Docstoc

103353272-1825-2

Document Sample
103353272-1825-2 Powered By Docstoc
					Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page1 of 19




                Exhibit B
                         Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page2 of 19



                1       QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
                          Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
                2         charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
                3       50 California Street, 22nd Floor
                        San Francisco, California 94111
                4       Telephone: (415) 875-6600
                        Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
                5
                          Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
                6         kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
                7         Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603)
                          victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
                8       555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
                        Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
                9       Telephone:     (650) 801-5000
                        Facsimile:     (650) 801-5100
               10

               11         Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)
                          michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
               12       865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
                        Los Angeles, California 90017
               13       Telephone: (213) 443-3000
                        Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
               14

               15       Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
                        LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
               16       INC. and SAMSUNG
                        TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
               17
                                                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
               18
                                     NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
               19

               20       APPLE INC., a California corporation,          Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

               21                        Plaintiff,                    SAMSUNG‟S PROPOSED SPECIAL
                                                                       VERDICT FORM
               22              v.

               23       SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a           Judge:       Hon. Lucy H. Koh
                        Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Place:          Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
               24       AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and Trial:       July 30, 2012 at 9 a.m.
                        SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
               25       AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
                        company,
               26
                                         Defendants.
               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                                       Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                            SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                         Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page3 of 19



                1       We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them under
                        the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case.
                2

                3                                      FINDINGS ON APPLE‟S CLAIMS

                4       APPLE‟S UTILITY AND DESIGN PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST SAMSUNG

                5       1.    For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
                              evidence that Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (“STA”) infringed the
                6             indicated claims of Apple‟s „381, „915 and „163 patents?
                7
                               (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
                8              Samsung). Do not answer for any cell that contains grey shading).

                9       Samsung Product      „381 Patent      „381 Patent     „381 Patent     „915 Patent      „163 Patent

               10                             (Claim 19)      (Claim 19)      (Claim 19)       (Claim 8)       (Claim 50)
                                            Web Browser       Gallery          Contacts      Web Browser      Web Browser
               11                           Application      Application      Application    Application      Application
                        Captivate
               12
                        (JX 1011)
               13       Android Version:
                        2.1-update1
               14
                        Continuum
               15       (JX 1016)
                        Android Version:
               16       2.1-update1
               17       Droid Charge (JX
                        1025)
               18       Android Version:
                        2.2.1
               19
                        Epic 4G
               20       (JX 1012)
                        Android Version:
               21       2.2.1
               22       Exhibit 4G
                        (JX 1028)
               23
                        Android Version:
               24       2.3.3
                        Fascinate
               25
                        (JX 1013)
               26       Android Version:
                        2.2.2
               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                                                Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                     SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                         Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page4 of 19



                1       Samsung Product      „381 Patent   „381 Patent         „381 Patent    „915 Patent     „163 Patent
                                              (Claim 19)   (Claim 19)          (Claim 19)      (Claim 8)      (Claim 50)
                2
                                             Web Browser    Gallery             Contacts     Web Browser     Web Browser
                3                            Application   Application         Application   Application     Application
                        Galaxy Prevail (JX
                4       1022)
                5       Android Version:
                        2.2.2
                6       Galaxy S II
                        (AT&T)
                7
                        (JX 1031)
                8       Android Version:
                        2.3.4
                9       Galaxy S II (T-
                        Mobile)
               10
                        (JX 1033)
               11       Android Version:
                        2.3.5
               12
                        Galaxy S 4G (JX
               13       1019)
                        Android Version:
               14       2.2.1
                        Gem
               15
                        (JX 1020)
               16       Android Version:
                        2.1-update1
               17
                        Indulge
               18       (JX 1026)
                        Android Version:
               19       2.2.1
               20       Infuse 4G
                        (JX 1027)
               21
                        Android Version:
               22       2.2.1
                        Intercept
               23
                        (JX 1009)
               24       Android Version:
                        2.2.2
               25       Mesmerize
               26       (JX 1015)
                        Android Version:
               27       2.1-update1

               28       Nexus S 4G (JX


02198.51855/4915961.5                                                    -3-                          Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                      SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                         Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page5 of 19



