noise
Document Sample


Noise Reduction Research
Bill Willshire
Home & Home
Langley Research Center
November 16, 1999 AT
H&Hnr-vk
Noise Reduction
Program Drivers
Environmental
Concern
• Quality of Life
• Public Good
Increased Improved
Capacity Competitiveness
• Enables Growth • Balance of Trade
• Public Good • Public Good
Noise Reduction
Progress in Noise Reduction
120
Sideline 110
Noise
Level,
EPNdB
(1500’ Sideline)
100
A321
A330
777-200
MD90-30
90
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1995
Year of Initial Service
• Without new noise reduction technology, increasing demand coupled with
increasing population will result in increased community noise impact.
Noise Reduction
Current Program Objective and Scope
Objective:
• 10 dB Community Noise Impact Reduction Relative to 1992
Production Technology
Scope:
• A broad, $200M joint program with the FAA
• Initiated in FY1994, ends in FY2001
• Technical program is result of an extensive NASA inter-center,
FAA, and industry partnership.
Note: With the termination of the Advanced Subsonic
Technology Program in FY00, the Noise Reduction Element was
transferred to the Aerospace Vehicle Systems Technology
Program
Noise Reduction
Current Program Management Structure
Aerospace Vehicle Systems
Technology Program Industry/Government
NASA Langley Research Center Steering Committee
Darrel Tenney, Director
FAA
Noise Reduction Program
NASA Langley Research Center Industry/Government
Bill Willshire, Manager Technical Working Group
Loretta Shaw, GRC; Brian Smith, ARC
Ames Research Center Langley Research Center Glenn Research Center
• Engine Noise Reduction • Engine Noise Reduction • Engine Noise Reduction
• Nacelle Aeroacoustics • Nacelle Aeroacoustics Dennis Huff
• Airframe Noise Reduction Joe Posey • Nacelle Aeroacoustics
Clif Horne • Airframe Noise Reduction
• Interior Noise Reduction
Rich Silcox Primary
• Community Noise Impact
Kevin Shepherd Support
Noise Reduction
Engine Noise Reduction
• NASA/Allison Low-Noise Fan
in Glenn Research Center
9’x15’ Wind Tunnel
• Demonstrated 3 EPNdB Fan
Noise Reduction
Baseline Swept Stators Swept/Leaned Stators
Noise Reduction
Flap-edge Airframe Noise Reduction
Airframe noise:
– Today major source on approach
– Tomorrow major source on takeoff
– Components: flap, slat, and gear
CFD/CAA Model in LTPT*
Flap-edge Airframe Noise Reduction
– Physics-based mechanism
identification
– Source localization
Reduction – Non-intrusive reduction concepts
Mic Array discovered and optimized
– 4 dB flap-edge noise reduction
*Langley Research Center Low
Frequency, Hz Turbulence Pressure Tunnel
Noise Reduction
Propulsion Airframe Interaction Experiment
Low Speed Aeroacoustic Facility Microphone Array Results
Boeing 20 kHz
Jet with Wing
Isolated Jet
• Presence of wing/fuselage
dramatically impacts apparent
noise source
• Jet with wing up to 8 dB nosier
• Interactions not understood and
therefore not exploited
Noise Reduction
Validation of Noise Prediction Model in Community
Noise Impact Models
120 • 5001 Departures from DIA
• 6 Aircraft Types
Predicted, dB
100 • ≥ 60 Degrees Above Horizon
80
Contour Plot
Perfect
Agreement
60
Predicted, dB
60 80 100 120
Measured, dB
10 dB
Measured, dB
National Need for Noise Reduction AT
Vision
Objectionable aircraft noise Enterprise Noise Goal
contained within airport
boundary. Reduce the perceived noise levels of future
aircraft by one half (10 dB) from today’s
subsonic aircraft within 10 years, and by
three quarters (20 dB) within 25 years
Benefit
10-year Goal: 65 LDN at airport boundary
25-year Goal: 55 LDN at airport boundary
Justification
Air transport system is constrained by noise
Current planned program will achieve 50% of 10-year goal
Broad-based customer support
Technology for 2020 and beyond needed soon
FAA relies on NASA for long-term noise solutions
No national noise program after 2001
Noise Reduction
Benefit
AT
O’Hare Yearly Average Day Night Level (DNL) Noise Contours
20
1997 Baseline
• Not acceptable
10
20
5 Current Program*
5 dB Reduction
10
• Improvement - significant reduction
5 • Does not meet public expectations
• Constrained growth
20
Key
55 dB
10
65 dB
10-Year Enterprise Goal
5 Airport
10 dB Reduction
• 65 dB contour contained within airport Scale
• Enable projected air travel growth 0 Miles 10
• Reduce community noise impact
*TRL 6 relative to 1997
Noise Reduction
Concluding Remarks
• Aircraft noise is a critical international environmental issue
– Very visible public concern in the US
• Noise will continue to constrain air travel growth until objectionable noise
contained within airport boundary
• Current noise reduction program will achieve half of 10-year goal (-5 dB)
• Slow fleet turnover dictates near-term solution of far-term problems
• No national noise reduction program exists or is planned for the future
• Noise reduction research is about public good and enhances quality of life
• Technical solutions should lead /guide national policy
• NASA alone of the federal labs has the expertise/capability/track record to
make the required contributions
Get documents about "