Please make sure to visit our home site at CitizenInvestigationTeam.com and view our
critically acclaimed follow-up to The PentaCon, "NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT".
You have reached a website hosting a documentary with groundbreaking witness
interviews proving the 9/11 official story false. There are many aspects of 9/11
but this movie focuses specifically on the events as they happened at the Pentagon.
These first-hand eyewitness accounts were obtained by Citizen Investigation
Team in a persistent effort to find the truth in light of a myriad of questions.
We contacted as many of the previously published eyewitnesses we could obtain
contact information for, and we canvassed the neighborhoods of Arlington Virginia
on foot in a quest to find previously unknown witnesses. Our goal was to establish
the final flight path of the plane before it reached the Pentagon as seen by the
The results are devastating as we now know for sure that the plane can not be
what damaged the Pentagon or the light poles.
We first present the “Smoking Gun Version” featuring quadruple corroborated
testimony showing beyond a reasonable doubt that the plane flew on the north side
of the CITGO station completely contradicting the official story. This simple fact
makes it impossible for the plane to have toppled the light poles and damage the
building as outlined in the "Building Performance Report" by the American Society
of Civil Engineers.
Since the release of this presentation in 2007 we have uncovered an
astronomical amount of corroborating evidence and this can be viewed in our
acclaimed subsequent presentation titled "National Security Alert" available to
view on our primary website CitizenInvestigationTeam.com.
But for the original presentation including the long-form
interviews from the critical witnesses at the Citgo gas station
featuring Pentagon police officers William Lagasse and Chadwick
Brooks please view the video that has forever changed the face of
the 9/11 Pentagon event discussion:
Eyewitnesses Speak, Conspiracy Revealed
(Smoking Gun Version)
Watch movie for free online
Support further research with DVD purchase
Many first responders and Pentagon workers have serious questions about the official
story. Take a look at these powerful words of encouragement from a still currently
enlisted Pentagon employee who heroically saved lives during the recovery efforts on
He is one of the people in this image:
See page 264 of David Ray Griffin’s book “Debunking 9/11 Debunking” for his reference to the
information presented in The PentaCon.
The creator of “9/11 Mysteries” endorses The PentaCon:
"A stellar deconstruction of the official story. If four independent witnesses are
positive the plane approached from the north side, then why were the famous light
poles downed on the south side? If there was virtually no Boeing wreckage found, did
pyrotechnics/explosives create the "attack"? Where did the plane go when the flames
took over? A must-see and MUST THINK!"
Pentagon attack victim April Gallop endorses “The PentaCon".
"Well after I reviewed the footage and carefully
looked at the information I think it should be
considered as credible for public viewing and also
very important for people to look at because it
shows there is obviously some fabrication in the
official testimony. And I think that everyone should
sit down and take a look at it." - April Gallop
*Full 18 minute interview with April Gallop included as a bonus feature on the DVD.
Highlights from interviews with eyewitnesses/Pentagon police officers SGT William
Lagasse and SGT Chadwick Brooks
*Special note: Many detractors to the information we present suggest we are
wrong because the witnesses at the CITGO station believe the plane hit the
building. This is what true critical thinkers call circular logic. We claim the
fact that the witnesses place the plane on the north side of the station proves it
was used as an instrument of deception during a perfectly timed military sleight of
hand illusion because it is impossible for a plane in that location to have created
the physical damage. In other words, the intended goal was to fool witnesses into
believing the plane hit the building. The fact that the witnesses were successfully
deceived exactly as the perpetrators intended does not prove that they are
incorrect in their placement of the plane. Quite the opposite is true. Their
placement of the plane proves that they were deceived in regards to the impact.
Watch this demonstration exposing the secrets behind a successful sleight of
hand ironically from pseudo-skeptic official story supporters Penn & Teller:
The Adobe Flash Player or an HTML5 supported browser is required for video
Get the latest Flash Player
Learn more about upgrading to an HTML5 browser
1. Palm: To hold an object in an apparently empty hand.
(In essence this means to set up the illusion. This was done on 9/11 by showing the
2nd plane crash into the south tower in Manhattan on live TV. This mentally
conditioned everyone in Arlington to instantly expect a low flying airliner headed
fast towards the Pentagon to hit the building.)
2. Ditch: To secretly dispose of an unneeded object.
(Flight 77 was lost on radar as early as 8:56 while the alleged impact was not until
just after 9:30. This gave the perpetrators approximately 30 minutes to “ditch” the
original plane for the flyover drone.)
3. Steal: To secretly obtain a needed object.
(The plane swap was initiated as the flyover drone was launched and took over the
flight path of the ditched original plane.)
4. Load: To secretly move a needed object to where it is needed.
(The drone passenger jet was put on course to the Pentagon and flown treetop level
5. Simulation: To give the impression that something that hasn’t happened, has.
(The plane reaches the Pentagon with a perfectly timed explosion and fireball creating
the impression that it hit the building.)
6. Misdirection: To lead attention away from a secret move.
(The massive fireball and smoke plume divert attention from, and help conceal, the
flyover drone as it flies away.)
7. Switch: To secretly exchange one object for another.
(The C-130, E4B, and additional flying craft in the area are introduced to serve as
cover and confusion for anyone who may have witnessed the drone fly over or away from
*Click here for details regarding the 2nd plane cover story.
For information regarding the 2006 NTSB released data from the alleged black box of
"Flight 77" please visit Pilots for 9/11 Truth.
We would like to make it clear that while Citizen Investigation Team supports the
research of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, we are separate organizations that focus on
completely separate lines of inquiry into the Pentagon attack.
The complete witness flight path that we report does not match the flight path as
indicated by the FDR and we have never cited this official data as supporting evidence
that the witnesses are correct.
So although the alleged FDR and witness flight paths do not match each other, more
importantly, both are irreconcilable with the physical damage. Both Citizen
Investigation Team and Pilots for 9/11 Truth are unified in demanding an official
response to these fatal anomalies in the official story.
© 2007 Citizen Investigation Team. All rights reserved.