sdms

Document Sample
sdms Powered By Docstoc
					SDMS                                                                          BY2008 – President’s Budget

               BY08 - Superfund Document Management System (Ver. 2.0, aka "SDMS2")

INITIATIVE DEFINITION BY08

Initiative Definition BY08
Template Name                                             IT Investment BY2008
Investment Name                                           BY08 - Superfund Document Management System
                                                          (Ver. 2.0, aka "SDMS2")
Investment Revision Number                                6
Is this investment a consolidated business case?          No
Point of Contact                                          Wyman, Steven K
Revision Comment
Class                                                     IT

I.A: OVERVIEW BY08

Descriptive Information BY08
Date of Submission                                        9/11/2006
Agency                                                    Environmental Protection Agency
Bureau                                                    Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
                                                          BY08 - Superfund Document Management System
Name of this Capital Asset
                                                          (Ver. 2.0, aka "SDMS2")
Full UPI Code                                             020-00-01-13-01-1020-00
Four Digit UPI Code                                       1020
Two Digit UPI Code                                        00
Exhibit 53 Part                                           IT Investments by Mission Area
OMB Investment Type                                       01 - Major Investment
OMB Exhibit 53 Major Mission Area                         Goal 3 - Preserve and Restore the Land
PY Full UPI Code                                          020-00-01-13-01-1020-00-108-024
What kind of investment will this be in this Budget Year? Mixed Life Cycle
If this investment supports homeland security, Indicate Emergency Preparedness and Response
by corresponding number which homeland security
mission area(s) this investment supports?
                                                          SDMS began as a document imaging application that
                                                          has grown in capability to include electronic capture,
OMB Short Description                                     storage, and use of OSWER records and other
                                                          documents. It contains over 50 million pages of
                                                          Superfund site records.
                                                          55 - All of the systems within this investment have
Investment C&A Status                                     been through a C&A Process and have been granted
                                                          Full Authority to Operate

Screening Questions BY08
What was the first budget year this investment was        FY2001 or earlier
submitted to OMB?
Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in
part or in whole an identified agency performance gap:
SDMS is a key EPA asset used to meet responsibilities of Federal agencies, Congress, and the Public in
Superfund site remediation and cleanup, and emergency response support. It addresses the Agency's
performance gap for capturing, preserving, and disseminating legislatively mandated Superfund
documents and records. SDMS is an electronic repository of Superfund documents routinely used to
disseminate records in response to FOIA requests, Administrative Records, and for litigation support.
These records provide a rich institutional "memory" of the highest importance to the Superfund Program.
SDMS advances e-Government by providing reliable and easily accessible documents to citizens for
making informed decisions in their communities.
In the FY07 business case, SDMS was strategically evaluated as a standalone system in the Superfund
program. The Alternatives Analysis completed in 2005 determined that by consolidating several smaller
Superfund systems into SDMS, and then making SDMS a core repository component of a larger systems'
integration project, management of the Superfund program would be improved and several benefits
achieved by managing a single Superfund system. This business case reflects the shifting of resources and
management of SDMS to implement the chosen alternative that will utilize SDMS and usable components
of the other existing Superfund systems to create a single source for Superfund data collection and
tracking that minimizes reporting burdens, reduces costs, and eliminates management of redundant




                                                      1 of 32
SDMS                                                                         BY2008 – President’s Budget

information systems. This strategy relies on aligning SDMS with the Agency's IT Enterprise Architecture
and using secure technologies. The current business case sets forth how SDMS will improve Federal
Government service to the public, businesses, and agencies alike while focusing on the Agency e-
government performance gap.
While SDMS is serving to consolidate multiple other information systems, Superfund management has
decided to further this advance this concept even further by creating a new system called the "Superfund
Enterprise Content System" (SEMS) which will incorporate SDMS and others within the program office.
SEMS is in planning during FY07 and will be submitted as a separate business case.
Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee       Yes
approve this request?
If "yes," what was the date of this approval?              5/11/2006
Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?               Yes
Contact information of Project Manager?

Project Manager Name
Wyman, Steven
Project Manager Phone Number                              703-603-8882
Project Manager E-mail                                    wyman.steve@epa.gov
Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost             Yes
effective, energy efficient and environmentally
sustainable techniques or practices for this project.
Will this investment include electronic assets (including Yes
computers)?
Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit No
of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to
non-IT assets only)
If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC being used to help fund this
investment?
If "yes," will this investment meet sustainable design
principles?
If "yes," is it designed to be 30% more energy efficient
than relevant code?
Does this investment directly support one of the PMA      Yes
initiatives?
If "yes," check all of the PMA initiatives that apply:    Expanded E-Government
Does this investment support a program assessed using No
the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)? (For more
information about the PART, visit
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)
Does this investment address a weakness found during No
the PART Review?
If "yes," what is the name of the PARTed program?
If "yes," what PART rating did it receive?
Is this investment for information technology?            Yes
                                                           SDMS addresses a performance gap in e-
                                                           Government by providing a digital repository to
                                                           manage and access Federal fulltext documents and
                                                           records electronically. Source code from SDMS has
Briefly describe how this asset directly supports the      been donated to the Agency's Enterprise Content
identified initiative(s)?                                  Management System project for reuse. SDMS
                                                           continues to pave the way in innovation and
                                                           standards setting for electronic content solutions for
                                                           the EPA, helping the Agency to be more adaptive to
                                                           change and responsive to business needs.

IT Screening Questions BY08
If the answer to Question: "Is this investment for information technology?" was "Yes," complete this sub-section.
If the answer is "No," do not answer this sub-section.
What is the level of the IT Project? (per CIO Council PM Level 2
Guidance)
What project management qualifications does the           (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified
Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance): for this investment
Is this investment identified as "high risk" on the Q4 -  No
FY 2006 agency high risk report (per OMB's "high risk"
memo)?
Is this a financial management system?                    No



                                                        2 of 32
SDMS                                                                              BY2008 – President’s Budget

If "yes", does this investment address a FFMIA          No
compliance area?
If "yes," which FFMIA compliance area?                  N/A.
If "no," what does it address?
If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial
systems inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52

Provide the Percentage Financial Management for the        0
budget year
What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2008       100
funding request for the following? (This should total
100%)
For budget year, what percentage of the total              5
investment is for hardware?
For budget year, what percentage of the total              5
investment is for software?
For budget year, what percentage of the total              80
investment is for services?
For budget year, what percentage of the total              10
investment is for other services?
If this project produces information dissemination         Yes
products for the public, are these products published to
the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-
04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and
priorities?
Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions:

Privacy Officer Name
Hutt, Judy
Privacy Officer Phone Number                                     202-566-1668
Privacy Officer Title                                            Agency Privacy Act Officer
Privacy Officer E-mail                                           hutt.judy@epa.gov
Are the records produced by this investment                      Yes
appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and
Records Administration's approval?


I.B: SUMMARY OF SPENDING BY08

Summary of Spending BY08
Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts
represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should
be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown
for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The "TOTAL" estimated annual cost of the
investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal
buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or
restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this
report.

                                                                                                          * Costs in
SUMMARY OF SPENDING FOR PROJECT STAGES
                                                                                                       thousands

                           PY - 1                                                                      BY + 4
                                          PY         CY         BY     BY + 1      BY + 2     BY + 3
                            and                                                                         and Total
                                         2006       2007       2008     2009        2010       2011
                           Earlier                                                                     Beyond
Planning
  Budgetary Resources      6605      700        900        600
  Outlays                  0         0          0          0
   Preliminary Design
     Budgetary             5860      700        900        600
Resources
      Outlays              0         0          0          0
   Contract Services
     Budgetary             745       0          0          0
Resources



                                                           3 of 32
     SDMS                                                                              BY2008 – President’s Budget

           Outlays                   0      0           0         0            0   0           0        0       0
     Acquisition
       Budgetary Resources           12725 2000         3400      3800
       Outlays                       0      0           0         0
        Development
          Budgetary                  11600 1500         2400      2500
     Resources
           Outlays                   0      0           0         0
        Government FTE
          Budgetary
     Resources
           Outlays
        Infrastructure Expenses
          Budgetary                  1125   500         1000      1300
     Resources
           Outlays                   0      0           0         0
     Subtotal Planning & Acquisition
       Budgetary Resources           19330 2700         4300      4400
       Outlays                       0      0           0         0
     Operations & Maintenance
       Budgetary Resources           17880 650          950       1200
       Outlays                       0      0           0         0
     TOTAL
       Budgetary Resources           37210 3350         5250      5600
       Outlays                       0      0           0         0
     Government FTE Costs
       Budgetary Resources
        Planning
          Budgetary                  0      0           0         0
     Resources
        Acquisition
          Budgetary                  0      0           0         0
     Resources
        Maintenance
          Budgetary                  2309   200         300       400
     Resources

     Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner
     agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

     Full Time Equivalents BY08
     Use the following table to provide the number of Government Full Time Equivalents (FTE) represented by the
     Government FTE Costs in the Summary of Spending Table. Numbers should be entered in decimal format for
     each of the categories listed.

     FTE Table


                   PY - PY - PY - PY - PY - PY - PY    CY   BY BY + BY + BY + BY + BY + BY + BY + BY + Total
                    6    5    4    3    2    1   2006 2007 2008 1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8
                   2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005               2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Financial
           0             0     0     0      0     0         0     0      0
Management
Security           0.1   0.1   0.1   0.1    0.1   0.1       0.1   0.1    0.2
Program
           1             1     1     1      1     1         1     1      1
Management
IT                 2.5   2.5   2.5   2.5    2.5   2.5       0.5   0.5    1.4




                                                                  4 of 32
     SDMS                                                                          BY2008 – President’s Budget

 Other           0.21 0.21   0.21 0.22   0.4   0.4   0.4   1.4   1.4   1.6   1.9   0   0    0   0     0     0     8.35
 Total*          3.81 3.81   3.81 3.82   4.0   4.0   2.0   3.0   4.0   4.4   4.6   0   0    0   0     0     0     41.25


     *This row represents the 'Number of FTE represented by cost' from Summary of Spending table and will
     be sent to OMB.