                1       Samsung Product        „381 Patent     „381 Patent          „381 Patent    „915 Patent     „163 Patent
                                               (Claim 19)       (Claim 19)          (Claim 19)      (Claim 8)      (Claim 50)
                2
                                              Web Browser       Gallery              Contacts     Web Browser     Web Browser
                3                             Application      Application          Application   Application     Application
                        1023)
                4
                        Android Version:
                        2.3.4
                5
                        Replenish
                6       (JX 1024)
                7       Android Version:
                        2.2.2
                8       Transform
                9       (JX 1014)
                        Android Version:
               10       2.2.2

               11       Vibrant
                        (JX 1010)
               12       Android Version:
                        2.1-update1
               13
                        Galaxy Tab 7.0 (JX
               14       1036)
                        Android Version:
               15       2.3.5

               16       Galaxy Tab 10.1
                        (JX 1037)
               17       Android Version:
                        3.1
               18

               19       2.      For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
                                evidence that Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”) infringed the indicated
               20               claims of Apple‟s ‟381, „915, and „163 patents?
               21                (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
                                 Samsung). Do not answer for any cell that contains grey shading).
               22
                        Samsung Product        „381 Patent      „381 Patent         „381 Patent     „915 Patent    „163 Patent
               23                               (Claim 19)      (Claim 19)           (Claim 19)      (Claim 8)     (Claim 50)
               24                             Web Browser       Gallery              Contacts      Web Browser    Web Browser
                                              Application      Application          Application    Application    Application
               25       Galaxy Tab 7.0 (JX
                        1036)
               26
                        Android Version:
                        2.3.5
               27
                        Galaxy Tab 10.1
               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                         -4-                          Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                           SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                         Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page6 of 19



                1       (JX 1037)
                        Android Version:
                2       3.1

                3
                        [Samsung does not believe that Apple has properly raised an induced infringement claim, but has
                4       listed a proposed verdict form question below in the event the Court disagrees].
                5       3.    a. If you do not find infringement by STA or SEA, skip this question. Otherwise, for
                6             each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence
                              that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”), knowing of the patent(s) you found
                7             infringed, took action that it knew or should have known would induce STA or SEA to
                              infringe that patent(s)?1
                8
                              (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
                9
                              Samsung). Do not answer for any cell that contains grey shading).
               10
                             Samsung Product    „381 Patent   „381 Patent    „381 Patent    „915 Patent   „163 Patent
               11                               (Claim 19)    (Claim 19)     (Claim 19)      (Claim 8)    (Claim 50)

               12                                 Web          Gallery        Contacts        Web           Web
                                                 Browser      Application    Application     Browser       Browser
                                                Application                                 Application   Application
               13
                             Captivate
               14            (JX 1011)
               15            Android Version:
                             2.1-update1
               16            Continuum

               17            (JX 1016)
                             Android Version:
               18            2.1-update1
                             Droid Charge (JX
               19
                             1025)
               20            Android Version:
                             2.2.1
               21            Epic 4G
               22            (JX 1012)
                             Android Version:
               23            2.2.1

               24            Exhibit 4G
                             (JX 1028)
               25            Android Version:
                             2.3.3
               26

               27
                                1
                                There is no evidence that SEC directly infringed the „381, „915 or „163 patents.
               28       Consequently, the verdict form does not include a direct infringement question for SEC.

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                       -5-                            Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                           SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page7 of 19



                1         Samsung Product      „381 Patent   „381 Patent    „381 Patent    „915 Patent   „163 Patent
                                               (Claim 19)    (Claim 19)     (Claim 19)      (Claim 8)    (Claim 50)
                2
                                                 Web          Gallery        Contacts        Web           Web
                3                               Browser      Application    Application     Browser       Browser
                                               Application                                 Application   Application
                4         Fascinate
                5         (JX 1013)
                          Android Version:
                6         2.2.2

