TAAE Powerpoint slides Feb 2-4, 2006 by ya60e53

VIEWS: 0 PAGES: 14

									State Accountability
  System Update

       Special Education
       TETN
       January 6, 2010


       Shannon Housson
       TEA, Performance Reporting Division
    Today’s Topics


       Preview of 2010 and 2011 Standard Accountability
        Procedures

       Preview of 2010 AEA Procedures and Indicators

       Accountability Resources




2
Preview of
2010 and 2011
Standard
Accountability
Procedures
    2010 Accountability Timeline

    Jan - Feb       Accountability System Development –
                    2009 Review / 2010 and beyond Development
    March 4 - 5     Educator Focus Group Meeting
    March 29        Commissioner’s Accountability Advisory
                    Committee (CAAC) Meeting
    April           Final decisions for 2010 and beyond
                    announced by Commissioner
    Late May        2010 Accountability Manual posted online
    July 30         2010 Accountability Ratings release
    Mid-September   2011 AEA Campus Registration
4
    Standard Accountability Decisions for
    2010 and 2011

                                   TAKS Indicator
                                                2009            2010             2011*

      Exemplary                                ≥ 90%            ≥ 90%            ≥ 90%
      Recognized                               ≥ 75%            ≥ 80%            ≥ 80%
      Academically Acceptable
        Reading/ELA                            ≥ 70%            ≥ 70%            ≥ 70%
        Writing, Social Studies                ≥ 70%            ≥ 70%            ≥ 70%
        Mathematics                            ≥ 55%            ≥ 60%            ≥ 65%
        Science                                ≥ 50%            ≥ 55%            ≥ 60%
      * Standards for 2011 will be reviewed in 2010 and are subject to change.
5     Numbers in bold indicate a change from the prior year.
    Standard Accountability Decisions for
    2010 and 2011 (cont.)

     TAKS (Accommodated)                                    2009     2010     2011
     Science (grades 5, 8, 10, & 11, incl. gr. 5 Spanish)
     Social Studies (grades 8, 10, & 11)
                                                             Use      Use     Use
     English Language Arts (grade 11)
     Mathematics (grade 11)

     Reading/ELA (grades 3 – 10, incl. gr. 3 – 5 Spanish)
     Mathematics (grades 3 – 10, incl. gr. 3 – 5 Spanish)   Report    Use     Use
     Writing (grades 4 & 7, incl. gr. 4 Spanish)

     TAKS-Modified
     All Subjects and Grades, combined w/ TAKS              Report   Report   Use
     TAKS-Alternate
     All Students Only, summed Subjects and Grades          Report   Report   Use
     English Language Learner Progress Measure
6    All Students Only                                      Report   Report   Use
    Standard Accountability Decisions for
    2010 and 2011 (cont.)

                   Completion Rate I, Annual Dropout Rate,
                         and Underreported Students
                                                                          2010      2011*
    Completion Rate I
                                                                        ≥ 95.0%    ≥ 95.0%
       Exemplary
                                                                        ≥ 85.0%    ≥ 85.0%
       Recognized
                                                                        ≥ 75.0%    ≥ 75.0%
       Academically Acceptable

    Gr. 7-8 Annual Dropout Rate (All categories)                         ≤ 1.8%     ≤ 1.6%

                                                                       150 and ≤   150 and ≤
    Underreported Students (District only)
                                                                         4.0%        3.0%
    * Standards for 2011 will be reviewed in 2010 and are subject to change.
7   Numbers in bold indicate a change from the prior year.
    Standard Accountability Decisions for
    2010 and 2011 (cont.)

               Summary – 2010 Development Topics

       Annual review of RI, TPM, and Exceptions Provision
       Annual review of Gold Performance Acknowledgments
        standards, including Comparable Improvement (CI)
       2010 and 2011 Standards for TAKS Indicators
       Completion/Dropout Indicators and Standards
       Transition Timeline from TAKS to EOC Assessments
       Transition to Restructured System for 2011 and Beyond

8
Preview of 2010
AEA Procedures
and Indicators
     TAKS Progress Indicator

        The TAKS Progress indicator includes all TAKS
         (Accommodated) results as described on slide 29.

        The TAKS Progress indicator standard remains 50%
         for 2010.

        The TAKS Progress indicator standard for 2011 will be
         reviewed with accountability advisory groups in spring 2010.




10
     TAKS Progress Indicator (cont.)

        The TAKS Progress indicator sums performance results across
         grades (3-12) and subjects to determine ratings under AEA
         procedures.
        This indicator is based on the number of tests taken, not on the
         number of students tested.




11
     Completion Rate II and Annual Dropout
     Rate (Grades 7-12) Indicators

        The Completion Rate II indicator standard remains 60.0% for 2010.
        The Annual Dropout Rate indicator standard remains 20.0% for
         2010.
        In spring 2010, the accountability advisory groups will review
         various options and make recommendations to the commissioner
         about the leaver indicators evaluated under AEA procedures
         for 2011.




12
     Completion Rate II Indicator

        This longitudinal rate shows the percent of students who completed
         or who are continuing their education four years after first attending
         grade 9 in Texas.
        Completion Rate II counts graduates, continuing students (students
         who return to school for a fifth year), and GED recipients in the
         definition for AECs of Choice and charters evaluated under
         AEA procedures.
        Residential Facilities are not evaluated on the Completion Rate II
         indicator. Charters that operate only Residential Facilities are not
         evaluated on the Completion Rate II indicator.
        Since 2008, only All Students are evaluated; student groups are not
         evaluated separately.
13
     Accountability Resources

        ESC Accountability Staff
        Division of Performance Reporting
         Phone: (512) 463-9704
         Email: performance.reporting@tea.state.tx.us
        AEA
         http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/aea
        Accountability
         http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/
        Accountability Resources
         http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/resources/index.html

14

								
To top