     Funding Questions BY08
     Will this project require the agency to hire additional No
     FTE's?
     How many and in what year?
     If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2007 President's budget request, briefly explain those
     changes.
     The summary of spending has changed to reflect a shift in resources for SDMS to be used as the basis for
     a single one stop Superfund collection and tracking system. The funding changes address the integration
     of two major reporting and tracking systems and one non-major investment used in the Superfund
     program for addressing performance gaps in collecting and tracking Superfund site information. These
     systems are SDMS, CERCLIS and ICTS. An alternatives and cost benefit analysis identified that by
     integrating these systems customer and stakeholder concerns of data quality and access issues could be
     better addressed and would transform redundant tracking systems. In keeping with Agency and OMB
     guidance and requirements the integration of these systems will reduce risks in project management by
     having a single certified project management professional responsible for a single large project versus
     multiple projects. Performance goals will align to the FEA PRM to measure mission and business results;
     customer results; processes and activities, and technology. Security will be improved by having a single
     system certified and accredited versus multiple systems collecting similar data. In addition, by providing
     broader access to clean-up related documents more participation can lead to better cleanup remedies
     because more of the risks and needs can be identified and addressed in making a remedy selection. It can
     also lead to better monitoring and adherence to the remedy because the public, realtors and land buyers
     can be involved in the decision and know more about the chosen remedies for the sites in their
     communities.
     Provide the Percent Budget Formulation (BF) for the
     budget year
     Provide the Percent Budget Execution (BE) for the
     budget year

     Funding Sources BY08

                                                                                                         * Costs in
     Funding Sources
                                                                                                      thousands

FS Name: Row PY - PY - PY - PY - PY - PY - PY    CY   BY BY + BY + BY + BY + BY + BY + BY + BY + Total
MAX Code Type 6    5    4    3    2    1   2006 2007 2008 1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8
             2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005               2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Superfund DME 0        0      0    0      0     1600 2150 5300 5300
(SF):     SS  0        0      0    0      0     0     0     0     0


On Ex.53:   Total 0    0      0    0      0     1600 2150 5300 5300
Yes
Total       DME 0      0      0    0      0     1600 2150 5300 5300
Yearly      SS    0    0      0    0      0     0     0     0     0
Budgets
            Total 0    0      0    0      0     1600 2150 5300 5300




                                                           5 of 32
          SDMS                                                                          BY2008 – President’s Budget




           I.C: ACQUISITION/CONTRACT STRATEGY BY08

           Contract/Task Order Table BY08
           Complete the table for all (including all non-Federal) contracts and/or task orders currently in place or planned for this investment. Total Value should include all option
           years for each contract. Contracts and/or task orders completed do not need to be included.

          Contract/Task Orders Table

 Row   Contract Type of   Has the   If so    Start   End date    Total    Is this an     Is it   Competitively What, if Is EVM in       Does   Name of CO Contact information Contracting If N/A, has
Number or Task Contract/ contract what is   date of     of      Value of Interagency performance   awarded?       any,       the         the     CO        (phone/email)        Officer      the agency
        Order    Task      been   the date Contract/ Contract/ Contract/ Acquisition?  based?                 alternative contract?   contract                                Certification determined
       Number    Order   awarded? of the     Task      Task      Task                                          financing               include                                   Level         the CO
                                   award?    Order     Order     Order                                         option is                 the                                                assigned has
                                   If not,                                                                       being                required                                                   the
                                   what is                                                                       used?                security                                             competencies
                                     the                                                                                                 and                                                  and skills
                                  planned                                                                                              privacy                                              necessary to
                                   award                                                                                              clauses?                                              support this
                                    date?                                                                                                                                                   acquisition?
                 Cost-Plus-
                 Award-
                 Fee, Cost-
        DW-47-                                                                                                                                McDowell, 703-306-7635 /
1                Plus-       Yes    9/1/2002 9/1/2002   9/1/2013   4600    Yes        Yes         Yes           NA         No         Yes                                       Level 3
        93935401                                                                                                                              Chiara    Chiara.McDowell@gsa.gov
                 Fixed-Fee
                 and Firm
                 Fixed Price
                 Cost Plus
        68-W-04-                                                                                                                              Paul,     202-564-4473 /
2                Incentive   Yes    1/7/2004 1/7/2004   1/1/2013   15000   No         Yes         Yes           NA         Yes        Yes                                       Level 3
        005                                                                                                                                   Dawson    dawson.paul@epa.gov
                 Fee




                                                                                             6 of 32
SDMS                                                                         BY2008 – President’s Budget



Contract/Task Order Questions BY08
If earned value is not required or will not be a contract requirement for any of the contracts or task orders
above, explain why:
For the two contract vehicles which directly support SDMS, EVM is required at the task order level. The
"ITS_ESE" contract in EPA is a systems development support contract. The "ITS-EPA" contract is used
operations and maintenance of the production system. This split mirrors the mixed life cycle nature of
SDMS. EVM is reported by both contractors monthly.
Do the contracts ensure Section 508 compliance?         Yes
                                                        Section 508 requires Federal departments and
                                                        agencies that develop, procure, maintain, or use
                                                        electronic and information technology to ensure that
                                                        Federal employees and members of the public with
Explain why (508 Compliance)?
                                                        disabilities have access to and use of information
                                                        and data, comparable to that of the employees and
                                                        members of the public without disabilities-unless it is
                                                        an undue burden to do so.
Is there an acquisition plan which has been approved in Yes
accordance with agency requirements?
What is the date of your acquisition plan?                6/13/2002
If "no," will an acquisition plan be developed?
If "no," briefly explain why:


I.D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION BY08

Performance Goals & Measures BY08
Agencies must use the Performance Goals and Measures Table below for reporting performance goals and
measures for all non-IT investments and for existing IT investments that were initiated prior to FY 2005. The
table can be extended to include measures for years beyond FY 2006.

Performance Goals and Measures


Fiscal   Strategic Goal(s)       Performance         Actual/baseline          Planned       Performance Metric
Year        Supported              Measure           (from Previous      Performance Metric  Results (Actual)
                                                          Year)               (Target)
2004 Goal 3: Preserve & SDMS page-                 50 million page-    Increase page           47 Million
     Restore the Land - equivalents                equivalents online. count in SDMS by
     Line of sight =                                                   6%.
     Shift from paper-
     based to electronic
     products and
     processes.
2004 Goal 3: Preserve & CDs distributed for        10,100 CDs            Increase ratio of      3 Regions produce
     Restore the Land, FOIA responses              distributed, to       FOIAs responded       CDs rather than
     Line of sight =                               date: approx. 10%     to with CD-ROM vs     paper nearly 100%
     Shift from paper-                             for FOIA              paper by 5%.          of the time. 2
     based to electronic                           Responses.                                  Regions at 50%.
     products and                                                                              Remaining Regions
     processes.                                                                                remain mixed.
2004 Goal 3: Preserve &      Records converted 20% of 45 million Convert 50% of                30.25 Million TIFF
     Restore the Land,       nationally from    TIFF image to PDF TIFF images to               images converted
     Line of sight =         TIFF images to PDF conversions.      PDF, nationally.             to PDF documents
     Shift from paper-       documents                                                         (85% of total
     based to electronic                                                                       completed)
     products and
     processes.
2004 Goal 3: Preserve &      Count of Regions      20% of Regions        Increase electronic 10 Regions
     Restore the Land,       with capability to    (2) can produce       production
     Line of sight =         produce ARs           ARs on CDs for        capability by 25%.
     Shift from paper-       electronically.       distribution
     based to electronic
     products and




                                                     7 of 32
SDMS                                                                    BY2008 – President’s Budget

      processes.
2004 Goal 3: Preserve & Percentage of          Use FRC for          80% of records     80%
     Restore the Land. images transferred      storage of imaged    transferred to FRC
     Line of sight =     to FRC                SF records to
     Shift from paper-                         ensure integrity
     based to electronic                       and security, and
     products and                              to reduce storage
     processes.                                cost.
2004 Goal 3: Preserve & Records captured       5% of all site       5% increase (to   2327 - an increase
     Restore the Land. eletronically           records nationally   10% total) in     of 2%
     Line of sight =                           are captured         docments captured
     Shift from paper-                         electronically.      electronically
     based to electronic
     products and
     processes.
2004 Goal 3: Preserve & Count of forms         No XML templates     Begin integration     0 - Forms deployed
     Restore the Land. deployed for            available to         of XML technology     only in Region 6.
     Line of sight =     national use.         generate and         with SDMS2            Not widely used
     Shift from paper-                         capture              document forms.       even there. Will
     based to electronic                       documentation                              take culture
     products and                              electronically.                            change and
     processes.                                                                           contract change.
2005 Goal 3: Preserve & SDMS page-             47 million page-    Increase page          51.4 million
     Restore the Land. equivalents             equivalents online. count in SDMS by       images are online
     Line of sight =                                               5%.                    – goal exceeded.
     Shift from paper-
     based to electronic
     products and
     processes.
2005 Goal 3: Preserve & Percentage of CD-      An average of 550 Establish baseline       4 Regions produce
     Restore the Land. based responses.        CDs are produced percentage of CD          CDs rather than
     Line of sight =                           each quarter.     over paper based         paper nearly 100%
     Shift from paper-                                           AR collections and       of the time. 3
     based to electronic                                         FOIA request             Regions at 50%.
     products and                                                responses                Other Regions
     processes.                                                                           remain mixed.
2005 Goal 3: Preserve &    Total % of records 85 % of 45 Million    Convert remaining Over 96% have
     Restore the Land,     converted          TIFF image            15% of TIFF       been converted.
     Line of sight =       nationally from    converted to PDF.     images to PDF
     Shift from paper-     TIFF images to PDF
     based to electronic   documents
     products and
     processes.
2005 Goal 3: Preserve &    Number of           Less than 30% of     Increase              69% of RODs and
     Restore the Land.     ARs/Five Year       post 1995 ARs (or    percentage of post    5-Year Reviews
     Line of sight =       Reviews available   AR indices)/Five     1995 ARs and five     from 2002 –
     Shift from paper-     online              Year Reviews are     year reviews          2004 are available
     based to electronic                       available online     available online by   online. ARs were
     products and                                                   15% each              not fully
     processes.                                                                           investigated.
2005 Goal 3: Preserve & Number of Regions 2 of 10 Regions           Increase Electronic   3 Regions and
     Restore the Land. capturing            capture Electronic      record capture by     Headquarters
     Line of sight =     Electronic Records Records in SDMS         30% (so that 5 of     regularly capture
     Shift from paper-                                              10 regions capture    e-records.
     based to electronic                                            E-records
     products and
     processes.
2005 Goal 3: Preserve & Records captured       7% of all site       5% increase in        1.4% of all records
     Restore the Land. electronically          records nationally   documents             are captured
     Line of sight =                           are captured         captured              electronically in
     Shift from paper-                         electronically.      electronically        Q4.
     based to electronic
     products and




