Docstoc

LGRT_Project_-_PIKE_NF_Hayman_Decommission

Document Sample
LGRT_Project_-_PIKE_NF_Hayman_Decommission Powered By Docstoc
					LGRT Project Submission Form - PSICC

   1.      General Information on Project:
 Forest: Pike & San Isabel NF & Cimarron & Comanche NG
 District: Pikes Peak, South Park, & South Platte RD’s
 Road or Trail # Listed Below Project Name:        Hayman EA Roads Decommissioning
 State: CO, County: Douglas, Jefferson, Park and Teller, Congressional District: 5 & 6

 Attach copy of signed RMO – Not applicable; roads slated for decommissioning or
 conversion to trails via approved EA.

 Description/Purpose of the project:

 Road Decommissioning & Road Conversion as listed below, generated from the
 Hayman Fire Roads Management Project Decision Memo, signed 9/4/2004 and the
 Hayman Fire Burn Area Roads Analysis, dated 9/2003.

 This submittal is a combination of three separate District submittals, and could
 accommodate partial funding & accomplishment if necessary.

   PIKES PEAK RANGER DISTRICT

   Roads to Decommissioned
   NFSR         Miles          Unit Cost             Total
   200.B        0.25           $5000                $ 1,250.00
   closed after Hayman, could use more work probably channelized now also need
   fences, etc.
   340.C        0.60           $5000                $ 3,000.00
   closed after Hayman – GONE – channelized ?? – could use some work
   343.A1       0.40           $5000                $ 2,000.00
   need to ground truth – might have closed itself
   343.A2       0.67           $5000                $ 3,350.00
   need to ground truth – might have closed itself
   357.I        0.55           $5000                $ 2,750.00
   Dycks – special use permit road – leave as is
   361.A        0.20           $5000                $ 1,000.00
   Wildhorn campground road – campground decommissioned… not a priority
   362.C        0.20           $5000                $ 1,000.00
   Priority to close
   362.D        0.50           $5000                $ 2,500.00
   Priority to close
   364.B        0.70           $5000                $ 3,500.00
   Priority to close – in drainage
   366.A        2.07           $5000                $ 10,350.00
   A portion was agreed to be left open, need to ground truth
   366.AA 0.50                 $5000                $ 2,500.00
already done – no work necessary
           6.64                      $ 33,200.00

Roads to Motorized Trails
NFSR      Miles          Unit Cost    Total
340.B     1.13           $5000       $ 5,650.00
343.B     0.50           $5000       $ 2,500.00
          1.63                       $ 8,150.00




SOUTH PARK RANGER DISTRICT

Roads to Decommission
NFSR      Miles         Unit Cost     Total
367.A     0.61          $5000        $ 3,050.00
205.A     0.52          $5000        $ 2,600.00
207       0.67          $5000        $ 3,350.00
          1.80                       $ 9,000.00

Roads to Motorized Trails
NFSR      Miles          Unit Cost    Total
215       1.87           $5000       $ 9,350.00
          1.87                       $ 9,350.00

SOUTH PLATTE RANGER DISTRICT

Roads to Decommission
NFSR      Miles         Unit Cost     Total
206       2.00          $5000        $ 10,000.00
211.I     1.96          $5000        $ 9,800.00
211.J     0.30          $5000        $ 1,500.00
211.K     0.40          $5000        $ 2,000.00
211.L     1.44          $5000        $ 7,200.00
211.M     0.41          $5000        $ 2,050.00
360.C     0.65          $5000        $ 3,250.00
522.A     0.16          $5000        $    800.00
525       3.00          $5000        $ 15,000.00
542       5.19          $5000        $ 25,950.00
544       2.01          $5000        $ 10,050.00
          17.52                      $ 87,600.00
   2.     Funding Information: Show dollars ($M) by activity. Project cost should
          include (if appropriate) NEPA, contract preparation, contract administration,
          and indirect costs. (Indirect costs should be included in the appropriate line
          below.

(See funding summary below individual District summaries.)




