Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Document Sample


K.U.Leuven
Science and Engineering Reform
Guido Langouche
Marrakech, 12 February 2008
Tempus Reform Project
K.U.Leuven history
1425 foundation
1797 abolition by French authorities
1835 foundation of present catholic
university
1911 start of courses in Dutch
1970 splitting into 2 sister-universities
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Université Catholique de Louvain
Students and Staff
Students: 32,500 Staff: 17,000
55 % female 50 % in university hospital
4,000 international students 1,400 professors (1,000 fte)
[data February 2007]
Budget and Governance
Annual Budget (non-hospital)
Education (ministry) 250 M€
(university pays all salaries, is owner of buildings)
Research (competitive) 350 M€
(fraction of income from industry: 100 M€)
Governance
“free university”
but same funding rules as state universities
Academic Council decides on
- appointments, promotions, evaluations
- study programmes [within legally approved fields]
- internal budget flow (until 2004)
(central university faculty department)
Study Programmes
Programmes:
49 bachelor programmes (3 yrs)
including 2 in English
123 master programmes (1 or 2 yrs)
including 32 in English, 1 French
66 specialized programmes
(‘master after master’)
including 43 in English, 1 Spanish
Diplomas / year:
4,000 master degrees
1,500 postgraduate degrees
450 doctoral degrees
Faculties
13 faculties % of students
Medicine 16 %
Law 13 %
Arts 12 %
Engineering 12 %
Economics 12 %
Psych. & Educ. Sc. 11 %
Science 8%
……
3 “groups”
Arts & humanities 50 %
Science & Engineering 25 %
Bio-medical sciences 25 %
Science and Engineering Group
Faculty of Sciences
2,400 students
5 departments
Faculty of Engineering
3,800 students
7 departments
Faculty of Bio-engineering
1,400 students
3 departments
Reform needed in Science and Engineering
“Walls between faculties too high”
- overlapping research fields but lack of collaboration across
faculty walls
- lack of interdisciplinarity when opening new positions
- lack of study programmes across faculty walls
- students cannot switch between pure & applied sciences
- no master thesis works allowed outside department
- 3 faculty deans do not talk to each other at group level
- budget stream contributes to lack of collaboration:
central university faculty department
How to introduce reform ?
How to bring down walls between faculties ?
by giving extra power to faculty deans
BUT !
extra power only if shared power
2004 reform: Group structure imposed
after intensive discussions approved by academic council
part of decisive power from “academic council” to “group”
reform of study programmes
open positions for professors
internal structure (departments / institutes)
budget flow: central university group department
condition: joint decisions across group needed !
[small board: vice-rector + 3 deans + 3 representatives]
since 2004 being implemented:
students can move more easily cross faculty lines:
e.g.
bachelor in physics master in electrical engineering
new joint study programmes:
[open to bachelors from all 3 faculties]
[choice between engineering track or pure science track]
master of nanoscience and –technology
master of bio-informatics
master of environmental sciences
master of artificial intelligence
since 2004 being implemented:
new joint doctoral school
“Leuven Arenberg Doctoral School in
Science, Engineering and Technology”
- common internet portal
all research positions jointly advertised
(from many different funding agencies)
- common follow-up procedure for doctoral students
Group library
new joint library
15 departmental
libraries suspended
in favour of
1 group library
Conclusion
Implementing University reform by consent is not obvious
Long preparations and negotiations needed
(preceded by international case study report)
Determined University Board needed
(rector and vice-rectors have to speak with one voice)
Offering something in return definitely helps to convince
(‘extra power’)
K.U.Leuven
578 years old but “alive and kicking”
Related docs
Other docs by HC120807232912
Get documents about "