For Immediate Release

Document Sample
For Immediate Release Powered By Docstoc
					For Immediate Release                       Contacts: Jeff Tittel, NJ Sierra Club, (609) 558-9100
May 21, 2008                                Dave Pringle, NJ Enviro Federation, (732) 996-4288

          Christmas Comes Early for New Jersey Builders
On Monday Assemblymen Greenwald and Cryan introduced the Permit Extension Act, the major
bill being pushed by builders and developers in New Jersey. This bill is an attack on the
environment, on good planning, and on home rule. “This is one of those special interest bills
they try to pass quietly in the middle of the night,” said Jeff Tittel, Director of the New Jersey
Sierra Club, “but it will have dire consequences for the state of New Jersey.”

The Permit Extension Act would extend all permits and approvals for developers at the state and
local levels for six years, allowing projects that were permitted many years ago to avoid changes
in environmental law, public health standards, building codes, or local zoning. “This bill is one
of the biggest giveaways to developers in the history of New Jersey,” Tittel added. “It would
result in more flooding, more people living on toxic sites, more sprawl, and more pollution in our
environment.”

The act includes what Tittel terms a “Dracula Clause.” It would allow projects where permits or
approvals have expired within the past two years to be brought back to life, even if those projects
would cause environmental harm or damage to public health.

It would undermine the state’s Pollution Discharge Rules, Flood Hazard Rules, Site Remediation
Rules, Category 1 Rules, and others, preventing their appropriate implementation in violation of
the laws that brought these rules into existence. In fact, the bill’s language specifies that the
permit extension would be in effect from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2012, due to the
current economic situation. “For what’s supposed to be a short-term problem, they’re looking
for a long-term giveaway,” said Tittel.

The act would also arbitrarily extend permits affecting federally-designated programs, such as
the Wetlands Act and Clean Water Act, violating Memorandums of Agreement between the state
of New Jersey and the federal government. In essence, this would mean that the Bush
Administration, with its atrocious environmental record, would be more protective of the
environment than the New Jersey legislature.

Currently Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) permits are good for five years plus a
five year renewal, and on some occasions can be renewed beyond this. With the Permit
Extension Act, all permits would be good for at least sixteen years. “This would be like a project
that was approved during the Reagan Administration being built during George W. Bush’s
administration,” commented Dave Pringle, Campaign Director for New Jersey
Environmental Federation. “The world changes a lot in sixteen years. Circumstances are
different and scientific knowledge is light years ahead of where it was before.”
The six year clock makes this bill even worse than the two previous Permit Extension Acts,
which were passed despite a veto by Governor Florio and a conditional veto by Governor
Whitman. While those bills caused a great deal of environmental damage and sprawl problems
that the state is still feeling the effects of today, the first act only extended permits for two years
and the second one for one year. This bill would be for twice the time of those two acts
combined.

The Permit Extension Act is the first of what environmentalists anticipate will be a series of bills
based on the Department of Community Affairs’ (DCA) Housing Task Force reports, which
were written by individuals with ties to the building industry with no input from the public or
environmental groups. “The builders and the sprawl machine are trying to take over land use
and environmental planning in New Jersey,” noted Tittel. “We believe that this bill was written
by the New Jersey Builders Association and that the legislators that introduced it are just fronting
for them. This is an example of special interest money influencing the legislature to the
detriment of the public.”

The DCA and the builders have claimed that a downturn in the economy necessitates doing away
with environmental regulations to keep the building industry afloat. “The builders are using the
economy as an excuse to overturn important environmental protections, even though these
regulations have nothing to do with the subprime mortgage crisis,” concluded Pringle, “But it
will cost the state of New Jersey far more if we allow the builders to wreak havoc on public
health and the natural resources we depend on for our economic and physical well-being.”

                                            ##########
For Immediate Release                      Contacts: Jeff Tittel, NJ Sierra Club, (609) 558-9100
May 21, 2008                               Dave Pringle, NJ Enviro Federation, (732) 996-4288

                         The Encap Extension Act
   Examples of Projects That Would Be Affected By the Permit Extension Act
The Permit Extension Act would extend all permits and approvals for development projects for
an additional six years with no attention given to whether a project was good or bad. This
indiscriminate approach would allow projects that no longer meet environmental, public health,
or building standards to go forward. For example:

          Encap’s approvals would be extended for another six years, instead of those permits
           expiring and Encap actually being required to be cleaned up.

          Eagle Ridge in West Milford, a project of 288 homes above the Wanaque Reservoir
           in an endangered species area, would be revived, although its approval by the local
           planning board and its Highlands Act exemption expired last year. This project was
           originally proposed in the 1980’s and was kept alive by the first Permit Extension
           Act. If built, it would have a dramatic impact on water quality in the Highlands
           region, especially in the Wanaque Reservoir, and would dry out the wells serving
           surrounding homes, violating the Highlands Act, the Water Quality Planning Act, and
           West Milford’s zoning ordinances. The Permit Extension Act would allow this to
           happen over the opposition of the mayor and the town council.

          At Pond View Estates in Rockaway, the water permit has lapsed because it is in an
           area of groundwater contamination. Under this bill, the permit could be reinstated
           and residents of the area could end up drinking contaminated water since the bill has
           no public health and safety clause to prevent this.

          In Jersey City, proposed projects that were ultimately not built on contaminated
           chromium sites could go forward with their permitting, despite the fact that the toxic
           waste they sit on is now 12 times the standard for public health. Last year the
           Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), citing better, more recent science,
           changed the standard from 240 to 20. Under the Permit Extension Act, however, the
           No Further Action letters saying that cleanup had been completed to the DEP’s
           standards and construction could now go forward would be grandfathered, and houses
           would be built on toxic sites.

          The act would grandfather approvals for strip clubs and sex shops, even if a town had
           since changed its zoning to ban them. There was a case like this in Edison after the
           first Permit Extension Act.
   The act would grandfather the permits to dump dredge spoils in Palmyra Cove Nature
    Center, which the local community has worked hard to renegotiate.

   It would allow projects sited in flood plains and Flood Hazard Areas to continue,
    putting people in harm’s way and increasing flooding in the area, which in turn would
    impact downstream property owners and put even more people in potential danger.

   It would also allow projects sited next to Category 1 streams and above reservoirs to
    be built, impacting water quality and water supply in our already overburdened state
    and adding more pollution to the streams that provide our drinking water.

   It would prevent projects approved now from being subject to any green building
    codes that are later adopted, hampering our ability to fight global warming and meet
    the mandates of the Global Warming Response Act.

   It would grandfather Highway Access Permits, even if it later turns out that the
    project could cause a public safety hazard.

   It would prevent the implementation of the Kiddie Kollege law, banning the building
    of schools or daycare centers on contaminated sites.

   It would prevent DEP from revoking permits that were illegally granted, such as on a
    number of golf courses in Somerset County.

   It would prevent towns from changing their Council on Affordable Housing (COAH)
    plans, forcing development into environmentally-sensitive areas.

                                   ##########

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:9/13/2012
language:Unknown
pages:4