                                                 8 of 32
SDMS                                                                    BY2008 – President’s Budget

      processes.
2006 Goal 3: Preserve & SDMS page-             47 million page-     Increase page          Performance goal
     Restore the Land, equivalents             equivalents online   count in SDMS by       met. As of Q2,
     Line of sight =                           (plus amount         5% to facilitate       55.5 million pages
     Shift from paper-                         reported at close    document access        are online resulting
     based to electronic                       of FY2005).          and reduce paper       in more documents
     products and                                                   consumption.           being readily
     processes.                                                                            accessible and
                                                                                           reducing the
                                                                                           consumption of
                                                                                           paper.
2006 Goal 3: Preserve & Percentage of CD-      An average of 550 20% increase in           As of Q2, 1,466
     Restore the Land. based responses.        CDs are produced CD-based                   CDs have been
     Line of sight =                           each quarter.     responses over            produced. Typically
     Shift from paper-                                           paper-based               the end of fiscal
     based to electronic                                         production                year is particularly
     products and                                                                          busy for CD
     processes.                                                                            creation. Whether
                                                                                           or not this goal will
                                                                                           be met will not be
                                                                                           known until after
                                                                                           the end of the
                                                                                           fourth quarter.
2006 Goal 3: Preserve &    Number of           Less than 30% of     Increase               Under investigation
     Restore the Land.     ARs/Five Year       post 1995 ARs (or    percentage of post     – will be
     Line of sight =       Reviews available   AR indices)/Five     1995 ARs and five      reported at FY2006
     Shift from paper-     online              Year Reviews are     year reviews           end
     based to electronic                       available online     available online by
     products and                                                   15% each to
     processes.                                                     facilitate records
                                                                    access and reduce
                                                                    the consumption of
                                                                    paper.
2006 Goal 3: Preserve & Number of Regions 2 of 10 Regions           Increase Electronic    As of Q2, 7 of 10
     Restore the Land. capturing            capture Electronic      record capture by      Regions capture E-
     Line of sight =     Electronic Records Records in SDMS         50% (so that 10 of     records. HQ also
     Shift from paper-                                              10 regions capture     captures E-
     based to electronic                                            E-records. The         records. This
     products and                                                   increase in            increase in
     processes.                                                     regional               participation has
                                                                    participation will     facilitated the
                                                                    facilitate access to   access to records
                                                                    these records and      and reduced the
                                                                    reduce the             consumption of
                                                                    consumption of         paper. Final count
                                                                    paper.                 will be reported at
                                                                                           FY2006 end
2006 Goal 3: Preserve & Records captured       As of 2004, 7% of    5% increase in         Goal not yet met.
     Restore the Land. electronically          all site records     documents              As of Q2, 8% of all
     Line of sight =                           nationally are       captured               site records
     Shift from paper-                         captured             electronically to      captured
     based to electronic                       electronically.      facilitate records     electronically
     products and                                                   access and reduce      resulting in more
     processes.                                                     the consumption of     documents being
                                                                    paper.                 readily accessible
                                                                                           and reducing the
                                                                                           consumption of
                                                                                           paper; Final count
                                                                                           will be reported at
                                                                                           FY2006 end
2006 Goal 3: Preserve & Number of Regions      One region is       Increase use of         Met performance
     Restore the Land. using ExpressLink       currently using the ExpressLink by          goal. As of Q3,
     Line of sight =                           new "ExpressLink" 50%                       ExpressLink has
     Shift from paper-                         document capture                            been released to 3




                                                 9 of 32
SDMS                                                                     BY2008 – President’s Budget

      based to electronic                       module to process                         Regions and OSRTI
      products and                              documents (Plus                           HQ. Final count will
      processes.                                figure reported in                        be reported at
                                                2005).                                    FY2006 end
2006 Goal 3: Preserve & Number of Regions       One region is        Increase use of      As of Q2, still only
     Restore the Land. using WITS               currently using      WITS by 50%          1 using WITS;
     Line of sight =                            SDMS2's Workflow                          Final count will be
     Shift from paper-                          Inventory Tracking                        reported at FY2006
     based to electronic                        System (WITS) to                          end
     products and                               electronically track
     processes.                                 document
                                                processing (Plus
                                                figure reported in
                                                2005).
2007 Goal 3: Preserve & SDMS page-              47 million page-     Increase page        Will be reported at
     Restore the Land, equivalents              equivalents online   count in SDMS by     FY2007 end
     Line of sight =                            (plus amount         5%.
     Shift from paper-                          reported at close
     based to electronic                        of FY2006).
     products and
     processes.
2007 Goal 3: Preserve & Percentage of CD-       An average of 550 20% increase in         Will be reported at
     Restore the Land. based responses.         CDs are produced CD-based                 FY2007 end
     Line of sight =                            each quarter.     responses over
     Shift from paper-                                            paper-based
     based to electronic                                          production
     products and
     processes.
2007 Goal 3: Preserve &     Number of           Less than 30% of     Increase            Will be reported at
     Restore the Land.      ARs/Five Year       post 1995 ARs (or    percentage of post FY2007 end
     Line of sight =        Reviews available   AR indices)/Five     1995 ARs and five
     Shift from paper-      online              Year Reviews are     year reviews
     based to electronic                        available online     available online by
     products and                                                    15% each
     processes.
2007 Goal 3: Preserve & Records captured        As of 2004, 7% of    5% increase in       Will be reported at
     Restore the Land. electronically           all site records     documents            FY2007 end
     Line of sight =                            nationally are       captured
     Shift from paper-                          captured             electronically
     based to electronic                        electronically.
     products and
     processes.
2007 Goal 3: Preserve & Number of Regions       One region is        Increase use of      Will be reported at
     Restore the Land. using ExpressLink        currently using      ExpressLink to all   FY2007 end
     Line of sight =                            ExpressLink to       Regions.
     Shift from paper-                          process
     based to electronic                        documents. (Plus
     products and                               figure reported in
     processes.                                 2006)
2007 Goal 3: Preserve & Number of Regions       One region is        Increase use of      Will be reported at
     Restore the Land. using WITS               currently using      WITS to all          FY2007 end
     Line of sight =                            WITS to              Regions
     Shift from paper-                          electronically track
     based to electronic                        document
     products and                               processing. (Plus
     processes.                                 figure reported in
                                                2006)



FEA Performance Reference Model (PRM) BY08

FEA PRM




                                                 10 of 32
        SDMS                                                                     BY2008 – President’s Budget

Fiscal Strategic Measurement Measurement    Measurement      Measurement             Baseline     Planned           Actual
Year    Goal(s)     Area       Category      Grouping         Indicator                         Improvement         Results
       Supported                                                                                   to the
                                                                                                  Baseline
2005           Customer     Service         Access         Percentage of       Less than 30% 15%           69% of 5-
               Results      Accessibility                  post-1995           available.    improvement Year Reviews
                                                           Administrative                    to at least   are publicly
                                                           Records and 5-                    45%           accessible in
                                                           Year Reviews                      availability. SDMS. ARs
                                                           publicly accessible                             were not
                                                           on the Web.                                     fully
                                                                                                           investigated.
2005           Customer     Service         Frequency      Percentage of       40%              80%            As of Q3
               Results      Coverage        and Depth      post-1995                                           66% of NPL
                                                           Superfund NPL                                       sites are
                                                           and equivalent                                      available to
                                                           sites in SDMS and                                   Regional
                                                           accessible directly                                 staff.
                                                           to regional staff.
2005           Processes    Cycle Time   Cycle Time        Number Regions        1              2 additional   All Regions
               and          and Resource                   implementing                         Regions        have it
               Activities   Time                           SDMS electronic                                     available;
                                                           workflow                                            but only 3
                                                                                                               are using it.
2005           Processes    Productivity   Efficiency      Number of           2                3 additional   3 Regions
               and          and Efficiency                 Regions accepting                    Regions        and
               Activities                                  and processing                                      Headquarters
                                                           electronic records.                                 regularly
                                                                                                               capture e-
                                                                                                               records.
2005           Processes    Productivity   Productivity    Regions using         3              7              10
               and          and Efficiency                 combined full
               Activities                                  text/indexing
                                                           search
2005           Technology   Effectiveness   IT             Number of             3              Additional 7   10
                                            Contribution   Regions switched                     Regions
                                            to Process,    from 16-bit
                                            Customer, or   technology to 32-
                                            Mission        bit*
2005           Technology   Effectiveness   IT             Unique visitors per Approximately Additional 75     As of Q3
                                            Contribution   month (inside       400 per month users for an      there was an
                                            to Process,    firewall)                         average of        average of
                                            Customer, or                                     475 per           470 visitors
                                            Mission                                          month.            per month in
                                                                                                               FY2005.
2005           Technology   Information     Data            Percentage of sites Approximately Reach 10%        Still close to
                            and Data        Reliability and in SDMS with        5%                             5%
                                            Quality         SDMS document
                                                            connections from
                                                            CERCLIS (or a
                                                            replacement
                                                            system that tracks
                                                            performance
                                                            against strategic
                                                            objectives)
2006           Customer     Service         Access         Percentage of         Dependent on Additional       Under
               Results      Accessibility                  post-1995             improvements 15%              investigation
                                                           Administrative        achieved in  improvement.     – will be
                                                           Records and 5-        FY2005.                       reported at
                                                           Year Reviews                                        close of
                                                           publicly accessible                                 FY2006
                                                           on the Web.
2006           Customer     Service         Frequency      Percentage of         40% + results Reach 100%      Goal not yet




                                                        11 of 32
       SDMS                                                               BY2008 – President’s Budget