PIKES PEAK RANGER DISTRICT
Program Area: Roads $ 51,690.00 Trails                     Other
(Must equal FY TOTAL below)
                           $M FY2008
Planning Costs:
Survey & Design Costs                                                    $ 6,205.00
Engineer’s Estimate                                                      $ 41,350.00
Contract Admin Costs                                                     $ 4,135.00
FY TOTAL:                                                                $ 51,690.00

SOUTH PARK RANGER DISTRICT

Program Area: Roads $ 22,470.00     Trails              Other
(Must equal FY TOTAL below)
                           $M FY2008
Planning Costs:
Survey & Design Costs     GS-11 Engineer          4 days @ $320/day =     $ 1,280.00
                          GS-9 Nat Res Specialist 4 days @ $235/day =     $ 940.00
Field Assistance          GS-5 Forestry Tech      4 days @ $150/day =     $ 600.00
Seed for Revegetation                                                     $    300.00
Engineer’s Estimate                                                       $ 18,350.00
Contract Admin Costs                                                      $ 1,000.00
FY TOTAL:                                                                 $ 22,470.00

SOUTH PLATTE RANGER DISTRICT

Program Area: Roads $ 109,500.00 Trails            Other
(Must equal FY TOTAL below)
                           $M FY2008
Planning Costs:
Survey & Design Costs                                                    $ 13,140.00
Engineer’s Estimate                                                      $ 87,600.00
Contract Admin Costs                                                     $ 8,760.00
FY TOTAL:                                                                $ 109,500.00
Funding Summary

Pikes Peak RD          $ 51,690.00
South Park RD          $ 22,470.00
South Platte RD        $ 109,500.00
                       $ 183,660.00

Combined total planning = $        0.00 (planning completed)
Combined total design =    $ 22,165.00
Combined total contract = $147,600.00
Combined total admin. = $ 13,895.00
  3.    Priority Designation: Indicate the Forest priority with an “X” for this project
        (high, medium, low).

   High        X       Medium                 Low


   4.      Criteria: Give a description for those criteria that apply:

   1. Enhancing Watershed Function (How does the project contribute to
      remediation of water quality problems in watersheds listed by EPA as
      impaired under Section 303d of the Clean Water Act?)

        Balances concerns for recreation access and watershed and soil health, it
        maintains or improves water quality to meet federal and state standards, protects
        riparian areas and wetlands from degradation.

   2. Reduction of risk to Human Health and Public Safety (How does this
      project address risks to community drinking water, human health, or
      traveler safety?)

        Restores roads to a safe, environmentally sound condition, and decommissions
        unneeded roads and those causing excessive erosion, water degradation and/or
        habitat degradation, Also provides a safe transportation network in the burn area
        that is reponsive to public needs.

   3. Miles of Aquatic Habitat Made Available (How many miles of habitat
      are made available by remediation of a blockage to aquatic passage at a
      road or trail drainage structure?)

        No data have been collected on the forest to characterize how stream crossings for
        the above-mentioned roads have restricted migration of fish. Suffice it to say that
        some of these roads do have undersized or perched culverts. Removal of these
        blockages would have a positive effect on the survival of resident fish
   populations, particularly in small tributaries where fish migrate seasonally due to
   environmental stresses such as summer and winter temperature extremes.

4. Emergency Repairs to Roads and Trails (How does this project restore
   access, protect investments, and minimize resource damage after an
   event that does not qualify for ERFO funding?)

   Since the catastrophic Hayman Fire event in 2002, the PSICC and its partners
   have been working on a wide variety of rehabilitation efforts for the burned area.
   The proposed work herein is consistent with approved NEPA and management
   plans for the area and its transportation system. These roads were identified in the
   Haymen Fire Roads EA for decommission in order to protect visitor health and
   safety as well as to ensure protection of soils, watershed conditions and wildlife
   habitat. By completing this project we will further our goal to meet the intent of
   the Hayman Fire Roads EA decision and roads analysis to minimize resource
   damage caused by allowing these roads to remain and fall into further disrepair
   due to catastrophic events (heavy rain, loss of soil, increased sedimentation, etc).

5. Partnerships (Does the project leverage available funds?

   No partnership agreements are in place for this work. The project would be
   implemented via contract and/or force account (highly likely contract).

6. Project Readiness (Date that project work is expected to be completed
   (force account) or obligated (contract or partnership)

   This project can be completed in FY2008. Anticipated start date is summer 2008
   using both force account & contract resources. Anticipated completion is fall
   2008.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:7
posted:8/19/2012
language:
pages:5