Docstoc

Do Search Engines Care About Valid HTML

Document Sample
Do Search Engines Care About Valid HTML Powered By Docstoc
					Do Search Engines
Care About Valid
     HTML?
     Brought to you by:

       Margaret Ortiz
     Affilorama Jetpack
Like most web developers, I’ve heard a lot about the importance of valid
html recently. I’ve read about how it makes it easier for people with
disabilities to access your site, how it’s more stable for browsers, and how it
will make your site easier to be indexed by the search engines.

So when I set out to design my most recent site, I made sure that I validated
each and every page of the site. But then I got to thinking – while it may
make my site easier to index, does that mean that it will improve my search
engine rankings? How many of the top sites have valid html?

To get a feel for how much value the search engines place on being html
validated, I decided to do a little experiment. I started by downloading the
handy Firefox HTML Validator Extension
(http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/) that shows in the corner of the
browser whether or not the current page you are on is valid html. It shows a
green check when the page is valid, an exclamation point when there are
warnings, and a red x when there are serious errors.

I decided to use Yahoo! Buzz Index to determine the top 5 most searched
terms for the day, which happened to be “World Cup 2006”, “WWE”, “FIFA”,
“Shakira”, and “Paris Hilton”. I then searched each term in the big three
search engines (Google, Yahoo!, and MSN) and checked the top 10 results
for each with the validator. That gave me 150 of the most important data
points on the web for that day.

The results were particularly shocking to me – only 7 of the 150 resulting
pages had valid html (4.7%). 97 of the 150 had warnings (64.7%) while 46 of
the 150 received the red x (30.7%). The results were pretty much
independent of search engine or term. Google had only 4 out of 50 results
validate (8%), MSN had 3 of 50 (6%), and Yahoo! had none. The term with
the most valid results was “Paris Hilton” which turned up 3 of the 7 valid
pages. Now I realize that this isn’t a completely exhaustive study, but it at
least shows that valid html doesn’t seem to be much of a factor for the top
searches on the top search engines.

Even more surprising was that none of the three search engines home pages
validated! How important is valid html if Google, Yahoo!, and MSN don’t
even practice it themselves? It should be noted, however, that MSN’s results
page was valid html. Yahoo’s homepage had 154 warnings, MSN’s had 65,
and Google’s had 22. Google’s search results page not only didn’t validate, it
had 6 errors!

In perusing the web I also noticed that immensely popular sites like
ESPN.com, IMDB, and MySpace don’t validate. So what is one to conclude
from all of this?

It’s reasonable to conclude that at this time valid html isn’t going to help you
improve your search position. If it has any impact on results, it is minimal
compared to other factors. The other reasons to use valid html are strong
and I would still recommend all developers begin validating their sites; just
don’t expect that doing it will catapult you up the search rankings right now.
             SPECIAL BONUS
Get Instant Access with the Best Unbeatable Affiliate Program
                    Training On the Web!

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:8/8/2012
language:
pages:4