          Results       Coverage       and Depth      post-1995           of 2005                        met. A
                                                      Superfund NPL       improvements                   national
                                                      and equivalent                                     dialog is
                                                      sites in SDMS and                                  underway on
                                                      accessible directly                                how to best
                                                      to regional staff.                                 meet this
                                                                                                         goal.
                                                                                                         Funding
                                                                                                         limitations
                                                                                                         may require
                                                                                                         scaling back.
                                                                                                         Final count
                                                                                                         will be
                                                                                                         reported at
                                                                                                         the end of
                                                                                                         FY2006
2006      Mission and   Disaster       Disaster       Regions using     2 Regions with 3 additional      This is not
          Business      Management     Monitoring     Aventail (AAA     access         Regions with      under the
          Results                      and Prediction extranet) for                    access -- 5       control of
                                                      access to SDMS in                total             SDMS. SDMS
                                                      emergency                                          has been
                                                      scenarios                                          able to
                                                                                                         influence
                                                                                                         multiple
                                                                                                         regions to
                                                                                                         upgrade
                                                                                                         their regional
                                                                                                         offices to
                                                                                                         Active
                                                                                                         Directory,
                                                                                                         which assists
                                                                                                         in this
                                                                                                         matter, and
                                                                                                         as such, has
                                                                                                         met the
                                                                                                         performance
                                                                                                         goal.
2006      Processes     Cycle Time   Cycle Time       Number of        3                  5 additional   Goal not yet
          and           and Resource                  Regions                             Regions        met. Several
          Activities    Time                          implementing and                                   offices have
                                                      utilizing SDMS                                     not yet
                                                      electronic                                         decided to
                                                      workflow                                           direct
                                                                                                         contractors
                                                                                                         to learn and
                                                                                                         record their
                                                                                                         production
                                                                                                         activities
                                                                                                         using SDMS
                                                                                                         workflow.
2006      Processes     Productivity   Efficiency     Number of           2 + additional 5 additional    As of Q2, 7
          and           and Efficiency                Regions accepting Regions added Regions            of 10
          Activities                                  and processing      in FY2005                      Regions and
                                                      electronic records.                                Headquarters
                                                                                                         are capturing
                                                                                                         E-records
2006      Processes     Productivity   Efficiency     Number of           0 - XML         50% Use of     Goal not yet
          and           and Efficiency                Regions utilizing   templates       templates in   met. This
          Activities                                  XML templates for   have been       at least 2     has become
                                                      automated           introduced in   Regions for    an issue of
                                                      ingenstion of       Region 6 but    ROD and 5      interest to
                                                      records.            they are not    Year Reivew    the Agency
                                                                          heavily used.   documents.     as it moves
                                                                                                         forward on




                                                    12 of 32
       SDMS                                                                    BY2008 – President’s Budget

                                                                                                                the ECMS
                                                                                                                project.
                                                                                                                SDMS is
                                                                                                                leading the
                                                                                                                analysis.
2006      Technology    Effectiveness   IT               Unique visitors per See results of   Additional 75     As of Q2, an
                                        Contribution     month (inside       FY2005           users on          average of
                                        to Process,      firewall)                            average per       549 unique
                                        Customer, or                                          month.            visitors
                                        Mission                                                                 access the
                                                                                                                site; Final
                                                                                                                count will be
                                                                                                                reported at
                                                                                                                close of
                                                                                                                FY2006
2006      Technology    Information     Data            Percentage of sites 5% plus      Increase to            Goal not yet
                        and Data        Reliability and in SDMS with        FY2005       50% of all             met.
                                        Quality         SDMS document       Improvements documents              Connections
                                                        connections from                                        between
                                                        CERCLIS (or a                                           SDMS and
                                                        replacement                                             CERCLIS in
                                                        system that tracks                                      planning
                                                        performance                                             phase. A new
                                                        against strategic                                       system is
                                                        objectives)                                             being
                                                                                                                planned that
                                                                                                                will require
                                                                                                                deeper
                                                                                                                connections
                                                                                                                between
                                                                                                                CERCLIS
                                                                                                                data and
                                                                                                                SDMS
                                                                                                                documents.
                                                                                                                Progress will
                                                                                                                be reported
                                                                                                                at close of
                                                                                                                FY2006
2007      Customer      Service         Availability     Increase              Dependent on   Reach 100%        Will be
          Results       Accessibility                    availability of web   improvements   availability of   reported at
                                                         accessible records    achieved in    post-1995         the end of
                                                         to the public,        FY2006.        Administrative    FY2007
                                                         congress and legal                   Records and
                                                         entities which will                  5-Year
                                                         decrease                             Reviews
                                                         emergency                            publicly
                                                         response time,                       accessible on
                                                         and assist in                        the Web.
                                                         disaster
                                                         preparedness and
                                                         planning.
2007      Customer      Service         Availability     Increase              500 new non-   1000 new          Will be
          Results       Accessibility                    availability of       OSRTI users    non-OSRTI         reported at
                                                         SDMS prior to,        for SDMS       users for         end of
                                                         during and after      through ECMS   SDMS              FY2007.
                                                         an incident by        integration.   through ECMS
                                                         ensuring that                        integration.
                                                         ECMS Users have
                                                         access to public
                                                         role based
                                                         documents in
                                                         SDMS.
2007      Mission and   Disaster        Disaster     SDMS will be              One Regional   Four Regional Will be
          Business      Management      Preparedness loaded with               OSC/OEM        OSC/OEM       reported at




                                                       13 of 32
       SDMS                                                                  BY2008 – President’s Budget

          Results                       and Planning   coastal maps to       team will use    teams will   the end of
                                                       use during the        SDMS during      user SDMS    FY2007.
                                                       2007 Hurricane        preparedness     during
                                                       Season                exercises        preparedness
                                                                             during 2007.     exercises in
                                                                                              2007.
2007      Mission and   Disaster        Emergency      Decrease response     2 Regions with   10 Regions       Will be
          Business      Management      Response       time in an            access to        with access to   reported at
          Results                                      emergency by          Aventail (AAA    Aventail (AAA    close of
                                                       ensuring access to    extranet) for    extranet) for    FY2007
                                                       Aventail (AAA         access to        access to
                                                       extranet) in          SDMS in          SDMS in
                                                       additional regions.   emergency        emergency
                                                                             situations.      situations.
2007      Mission and   Disaster        Emergency      Decrease              Web Service      Development      Will be
          Business      Management      Response       emergency             link exists      of non-EPA       reported at
          Results                                      response time by      between Office   role based       end of
                                                       ensuring that         of Emergency     link for OEM     FY2007.
                                                       OEM/OSC users         Management       Portal to
                                                       have real time        Portal and       increase ease
                                                       access to SDMS        SDMS             of user for
                                                       data.                 application.     state and
                                                                                              local response
                                                                                              teams
                                                                                              complete.
2007      Mission and   Environmental Environmental Address                  RPM staff in 2   RPM staff in 5   Will be
          Business      Management Remediation environmental                 regions use      regions use      reported at
          Results                                   hazards and              SDMS Portal in   SDMS Portal      close of
                                                    contamination by         2007             in 2007.         FY2007.
                                                    ensuring that the
                                                    Remedial Program
                                                    Manager is able to
                                                    use SDMS Portal
                                                    to access data.
2007      Processes     Productivity   Efficiency      Decrease the        Dependent on       50% Use of       Will be
          and           and Efficiency                 response time in    success in         XML              reported at
          Activities                                   an emergency by FY2006.                templates in 6   close of
                                                       increasing the                         Regions for      FY2007.
                                                       accuracy of                            ROD and 5
                                                       electronic records.                    Year Review
                                                                                              documents
                                                                                              with
                                                                                              introductions
                                                                                              and
                                                                                              development
                                                                                              of templates
                                                                                              occurring in
                                                                                              an additional
                                                                                              2.
2007      Processes     Productivity   Productivity    Increase the          2 + additional   10 (complete     Will be
          and           and Efficiency                 timeliness for        Regions          compliance)      reported at
          Activities                                   accepting and         accepting and    regions          close of
                                                       processing            processing       accepting and    FY2007
                                                       electronic records    electronic       processing
                                                       after an incident.    records in       electronic
                                                                             FY2006.          records.
2007      Technology    Effectiveness   IT             Ensure effective    See results of     Additional 75    Will be
                                        Contribution   response to and     FY2006             users on         reported at
                                        to Process,    planning for                           average per      close of
                                        Customer, or   incidents by                           month.           FY2007
                                        Mission        providing unique
                                                       visitors access per
                                                       month (inside
                                                       firewall).




                                                    14 of 32
       SDMS                                                                   BY2008 – President’s Budget

2007      Technology    Information     Internal Data Decrease the            FY2006 results     100%              Will be
                        and Data        Sharing       response time           in a percent       connectivity      reported at
                                                      required in an          for the number     between           close of
                                                      emergency by            of sites in        databases         FY2007
                                                      increasing the          SDMS with          (SDMS and
                                                      amount of data          SDMS               CERCLIS –
                                                      shared between          document           or a
                                                      systems.                connections        replacement
                                                                              from CERCLIS       system that
                                                                              (or a              tracks
                                                                              replacement        performance
                                                                              system that        against
                                                                              tracks             strategic
                                                                              performance        objectives).
                                                                              against
                                                                              strategic
                                                                              objectives).
2008      Customer      Service         Access           Increase             Percentage of      Reach 50%         Will be
          Results       Accessibility                    accessibility when   core               availability of   reported at
                                                         preparing/planning   documents for      core              close of
                                                         for and responding   all active NPL     documents for     FY2008.
                                                         to an emergency      sites accessible   all active NPL
                                                         by increasing the    on the Web.        sites
                                                         percentage of core                      accessible on
                                                         documents for all                       the Web.
                                                         active NPL sites
                                                         accessible on the
                                                         Web.
2008      Customer      Service         Availability     Increase             1000 non-          1500 new          Will be
          Results       Accessibility                    availability of      OSRTI users        non-OSRTI         reported at
                                                         SDMS prior to,       for SDMS           users for         the end of
                                                         during and after     through ECMS       SDMS              FY2008.
                                                         an incident by       integration.       through ECMS
                                                         ensuring that                           integration
                                                         ECMS Users have
                                                         access to public
                                                         role based
                                                         documents in
                                                         SDMS.
2008      Mission and   Disaster        Disaster     SDMS will be             One Regional       Four Regional     Will be
          Business      Management      Preparedness loaded with maps         OSC/OEM            OSC/OEM           reported at
          Results                       and Planning of the ten largest       team will use      teams will        the end of
                                                     cities in the United     SDMS during        user SDMS         FY2008.
                                                     States.                  preparedness       during
                                                                              exercises          preparedness
                                                                              during 2008.       exercises in
                                                                                                 2008.
2008      Mission and   Disaster        Emergency        Decrease             Development        50% of            Will be
          Business      Management      Response         emergency            of non-EPA         Regions are       reported at
          Results                                        response time by     role based link    using the         the end of
                                                         ensuring that        for OEM Portal     non-EPA role      FY2008.
                                                         OEM/OSC users        to increase        based link for
                                                         have real time       ease of user       OEM Portal to
                                                         access to SDMS       for state and      increase of
                                                         data.                local response     use for stat
                                                                              teams              and local
                                                                              complete.          response
                                                                                                 teams
2008      Mission and   Environmental Environmental Address                   RPM staff in 5     RPM staff in      Will be
          Business      Management Remediation environemental                 regions use        10 regions        reported at
          Results                                   hazards and               SDMS Portal in     use SDMS          the end of
                                                    contamination by          2007.              Portal.           FY2008.
                                                    ensuring that the
                                                    Remedial Program




