Articles by lanyuehua

VIEWS: 15 PAGES: 4

									1. Barrenas, M., and Hellstrom, P. (1996). “The Effect of Low Level Acoustic
   Stimulation on Susceptibility to Noice in Blue- and Brown-Eyed Young Human
   Subjects,” Ear Hear. 17(1) 63-68.
2. Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Bertschy, M., Tyler, R.S., Lowder, M., Takahashi, G.,
   Purdy, S., and Gantz, B. J. (1995). “Longitudinal Assessment of Physiological
   and Psychophysical Measures in Cochlear Implant Users,” Ear Hear. 16(5), 439-
   449.
3. Chisolm, T.H., Abrams, H.B., and McArdle, R. (2004). “Short- and Long-Term
   Outcomes of Adult Audiological Rehabilitation,” Ear Hear. 25(5), 464-477.
4. Clark, W.W., and Bohl, C.D. (2005). “Hearing Levels of Firefighters: Risk of
   Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Assessed by Cross-Sectional and
   Longitudinal Data,” Ear Hear. 26(3), 327-340.
5. Clarke, C.M., and Garrett, M.F. (2004). “Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented
   English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3647-3658.
6. Cox, R.M., and Alexander, G.C. (1999). “Measuring Satisfaction with
   Amplification in Daily Life: The SADL Scale,” Ear Hear. 20(4), 306.
7. Divenyi, P.L., Stark, P.B., and Haupt, K.M. (2005). “Decline of speech
   understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118,
   1089-1100.
8. Dunn, C.C., Tyler, R.S., and Witt, S.A. (2005). “Benefit of Wearing a Hearing
   Aid on the Unimplanted Ear in Adult Users of a Cochlear Implant,” J. Speech
   Lang. Hear. Res. 48 (3), 668-680.
9. Eisenberg, L.S., Shannon, R.V., Martinez, A.S., Wygonski, J., and Boothroyd, A.
   (2000). “Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age,” J.
   Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 2704-2710.
10. Ferguson, S.H., and Kewley-Port, D. (2002). “Vowel intelligibility in clear and
   conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J.
   Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 259-271.
11. Florentine, M., Hunter, W., Robinson, M., Ballou, M., and Buus, S. (1998). “On
   the Behavioral Characteristics of Loud-Music Listening,” Ear Hear. 19(6), 420-
   428.
12. Gould, J., Lane, H., Vick, J., Perkell, J.S., Matthies, M.L., and Zandipour, M.
   (2001). “Changes in Speech Intelligibility of Postlingually Deaf Adults after
   Cochlear Implantation,” Ear Hear. 22(6), 453-460.
13. Hartley, D.E.H., and Moore, D.R. (2002). “Auditory processing efficiency deficits
   in children with developmental language impairments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112,
   2962-2966.
14. Humes, L. E., and Floyd, S. S. (2005). “Measures of Working Memory, Sequence
   Learning, and Speech Recognition in the Elderly,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 48
   (1), 224-235.
15. Humes, L. E., and Wilson, D.L. (2003). “An Examination of Changes in Hearing-
   Aid Performance and Benefit in the Elderly Over a 3-Year Period of Hearing-Aid
   Use,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 46(1), 137-145.
16. Humes, L.E. (2005). “Do 'Auditory Processing' Tests Measure Auditory
   Processing in the Elderly?,” Ear Hear. 26(2), 109-119.
17. Jerger, J., Chmiel, R., Florin, E., Pirozzolo, F., and Wilson, N. (1996).
   “Comparison of Conventional Amplification and an Assistive Listening Device in
   Elderly Persons”, Ear Hear. 17(6), 490-504.
18. Kennedy, S.M., Hodgson, M., Edgett, L.D., Lamb, N., and Rempel, R. (2006).
   "Subjective assessment of listening environments in university classrooms:
   Perceptions of students,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 299-309.
19. Moore, B.C.J., Peters, R.W., and Stone, M.A. (1999). “Benefits of linear
   amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in
   backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 400-411.
20. Náb lek, A.K., and Robinson, P.K. (1982). “Monaural and binaural speech
   perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71,
   1242-1248.
21. Qin, M.K., and Oxenham, A.J. (2003). “Effects of simulated cochlear-implant
   processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114,
   446-454.
22. Shanks, J. E., Wilson, R.H., Larson, V., and Williams, D. (2002). “Speech
   Recognition Performance of Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Under
   Unaided and Aided Conditions Using Linear and Compression Hearing Aids,”
   Ear Hear. 23(4), 280-290.
23. Sommers, M.S., Tye-Murray, N., and Spehar, B. (2005). “Auditory-Visual
   Speech Perception and Auditory-Visual Enhancement in Normal-Hearing
   Younger and Older Adults,” Ear Hear. 26(3), 263-275.
24. Suter, A.H. (1985). “Speech recognition in noise by individuals with mild hearing
   impairments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 887-900.
25. Walden, B.E., Grant, K.W., and Cord, M.T. (2001). “Effects of Amplification and
   Speechreading on Consonant Recognition by Persons with Impaired Hearing,”
   Ear Hear. 22(4) 333-341.
                             Guidelines for article critiques

You are required to critique two articles chosen from the list above. You are
encouraged to choose articles from different areas. For example, if you picked one
on hearing aid outcome, you might want pick the other from a different area such as
hearing conservation. Use the following guidelines to frame your critique. Keep in
mind that some of these concepts have not been discussed in class yet.

The critiques should be two (2) single-spaced pages in length. Please use a 12-point font
(either Arial or Times New Roman, with no less than 0.5” of margin around the page).

The first page of each critique should contain the following:

1. Article Title:
2. Author(s):
3. Complete Journal Citation (journal name, volume number, page numbers and year of
    publication). Use APA guidelines when citing the journal.
4. Purpose of the study
5. List of names and values of independent variables
6. List of dependent variables
7. Type(s) of sampling used
8. Type of research (True experimental/Quasi experimental/Ex-post-facto)
9. Description of research design (e.g., “2 x 2 factorial, independent group design”) and
    1-2 sentences supporting this classification of design [e.g., “independent variables
    were age (young, old) and gender (male, female) with separate groups used for each
    combination of independent variables”]
10. Descriptive statistics used and examples of each from article:
11. Inferential statistics used and examples of each from article:


On the second page of each critique:

12. Does the Introduction provide a sound rationale and theoretical background for the
    research discussed in the article? Justify your answer.
13. Identify the strengths and weakness of the methodology used. Provide possible
    rationale(s) for why the authors might have used the methods they did. If possible,
    provide alternative methods of testing the hypothesis.
14. Choose one figure OR table, and summarize its main findings. Provide a photocopy
    of the figure or table that is summarized.
15. In your opinion, are the conclusions valid and justified?
16. Identify the threats to internal and external validity and write a summary statement as
    to the “perceived quality” of the study. Does the study represent “sound research”
    that should be incorporated into our knowledge base or clinical practice? Why or
    why not?

								
To top