NEECOM 3
Shared by: HC120913001914
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 9/12/2012
- language:
- Unknown
- pages:
- 20
Document Sample


Choosing a Next Generation Platform: New
Balance’s Evaluation Process
You Can’t Fit A Size 12 Foot Into a Size 5 Shoe!
Robyn D'Addario, Assistant EC Manager, New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Evroy Anglin, Senior EC Analyst, New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Agenda
• EDI at NB
• Why change?
• Software selection process
• Lessons learned
• Q&A
The New Balance Family of Brands
Systems Supported
Seven
Business
Applications
EDI Milestones
- ASN for overseas footwear factory direct - EDI is 60% of business
- Electronic Remittance (JC Penney shipments (print labels in factory) - Spreadsheet order processing for
1st account) - Brand Security tongue label Sample Orders
- Consolidated Invoices - IT Automated PO updates to XPC with pre- - New EDI Software
- On-line Visibility to EDI Error Recovery pack table -- 500 Trading Partners
Suspense reasons.
- Send ASN's hourly instead of once a day
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
- 72 Accounts on EDI;
- Email ASN to replace faxed
packing slip from warehouse
- Start receiving customer Sell-thru
- Ship Direct w/ASN's from Solar Link
- AS2 Direct Connect communications
- Dynamic DC Association -- Brine merged w/ Warrior
- PO Acknowledgments
- Added 1 headcount (from 3 to 4 EDI personnel)
- Update pre-pack table off EDI PO
- EDI hits 56% - Allow processing of Hash Orders via
- 24 Hour Orders implemented spreadsheet processing
(Hourly processing of EDI Orders)
- Canada Order Processing Spreadsheet
orders
Shared Services Group - 2001
Shared Services Group - Current
Determine Scope of software needed
• Where we fall short today
– Process monitors
– Are we missing any documents
– Did a process fail
– Visibility
Determine Scope 2
• EDI Mapping
• Migrate Business Processes
• Replace existing scripts
• End-to-end mature package
Limitations to be aware of
• Corporate IT Limitations
– Databases supported
– Server OS/Platform
– Limited access to firewall changes
• Integrate with SAP
Who are the major players?
• Gartner magic quadrant
• AMR conference call
• Are consultants widely available?
• Due diligence
– General reputation of company and software
– How long have they been in the industry
– How widely known/used?
– Any upheavals? i.e. mergers, retention of top-level
executives
Speak to actual users
• Determine ease of use, ease of installation,
availability of training, effectiveness of software
• How complex were other companies
requirements in comparison to ours?
• Do users need to be rocket scientists to get work
done?
Assemble RFP
• Create Functionality Checklist
– Trading Partnership Management
– Tables
– Translation Capability
– Reporting/Metrics
– Communications
– Process Monitoring
– Security
– Training
– Installed Base
Analyze RFP responses as a team
• Put together scorecard spreadsheet of desired
features and rate
• Scorecard was developed AFTER we had seen
at least one demo instead of in the beginning
• At the end of the exercise, statistical dead heat
Vendor Demos
• In-house and web based
• Evaluated from the viewpoints of a technical user
and administrative (day-to-day operations)
• What we could have done better
How Much Training Needed?
• Is there a painless migration path
• Knowledge Transfer
• Reference calls
Decision Making
• EDI Team roundtable
• Take the pulse of the group
• Who/what we liked/disliked and why
• Perceived risks
Other Decision Making Factors ($$$)
• Licenses & support plan
• Training
• Consulting services (migration, implementation)
• Pricing varies according to how work is allocated
Lessons learned
• Speak to a technical person in vendor demos
– Can be a discrepancy between the marketing
literature and the reality
• Standardize a list of questions
– So you can compare apples to apples
• Don’t schedule the demos too far apart
– You’ll forget a bunch of stuff
– Harder to make an objective decision
• Stick to deadlines
• Contact more than one user
Questions?
Get documents about "