                                                       15 of 32
       SDMS                                                                         BY2008 – President’s Budget

                                                              Manager is able to
                                                              use SDMS Portal
                                                              to access data.
2008           Processes     Productivity   Efficiency        Decrease the          75% use of        75% use of       Will be
               and           and Efficiency                   response time in      XML templates     XML              reported at
               Activities                                     an emergency by       in 6 regions      templates in 8   close of
                                                              increasing the        with              Regions with     FY2008
                                                              accuracy of           introductions     introductions
                                                              electronic records.   and               and
                                                                                    development       development
                                                                                    of templates      of templates
                                                                                    occurring in an   occurring in
                                                                                    additional 2      remaining 2.
2008           Technology    Effectiveness    IT              Ensure effective    See results of      Additional 75    Will be
                                              Contribution    response to and     FY2007              users on         reported at
                                              to Process,     planning for                            average per      close of
                                              Customer, or    incidents by                            month.           FY2008
                                              Mission         providing unique
                                                              visitors access per
                                                              month (inside
                                                              firewall).
2008           Technology    Information      Internal Data Decrease the            Same as the   100%                 Will be
                             and Data         Sharing       response time           FY2007        connectivity         reported at
                                                            required in an          Improvements. between              close of
                                                            emergency by                          databases            FY2008
                                                            increasing the
                                                            amount of data
                                                            shared between
                                                            systems

       All new IT investments initiated for FY 2005 and beyond must use Table 2 and are required to use the Federal
       Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Please use Table 2 and the PRM to identify
       the performance information pertaining to this major IT investment. Map all Measurement Indicators to the
       corresponding ""Measurement Area"" and ""Measurement Grouping"" identified in the PRM. There should be at
       least one Measurement Indicator for at least four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is
       available at www.egov.gov.


       I.E: SECURITY AND PRIVACY BY08

       Costs & Risks BY08
       In order to successfully address this area of the business case, each question below must be answered at the
       system/application level, not at a program or agency level. Systems supporting this investment on the planning
       and operational systems security tables should match the systems on the privacy table below. Systems on the
       Operational Security Table must be included on your agency FISMA system inventory and should be easily
       referenced in the inventory (i.e., should use the same name or identifier).
       All systems supporting and/or part of this investment should be included in the tables below, inclusive of both
       agency owned systems and contractor systems. For IT investments under development, security and privacy
       planning must proceed in parallel with the development of the system/s to ensure IT security and privacy
       requirements and costs are identified and incorporated into the overall lifecycle of the system/s.
       Please respond to the questions below and verify the system owner took the following actions:
       Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been         Yes
       identified and integrated into the overall costs of the
       investment?
       Provide the Percentage IT Security for the budget year 5
       Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a Yes
       part of the overall risk management effort for each
       system supporting or part of this investment.

       Security: Planning Systems BY08

       Systems in Planning - Security


          Name of       Agency/ or Contractor Operated       Planned Operational           Planned or Actual C&A
          System                   System?                          Date                      Completion Date




                                                          16 of 32
SDMS                                                                            BY2008 – President’s Budget



Security: Operational Systems BY08

Operational Systems - Security


   Name of       Agency/ or      NIST FIPS    Has C&A       Date C&A          What        Date          Date the
   System        Contractor       199 Risk      been        Complete       standards   Complete(d):   contingency
                  Operated         Impact    Completed,                    were used     Security     plan tested
                  System?           level    using NIST                      for the     Control
                                              800-37?                       Security     Testing
                                                                            Controls
                                                                             tests?
Superfund
               Contractor                                            FIPS 200 /
Document
               and               Moderate Yes              9/16/2005 NIST 800-         9/20/2006      6/21/2006
Management
               Government                                            53
System



Security: Weaknesses & Contractor Procedures BY08
Have any weaknesses, not yet remediated, related to       No
any of the systems part of or supporting this investment
been identified by the agency or IG?
If "yes," have those weaknesses been incorporated into
the agency's plan of action and milestone process?
Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is    No
requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?
If "yes," specify the amount, provide a general description of the weakness, and explain how the funding request
will remediate the weakness.

How are contractor security procedures monitored, verified, and validated by the agency for the contractor
systems above?



Privacy: Planning & Operational Systems BY08

Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy


 Name of System      Is this a      Is there a Privacy       Is the PIA      Is a System of       Was a new or
                       new         Impact Assessment        available to     Records Notice      amended SORN
                     system?      (PIA) that covers this    the public?     (SORN) required    published in FY 06?
                                         system?                            for this system?
Superfund                                                                                      No, because the
Document                                                                                       system is not a
                    No           Yes.                      Yes.            No
Management                                                                                     Privacy Act system
System                                                                                         of records.




I.F: ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE (EA) BY08

General EA Questions BY08
In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the
investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is
mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between
the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's
EA.
Is this investment included in your agency's target       Yes
enterprise architecture?
If "no," please explain why this investment is not included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?

Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Yes
Strategy?
If "yes," provide the investment name as identified in    SDMS is identified in the EA Transition Strategy



                                                   17 of 32
   SDMS                                                                        BY2008 – President’s Budget

   the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most     under the Environmental Health and Protection
   recent annual EA Assessment.                              Architecture (EHPA). SDMS has leveraged many
                                                             existing EA Solution Architecture Components such
                                                             as Portal Foundation Services, Identity and Access
                                                             Management Component Services, ECMS, CDX, BI
                                                             Services and the Extract, Transform and Load
                                                             Services. Alignment with EA plays a driving force in
                                                             using SDMS as the basis for a key Superfund
                                                             reporting system that utilizes reusable components
                                                             and Services.
   If "no," please explain why this investment is not included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?



   FEA SRM BY08
   Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content
   management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following
   table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.

   Service Component Reference Model (SRM) Table


  Agency         Agency         Service     FEA SRM        FEA SRM       FEA Service   FEA    Internal     BY
Component      Component        Domain    Service Type    Component      Component    Service    or     Funding
   Name        Description                                              Reused Name Component External Percentage
                                                                                      Reused   Reuse?
                                                                                       UPI
             Defines the
             set of
SDMS         capabilities      Back       Asset /    Asset
Content      that facilitate   Office     Materials  Cataloging /                                   Internal 7
Capture      collection of     Services   Management Identification
             data and
             information.
           Defines the
           set of
           capabilities
           that allow
                                                     Asset             Asset
           classification                                                               020-00-
ECMS                           Back       Asset /    Transfer,         Transfer,
           of data and                                                                  01-16-04-
Records                        Office     Materials  Allocation,       Allocation,                Internal 7
           information                                                                  0240-24-
Management                     Services   Management and               and
           into specific                                                                404-141
                                                     Maintenance       Maintenance
           layers or
           types to
           support an
           organization.
             Defines the
             capabilities to
             share SDMS
             data across
SDMS                         Back
             the ECMS,                    Data       Data
Content                      Office                                                                 Internal 10
             ICTS,                        Management Exchange
Sharing                      Services
             CERCLIS
             Platforms and
             CD-ROM
             media.
           Defines the
           set of
           capabilities
           that support
SDMS                      Back
           the                            Data       Meta Data
Metadata                  Office                                                                    Internal 10
           maintenance                    Management Management
Management                Services
           and
           administration
           of data that
           describes




                                                         18 of 32
   SDMS                                                                    BY2008 – President’s Budget

             data.
             Integration
                                                     Mapping /      Mapping /      020-00-
EPA          with EPA       Business
                                                     Geospatial /   Geospatial /   01-16-01-
Geospatial   Geospatial     Analytical Visualization                                         Internal 5
                                                     Elevation /    Elevation /    0120-00-
Services     Metacarta      Services
                                                     GPS            GPS            404-142
             Service
           Defines the
           set of
           capabilities                                                            020-00-
ECMS                      Digital
           that support                 Document   Library /        Library /      01-16-04-
Repository                Asset                                                              Internal 15
           document and                 Management Storage          Storage        0240-24-
Management                Services
           data                                                                    404-141
           warehousing
           and archiving.
             Defines the
             set of
             capabilities
             that support
             selection and
SDMS
             retrieval of    Support
Search and                              Search      Query                                    Internal 15
             records         Services
Retrieval
             organized by
             shared
             characteristics
             in content or
             context.
             Support the
             management
             of permissions
             for logging
             onto a
             computer,
SDMS         application,   Support     Security   Access
                                                                                             Internal 5
SysAdmin     service, or    Services    Management Control
             network:
             includes user
             management
             and
             role/privilege
             management.
             Support
             management
             and reporting
             of compliance
SDMS                                               FISMA
             with the      Support      Security
FISMA                                              Management                                Internal 5
             Federal       Services     Management
Reporting                                          and Reporting
             Information
             Security
             Management
             Act of 2002.
             Support
             obtaining
             information
             about those
             parties
             attempting to
                                                   Identification
SDMS User    log on to a     Support    Security
                                                   and                                       Internal 5
ID Admin     system or       Services   Management
                                                   Authentication
             application for
             security
             purposes and
             the validation
             of those
             users.




                                                    19 of 32
   SDMS                                                                      BY2008 – President’s Budget

             Integration
             with EPA
                                                                                 020-00-
             Portal to                             Identification Identification
EPA Portal                  Support     Security                                 01-16-02-
             enable Single                         and            and                      Internal 7
for SDMS                    Services    Management                               6029-00-
             Sign-on for                           Authentication Authentication
                                                                                 404-142
             User ID
             Administration
             Provide
             Authorization,
                                                                                 020-00-
EPA Identity Authentication                        Identification Identification
                            Support     Security                                 01-16-01-
and Access and ID                                  and            and                      Internal 3
                            Services    Management                               6006-00-
Management Provisioning                            Authentication Authentication
                                                                                 404-142
             Services to
             SDMS.

    Use existing SRM Components or identify as "NEW". A "NEW" component is one not already identified as a
    service component in the FEA SRM.
    A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than
    answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other
    investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
    'Internal' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service
    component provided by another agency within the same department. 'External' reuse is one agency within a
    department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of
    this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
    Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the
    table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

    FEA TRM BY08
    To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list
    the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

   Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table


     FEA SRM Component        FEA TRM Service      FEA TRM Service     FEA TRM Service      Service Specification
                                   Area               Category            Standard         (i.e. vendor or product
                                                                                                    name)
                            Component                                Platform
   Query                                          Business Logic
                            Framework                                Dependent
   Meta Data                Component                                Platform
                                                  Business Logic
   Management               Framework                                Dependent
   Asset Transfer,
                            Component                                Platform
   Allocation, and                                Business Logic
                            Framework                                Dependent
   Maintenance
   Asset Cataloging /       Component                                Platform
                                                  Business Logic
   Identification           Framework                                Dependent
                            Component                                Platform
   Access Control                                 Business Logic
                            Framework                                Dependent
                            Component                                Platform
   Data Exchange                                  Business Logic
                            Framework                                Dependent
   Asset Cataloging /       Component                                Database
                                                  Data Management
   Identification           Framework                                Connectivity
                            Component                                Database
   Query                                          Data Management
                            Framework                                Connectivity
                            Component                                Database
   Data Exchange                                  Data Management
                            Framework                                Connectivity
   Meta Data                Component                                Database
                                                  Data Management
   Management               Framework                                Connectivity
                            Component             Presentation /
   Data Exchange                                                     Content Rendering
                            Framework             Interface
                            Component             Presentation /
   Query                                                             Content Rendering
                            Framework             Interface




                                                      20 of 32
SDMS                                                                 BY2008 – President’s Budget

Meta Data            Component            Presentation /
                                                             Content Rendering
Management           Framework            Interface
Asset Cataloging /   Component            Presentation /
                                                             Content Rendering
Identification       Framework            Interface
Asset Transfer,
                     Component            Presentation /     Dynamic Server-
Allocation, and
                     Framework            Interface          Side Display
Maintenance
Meta Data            Component            Presentation /     Dynamic Server-
Management           Framework            Interface          Side Display
                     Component            Presentation /     Dynamic Server-
Query
                     Framework            Interface          Side Display
                     Component            Presentation /     Dynamic Server-
Data Exchange
                     Framework            Interface          Side Display
Mapping / Geospatial / Component          Presentation /     Dynamic Server-
Elevation / GPS        Framework          Interface          Side Display
FISMA Management     Component                               Supporting
                                          Security
and Reporting        Framework                               Security Services
Identification and   Component                               Supporting
                                          Security
Authentication       Framework                               Security Services
                     Service Access and
Data Exchange                           Access Channels      Web Browser
                     Delivery
                     Service Access and
Query                                   Access Channels      Web Browser
                     Delivery
Asset Cataloging /   Service Access and
                                        Access Channels      Web Browser
Identification       Delivery
Asset Cataloging /   Service Access and
                                        Delivery Channels Intranet
Identification       Delivery
                     Service Access and
Query                                   Delivery Channels Intranet
                     Delivery
                     Service Access and
Data Exchange                           Delivery Channels Intranet
                     Delivery
Asset Transfer,
                     Service Access and Service              Legislative /
Allocation, and
                     Delivery           Requirements         Compliance
Maintenance
                     Service Interface                       Data
Data Exchange                             Interoperability
                     and Integration                         Transformation
                     Service Interface                       Data Types /
Data Exchange                             Interoperability
                     and Integration                         Validation
Meta Data            Service Platform     Database /
                                                             Database
Management           and Infrastructure   Storage
                     Service Platform     Database /
Query                                                        Database
                     and Infrastructure   Storage
                     Service Platform     Database /
Library / Storage                                            Database
                     and Infrastructure   Storage
Asset Transfer,
                     Service Platform     Database /
Allocation, and                                              Database
                     and Infrastructure   Storage
Maintenance
                     Service Platform     Database /
Access Control                                               Database
                     and Infrastructure   Storage
                     Service Platform     Database /
Library / Storage                                            Storage
                     and Infrastructure   Storage
Asset Cataloging /   Service Platform     Database /
                                                             Storage
Identification       and Infrastructure   Storage
Asset Transfer,
                     Service Platform
Allocation, and                           Delivery Servers   Application Servers
                     and Infrastructure
Maintenance
                     Service Platform
Query                                     Delivery Servers   Web Servers
                     and Infrastructure



                                              21 of 32
SDMS                                                                        BY2008 – President’s Budget

Meta Data                Service Platform
                                               Delivery Servers     Web Servers
Management               and Infrastructure
                         Service Platform
Data Exchange                                  Delivery Servers     Web Servers
                         and Infrastructure
Asset Cataloging /       Service Platform
                                               Delivery Servers     Web Servers
Identification           and Infrastructure
Asset Cataloging /       Service Platform      Hardware /
                                                                    Peripherals
Identification           and Infrastructure    Infrastructure
Asset Cataloging /       Service Platform      Hardware /           Servers /
Identification           and Infrastructure    Infrastructure       Computers
                         Service Platform      Hardware /           Servers /
Library / Storage
                         and Infrastructure    Infrastructure       Computers
                         Service Platform      Hardware /           Servers /
Query
                         and Infrastructure    Infrastructure       Computers
Meta Data                Service Platform      Hardware /           Servers /
Management               and Infrastructure    Infrastructure       Computers
Asset Transfer,
                         Service Platform      Hardware /           Servers /
Allocation, and
                         and Infrastructure    Infrastructure       Computers
Maintenance
                         Service Platform      Hardware /           Servers /
Data Exchange
                         and Infrastructure    Infrastructure       Computers
                         Service Platform      Software
Access Control                                                      Test Management
                         and Infrastructure    Engineering
Asset Cataloging /       Service Platform                           Platform
                                               Support Platforms
Identification           and Infrastructure                         Dependent
Asset Transfer,
                         Service Platform                           Platform
Allocation, and                                Support Platforms
                         and Infrastructure                         Independent
Maintenance
Meta Data                Service Platform                           Platform
                                               Support Platforms
Management               and Infrastructure                         Independent
                         Service Platform                           Platform
Query                                          Support Platforms
                         and Infrastructure                         Independent
                         Service Platform                           Platform
Data Exchange                                  Support Platforms
                         and Infrastructure                         Independent

Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple
rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications
In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or
vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

Reuse & Information Sharing BY08
Will the application leverage existing components and/or No
applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov,
Pay.Gov, etc)?
If "yes," please describe how the application will leverage existing components and/or applications across the
Government.

Does this investment provide the public with access to a No
government automated information system?
If "yes," does customer access require specific software
(e.g., a specific web browser version)?
If "yes," provide the specific product name(s) and
version number(s) of the required software and the date
when the public will be able to access this investment by
any software (i.e. to ensure equitable and timely access
of government information and services).

FEA Primary Mapping BY08

FEA Primary Mapping




                                                   22 of 32
        SDMS                                                                           BY2008 – President’s Budget

         Reference Model:                                                                  BRM
         Business Area:                                                                    Services For Citizens
         Line of Business:                                                                 Environmental Management
         Sub Function:                                                                     Environmental Remediation
         Mapping Code:                                                                     108024


        II.A: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS BY08

        Analysis Background BY08
        Part II should be completed only for investments identified as "Planning" or "Full Acquisition," or "Mixed Life-
        Cycle" investments in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above.
        In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition
        to the current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A- 94 for all investments, and the Clinger Cohen
        Act of 1996 for IT investments, to determine the criteria you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis.
        Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this           Yes
        project?
        If "yes," what is the date of the analysis?                 11/1/2005
        If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be
        completed?
        If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:



        Alternatives Table BY08
        Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

        Alternatives Analysis Results


          Send to      Alternative          Description of       Risk Adjusted Lifecycle         Risk Adjusted Lifecycle
           OMB          Analyzed             Alternative             Costs estimate                 Benefits estimate
        True        Alternative 1
        True        Alternative 2
        True        Alternative 3



Selected Alternative BY08
Which alternative was selected by the Initiative Governance process and why was it chosen?
Alternative 1 was selected for its consistency with the EPA EA strategies, the intent of the President's Management
Agenda for improved access, most cost effective, holding least risk in schedule, and most consistency with the program
direction to ultimately have a one stop source for all Superfund data management. It provides improved statutory-
requirement functionality and brings discipline to the formatting of content that was lacking in the original SDMS.
What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?
This alternative provides direct benefits that include reducing space requirements and reducing copying charges. There
will also be reductions in lost cases due to poor documentation; reduction in potential for exposure to litigation; reduction
in time spent searching for documents; reduction in errors; ensures compliance with Congressional mandates and
improve response to citizens' requests (FOIA). When integrated with the other Superfund systems security risks will be
reduced by having a single system with one designated project manager and security plan.

Alternative 1 also best facilitates the use of SDMS as a platform to consolidate other information systems into a common
repository. This strategy will facilitate sharing of services, code libraries, infrastructure, and enterprise architecture
alignments. Alternative 1 is also the most effective approach for achieving data linkage within the components and across
the Agency for other systems, such as ECMS, CERCLIS, etc.

II.B: RISK MANAGEMENT BY08

Risk Management Plan BY08
You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle,
developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk
throughout the investment's life-cycle.
Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
What is the date of the risk management plan?
Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since




                                                             23 of 32
        SDMS                                                                         BY2008 – President’s Budget

last year's submission to OMB?
If "yes," describe any significant changes to the Risk Management Plan:

If there currently is no risk plan, will a plan be developed?
If "yes," what is the planned completion date of the risk plan?
If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?



Investment Risks BY08
Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:

II.C: COST AND SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE BY08

Earned Value BY08
Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in
ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?
Answer the following questions about current cumulative cost and schedule performance. The numbers reported below should
reflect current actual information. (Per OMB requirements Cost/Schedule Performance information should include both
Government and Contractor Costs):
What is the Planned Value (PV)?
What is the Earned Value (EV)?
What is the actual cost of work performed (AC)?
What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule
Performance information (Government Only/Contractor
Only/Both)?
EVMS "As of" date:
What is the calculated Schedule Performance Index (SPI =
EV/PV)?
What is the schedule variance (SV = EV-PV)?
What is the calculated Cost Performance Index (CPI = EV/AC)?
What is the cost variance (CV = EV-AC)?
EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in
the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in
the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.
Answer the following questions about the status of this investment. Include information on all appropriate capital assets
supporting this investment except for assets in which the performance information is reported in a separate exhibit 300.

Cost/Schedule Variance BY08
Is the CV% or SV% greater than 10%? (CV%= CV/EV x 100;             No
SV%= SV/PV x 100)
If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both?
If "yes," explain the variance:

If "yes," what corrective actions are being taken?

What is the most current "Estimate at Completion"?

Performance Baseline BY08
Have any significant changes been made to the baseline during No
the past fiscal year?
Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial
performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual
completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/ "04/28/2004") and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a
milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the 'Description of
Milestone' and 'Percent Complete' fields are required. Indicate 0 for any milestone no longer active.
If "yes," when was it approved by OMB?

Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline


Milestone Description                                                                                    Current         Percent
Number         of                 Initial Baseline                      Current Baseline                 Baseline       Complete
           Milestone                                                                                     Variance
                              Planned         Total Cost                                            Schedule     Cost
                                                                  Completion         Total Cost




                                                             24 of 32
     SDMS                                                                       BY2008 – President’s Budget


                          Completion                         Date
                                        (Estimated)                                               (# days)
                            Date
                                                      Planned      Actual     Planned Actual
       SDMS2:
       Conduct Formal
       Risk
01                         11/15/2005          $0.050 11/15/2005 11/30/2005     $0.050   $0.050        -15    $0.000    100%
       Assessment of
       OSRTI (Local)
       Configuration
       SDMS2:
       Alternatives
       Analysis for
       Establishment
02     of Centralized      11/15/2005          $0.015 11/15/2005 11/23/2005     $0.015   $0.007         -8    $0.008    100%
       Repository (=
       SDMS2
       Contingency
       Configuration)
       SDMS2: Cost -
       Benefit Analysis
       for Selected
03                         01/15/2006          $0.025 01/15/2006 02/17/2006     $0.025   $0.015        -33    $0.010    100%
       Centralized
       Repository
       Alternative
       SDMS2: Update
       Risk
       Management
04                         02/15/2006          $0.010 02/15/2006 11/27/2005     $0.010   $0.006         80    $0.004    100%
       Plan to Include
       Central
       Repository
       SDMS2:
       Central
05     Repository          01/31/2006          $0.070 01/31/2006                $0.070   $0.020               $0.050    88%
       Implementation
       of ExpressLink
       SDMS2:
       Implement
       Central
       Repository
       (=Activation of
       SDMS2
       Contingency
       Plan; Fully
06                         09/30/2006          $0.100 09/30/2006                $0.100   $0.370              ($0.270)   91%
       Operational
       When All
       Regional
       Datasets are
       Migrated and
       Synchronized in
       Central
       Repository
       SDMS2:
       Conduct Risk
       Assessment of
       Central
07                         03/31/2006          $0.050 03/31/2006 11/30/2005     $0.050   $0.050        121    $0.000    100%
       Repository with
       Test Instance
       of OSRTI
       Content
       SDMS2:
       Integrate
       Documentum's
08     Records             07/31/2006          $0.265 07/31/2006                $0.265   $0.064               $0.201    79%
       Management
       Functionalities
       with SDMS2
       SDMS2: Create
       Central
09                         06/01/2006          $0.270 06/01/2006                $0.270   $0.162               $0.108    98%
       Registry
       Application
       SDMS2:
       Sequencing
       Plan for
       Migration /
10     Replication of      04/15/2006          $0.008 04/15/2006                $0.008   $0.000               $0.008    93%
       Regional
       Content to
       Central
       Repository
11     SDMS2:              09/29/2006          $0.075 09/29/2006                $0.075   $0.014               $0.061    80%




                                                      25 of 32
     SDMS                                                             BY2008 – President’s Budget

       Migrate
       Localized
       Oracle
       Databases
       Instances to
       Central
       Database
       SDMS2:
       Management
       Evaluation
       Report of
       Regional SDMS
       Systems Uses
       and
12                        03/31/2006   $0.038 03/31/2006 03/31/2006   $0.038   $0.038     0    $0.000   100%
       Dependencies
       in Preparation
       for Content
       Migration /
       Replication to
       Central
       Repository
       SDMS2:
       Migrate /
       Replicate
13     Regional SDMS      02/15/2007   $0.100 02/15/2007              $0.100   $0.007          $0.093   61%
       Content to
       Central
       Repository
       SDMS2:
14     Security Plan      05/31/2006   $0.025 05/31/2006 04/10/2006   $0.025   $0.010    51    $0.015   100%
       Update
       SDMS3: Map
       Regional
15     Business           08/31/2006   $0.025 08/31/2006              $0.025   $0.014          $0.011   69%
       Processes and
       Workflows
       Review PDF-
       A[rchive]
       Format as
       Potential
16                        04/28/2006   $0.010 04/28/2006              $0.010   $0.000          $0.010   100%
       Central
       Repository
       Migration
       Target Format
       SDMS3: Cost -
17                        03/31/2006   $0.010 03/31/2006 08/24/2006   $0.012   $0.007   -146   $0.005   100%
       Benefit Analysis
       SDMS3: Draft
18     System             04/30/2006   $0.100 04/30/2006 02/06/2006   $0.100   $0.002    83    $0.098   100%
       Architecture
       SDMS3: Draft
19     Disaster           05/31/2006   $0.005 05/31/2006              $0.005   $0.001          $0.004   96%
       Recovery Plan
       Update Privacy
20     Impact             06/15/2006   $0.001 06/15/2006 06/12/2006   $0.001   $0.000     3    $0.001   100%
       Assessment
       Develop an
       inventory of
       current sources
       and contractual
21     obligations for    12/31/2005   $0.000 12/31/2005              $0.002   $0.001          $0.001   50%
       information
       security
       products and
       services
       Develop
       migration plan
       for acquiring
       information
       security
       products and
       services from
22     Centers of         09/30/2006   $0.000 09/30/2006              $0.000   $0.000          $0.000     %
       Excellence
       established
       under the
       Information
       Systems
       Security Line of
       Business
23     Implement plan     09/30/2007   $0.000 09/30/2007              $0.000   $0.000          $0.000     %




                                              26 of 32
     SDMS                                                  BY2008 – President’s Budget

       to migrate from
       current
       information
       security
       acquisition
       processes to
       the
       procurement of
       information
       security
       products and
       services from
       Centers of
       Excellence
       established
       under the
       Information
       Systems
       Security Line of
       Business
       Operations &
24                        09/30/2006   $0.950 09/30/2006   $0.950   $1.650   ($0.700)    100%
       Maintenance
25     Security           09/30/2006   $0.150 09/30/2006   $0.150   $0.050    $0.100     42%
       Working Capital
26                        09/30/2006   $1.000 09/30/2006   $1.000   $0.181    $0.819     18%
       Fund
       SDMS3 and
       CERCLIS:
       Alternatives
27     Analysis for       03/01/2007   $0.000 03/01/2007   $0.000   $0.023   ($0.023)      %
       Merging
       CERCLIS into
       SDMS
       SDMS3 and
       CERCLIS:
       Security Plan
28                        06/30/2007   $0.000 06/30/2007   $0.000   $0.000    $0.000      0%
       Update for
       CERCLIS /
       SDMS Merger
       Update Privacy
29     Impact             06/30/2007   $0.000 06/30/2007   $0.000   $0.000    $0.000       %
       Assessment
       SDMS3: Cost -
30     Benefit Analysis   04/25/2007   $0.000 04/25/2007   $0.000   $0.000    $0.000       %
       Update
       SDMS3 and
       CERCLIS:
       Integrate
31                        03/31/2008   $0.000 03/31/2008   $0.000   $0.000    $0.000       %
       Oracle Schema
       Between SDMS
       and CERCLIS
       SDMS3 and
       CERCLIS: Draft
       System
32     Architecture for   04/30/2007   $0.000 04/30/2007   $0.000   $0.000    $0.000       %
       Integrated
       Integrated
       System
       SDMS3 and
       CERCLIS: Draft
       Disaster
33                        05/31/2007   $0.000 05/31/2007   $0.000   $0.000    $0.000       %
       Recovery Plan
       for Integrated
       System
       Incorporate
       Agency IT
       Enterprise
       Architecture
       Plan Into SDMS
       Development
34                        09/30/2008   $0.000 09/30/2008   $0.000   $0.000    $0.000       %
       Path: Select
       Components to
       Add, such as
       Identity and
       Access
       Management
       Implement plan
       to migrate from
35     current            09/30/2008   $0.000 09/30/2008   $0.000   $0.000    $0.000       %
       information
       security




                                              27 of 32
        SDMS                                                                         BY2008 – President’s Budget

             acquisition
             processes to
             the
             procurement of
             information
             security
             products and
             services from
             Centers of
             Excellence
             established
             under the
             Information
             Systems
             Security Line of
             Business
             Operations &
36                              09/30/2007            $0.000 09/30/2007              $0.000   $0.000             $0.000         %
             Maintenance
             Working Capital
37                              09/30/2007            $0.000 09/30/2007              $0.000   $0.000             $0.000         %
             Fund
38           Security           09/30/2007            $0.000 09/30/2007              $0.000   $0.000             $0.000         %




             Determine
             SDMS/CERCLIS
41                              11/20/2007            $0.081 11/20/2007              $0.081                                     %
             Merged System
             Architecture
             Complete
             SDMS/CERCLIS
42                              08/01/2008            $0.945 08/01/2008              $0.945                                     %
             Merged System
             Design
             Implement
43                              03/28/2008            $0.234 03/28/2008              $0.324                                     %
             Reports Module

Project
Totals


III.A: RISK MANAGEMENT BY08

Risk Management Plan BY08
Part III should be completed only for investments identified as "Operation and Maintenance" (Steady State) in response to
Question 6 in Part I, Section A above.
You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle,
developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk
throughout the investment's life-cycle.
Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
What is the date of the risk management plan?
Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since
last year's submission to OMB?
If "yes," describe any significant changes to the Risk Management Plan:

If there currently is no risk plan, will a plan be developed?
If "yes," what is the planned completion date of the risk plan?
If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?