                7         Galaxy Prevail (JX
                          1022)
                8         Android Version:
                          2.2.2
                9         Galaxy S II
                          (AT&T)
               10
                          (JX 1031)
               11         Android Version:
                          2.3.4
               12
                          Galaxy S II (T-
               13         Mobile)
                          (JX 1033)
               14         Android Version:
                          2.3.5
               15
                          Galaxy S 4G (JX
               16         1019)
                          Android Version:
               17         2.2.1

               18         Gem
                          (JX 1020)
               19         Android Version:
                          2.1-update1
               20
                          Indulge
               21         (JX 1026)

               22         Android Version:
                          2.2.1
               23         Infuse 4G
                          (JX 1027)
               24
                          Android Version:
               25         2.2.1
                          Intercept
               26
                          (JX 1009)
               27         Android Version:
                          2.2.2
               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                      -6-                            Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                          SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page8 of 19



                1         Samsung Product    „381 Patent   „381 Patent    „381 Patent    „915 Patent   „163 Patent
                                             (Claim 19)    (Claim 19)     (Claim 19)      (Claim 8)    (Claim 50)
                2
                                               Web          Gallery        Contacts        Web           Web
                3                             Browser      Application    Application     Browser       Browser
                                             Application                                 Application   Application
                4         Mesmerize
                5         (JX 1015)
                          Android Version:
                6         2.1-update1

                7         Nexus S 4G (JX
                          1023)
                8         Android Version:
                          2.3.4
                9         Replenish
               10         (JX 1024)
                          Android Version:
               11         2.2.2

               12         Transform
                          (JX 1014)
               13         Android Version:
                          2.2.2
               14
                          Vibrant
               15         (JX 1010)

               16         Android Version:
                          2.1-update1
               17         Galaxy Tab 7.0
                          (JX 1036)
               18         Android Version:
                          2.3.5
               19
                          Galaxy Tab 10.1
               20         (JX 1037)
               21         Android Version:
                          3.1
               22

               23

               24

               25

               26

               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                    -7-                            Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                        SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                         Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page9 of 19



                1
                               b. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
                2              evidence that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”), knowing of the patent(s) you
                3              found infringed, took action that it knew or should have known would induce anyone
                               other than STA or SEA to infringe that patent(s):
                4
                              Samsung Product    „381 Patent   „381 Patent    „381 Patent    „915 Patent   „163 Patent
                5                                (Claim 19)    (Claim 19)     (Claim 19)      (Claim 8)    (Claim 50)
                6                                  Web          Gallery        Contacts        Web           Web
                                                  Browser      Application    Application     Browser       Browser
                7                                Application                                 Application   Application
                              Galaxy Ace
                8
                              (JX 1030)
                9             Android Version:
                              2.2.1
               10             Galaxy S (i9000)
                              (JX 1007)
               11
                              Android Version:
               12             2.2.1
                              Galaxy S II
               13             (i9100)

               14             (JX 1032)
                              Android Version:
               15             2.3.3

               16

               17       4.     For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
                               evidence that SEA or STA infringed the indicated Apple design patents?
               18
                                (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
               19               Samsung). Do not answer for any cell that contains gray shading).
               20
                                    Accused Samsung Product                        D‟677          D‟087             D‟305
               21                                                                  Patent         Patent            Patent
               22            Captivate (AT&T) (JX 1011)

               23            Continuum (AT&T) (JX 1016)

               24            Droid Charge (Verizon) (JX 1025)

               25            Epic 4G (Sprint) (JX 1012)
               26            Fascinate (Verizon) (JX 1013)
               27            Galaxy S 4G (T-Mobile) (JX 1019)
               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                        -8-                            Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                            SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page10 of 19



                1
                             Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031)
                2
                             Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX 1033)
                3
                             Galaxy S II Skyrocket (JX 1035)
                4
                             Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch (JX 1034)
                5
                             Gem (U.S. Cellular) (JX 1020)
                6
                             Indulge (Cricket Communications)
                7            (JX 1026)
                8            Infuse 4G (AT&T) (JX 1027)
                9
                             Mesmerize (US Cellular) (JX 1015)
               10
                             Showcase i500 (C-Spire) (JX 1017)
               11
                             Vibrant (T-Mobile) (JX 1010)
               12

               13                     Accused Samsung Product                          D‟889 Patent
               14            Galaxy Tab 10.1 (logo on front)
               15            Galaxy Tab 10.1 (no logo on front)
               16       [Samsung does not believe that Apple has properly raised an induced infringement claim, but has
                        listed a proposed verdict form question below in the event the Court disagrees].
               17

               18       5.     a. Did Apple prove by a preponderance of the evidence that SEC, knowing of any
                               Apple design patent you found to be infringed, took action that it knew or should have
               19              known would induce anyone other than STA or SEA to infringe any of the following
                               patents:
               20

               21                   Accused Samsung Product          D‟677       D‟087 Patent        D‟305
                                                                     Patent                          Patent
               22                 Galaxy Ace
                                  Galaxy S (i9000)
               23
                                  Galaxy S II (i9100)
               24

               25

               26

               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                 -9-                         Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                  SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page11 of 19



                1

                2            b. If you did not find infringement by STA or SEA in Question 4, skip this question.
                3            Otherwise, do you find that Apple has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
                             SEC, knowing of any Apple design patent you found to be infringed, took action that it
                4            knew or should have known would induce STA and/or SEA to infringe that patent?

                5             Yes _______ (for Apple)         No _______ (for Samsung)
                6       6.   If in response to Question Nos. 1-5 you found that any Samsung entity has infringed
                7            any Apple patent(s), has Apple proven by clear and convincing evidence that the
                             Samsung entity actually knew or should have known that its actions constituted an
                8            unjustifiably high risk of infringement of a valid and enforceable Apple patent?

                9             Yes _______ (for Apple)         No _______ (for Samsung)
               10
                             If “yes,” please fill in the table below with a “Y” for any Samsung entity that you
               11            found actually knew or should have known that its actions constituted an unjustifiably
                             high risk of infringement of a valid and enforceable Apple patent:
               12

               13              Entity     „381         „915         „163       D‟677    D‟087     D‟889    D‟305
                                         Patent       Patent       Patent      Patent   Patent    Patent   Patent
               14                       (Claim 19)    (Claim 8)   (Claim 50)

               15              STA
                               SEA
               16              SEC
               17
                        7.   Has Samsung proven by clear and convincing evidence that Apple‟s asserted utility
               18            and/or design patent claims are invalid?
               19            „381 Patent (Claim 19)           Yes _______ (for Samsung) No _______ (for Apple)
               20
                             „915 Patent (Claim 8)            Yes _______ (for Samsung) No _______ (for Apple)
               21
                             „163 Patent (Claim 50)           Yes _______ (for Samsung) No _______ (for Apple)
               22
                             D‟677 Patent                     Yes _______ (for Samsung) No _______ (for Apple)
               23

               24            D‟087 Patent                     Yes _______ (for Samsung) No _______ (for Apple)

               25            D‟889 Patent                     Yes _______ (for Samsung) No _______ (for Apple)

               26            D‟305 Patent                     Yes _______ (for Samsung) No _______ (for Apple)
               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                   -10-                        Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                    SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page12 of 19



                1       APPLE‟S TRADE DRESS CLAIMS AGAINST SAMSUNG
                2       8.    Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that its asserted unregistered
                3             trade dresses are protectable?

                4             Unregistered Claimed iPhone trade dress

                5             Yes _____ (for Apple)           No ____ (for Samsung)

                6             Unregistered Claimed Combined iPhone trade dress
                7             Yes _____ (for Apple)           No ____ (for Samsung)
                8             Unregistered Claimed iPad trade dress
                9
                              Yes _____ (for Apple)           No ____ (for Samsung)
               10
                        9.    Has Samsung proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple‟s registered
               11             iPhone trade dress is not protectable?

               12                  Yes _______ (for Samsung)          No _______ (for Apple)
               13
                        10.   For each asserted trade dress you found protectable in response to Questions 8 and 9,
               14             has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the asserted trade dress was
                              famous before the time of Samsung‟s alleged use?
               15
                                   In the chart of Question 12, please answer in the “Famous” row in the cell
               16                  corresponding to each asserted trade dress column with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), an
                                   “N” for “no” (for Samsung), or “N/A” for not applicable if the asserted trade dress
               17
                                   was not found protectable. Do not answer for any cell that contains gray shading.
               18
                        11.   For only those products for which you answered “Y” or “yes” in the “Famous” row in
               19             the chart of Question 12, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
                              Samsung diluted the indicated Apple trade dress?
               20
                                   In the chart of Question 12, please answer in each cell corresponding to an accused
               21
                                   product with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung). Do
               22                  not answer for any cell that contains gray shading.

               23

               24

               25

               26

               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                   -11-                       Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                   SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page13 of 19



                1       12.   Please complete the chart below using your responses to Questions 10 – 11.
                2
                                                                                      Dilution
                3
                                                                                                       Claimed
                4                                                 Claimed           Claimed           registered
                               Accused Samsung Product             iPhone           iPhone 3            iPhone
                5                                                Trade Dress       Trade Dress       Trade Dress

                6         Famous?
                          Galaxy S Captivate (JX 1011)
                7
                          Galaxy S Continuum (JX 1016)
                8         Droid Charge (JX 1025)
                9         Galaxy S Epic 4G (JX 1012)

               10         Fascinate (Verizon)
                          (JX 1013)
               11         Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022)
               12         Galaxy S 4G (T-Mobile)
                          (JX 1019)
               13
                          Galaxy S II (AT&T)
               14         (JX 1031)
               15         Galaxy S II (T-Mobile)
                          (JX 1033)
               16         Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch (JX
               17         1034)
                          Galaxy S II Skyrocket
               18         (JX 1035)
               19         Infuse 4G (AT&T)
                          (JX 1027)
               20
                          Mesmerize (Verizon)
               21         (JX 1015)
               22         Showcase i500 (C-Spire)
                          (JX 1017)
               23         Vibrant (T-Mobile)
               24         (JX 1010)

               25
                          Accused Samsung Product                              Dilution of claimed iPad Trade Dress
               26
                          Is the asserted iPad Trade dress Famous?
               27
                          Galaxy Tab 10.1 (logo on front)
               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                               -12-                         Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                 SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page14 of 19



                1
                           Galaxy Tab 10.1 (no logo on front)
                2

                3       13.   If you answered “yes” to Question 8 for Apple‟s asserted iPad/iPad2 trade dress, has
                              Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung infringed the asserted
                4             trade dress you found protectable?
                5             Galaxy Tab 10.1 (logo on front)
                6              Yes _____ (for Apple)            No ____ (for Samsung)
                7
                              Galaxy Tab 10.1 (no logo on front)
                8
                               Yes _____ (for Apple)            No ____ (for Samsung)
                9
                        14.   If you responded “Y” or “yes” to Questions 12 or 13, which of the Samsung entities do
               10             you find liable?
               11
                               STA     Yes _______ No _______
               12              SEA     Yes _______ No _______

               13       [Samsung does not believe that induced infringement is appropriate for Apple’s trade dress
                        claims, but has listed a proposed verdict form question below in the event the Court disagrees].
               14

               15       15.   a. Did Apple prove by a preponderance of the evidence that SEC, knowing of any
                              asserted Apple trade dress you found to be infringed, took action that it knew or
               16             should have known would induce anyone other than STA or SEA to infringe any of the
                              following patents:
               17
                                  Accused Samsung Product                                              Claimed
               18                                                    Claimed         Claimed          registered
                                                                      iPhone         iPhone 3           iPhone
               19
                                                                    Trade Dress     Trade Dress      Trade Dress
               20
                                Galaxy Ace
               21               Galaxy S (i9000)
                                Galaxy S II (i9100)
               22

               23             b. If you did not find infringement by STA or SEA, skip this question. Otherwise,
                              has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that SEC, knowing of Apple‟s
               24             unregistered iPad trade dress, took action that it knew or should have known would
               25             induce STA or SEA to infringe the iPad trade dress?

               26             Yes _______ (for Apple)        No _______ (for Samsung)

               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                  -13-                         Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                    SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page15 of 19



                1       16.   If you found STA and/or SEA liable on any Apple trade dress dilution claim, do you
                              find by clear and convincing evidence that it diluted and willfully intended to cause
                2             dilution of the trade dress?
                3               STA Yes_______ No______
                                SEA Yes_______ No______
                4
                        17.   If you found STA and/or SEA liable on any Apple trade dress dilution claim, did
                5             Apple prove by a preponderance of the evidence that STA‟s or SEA‟s alleged use of
                              the trade dress in fact injured or harmed the trade dress?
                6

                7              STA       Yes _______ No _______
                               SEA       Yes _______ No _______
                8
                        18.   If you found STA, SEA, and/or SEC liable on Apple‟s trade dress infringement claim,
                9             do you find that Apple has proven by a preponderance of the evidence both (a) that
                              STA‟s and/or SEA‟s alleged use of the trade dress is likely to cause confusion among
               10
                              prospective purchasers as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or approval of the
               11             accused Samsung product and (b) that there was actual consumer confusion or that
                              STA‟s and/or SEA‟s actions were intentionally deceptive?
               12
                               STA       Yes______     No______
               13              SEA       Yes______     No______
                               SEC       Yes______     No______
               14

               15       19.   If you found STA, SEA and/or SEC liable on Apple‟s trade dress infringement claim,
                              do you find by clear and convincing evidence that STA, SEA and/or SEC willfully
               16             intended to infringe the trade dress?
               17              STA       Yes______     No______
                               SEA       Yes______     No______
               18
                               SEC       Yes______     No______
               19
                        DAMAGES TO APPLE FROM SAMSUNG
               20
                        20.   Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that its iPhone and iPad
               21             products practice the asserted patent claims?
               22
                              Please fill in the table below with a “Y” for any Apple product that you found
               23             practiced the asserted patent claim: (Do not answer for any cell that contains gray
                              shading).
               24

               25               Entity      „381        „915         „163       D‟677    D‟087     D‟889    D‟305
                                           Patent      Patent       Patent      Patent   Patent    Patent   Patent
               26                         (Claim 19)   (Claim 8)   (Claim 50)

               27               STA
                                SEA
               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                    -14-                        Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                     SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page16 of 19



                1               SEC
                2       21.   On what dates did Apple provide actual notice to STA, SEA, and SEC of Apple‟s
                              patents?
                3
                              Entity     „381        „915      „163      D‟677       D‟087      D‟889      D‟305
                4                       Patent      Patent    Patent     Patent      Patent     Patent     Patent
                5             STA
                              SEA
                6
                              SEC
                7
                        22.   What is the amount that Apple is entitled to receive from Samsung on the claims on
                8             which you have ruled in favor of Apple, if any?
                9
                                       $__________________.
               10
                        23.   If you find that Apple is entitled to receive damages from Samsung, which Samsung
               11             entities are responsible for those damages?
               12              STA     Yes______      No______
               13              SEA     Yes______      No______
                               SEC     Yes______      No______
               14
                        24.   If you find that Apple is entitled to receive damages from Samsung, how is the total
               15             amount of damages stated in Question 22 divided?
               16
                               Lost profits                  $__________
               17              Reasonable royalty            $__________
                               Samsung‟s profits             $__________
               18

               19                                   FINDINGS ON SAMSUNG‟S CLAIMS
               20
                        SAMSUNG‟S UTILITY PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST APPLE
               21
                        25.   For each of the following products, has Samsung proven by a preponderance of the
               22             evidence that Apple infringed the indicated Samsung utility patent claims?
               23             (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Samsung), or with an “N” for “no”
                              (for Apple). You do not have to provide an answer for any cell that contains gray shading.)
               24

               25

               26

               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                  -15-                        Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                   SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                                             Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page17 of 19




