Cardiotocografi ( CTG ) Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Shared by: HC120913175347
-
Stats
- views:
- 288
- posted:
- 9/13/2012
- language:
- Unknown
- pages:
- 53
Document Sample


Cardiotocography ( CTG )
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Ali Sungkar
Divisi Fetomaternal
Bagian Obstetri dan Ginekologi FKUI/RSUPN - CM
Electronic Monitoring
Indirect (external monitoring)
Direct (internal)
EFM-ISSUES
Detect fetal hypoxia i.e reduce and avoid
harm to the fetus and improve fetal and
baby out-come.
Severe acidosis may result in FHR
changes.
Could occur in Normal physiological
response in labor.
Misunderstanding the physiological and
pathphysiological CTGs will improve the
Mx.
EFM Problems and Realities
Electronic Intra-partum FHR
Monitoring is now considered
mandatory for high-risk pregnancies.
Difficulties with interpretation include
over confidence and not-only
difference in opinion between
practitioners but, also when the same
practitioner examines the same CTG
twice.
Increases CS rates 1.41%rr.
EFM Problems and Realities
Increases operative vaginal delivery
1.20%rr.
And no change in incidence of C
Palsy.
Reduction in Neonatal seizures rates
0.51%
No difference in APGAR scores.
? About the efficacy.
EFM- Facts
Reliability of interpretation-50-75%
are false positive .
False positive Dx reduces to 105
with FBS.
FBS 93% sensitivity, 6% false
positive.
PH Vs Lactate -39% Vs 2.3(rr 16.7).
Electronic Fetal Monitoring-
Indications
Indications for the continuous
EFM
Oligohydramnios
High risk pregnancies Hypertension.
IOL and Augmentation Abnormal FHR
of Labour. detected.
Reduced FM. Malpresentation and
Premature labour/TPL. in labour.
APH/IPH DM,Multiple
Gestation.
Previous CS.
Abdominal Trauma.
Prolonged ROM.
Meconium Liq.
EFM- Interpretation
Consider :
Intrapartum/antepartum trace.
Stage of labour.
Gestation.
Fetal presentation, ? Malpresentation.
Any augmentation,? IOL Medications
Direct or indirect monitoring/
EFM- 4 Basic Features of
FH Trace
EFM-4 Basic Features.
Baseline FHR - Mean level of FHR when this is stable,
excluding Accelerations and Decelerations (110-160
bpm)
-Tachycardia
-Bradycardia
Baseline Variability-5 bpm or greater than or equal to
5bpm, between contractions
-Normal
-Non-reassuring-Less than 5 bpm or less but less
than 30 min
-Abnormal-less than 5 bpm for 90 min or more.
Baseline variability CTG
Baseline variability
FHR: Variability
Definitions
Short term
Long term
Baseline variability
The minor fluctuations on baseline
FHR at 3-5 cycles p/m produces
Baseline variability.
Examine imin segment and estimate
highest peak and lowest trough.
Normal is more than or equal to 5
bpm.
Factors affecting Baseline
variability.
Para-Sympathetic affects short term
variability whilst Long Term is more
Symp.
CNS ,Drugs reduce Variability
High gestation increases variability
Mild Hypoxia may cause both S and
para S stimulation.
Non-reassuring Baseline
variability.
NRCTGs- reduced or less than 5 bpm
for 40 min or more but less than 90
mins..
B-B or short Term V is varying
intervals between successive heart
beats .
Long Term v is irregular waves on the
CTG 3-5 bpm.
Normal is 5-25 bpm– this indicates N-
CNS.
EFM-Accelerations
Accelerations- transient increase in
FHR of 15 bpm or more lasting for 15
sec.
Absence of accelerations on an
otherwise normal CTG remains
unclear.
Presence of FHR Accelerations have
Good outcome.
EFM Decelerations
Decelerations-
transient slowing of
FHR below the
baseline level of
more than 15 bpm
and lasting for 15
sec.
or more.
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
a) Early Decelerations (fig 3)
Head compression
Begins on the onset of contraction
and returns to baseline as the
contraction ends.
Should not be disregarded if they
appear early in labor or Antenatal.
Clinical situation should be r/v
Fig 3 Early Decelerations
Late Decelerations.
Uniform periodic slowing of FHR
with the on set of the contractions .
Repetitive late decels increases
risk of Umbilical artery acidosis
and Apgar score of less than 7 at 5
mins and Increased risk of CP.
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
b) Late Decelerations (Fig 4)
• Due to acute and chronic feto-placental
vascular insufficiency
Occurs after the peak and past the length of
uterine contraction, often with slow return to
the baseline.
Are precipitated by hypoxemia
Associated with respiratory and metabolic
acidosis
Common in patients with PIH, DM, IUGR or
other form of placental insufficiency.
Fig 4 Late Decelerations
Late Decelerations
Reduces Baseline variability together
with Late Decelerations or Variable
Decelerations is associated with
increased risk of CP.
EFM- Variable Decelerations
Variable intermittent periodic slowing
of FHR with rapid onset recovery and
isolation.
They can resemble other types of
deceleration in timing and shape.
