Docstoc

cec

Document Sample
cec Powered By Docstoc
					                                                                                  Friday, 20 April, 2012.

To the Minister, Hon Tony Burke MP,

The Caldera Environment Centre (CEC) whole-heartedly supports the initiative of the
Commonwealth government to develop the Wildlife Corridor Plan and the CEC also is very
supportive of the proposal to introduce a Wildlife Corridors Act. The CEC also strongly supports
proposal of the prospective corridor initiative of ‘Noosa to Ballina’. Currently, the CEC is engaged in
developing a proposal to establish the Border Ranges Biosphere Reserve in the Tweed, Gold Coast,
Ballina, Byron and Kyogle Shires; the objectives of which merge well with the proposed National
Wildlife corridors initiative and the Noosa to Ballina prospective corridor. The Tweed Shire is a
biodiversity ‘hot-spot’ containing many endemic species as well as overlapping temperate and
tropical species.

The Caldera Environment Centre and its predecessor The Tweed Valley Conservation Trust have
been avid supporters of the Wildlife Corridor concept within and without the Mt. Warning Shield
Volcano Erosion Caldera for the past 35 years. Professional assessments and mapping from John
Hunter (ex. NSW NPWS), Carla Catterall (Griffith University), Dave Milledge (Landmark Ecological
Services) and Mark Kingston (Tweed Shire Council) have helped to define likely “green linkages”,
North-South and East-West across the Caldera.

The first notional corridors utilising steep and mostly vegetated land were incorporated into the first
Tweed Local Environment Plan. More recent mapping has been incorporated into the Border
Rangers Rainforest Biodiversity Management Plan which we strongly support and which we hope
will receive legislative recognition and support. Dave Milledge has been recently engaged in the
assessment and mapping of Tweed coastal corridors.

The CEC has received “in principal support” for a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve for the Mt. Warning
Shield Volcano Bioregion and we are hoping that government agencies will support the Reserve Plan.

We are depending on three publications for scientific support:

    •       Earth Alive by Mary White published by Rosenberg 2003
    •       Border Ranges Rainforest Biodiversity Management Plan, NSW & QLD
    •       Remnants of Gondwana by Kitching, Braithwaite and Cavanaugh published by Surrey,
            Beatty & Sons 2010

We believe adoption of a “UNESCO Biosphere Reserve” for the Mt. Warning Shield Volcano will
enhance the significance of a “National Wildlife Corridors Plan” and vice versa.

In more general terms we believe there is a direct correlation between the quantity and quality of
habitat and the numbers and sustainability of wildlife. Connectivity is obviously a desirable attribute
to the effectiveness and efficacy of wildlife corridors but even island remnants can provide essential
habitat for many mobile species.

Permanent reservation must be the best guarantee for the long term provision of habitat but the
other means using private land can be useful. Many of our land owning members have entered into
contracts with government and conservation agencies to ensure the long term protection of habitat.
“Permanent” habitat reafforestation could be assisted by carbon credit farming schemes.

Climate Change has made the need for Wildlife Corridors even more acute and greater provision for
the long term wide ranging mobility of native species in terms of latitude, longitude and altitude is
increasingly being realised.

About the Biosphere Proposal

The Border Ranges Biosphere Reserve is an evolving project hosted by the Caldera Environment
Centre and supported by the Tweed Shire Council, to develop a local UNESCO Biosphere Reserve
centred on the Mt Warning Erosion Caldera. The ultimate boundaries and government composition
is yet to be determined however it is hoped that the Border Ranges Biogeographic Region may
ultimately be that area of land and water in NE NSW and SE QLD which is comprised of Ballina, Byron
Bay, Lismore, Kyogle, Tweed and the Gold Coast Cities and Shires. The broad template follows the
UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Programme but the detail will be shaped by a consensual
committee process involving local community groups and corporations with the co-operation of the
three levels of government within Australia, and the United Nations internationally.

What is the Border Ranges Biosphere Reserve?
Biosphere Reserve projects were promoted as a conservation/sustainability tool and a major part of
the Man and the Biosphere programme arising from the 1992 Rio Earth Conference.

In principle support has been given by NSW authorities like the northern Rivers Catchment
Management Authority and the North East Regional Office of the National Parks and Wildlife
Service. Local Government bodies have also supported the project including; Tweed Shire Council,
Byron Shire Council and Ballina Shire Council.

Eight years ago the Commonwealth Government Department of Environment and Heritage also gave
its support to the project.

The Border Ranges Biosphere Reserve project aims to fulfil three functions:

    1. A conservation function – contribute to landscape conservation of ecosystems, species and
       genetic variation
    2. A development function – fostering economic and human development which is socio-
       culturally and ecologically sustainable;
    3. A logistic function – provide support for research, monitoring and education and information
       exchange related to local national and global issues of conservation and development.

Biosphere Reserves are organised into three interrelated zones:

       The core area
       The buffer zone
       The transition area

Only the core area requires legal protection and can correspond to an existing protected area such
as a national park or nature reserve. The zonation scheme applied through the biosphere is similar
to the outline of management actions provided in the Draft Wildlife Corridors Plan (2012). Also, the
management structure is aimed at being open, evolving and adaptive in order for the local
community to better respond to external political, economic and social pressures. In this way, the
management of the Border Ranges Biosphere project is similar to the management structure
proposed in the Draft Wildlife Corridors Plan.

Why the Mt. Warning Erosion Caldera?

The Mt. Warning Shield Volcano Erosion Caldera is the remnant of a much higher shield volcano that
has been heavily eroded by windblown moisture from the South Pacific Ocean. The combination of
high rainfall and mineral rich soil has given rise to lush rainforest vegetation with high biodiversity.
The junction of the Border Ranges and the McPherson Ranges is called a biodiversity ‘hotspot’ and
has been nominated as the geographic centre for the Border Ranges Rainforest Biodiversity
Management Plan. UNESCO World Heritage ‘Gondwana’ Rainforests fringe the Mt Warning Caldera.

Threats to the natural environment and local ecology

While the Border Ranges Biosphere Reserve Project is an exciting development that the CEC hopes
to realise in the next few years and happily merges with the priorities and outcomes put forward in
the Draft Corridors Plan, there are still many existing threats to biodiversity in the Tweed Shire. Most
threats to biodiversity are a result of development pressures, and are directly related to rapidly
increasing Tweed Shire population and the development of associated infrastructure (predications
for population growth estimate that the Tweed population will grow from ~90 000 (2012) to more
than 120 000 by 2030). The problem is not necessarily the population growth but the laissez faire
way in which it is being managed by the local council and NSW state governments.

What is not being properly considered, particularly by the state government is (i) the development
of ecologically sustainable communities or housing, and; (ii) the concurrent provision of employment
and industry to provide meaningful, localised work for existing and new residents. While point (ii) is
considered highly relevant for the future economic sustainability of the Tweed Shire, it is somewhat
beyond the terms of reference of this submission. Of more relevant concern is point (i) which
includes the proposed construction of the Cobaki and Kings Forest Development sites and the
proposed Byrrill Creek dam that will be necessary to service them.

Cobaki and Kings Forest Developments – conflating human and ecological functions: multipurpose
wildlife corridors?

The proponents of the King’s Forest and Cobaki Lakes developments within the Tweed Shire have
gradually ben diminishing the environmental qualities of these sites, even to the extent of infiltrating
National Parks Estates and undertaking illegal clearing there
(http://www.tweedecho.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3162&Itemid=538). The currently
approved concept plan includes “multi-purpose” wildlife corridors which the developer proponent
claims will fulfil the functions of wildlife corridor, green open space, bike paths and site drainage.
The CEC does not consider that the proponent is seriously considering the needs of natural ecology
and is merely engaged in an exercise of meeting statutory requirements with as minimal expenditure
as possible.

Koalas
The Tweed Coast Koala Habitat Study (2011http://www.tweed.nsw.gov.au/YourEnvironment/KoalaManagement.aspx),
describes a bleak future for Koala populations in the Tweed Shire, especially for those inhabiting
coastal regions. Without intensive management the Tweed coastal koala population is expected to
decline to the point of localised extinction by 2030. The CEC and its members and affiliates have
been campaigning for a better outcome for coastal flora and fauna since it was established in 1990,
but current development trends tend to rationalise habitat clearing and ignore cumulative impacts
from development of urban areas and housing. It is hoped that with the establishment of an
initiative such as the National Wildlife Corridors Plan, that populations of local species facing
extreme pressures will be able to be more resilient in the future. Also it would be hoped that with
the establishment of the National Wildlife Corridors Act that such blithe conflation of human and
ecological uses as have been currently proposed in the current Cobaki and Kings Forest concept
plans can be avoided

The Byrrill Creek Dam

The Tweed Shire Council is currently considering future water supply options. One of the preferred
options is to construct a dam at Byrrill Creek. The new dam is considered a necessity due to the
expected growth in population of the Tweed shire over the next 20 years. The CEC counters this
official assertion with the claim that Tweed council has done the bare minimum in providing
sustainable water infrastructure to residents and is not properly considering the intent of
Ecologically Sustainable Development (we make this claim with some authority; having been a
member of the Tweed Council working group into the water supply options).




                      Figure 1: Inundation area of the proposed Byrrill Creek Dam

The problem with this proposal is that it will submerge one of the area’s water courses which
remains in good condition. The Draft Corridors plan acknowledges the work of individuals and
groups in undertaking ecological restoration work over the past 30 years; and at Byrrill Creek such
restoration work has been ongoing for the past 10 or more years, an estimated $560 000 has been
spent by state and federal agencies in this time. The results have been impressive with a massive
reduction in weeds along the immediate riparian corridor and a concomitant increase in native
species regeneration.

The final and most serious concern of the Byrrill Creek option is the location (see Figure 1, above).
The proposed dam is situated between conservation areas and will affect the landscape connectivity
between these conservation areas. Similarly because of the local topography, the ecosystems of
valleys within the catchment are distinct from hillsides and mountain tops; the creek and river
valleys of the Tweed Shire are typically defined by subtropical gallery rainforest (Lowland rainforest
on flood plain is listed as an Endangered Ecological Community under the NSW Threatened Species
Conservation Act). The construction of a dam will irrevocably destroy the subtropical rainforest areas
(which have been assiduously maintained by volunteers such as Byrrill Creek Landcare) and sever
vital linkages.

Summary

The CEC has established itself as the Tweed’s leading conservation group by championing the cause
of wildlife corridors since 1990. Our current project to establish a UNESCO biosphere reserve for the
Tweed volcanic region is a complimentary aim to the Draft national Wildlife Corridors plan. It is an
unfortunate fact that the development of the Tweed Shire for residential purposes is placing massive
stresses on the ecology of the region to the point of causing the localised extinction of the Australian
icon, the Koala. Also, it is saddening to see the local council proposing infrastructure solutions that
will destroy regenerating habitat areas and sever vital landscape linkages. The CEC hopes the
recommendations of the Draft Plan become fully manifest and manifold. We endorse the Plan.

Sincerely Yours



Paul HopE Hopkins,
Coordinator Caldera Environment Centre.
[Additional Information supplied by Samuel K. Dawson (BAS Hons),
Secretary, Caldera Environment Centre.]

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:2
posted:8/17/2012
language:English
pages:5