III.B: COST AND SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE BY08

Operational Analysis BY08
Was operational analysis conducted?
If "yes," provide the date the operational analysis was
completed.
Please provide a brief summary of the operational analysis results.

If "no," please explain why it was not conducted and if there are any plans to conduct operational analysis in the future:



Performance Baseline BY08
Complete the following table to compare actual cost performance against the planned cost performance baseline. Milestones




                                                             28 of 32
        SDMS                                                                          BY2008 – President’s Budget

reported may include specific individual scheduled preventative and predictable corrective maintenance activities, or may be the
total of planned annual operation and maintenance efforts.
What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule
Performance information (Government Only/Contractor
Only/Both)?

Comparison of Plan vs. Actual Performance Table


                                                        Planned                         Actual                      Variance
    Milestone            Description of
    Number                 Milestone             Completion         Total       Completion         Total        Schedule (#
                                                                                                                               Cost
                                                   Date             Cost          Date             Cost            days)
Project Totals


IV.A: E-GOV AND LINES OF BUSINESS OVERSIGHT BY08

Partners BY08
Part IV should be completed only for investments identified as an E-Gov initiative or a Line of Business(LOB), i.e., selected the "E-
Gov and LOB Oversight" choice in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. Investments identified as "E-Gov and LOB
Oversight" will complete only Parts I and IV of the exhibit 300.
Multi-agency initiatives, such as E-Gov and LOB initiatives, should develop a joint exhibit 300.
As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for
this joint exhibit 300.

        Stakeholder Table


                 Partner Agency Name                 Partner Agency                   Joint Exhibit Approval Date




        Partnering Strategies BY08
        Provide the partnering strategies you are implementing with the participating agencies and organizations.
        Identify all partner agency capital assets supporting the common solution; Managing Partner capital assets
        should also be included in this joint exhibit 300. These capital assets should be included in the Summary of
        Spending table of Part I, Section B. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's
        exhibit 53)

        Partner Capital Assets within this Investment


        Partner Agency Name Partner Agency Partner Agency Asset Title Partner Agency Exhibit 53 UPI (BY2008)




        Partner Funding BY08
        For jointly funded initiative activities, provide in the "Partner Funding Strategies Table": the name(s) of partner
        agencies; the UPI of the partner agency investments; and the partner agency contributions for CY and BY. Please
        indicate partner contribution amounts (in-kind contributions should also be included in this amount) and fee-for-
        service amounts. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53. For non-IT
        fee-for-service amounts the Partner exhibit 53 UPI can be left blank)

        Partner Funding Strategies


           Partner          Partner       Partner exhibit 53         CY         CY Fee-for-          BY          BY Fee-for-
         Agency Name        Agency          UPI (BY2008)         Contribution     Service        Contribution     Service




        Analysis Background BY08
        An Alternatives Analysis for E-Gov and LOB initiatives should also be obtained. At least three viable alternatives,
        in addition to the current baseline (i.e., the status quo), should be included in the joint exhibit 300. Use OMB
        Circular A-94 for all investments, and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT investments, to determine the criteria
        you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis.
        Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this
        project?
        If "yes," what is the date of the analysis?




                                                               29 of 32
SDMS                                                                          BY2008 – President’s Budget

If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be
completed?
If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:



Alternatives Table BY08
Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

Alternatives Analysis Results


Send Alternative                          Description of Alternative                           Risk          Risk
 to   Analyzed                                                                              Adjusted      Adjusted
OMB                                                                                         Lifecycle     Lifecycle
                                                                                              Costs       Benefits
                                                                                            estimate      estimate
                 Centralize applications, content, and management of SDMS2.
                 Create a national Central Repository. Produce and align
                 content that would be able to populate ECMS. In-house
     Alternative Integration of COTS Enhancements, Data
True
     1           Conversion/Migration and Web technology to align data with
                 Agency Enterprise Architecture (e.g., ECMS, CDX, Web
                 Services) and comply with laws, regulations, policy and
                 guidance.
         Alternative
True
         2
         Alternative
True
         3



Selected Alternative BY08
Which alternative was selected by the Initiative Governance process and why was it chosen?
Alternative 1 was selected for its consistency with the EPA EA strategies, the intent of the President's
Management Agenda for improved access, most cost effective, holding least risk in schedule, and most
consistency with the program direction to ultimately have a one stop source for all Superfund data
management. It provides improved statutory-requirement functionality and brings discipline to the
formatting of content that was lacking in the original SDMS.
What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?
This alternative provides direct benefits that include reducing space requirements and reducing copying
charges. There will also be reductions in lost cases due to poor documentation; reduction in potential for
exposure to litigation; reduction in time spent searching for documents; reduction in errors; ensures
compliance with Congressional mandates and improve response to citizens' requests (FOIA). When
integrated with the other Superfund systems security risks will be reduced by having a single system with
one designated project manager and security plan.

Alternative 1 also best facilitates the use of SDMS as a platform to consolidate other information systems
into a common repository. This strategy will facilitate sharing of services, code libraries, infrastructure,
and enterprise architecture alignments. Alternative 1 is also the most effective approach for achieving
data linkage within the components and across the Agency for other systems, such as ECMS, CERCLIS,
etc.

Quantitative Benefits BY08
What specific quantitative benefits will be realized (using current dollars) Use the results of your alternatives
analysis to complete the following table:

Federal Quantitative Benefits


              Budgeted   Cost           Justification for Budgeted Cost          Justification for Cost Avoidance
                Cost   Avoidance                    Savings
               Savings
PY - 6
2000
PY - 5
2001



                                                       30 of 32
               SDMS                                                                         BY2008 – President’s Budget

               PY - 4
               2002
               PY - 3
               2003
               PY - 2
               2004
               PY - 1
               2005
               PY 2006
               CY 2007
               BY 2008
               BY + 1
               2009
               BY + 2
               2010
               BY + 3
               2011
               BY + 4
               2012
               BY + 5
               2013
               BY + 6
               2014
               BY + 7
               2015
               BY + 8
               2016
               Total LLC
               Benefit




IV.B: RISK MANAGEMENT BY08

Risk Management Plan BY08
You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a
risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the
investment's life-cycle.
Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
What is the date of the risk management plan?
Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last
year's submission to OMB?
If "yes," describe any significant changes to the Risk Management Plan:

If there currently is no risk plan, will a plan be developed?
If "yes," what is the planned completion date of the risk plan?
If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?



Investment Risks BY08
Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:



IV.C: COST AND SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE BY08

Earned Value BY08
You should also periodically be measuring the performance of operational assets against the baseline established during the planning or full
acquisition phase (i.e., operational analysis), and be properly operating and maintaining the asset to maximize its useful life. Operational
analysis may identify the need to redesign or modify an asset by identifying previously undetected faults in design, construction, or




                                                                   31 of 32
               SDMS                                                                          BY2008 – President’s Budget

installation/integration, highlighting whether actual operation and maintenance costs vary significantly from budgeted costs, or documenting
that the asset is failing to meet program requirements.
Are you using EVM to manage this investment? Yes
If "no," explain plans to implement EVM:

Please provide a brief summary of the operational analysis results.

This sub-sections questions are NOT applicable for capital assets with ONLY O&M
Answer the following questions about current cumulative cost and schedule performance. The numbers reported below should reflect current
actual information. (Per OMB requirements Cost/Schedule Performance information should include both Government and Contractor Costs):
What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule Performance
information (Government Only/Contractor Only/Both)?
EVMS "As of" date:
What is the Planned Value (PV)?
What is the Earned Value (EV)?
What is the actual cost of work performed (AC)?
What is the calculated Schedule Performance Index (SPI = EV/PV)?
What is the schedule variance (SV = EV-PV)?
What is the calculated Cost Performance Index (CPI = EV/AC)?
What is the cost variance (CV = EV-AC)?
EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table
(Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well
as milestones in the current baseline.
Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in             Yes
ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?

Cost/Schedule Variance BY08
Is the CV% or SV% greater than 10%? (CV%= CV/EV x 100; SV%=
SV/PV x 100)
If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both?
If "yes," explain the variance:

If "yes," what corrective actions are being taken?

What is the most current "Estimate at Completion"?

Performance Baseline BY08
Have any significant changes been made to the baseline during the past No
fiscal year?
Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline.
In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/
"04/28/2004") and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current
baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the 'Description of Milestone' and 'Percent Complete' fields are required. Indicate 0 for any
milestone no longer active.
If "yes," when was it approved by OMB?
Answer the following questions about the status of this investment. Include information on all appropriate capital assets supporting this
investment except for assets in which the performance information is reported in a separate exhibit 300.

Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline (EGov)


                                                                                                           Current
                                        Initial Baseline                   Current Baseline                Baseline
                Description                                                                                Variance                 Agency
  Milestone                                                                                                               Percent
                     of                                                                                                           Responsible
  Number                          Planned                             Completion                                         Complete
                 Milestone                         Total Cost                           Total Cost      Schedule                  For Activity
                                 Completion                             Date                                     Cost
                                                  (Estimated)                                           (# days)
                                    Date                          Planned Actual Planned Actual
Project




                                                                      32 of 32

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:175
posted:8/25/2012
language:Unknown
pages:32