The Second Reich Revision sheet - DOC

Document Sample
The Second Reich Revision sheet - DOC Powered By Docstoc
					                         The democratic experiment – Weimar 1919-29

1. The German Revolution – October reform, November revolution. Left wing – SPD,
    Spartacists, Red Rosa, Spartacist revolt –Jan 1919 (Freikorps brought disturbances under
2. The National Constituent Assembly – First election 19 Jan 1919. Even amongst all the
    turmoil still hold an election!
3. How much change did the revolution bring about? – Possible of revolution remained,
    Imperial Germany could not survive due to WW1 loss! Parliamentary democracy was
    introduced (big change). Yet revolutions did not go much further. Society was virtually
    untouched as no attempt to reform the key institutions: The civil service, judiciary and army.
    No change in big business structure or the power of the industrial elite did not change.
    Improving working conditions were outlined but would follow slowly!
4. Weimar’s political Crisis – The Constitution – Bill of Rights. Some historians have blamed
    the constitution for the real collapse of Weimar. This is based on 3 aspects – Proportional
    Representation, relationship between president and Reichstag (Article 48) Traditional
    institutions of Imperial Germany were allowed to continue. Yet – it was a real improvement
    upon the previous undemocratic constitution of Imperial Germany. It could not control the
    circumstances which were unpredictable. It did have flaws but it perhaps was not fatally
    flawed! The Treaty of Versailles – Aims of big 3, Terms, Diktat! Threat from the Left –
    KPD, Communist opposition – posed much less threat than perceived at the time. (P128)
5. Threat from the Extreme Right – Freikorps, Kapp Putsch, Beer Hall Putsch.
6. The Great Inflation – the human consequences – Peasants, Mittlestand, Industrial workers,
    Civil Servants, Retired, Other Social effects (P146)
7. Strememann’s 100 days – Achievements, survival of Weimar.
8. The Golden Years – Economic Recovery, benefits of social welfare. Yet was the Republic a
    fundamentally sick economy? – Too reliant of USA? Political stability – Coalition politics,
    SPD divided, role of Hindenburg. Limitations of the political system – system failed to make
    any progress. It coped! Yet no putsch and anti-republican extremists were contained. Law and
    order was restored and activities of various paramilitary groups were limited. Turn out in
    elections declined and an increasing growth in fringe parties. Foreign Policy – Dawes Plan,
    Locarno Pact, diplomatic progress (Joined LON, Kellog-Briand Pact) Treaty of Berlin.
9. Weimar Culture – New radical cultural reaction! (‘Neue Sachlichkeit’.) Art, architecture
    and design, literature, theatre. Mass Culture – Jazz, consumerism, film(G. industry became
    the most advanced in Europe) Radio (despite depression 1 in 4 G. owned a radio) Cabaret.
    The conflict of cultures.
10. Weimar 1924-9: An overview- They appear stable yet the historian Peukert describes the
    years as a ‘deceptive stability.’ Economy – False idea of prosperity, divided society – deep
    class divisions still existed. Political division – Original ideals of the Constitution not lived
    up to. Foreign affairs – Even though Stresemmann was successful the large amount of
    Germans rejected his policy.
    Possible questions:
        ‘The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 to 1923 cam from the political violence of
         the extreme right.’ How far do you agree with this judgment?
        To what extent could the period 1924-1929 be described as one of economic social and cultural stability?
        Germany experienced a period of political calm, economic development and social progress in the mid 1920s. How
         far do you agree with this judgment?
        ‘The Weimar Republic was deceptively stable’ How far do you agree with this judgment?
        ‘Germany experienced a period of political calm, economic development and social progress in the mid-1920s.’ How
         far do you agree?

Shared By: