Docstoc

evaluation

Document Sample
evaluation Powered By Docstoc
					Health and Safety
Executive



Evaluation of CDM 2007


Anthony Lees
Evaluation of CDM 2007

 Background
 Methodology
 Emerging themes
 Constraints and the way forward
 Conclusions
Background

•   History of CDM 2007
•   Baseline Study in 2005
•   Prayer Debate
•   Commitment to early evaluation
•   Expectation of future process
Methodology

•   Baseline study 2006
•   Pilot research 2009-10
•   Main phase research 2010
•   CONIAC working group 2009-10
•   Mixture of qualitative and quantitative
•   Methodology limitations
Emerging themes

•   Consensus – but no consensus
•   Strong evidence of aims met
•   Regulations fit the sector
•   Concerns over application and
    interpretation
•   Bureaucracy
•   Co-ordination
•   Need for honesty over effectiveness of
    ACoP
Constraints and the way forward

•   Change of administration: New approach
    to regulation
•   Lord Young Review: Common Sense,
    Common Safety
•   Löfstedt Review of health and safety
    legislation
•   Red Tape Challenge
•   Skills and the ‘new competence’ agenda
•   Europe
Conclusions

•   Evaluation confirms anecdote
•   Sound basis for future policy development
•   High-level conclusions, but ample detail
    to inform future work
•   Evaluation caught up in radically-widened
    agenda
•   Commitment to continue to work with
    industry

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:40
posted:8/18/2012
language:
pages:7