Inquiry Project

Document Sample
Inquiry Project Powered By Docstoc
					                                                   Teacher Inquiry – A Way of Being
                                             Nancy F. Dana & Diane Yendol-Hoppey*

What is Inquiry?

             A way of being a teacher (“inquiry stance”)
             “Problematizing” my own practice
             Systematically studying my own practice
             Taking action based on what I find out

It’s more than just reflection, because…

             It’s intentional.
             It’s visible.

                                                             Why do Inquiry?

                             Teachers with an inquiry stance add the teacher’s voice to the larger conversation
                                     involving research, professional development, and school reform.

What does a typical Inquiry Cycle look like?

  1.        Pose my question (craft my wondering).
  2.        Collect data to gain insight into wondering.
  3.        Analyze my data + read relevant literature
  4.        Make any changes based on new understandings.
  5.        Share my findings with others.

Finding My Wondering…

1. From the Complexity of My Work:

             Our simultaneous negotiating of individual kids + the teaching context + the curriculum I must/want to teach + act of
              teaching, itself + my beliefs about teaching

2. From my “Felt Difficulties”


Eight Passions (Lenses for Studying My Classroom)

       1.     Desire to help an individual child
       2.     Desire to improve/enrich my curriculum
       3.     Desire to focus on my content knowledge
       4.     Desire to improve/experiment with my teaching strategies/techniques
       5.     Desire to look at the relationship between my beliefs and my teaching practices
       6.     Desire to look at the relationship between my personal and profession identity
       7.     Desire to investigate and advocate for social justice
       8.     Desire to better understand my teaching and learning school/classroom context

*A great (short) book about inquiry: Dana, N. & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2003). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
                   Crafting my Wondering…

Advice for designing a good research question:

   Journal, journal, journal!
   Make sure it’s a real question!
   Question must be able to be answered with the help of
    data collection (evidence), reflection, and the literature.
   Avoid questions with Yes/No answers.

                   Example of Yes/No question:

    “Can shaping clay letters help Rachel increase her sound-
                  symbol identification skills?”

                             Change to:

   “How would the process of working with shaping clay letters
      impact Rachel’s sound-symbol identification skills?”

   Make sure you are passionate about the question.
   Be willing to let the question change over time as you
    collect data and go deeper – this is normal!
                     Let’s collaborate with one another to find our own “Emerging Wondering” today…

                                                      Silent “Think/Pair/Share”
                                                      (2 Co-Teachers together)

     1.   Do a 5 minute quick-write on a kid that has been on your mind lately. Just free write. What makes this child stand out
          in your mind? How do you feel about this kid? Does she frustrate you? Does he delight you? Why? Why not? What
          kinds of academic and/or behavioral issues are you seeing at this point? What do you wish you could do for this kid?
     2.   Trade your quick-write with your co-teaching partner.
     3.   Partners - look at this quick-write as data and think to yourself: What kinds of issues do I see coming out in his/her
          free-write? Do I see a theme emerging? What is unique about his/her student? What question does this leave me
          with about his/her student? What needs to happen next?
     4.   Partners get __ minutes to respond to one another’s quick write. Write to your partner what you hear as an emerging
          wondering in the form of a question. Write this on paper below his/her quick-write.

                                  Sample Starter: “I think one thing I am hearing you wondering about is….”

     5. Give the quick-write back to the owner.
     6. Read your partner’s response to your free write. Is this your emerging wondering at this point? If so, write it out for
     yourself in a way that really captures it with as much detail as you can. If it isn’t, let the question provoke you to try to
     articulate what your question really is. Write it down. This is your “emerging wondering!”


                                                      Small Group Discussion
                                           (School Groups with Field Advisor as Facilitator)


     Now, with your school group, talk about as many emerging wonderings as you have time. It may be good to choose one
     person who has one “for sure,” and one person who is struggling to get one down on paper. Help each other look at the
     question in terms of the “Advice” given in the previous section. Begin to think about what you need to do next to refine your
     wondering in a way that will meet the criteria here for a good question.



                     I’ll need to refine my Wondering in the next few weeks, or so… how will I do that?

Through analyzing your data (journal, observations, scores, student artifacts, interviewing student, teachers, CRT, etc…),
seminar discussions, collaboration with your mentor teacher, field advisor(s), your students, and your co-teacher, reading
literature on your area of work…etc!


Example of a Wondering refined over time:

Initial Wondering: Why does Kyra hate to read?

Refined Wondering: How could I help Kyra improve her reading fluency?

Fully Refined Wondering: How can daily repeated readings impact Kyra’s reading fluency?
                The Inquiry Cycle Steps

PART ONE:         Finding my initial (emerging)
                  “wondering”

PART TWO:         Refining my “wondering”/Defining my
                  focus for research

PART THREE:       Collecting my data systematically

PART FOUR:        Analyzing my data systematically

PART FIVE:        What happened?

PART SIX:     Presenting and sharing my findings with my
colleagues
What Is Inquiry into Student Learning?