Atypical VD are associated with an
increased risk of umbilical artery
acidosis and Apgar score less than 7 at
5 min
EFM- Variable Decelerations
Additional components:
Loss of 1 degree or 2 degree rise in baseline
Rate
Slow return to baseline FHR after and end of
contraction.
Prolonged secondary rise in Base FHR
Biphasic deceleration
Loss of variability during deceleration
Continuation of base line at a lower level.
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
c) Variable Deceleration (Vagal activity) (Fig 5)
Inconsistent in configuration,
No uniform temporal r-ship to the onset of
contraction, are variable and occur in isolation.
Worrisome when Rule of 60 is exceeded (i.e. decrease
of 60 bpm,or rate of 60 bpm and longer than 60 sec)
Caused by cord compression of the umbilical cord
Often associated with Oligo-hydroaminos with or
without ROM
Can cause short lived RDS if they MILD
Acidosis if prolonged and Recurrent.
Fig 5 Variable Decelerations
EFM Prolonged deceleration
Prolonged Deceleration (Fig 6)
Drop in FHR of 30 bpm or More lasting for
at least 2 min
Is pathological when crosses 2
contractions i.e 3 mins.
Reduction in O2 transfer to placenta.
Associated with poor neonatal outcome.
EFM- Prolonged Decelerations
CAUSES
Cord prolapse.
Maternal hypertension
Uterine Hypertonia
Followed by a VE or ARM or SROM
with High PP.
Fig 6 Prolonged Deceleration
EFM Mx Prolonged
Deceleration
Maternal position
IV fluids
V.E to exclude cord prolapse
Assess BP
FBS if cx dilated and well applied PP
Mx Depending on the clinical situation.
Baseline Bradycardia
FH below 110bpm(FIGO ).
less than 100bpm (RANZCOG).
Causes :
Postdates, Drugs, Idiopathic,
Arrythmias, hypothermia(increased Vagal
Tone)
Cord Compression (Acute Hypoxia,
congenital H/disease and Drugs).
Mx depends on the clinical
situation.(FBS,VE Observation or expedite
delivery)
Types
Moderate Bradycardia 100-109 bpm
Abnormal bradycardia less than
100bpm.
Tachycardia 161-180 bpm
Abnormal Tachycardia more than 180
bpm
Ranzcog Australian more than 170
bpm
Baseline tachycardia and
Bradycardia.
Uncomplicated baseline tachycardia
161-180 bpm or bradycardia 101-109
do not appear to be associated with
poor NN outcome.
Causes of B Tachycardia.
Asphyxia
Drugs
Prematurity
Maternal Fever
Maternal thyrotoxicosis
Maternal Anxiety
Idiopathy
Mx depends on the clinical situation
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Baseline Bradycardia
FH Rate below 110bpm (FIGO Recommended)
Postdates
Drugs
Idiopathic
Arrhythmia's
Hypothermia.(Increased Vagal tone),
Cord compression(Acute Hypoxia,Congenital
H/disease, and drugs)
Mx depends on the clinical situation. (FBS, VE,
Observation or expedite Delivery).
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Baseline Tachycardia
Asphyxia
Drugs
Prematurity
Maternal fever
Maternal thyrotoxicosis
Maternal Anxiety
Idiopathy
Mx depends on the clinical situation
Fig 2 Sinusoidal pattern
Interpretation of the CTG
EFM-Sinusoidal Pattern
Regular Oscillation of the Baseline long-term
Variability resembling a Sine wave ,with no B-b
Variability (Fig 2),
Has fixed cycle of 3-5 p min. with amplitude of 5-
15 bpm and above but not below the baseline.
Should be viewed with suspicion as poor
outcome has been seen (eg Feto-maternal
haemorrhage)
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Sinusoidal pattern - distinctive smooth undulating
Sine-wave baseline with no B-b variability ( Fig 2 )
0.3 % (Young 1980)
cord compression
hypovolemia
ascites
idiopathic(fetal thumb sucking)
Analgesics
Anaemia
Abruption
Mx r/v clinical situation
EFM- Saltatory pattern
Seen During Fetal thumb sucking.
Could be associated with Hypoxia.
NR CTGs
Difficult to interpretation,leads to
Increased rate of C Section.
50% CTG in Labour have 1 abnormal
feature
15-20% Nr CTGs (pathological).
?? To reduce CS….
EFM-Summary
Normal - CTG with all 4 Features
Suspicious -one non reassuring
category and reminder are reassuring
Pathological -2 or more non-
reassuring categories or one or more
abnormal categories.
Caring for the Mom,
Not the Monitor!
References
Manual Obs and Gyn. by Niswander, MD
Fetal Monitoring RCOG UK
CTGs RANZCOG
Literature review articles American Family
Physician
CTG Made Easy
D. Lata Sharma, MD, FRANZCOG, Senior
Lecturer, University Of Queensland, Australia
Charles Kawada, M.D,Harvard Medical School
Amnioinfusi
Hamil ≥ 37 minggu, bukan bekas SC,
ICA < 5 cm
600 mL-1000 mL dlm 1 jam + 150-180
mL/jam, hangat 370 C
Transervikal NGT no.8
Bila keluar < 100 mL, ukur ICA
hindari distensi uterus
Pembukaan ≤5-6 cm
Review Cochrane
Get documents about "