Presentation1 Promotingevidence basedcare
Shared by: HC12080705242
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 8/6/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 18
Document Sample


Making childbirth safer:
Promoting Evidence-based
Care
Name of presenter
Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage Initiative
(POPPHI) Project
Session Objectives
By end of session, participants will be able to
describe/define:
• The global maternal health situation
• Evidence-based care and rationales
• Objective for using clinical evidence
Maternal Mortality and Morbidity:
Scope of Problem
• 180–200 million pregnancies per year
• 75 million unwanted pregnancies
• 50 million induced abortions and 20 million
unsafe abortions
• 600,000 maternal deaths/year (1 per
minute), 99% of which occur in developing
countries
• 30 maternal morbidities for every 1
maternal death
Deaths Worldwide from Complications of
Pregnancy and Childbirth
U ns a f e
a bor t i on
13% H e mor r ha ge
25%
I ndi r e c t
20%
Se ps i s
Ot he r di r e c t
15%
8%
HDP
Obs t r uc t e d
E c l a mps i a
l a bor
13%
7%
Principles of Basic Care
• Based on evidence
• Given by skilled providers in functioning healthcare
system
• Provided in manner respectful of woman, her
newborn and family, and their culture
• Individualized to meet unique needs of woman,
newborn, and family
Objectives of
Evidence-Based Care
• Promote practices based on best available evidence
• Encourage clinicians to:
• Value evidence above mere tradition or habit—
“We’ve always done it this way.”
• Access and evaluate new clinical data as it
becomes available
• Incorporate evidence into daily clinical practice
(i.e., modify practices accordingly)
Objective of using clinical evidence
• To promote care based on best available
evidence
• To encourage practitioners to develop their
skills in obtaining, evaluating and incorporating
evidence into daily clinical practice
In order to achieve that, practitioners should
understand and intellectually evaluate new
clinical data as it becomes available
In an ideal world…
• The most effective care for every condition
is known
• Every clinician has access to and
understands most up-to-date evidence
• Every clinician practices most effective
care s/he knows
In the real world
• Much of what should be known is not known
• Much that is known, is not known by most clinicians
• Clinicians often fail to practice what they know to be
the most effective form of care
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based medicine is the systematic,
scientific and explicit use of current best
evidence in making decisions about the care of
individual patients.
Levels of Evidence and Grades of
Recommendations
Grade of Level of
Interventions
recommendation evidence
Systematic review of randomized
1a
A controlled trials
1b Individual randomized controlled trial
2a Systematic review of cohort studies
2b Individual cohort study
B
3a Systematic review of case-control studies
3b Individual case-control study
C 4 Case series
Expert opinion without explicit critical
D 5 appraisal or based on physiology or bench
research
Importance of Rationales
• Practices should be based on firm rationales
• Provider should know why practice is
important:
• What condition can be detected by conducting
this part of examination?
• What condition may be prevented by giving this
supplement?
• Understanding rationales helps provider
focus assessment and care provision
Meta Analysis
• Is one tool that may allow useful information
to be obtained from multiple studies
• Is systematic evaluation of collection of
several studies which are similar in design,
study populations and outcomes examined
• Combines data appropriately to find answer
to important question in cumulative
information in literature
• Is systematic review of medical literature
Measures of Statistical Significance:
95% Confidence Interval
• Confidence interval: Range in which true
effect size can be found
• 95% chance that true effect size lies within
95% confidence interval
• If confidence interval overlaps 1.0, then there
is a > 5% possibility that observed outcome
difference is due to chance
• Very wide – results less believable
• Very narrow – more believable
Reduced Risk Increased Risk
Confidence Interval
Results consistent
with chance
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Odds Ratio
No Difference
Measures of Statistical Significance:
p Value
• Conventionally set as 0.05
• Equivalent to 5%
• Difference is significant if p value is less than
0.05 (< 0.05)
• Means that there is less than a 5% chance
that the result obtained is due to chance, or
• 95% certain that result obtained by the
intervention is true
Summary
Quality basic care is:
• Based on evidence and rationales
• Evidence-based medicine should be used
to set a standard of care
• New data should be evaluated critically to
determine whether to change standards
• Given by skilled provider in functioning
healthcare system
References
Hulley SB and SR Cummings. 1988. Designing Clinical
Research: An epidemiological approach. Williams and
Wilkins: Baltimore, Maryland.
Get documents about "