ceo presentation post elections review
Shared by: HC120809154711
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 8/9/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 26
Document Sample


2009 GENERAL ELECTIONS
CHALLENGES EXPERIENCED AND
METHODS OF RESOLUTION
Presentation by: D. C. Bandawe
Chief Elections Officer
Malawi Electoral Commission
8/9/2012 1
1. INTRODUCTION
• The Commission was established following the
enactment of the Electoral Commission’s Act to
specifically conduct elections in Malawi. The
commission was established under Section 75 of the
Constitution of the Republic of Malawi.
• It consists of a Chairman and not less than six other
Commissioners.
2
• Members of the Commission are appointed by the
President in accordance with the Constitution and in
consultation with leaders of the political parties
represented in the National Assembly.
• Currently there is the Chairman and 7 Commissioners.
• The Commission acts as a policy-making/regulatory
authority whose decisions are implemented through a
management team headed by the Chief Elections
Officer.
3
2. CHALLENGES
Summary
• Legal Environment
• Budgeting Process
• Staffing Levels
• Voter Registration
• Massive breaking down of equipment
• Farming Period
• Transportation of Part Bs (Optical Mark
Recognition Forms (OMR Forms)
4
2. CHALLENGES (cont’d)
Summary (Cont’d)
• Computerisation of the Registers
• Inspection of the Registers
• Nomination of Candidates
• Ballot Paper Management
5
A. LEGAL ENVIRONMENT
• Electoral Laws not amended for something
therefore do not conform to the current
environment, for example,
a) Laws governing voting procedure are too
detailed on voting process that would pose a
challenge to the Commission if the
Commission wanted to introduce inventions
in new technology;
6
b) Section 51(e) on Qualifications of Members of
Parliament
• Public Officer to resign from office in order to stand.
Example of MP.
• Intention not clear.
• Restrictive and not in conformity to democratic
principles which call for wide participation.
7
• Campaigning period Vs receipt of nomination
papers.
• Currently the Commission is reviewing the
electoral laws.
8
B. BUDGETING PROCESS
• Budget Preparation
• Adjustment of the budget
• Later budget was revised to its original form
• Only people competent in electoral process
to be involved in budget preparation
9
C. STAFFING LEVELS
• Staff Shortages
• Staff in Finance Section
• Secondment of Staff
10
D. VOTER REGISTRATION
• Inaccurate register entailed commencement of
fresh registration involving instant production of
IDs with voters’ photographs and finger prints.
• Acquisition of supporting equipment to capture
information in the 3897 centres but only 870
pieces of equipment procured.
• Staggering of registration
11
• Massive Equipment Failure
a) Poor handling
b) Equipment vulnerability to untested August
operational environment
12
Corrective Measures Included:-
• Replacement of equipment and acquisition of
spares
• Trained technicians
• Extensions
• Budgetary implications
13
E. FARMING PERIOD
• Registration coincided with farming season
• Patronage slow particularly in the morning hours
• Upon observing long queues, eligible voters
returned without registering
• Also affected bubbling of OMR Forms
Solution
• Intensifying of Civic Education programmes to
mobilise and motivate people.
14
F. RAINY SEASON
• Related to farming season is rainy season
• Eligible voters failed to turn up for registration
• Affected transportation of equipment from
one phase to another
• Cloudy conditions affected performance of
solar panels
15
G. Transportation of Part Bs – Optimal Mark
Recognition (OMR) Forms
• OMR forms transported to MEC Headquarters
for computerisation.
• Use of open trucks Vs vans.
16
H. Computerisation of the Register
• Computerisation of registers took place at MEC HQs where
Part Bs were scanned and stored in the Database.
Challenges
• Forms not properly bubbled
• Forms were dirty because of dust (resulted in scanning
problems)
Solution
• Introduced pre-processing phase
• Another correcting stage was introduced where images
were compared with corresponding scanned information.
17
• Use of wrong codes resulted into mis-
allocation of voters to other centres. At this
stage, this was difficult to detect until the
inspection period.
18
I. Inspection of the Register
• Conducted in order for registered voters to
verify entries on the registers.
• Although poorly patronised but exposed some
inaccurate information on the registers.
• Insufficient information of registered voters
• Swapping of photographs
• Misallocations
• Voters missing in the registers
19
Solution
• ICT made sure that problems reported and noted
were sorted out.
• MEC carried out an in-house verification exercise by
involving teachers and field registration staff.
• Matched information on Part As with information on
the voters register.
• Commission made decision to produce reference
register to carter for those not appearing on the
normal register with photographs.
20
• On polling, Presiding Officers were advised to
accommodate voters not appearing on the roll but
with certificate numbers within the range of that
centre. Details recorded.
21
J. Nomination of Candidates
• Extension of nomination period
• Determination of nomination fees challenged by
political parties
• Eligibility of former President of the Republic of
Malawi.
22
K. Ballot Paper Management
• Award of contracts to the successful bidder Vs two
other bidders.
• Posed challenge to the Commission as it could not re-
open tendering process in view of time factor.
• Mis-prints in two constituencies but corrected before
polling.
• Some opposition parties expressed concerns that
ballot papers were printed without their participation
and concluded that it was a recipe for rigging but the
Commission invited them to be present when taking
delivery of the ballot papers.
23
• The Commission also assured them that it was
neutral and dealing with the matter professionally to
ensure transparency.
• Despite all the assurances, on receipt of ballot
papers, the opposition political parties exerted
unnecessary pressure on officials receiving the ballot
papers.
24
3. CONCLUSION
•Despite challenges highlighted in this presentation,
the 2009 Parliamentary and Presidential Elections
were successfully implemented.
•This was demonstrated by the way Malawians
conducted themselves after the elections.
•It was also manifested in the registration drive in
which 5.9 million Malawians registered out of the
6.2 eligible Malawians.
25
• Voter turn-out was very high – 78% and the number
of null and void votes was the lowest since 1994.
• Reports from Observer Missions also applauded this
year’s elections as successful, peaceful, free and fair
and credible.
26
Get documents about "