								
To top