       Teacher inquiry is defined as systematic, intentional study of one’s own professional
practice (see, for example, Dana & Yendol-Silva, 2003; Hubbard & Power, 1993; Cochran-
Smith & Lytle, 1993). Inquiring professionals seek out change by reflecting on their
practice. They do this by posing questions or wonderings, collecting data to gain insights
into their wonderings, analyzing the data along with reading relevant literature, making
changes in practice based on new understandings developed during inquiry, and sharing
findings with others. Hence, whether you are a prospective teacher at the dawn of your
teaching career, or a veteran teacher with years of experience facing new educational
challenges every day, teacher inquiry becomes a powerful vehicle for learning and reform.
Given today's political context where much of the decision making and discussion is
occurring outside the walls of the classroom (Darling-Hammond, 1997), the time seems ripe
to create a movement of teacher voices armed with the tools of inquiry and committed to
educational change.
       During this semester, you and your partner (with the support of your mentor teacher)
will inquire into the learning of a struggling child in your classroom. You will collect student
data, develop an approach, method, and intervention for addressing the student’s needs,
collect data, analyze the data collected, and draw conclusions/implications from your
research. The inquiry project must discuss implications for your own teaching and student
learning.

              PART ONE: Finding My Initial “Wondering”
This is when you should do your observations of your child in different settings (Observation
forms attached). While you collect this data, share it with other professionals. What are
you wondering about this student at this point? Write this down in a clear question format.
Collect as much data as possible during the next two weeks. Gather information from the
following sources: observations in a variety of contexts, cumulative folders, talking to prior
teachers and support teachers, test scores, informal assessment, student work, etc….
Compile this information into a report for your teacher. Be sure that all information remains
confidential.

PART TWO: Revising My ”Wondering”/Defining Research Focus


Defining the focus/intervention: Based on the data collected in Part One, what adaptations
or accommodations will be made to the curriculum or instruction to support the learning of
these students? Meet with your Mentor Teacher and discuss the type of issues that emerge
in your data. Create a set of instructional or curricular changes that might enhance student
performance in the area investigated. At this time it may be necessary to revise your
“wondering” to be more specific.

           PART THREE: Collecting My Data Systematically
Collecting data is critical to the inquiry process in order to determine the answer to your
research question, or wondering. There are many types of data you can collect:

   1. Field Notes
           Capture actions,
           Dialogue, conversation, diagrams, anecdotal records, note taking
           Post-its
           Video or audiotape
           Someone else could be note taker
   2. Documents/Artifacts
           Student work –journals, projects (good idea to write date)
           Notes from parents
           IEP’s
           Lesson plans
           Photographs
           Entire paper trail
   3. Interviews
           Field notes—naturally occurring
           Interviews—thoughtfully planned and intentional
           Students, parents, admin.
   4. Focus Groups
           Small group discussion to understand students’ perceptions
           Likely to capture opinion
           Ask interview questions, listen to discussion
           Video on co-teaching
   5. Reflective Journals
           May reflect on field notes
           Capture thinking—process of thinking, changes in thinking
           Ex. How did the activity go? Cooking data? Begin analysis.
   6. Surveys
           Can get at more people than interviews
           Pre and post survey (before and after implementation)
           May lead to further interviewing
   7. Literature
           This is what you are finding, what have other people found?
   8. Test scores/informal assessment

           PART FOUR: Analyzing My Data Systematically

Analyzing your data is an ongoing, cyclical activity. You will work with your field advisor
and peers to get you started in this process.

              PART FIVE: Writing About What Happened

Now it is time to write up the process you went through and the findings of your inquiry.
The writing process can actually help you clarify and make connections in your data in a
way that is not otherwise possible. Remember, tell a good story. You want to provide
others with as much insight into your unique experience as possible.

                      PART SIX: Sharing my Findings

Present your findings in the Inquiry Conference/Showcase in order to celebrate your work as
a professional and to help other educators learn to improve their own practices.

Submit 3 paper copies of your Inquiry Paper to the following PDC stakeholders: school
principal, Field Advisor, and Mentor Teacher. An electronic copy to your field advisor will be
required, as well, for our Inquiry Archives.
                    Writing the Inquiry Paper

Parts A-C: Getting To Know My Student and Her/His Needs

A. Introduction and Rationale: Who is the student? (grade, age, etc.)
   Provide as much relevant background information as possible. Why did
   you select this student(s)? What elements lead your curiosity about the
   student(s) need for an intervention? End this section by stating your
   inquiry question.
B. Preliminary Data Collected: What initial information did you gather
   about your student in order to learn more about him/her and his/her
   learning situation and needs? Include the specific types of assessments,
   names of tests, indicate what information was teacher created or student
   created. Describe in detail the process you went through to gain
   knowledge and insight into the student(s) background and previous
   learning experiences. Include specific/relevant details about your three
   observations (i.e. location, subject, time of day).
C. Analysis of Preliminary Data- What did you learn about the student(s)
   through the initial data collection process? Share ANY insights that have
   been gained about the student(s) through your initial collection of data
   (ie. observations, review of folders, teacher interviews, student work).
_____________________________________________________