                                                                                     „711         „893         „460
                      Accused         „516 Patent            „941 Patent            Patent       Patent       Patent
                       Apple
                      Product
                                  Claim 15    Claim 16   Claim 10   Claim 15        Claim 9     Claim 10     Claim 1

                      iPhone 3G
                      (JX 1053)

                       iPhone
                         3GS
                      (JX 1054
                       and JX
                        1076)

                      iPhone 4
                      (JX 1055
                       and JX
                        1056)

                      iPad2 3G
                      (JX 1050
                       and JX
                        1051)

                         iPod
                        Touch
                       4th Gen.
                      (JX 1057
                       and JX
                        1077)




198.51855/4915961.5                                          -16                           Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                           SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page18 of 19



                1       26.   If in response to Question No. 25 you found that Apple has infringed any Samsung
                              patent(s), has Samsung proven by clear and convincing evidence that Apple actually
                2             knew or should have known that its actions constituted an unjustifiably high risk of
                3             infringement of a valid and enforceable Samsung patent?

                4               Yes _______ (for Samsung) No _______ (for Apple)

                5       27.   Has Apple proven by clear and convincing evidence that Samsung‟s asserted utility
                              patent claims are invalid?
                6

                7             „516 Patent (only as to obviousness)

                8               Claim 15:       Yes _______ (for Apple)   No _______ (for Samsung)
                                Claim 16:       Yes _______ (for Apple)   No _______ (for Samsung)
                9
                              „941 Patent (on all bases)
               10

               11               Claim 10:       Yes _______ (for Apple)   No _______ (for Samsung)
                                Claim 15:       Yes _______ (for Apple)   No _______ (for Samsung)
               12
                              „711 Patent (only as to obviousness)
               13
                                Claim 9:        Yes _______ (for Apple)   No _______ (for Samsung)
               14

               15             „893 Patent (on all bases)

               16               Claim 10:       Yes _______ (for Apple)   No _______ (for Samsung)

               17             „460 Patent (only as to obviousness)
               18
                                Claim 1:        Yes _______ (for Apple)   No _______ (for Samsung)
               19

               20       DAMAGES TO SAMSUNG FROM APPLE
               21       28.   What is the dollar amount that Samsung is entitled to receive from Apple for
               22             Samsung‟s utility patent infringement claims on the „516 and „941 patents?

               23                       $______________________.

               24       29.   What is the dollar amount that Samsung is entitled to receive from Apple for
                              Samsung‟s utility patent infringement claims on the „711, „893, and „460 patents?
               25

               26                       $______________________.

               27

               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                                            Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                 SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
                        Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-2 Filed08/18/12 Page19 of 19



                1                  FINDINGS ON APPLE‟S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST SAMSUNG
                2       BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS AND ANTITRUST
                3
                        30.   Has Apple proven that Samsung breached its contractual obligations by failing to
                4             timely disclose its intellectual property rights (“IPR”) during the creation of the
                              UMTS standard or by failing to license its “declared essential” patents on fair,
                5             reasonable, and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms?
                6              Yes _______ (for Apple)       No _______ (for Samsung)
                7
                        31.   Has Apple proven that Samsung has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act
                8             by monopolizing one or more technology markets related to the UMTS standard?

                9              Yes _______ (for Apple)       No _______ (for Samsung)
               10
                        32.   If you answered “Yes” to Question No. 30 or Question No. 31, what is the dollar
               11             amount that Apple is entitled to receive from Samsung for Samsung‟s antitrust
                              violation and/or breach of contract?
               12
                               $___________________________.
               13
                        PATENT EXHAUSTION
               14

               15       33.   Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung is barred by
                              patent exhaustion from enforcing the following Samsung patents against Apple?
               16
                              (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
               17             Samsung).)
               18
                                                   Samsung Patent                  Exhaustion
               19
                                             „516 Patent
               20

               21                            „941 Patent

               22

               23

               24
                        Have the presiding juror sign and date this form.
               25

               26
                        Signed:________________________________               Date:_______________________________
               27
                                                                                           PRESIDING JUROR
               28

02198.51855/4915961.5                                                   -18                         Case No. 11-cv-01846
                                                                                    SAMSUNG'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:3764
posted:8/20/2012
language:Latin
pages:19