Amnesia
Document Sample


Retrograde Amnesia:
Is Memory Gone For Good
Or Just Hiding Out?
Gretchen Hanson Gotthard, Ph.D.
Randolph-Macon Woman’s College
Lynchburg, VA
Hypothetical Memory Processes
Encoding Storage Retrieval
Forgetting
Amnesia
What Causes Amnesia?
Transient Agents:
Electroconvulsive Shock
(ECS)
Hypothermia
Hyperthermia
Concussive Head Injury
Permanent Agents:
Stroke
Brain Tumor
Brain Lesion
Two Types of Amnesia
1. Anterograde Amnesia:
new information
“Memento” and H.M.
2. Retrograde Amnesia:
old information
Trevor Reece Jones
Retrograde Amnesia Anterograde Amnesia
Temporal Gradient
of Retrograde Amnesia
Normal Memory Amnesia
Normal Memory 100
Recent better than 80
Percent Correct
Remote 60
Amnesia 40
Remote better than 20
Recent
0
Recent Remote
Time From Learning
Consolidation Theory
Müller and Pilzecker (1900)
Storage of information is disrupted.
Permanent loss of memory.
Encoding X Storage Retrieval
Evidence for Consolidation Theory
Duncan (1949)
Passive avoidance
ECS or No ECS
(varying delays)
Tested 24 hours
later
Results
No ECS
ECS
16
14
Mean Avoidances
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0.3 0.6 1 4 15 60 240 840
Delay Between Learning and ECS
(seconds)
Retrieval Failure Theory
Spear and Riccio (1994) and others…
Retrieval is disrupted
Temporary loss of memory
Encoding Storage X Retrieval
Evidence for Retrieval Failure Theory
Delayed Onset of
Retrograde Amnesia
Geller and Jarvik
(1968)
Passive avoidance
ECS or No ECS
(immediately after
training)
Tested 1, 2, 6, and
24 hours later
Results
No ECS ECS
Latency to Cross (seconds)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1 hr 2 hr 6 hr 24 hr
Test Delay
More Delayed Onset of
Retrograde Amnesia
Lynch and Yarnell (1973)
Football players
Questioned players
immediately and at
delays
Experimental Group
Control Group
Results
No Concussion Concussion
100
Percent Correct
80
60
40
20
0
30 5 10 20
sec min min min
Test Delay
More Evidence for Retrieval Failure
Reminder Treatment Effects
Hinderliter, Webster, and Riccio (1975)
Passive avoidance
Hypothermia (immediately after training)
Reminder or no reminder (prior to testing)
Results
700
Latency to Cross (seconds) 600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Hypo/ Hypo/ No
No Remind Remind Hypo
How do reminder treatments work?
“Two Bump” Theory
Washington Post Story
(early 1990’s)
Levy (1987)
State Dependent Retention
More Reminder Treatment Effects
Hanson, Bunsey,
and Riccio (2002)
Two odor
discriminations
(Bunsey Digging
Task)
Surgery
Lesions to either:
1. Hippocampal Formation
(HF)
Episodic Memory
(Events)
2. Parahippocampal Region
(PR)
Semantic Memory
(Facts) Parahippocampal
Region
Hippocampal Formation:
Episodic Memory (events)
Parahippocampal Region:
Semantic Memory (facts)
Testing
Two probe trials
(no FL in cups)
First probe trial:
reminder treatment
for second probe trial
Results: Latency to Dig
140
120
Latency (seconds)
100
80
60
40
20
0
HF PR CON
Disc. 1 Disc. 2
Results: Choice
1
0.8
0.6
Choice
0.4
0.2
0
HF PR CON
Disc. 1 Disc. 2
So Is Memory Gone For Good,
Or Just Hiding Out?
It’s probably “Just Hiding Out”:
Consolidation Theory: memories should be
immediately and permanently gone
However…
Delayed Onset of Amnesia
Reminder Treatment Effects
Retrieval Failure Theory provides a better
explanation.
Current Research: Sand Maze
Sand Maze: appetitive
version of Morris Water
Maze
Hippocampal Formation:
important for spatial
learning and memory
WIN-2 study: synthetic
cannabinoids and state
dependent retention
Ashley Smith
Get documents about "