syvertson yield
Document Sample


Effects of Mechanical harvesting on
Tree Health and Yield
Kuo-Tan Li
Jim Syvertsen
UF, IFAS
Citrus Research & Education Center
Lake Alfred
6 Apr 2006
? Compensation for defoliation
M H and abscission chemicals? 20% def.
No yield reduction even at 50 % def.
for 2 years (Yuan et al. 2005)
‘Valencia’ May 2003
Leaf Photosynthesis
16
y = 0.0599x + 8.4388
14 R2 = 0.1803
12 P < 0.05
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 12 25 50 %
% Defoliation (G-Sanchez
et al. 2003)
Defoliation – Light Interception
Avg. 10 to 12%
leaf area
Pre-harvest
removed Post-harvest
100
Total light interception (%)
90
No affect on leaf
80
photosynthesis 70
60
No affect on 50
canopy light 40
interception or 30
20
leaf area next
10
year 0
Hand 10 S 20 S
Flower Loss: Nodes?
Avg. 10 to 12% 50 2004
leaf area removed 45
2005
40
Does not affect leaf
Flowering node (%)
35
photosynthesis 30
25
No affect on canopy 20
light interception, 15
leaf area, or return 10
bloom next year 5
0
Hand 10 S 30 S
Petal fall –Flower loss
10 to 15%
fruitlets
25 2004
removed when
2005
harvested at
bloom 20
Flower removal (%)
Does not 15
reduce final
fruit set 10
Does not 5
reduce next
crop yield or 0
fruit size Hand 10 S 20 S
Petal fall -- Yield
10 to 15% fruitlet 2004
removed at bloom 100 2005
90
Does not reduce 80
Yield (kg/tree)
final fruit set 70
60
Does not reduce 50
40
next crop yield or
30
fruit size
20
10
0
Hand 10 S 20 S
Effect of Mechanical harvesting on
Tree Health and Yield
What do we know about
mechanical harvesting on No long term
effect on ‘Hamlin’
citrus tree health and yield (7- 8 years)
yield?
Yield Reduction
in ‘Valencia’
when harvested
late with or
aggressive trunk
shaking
Whitney et al.,
Problem: Visible
Physical injuries to trees
occur during
mechanical harvesting:
Defoliation
Petal fall
Bark scuffing
Root exposure
Defoliation
Avg. 12 to 13%
leaf area removed
2004
18 2005
No affect on leaf
16
photosynthesis
14
Defoliation (%)
12
Does not affect
10
canopy light
8
interception or leaf
6
area next year
4
2
0
Hand 10 S 20 S
Effect of Mechanical harvesting on
Tree Health and Yield
Physical injuries occur
during mechanical
harvesting:
Defoliation
Petal fall
Bark scuffing
Twig breakage
Root exposure
Bark scuffing
Replaced with
new bark
tissue within a
year
Does not
reduce growth
increment
No increased
disease
infections or
pest invasions
Physical injuries
during mechanical
harvesting:
Defoliation
Petal fall
Bark scuffing, Twig loss
Root exposure
Root death
Water Relations?
Root exposure – Drought stress
Little effect on
‘Hamlin’ after 2 weeks of drought
root water and 2.0 0.3” rain
nutrient uptake, 1.8
Mid-day stem water potential
exc. excessive 1.6
shaking and
Midday Drought stress
1.4
drought 1.2
(-MPa)
1.0
Little effect on 0.8
0.6
fine root growth
0.4
0.2
0.0
Hand + Drought
10 S + Drought
Unharvest
20 S
10 S
Hand
Root exposure
Little effect on
root water and
nutrient uptake,
exc. excessive
shaking and
drought
Little effect on
fine root growth
Root periscope
(K-T Li et al., 2005)
Video of Repeated
measurements
Root growth
through time
Effect of Mechanical harvesting on
Tree Health and Yield
300
Summary
250
Annual variation in yield
Yield (kg/tree)
is not related to harvest
methods 200 2004
Visible Injuries by 150
mechanical harvesting
are relatively mild and 100
do not affect tree health 2005 Hand
and return yield 50 10S
20S
0
0 1000 2000 3000
Fruit / tree
Effect of Mechanical harvesting on
Tree Health and Yield
Exception
Harvesting
‘Valencia’ after
May can remove
young fruit and
reduce yield of
next crop
Related docs
Other docs by HC1208310618
Get documents about "