Part D-F: The Intervention(s), Data Collection & Analysis

D. Description of Intervention/Accommodation/Strategies - What
   exactly was your plan of action with the student(s)? What specific
   interventions, accommodations, or strategies did you implement to assist
   the student(s)? What was your rationale for these actions?
E. Description of Data Collection: What was your systematic data
   collection plan? How did you gather data that indicates the student(s)
   response to your action, from part D? Remember these actions should
   correlate directly with your inquiry question. What specifically did you use
   to track the observations? This will include but not be limited to student
   work samples and your inquiry journal.
F. What Happened (Data Analysis)? As you implemented new
   interventions, accommodations, and strategies how did the student
   respond, in reference to your inquiry question? What specific indications
   suggests that the actions taken were effective/ineffective and to what
   extent? What data support your findings?
Part G: What I Learned
G. What have you learned about this student, your teaching, and the
challenges of public schools? Explain what you have learned about the
student(s) from your actions with this inquiry. First be specific about this
one student, then you may generalize about how this information may effect
how you teach other students in the future. How does this connect with the
way you will approach your future teaching experiences and the challenges
you may face in the process?
                        Rubric for Teacher Inquiry Paper

Elements            Low Level                Mid-Level               High Level
                    Evidence                 Evidence                Evidence
Part A:             Little or no rationale   Discussion of           Rationale for
Rationale and       for studying your        rationale is present,   studying your
                    student’s learning is    but lacks clear         student’s learning is
Wondering           provided and/or          connection to a         strong and maintains
                    question to be           question                a clear connection to
                    explored                 (“wondering”) that      the question
                    (”wondering”) is not     can be                  (“wondering”). The
                    stated.                  systematically          wondering is one
                                             studied.                that can be
                                                                     systematically
                                                                     studied.
Part B:             Little evidence of       Inappropriate           Initial data collection
Description of      preliminary data         selection of data, or   process is clearly
                    collection               data collected is not   defined and
Preliminary Data                             connected to            described to the
Sources                                      “wondering”             point that it could be
                                                                     replicated by
                                                                     someone else.
Part C:             Summary of analysis      Summary is well         Findings are clearly
Summary of          lacks depth              written, but there is   connected to your
                                             insufficient use of     analysis of
Analysis of                                  data to support your    preliminary data.
Preliminary Data                             findings.               Data is used to
                                                                     explicate and provide
                                                                     evidence for the
                                                                     preliminary findings.
Part D:             Inadequate               Description of          Detailed description
Description of      description of           intervention lacks      of intervention plan
                    intervention(s)          details or a strong     includes artifacts as
and Rationale for                            rationale.              evidence. Rationale
of Intervention                                                      for this particular
Plan                                                                 intervention is clearly
                                                                     stated.
Part E:             Inappropriate            Data collection         Data collection
Description of      selection of data or     methods and your        methods and
                    data is not connected    process/plan is         process/plan is
Process and         to your “wondering.”     appropriate to your     clearly defined and
Methods for Data               or            “wondering” and         described to the
Collection          description is too       described. However,     point that it could be
                    weak or too few          the plan would not      replicated by
                    sources of data          be able to be           someone else.
                    collection were used.    replicated by
                                             someone else
                                             because not enough
                                             information is given.
Elements        Low Level                 Mid-Level                High Level
                Evidence                  Evidence                 Evidence
Part F:         (1) Little of no          Steps for how you        The reader is
Summary of      discussion of your        analyzed your data       confident in the steps
                data analysis plan is     are provided, but        of your data analysis
Findings        given and/or (2)          they lack enough         plan because you
                findings are not          detail for your reader   have outlined them
                connected to your         to critically evaluate   carefully with
                data.                     your plan.               attention to detail.
                                                                   Findings are clearly
                Conclusions drawn         Some data is used to     connected to the
                seem unrelated to         support your findings,   analysis. Data,
                the findings,             but not enough to        directly from the
                analysis, data, or        convince your reader     inquiry, is used to
                original “wondering.”     that your                explicate and provide
                                          interpretations are      evidence for your
                                          valid. The reader is     findings. You have
                                          left questioning your    convinced your
                                          results because you      reader that the
                                          did not make a strong    interpretation of your
                                          case.                    findings is strong and
                                                                   data-based. Major
                                                                   findings are provided
                                                                   that directly refer to
                                                                   your “wondering.”
Part G:         Little to no reflection   Mediocre effort is       A substantial effort is
Discussion of   of your learning is       made to articulate       made to draw
                provided.                 conclusions from your    conclusions for your
What You                                  findings and relate      teaching practice
Learned                                   these conclusions to     from the findings of
                                          your own learning as     your research.
                                          an educator.             These conclusions
                                                                   are clearly
                                                                   articulated for the
                                                                   reader.
Comments:

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:9
posted:9/10/2012
language:simple
pages:10