It fully understands the pivotal location of the site and of its relationship between the town centre and Cannon Park in terms of design
Shared by: HC12073007510
-
Stats
- views:
- 4
- posted:
- 7/30/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 8
Document Sample


CANNON PARK PLANNING FRAMEWORK AND INDICATIVE MASTERPLAN –
RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION DRAFT
EXECUTIVE MEMBER FOR REGENERATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -
COUNCILLOR DAVID BUDD
DIRECTOR OF REGENERATION - TIM WHITE
Date: 19th August 2008
PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1. The purpose of this report is to:
(i) inform the Executive on the outcome of consultation on the Cannon Park
masterplan; and,
(ii) seek approval of the masterplan as interim planning guidance and
development framework for the regeneration of Cannon Park.
BACKGROUND AND EXTERNAL CONSULTATION
3.2. The Executive approved the Cannon Park masterplan for consultation on 12th Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
February 2008. The aspiration of the masterplan is to create a new retail quarter
for Middlesbrough town centre. This is to meet the need for new retail
development and allow the town centre to grow and to fulfil its strategic role as the
centre of the Tees Valley City Region. The masterplan provides a framework for
investment, promotes high quality design and allows for the creation of a new
urban boulevard approach to the town centre along Newport Road.
3. The formal consultation period ran for six weeks from February 1st to March 14th
2008. This included presentations to key stakeholders and consultation with on
site businesses, the general public and external organisations. The details of how
the consultation was undertaken are attached to this report at Appendix A.
4. The masterplan was covered very positively in the local media during February,
including on several occasions in the Evening Gazette, as well as in the Northern
Echo, Middlesbrough News, Tees Pride, Visit Middlesbrough and Radio
1
Cleveland. The masterplan was also the featured item in national Regeneration
and Renewal journal, where it received positive coverage, stating that the plan
was ‘realistic, optimistic and works hard to deal with the existing constraints on
site.’
RESPONSES
5. In total, 15 written responses were received, 14 telephone responses and 5 visits
in person to the Civic Centre. A summary of the responses and any resulting
actions is attached at Appendix B.
General Support
6. One NorthEast (ONE) welcomed the preparation of the masterplan, and regarded
it as a logical response to the findings of the Middlesbrough Retail Study.
Paragraph 26 provides a fuller explanation of the findings of this study. ONE
welcomes the inclusion of Cannon Park within the town centre and supports the
masterplan proposals. ONE, along with the North East Assembly (NEA), also
welcomes the emphasis that the document places on the achievement of high
quality development, particularly in respect of energy efficiency targets and other
measures to secure sustainable development.
7. NEA applauded the use of design guidelines in the masterplan as a means of
securing high quality design and layout. This is considered to be essential to
secure successful integration with the remaining areas in the town centre.
8. Comments were also received from West Middlesbrough Neighbourhood Trust
which were supportive of the proposals.
9. There was support and approval for plans to improve the town from members of
the public and some existing businesses on site. One comment from an existing
business stated the plans should be ‘encouraged and applauded’. Other existing
businesses wanted their company to be integral to the Council’s plans.
Implications for existing and future leases
10. A number of concerns were expressed from owners and employees of businesses
on site in respect of implications for existing and future leases. Some of the
businesses on site have invested heavily in their premises. They have concerns
that the implementation of the masterplan will see them lose this investment and
the reputation they have established. Concerns were raised over relocation,
whether leases will be renewed and if rents would increase. Respondents also
wanted a definite answer as to whether the Council owned units would continue
trading in the longer term.
11. All the small business units on Cannon Park are leaseholders, with the Council
having the freehold. The concerns raised by businesses have subsequently been
addressed by Valuation and Estates, which has sent a letter to all existing Council
tenants on site, confirming that it is not proposed that their units be part of the
2
redevelopment. The Council will progress lease renewals and new lettings in
respect of all the units as normal.
Reduction in trade and improving units
12. Concerns were expressed that the business units would suffer through decreased
trade once redevelopment was implemented. Several respondents did not wish
Cannon Park to lose its industrial element in favour of retail. It was felt that the
Council should improve the existing units and advertise them more. Several
businesses asked if grants were available to upgrade properties.
13. The area is currently blighted by significant areas of empty and underutilised land
and property. The masterplan proposals will encourage more development,
improve the environment and the offer at Cannon Park and attract more people to
the area and so businesses should see an increase in activity and future
investment. Businesses will have a higher profile, which should benefit their
performance. However, there are no plans to discourage small general businesses
from operating from the dedicated units.
14. In respect of business support, the Economic Development Service currently
offers a range of financial support to businesses which includes start-up and
growth funding as well as grants towards equipment, machinery and marketing. It
also offers a Business Improvement Grant that aims to enhance the environmental
quality of the estates within Middlesbrough and provides support to businesses for
frontage improvements and security measures. These grants are offered on the
basis that sufficient funding is in place to sustain provision. The funding for the
above is expected to be in place until March 2011.
Acquiring freehold
15. Several existing businesses commented that they would like to expand and
acquire the freehold of their site.
16. The Council currently owns the freehold and deals with the maintenance, letting
and management of the units. Under normal circumstances for reasons of estate
management, the Council would not consider disposing of the freehold of the
units.
Timescale of development
17. Several small businesses wanted to know exactly when and where redevelopment
would commence.
18. A more detailed timetable will be produced as proposals and development
strategies evolve, and businesses will be informed accordingly.
Impact on highway network and parking
19. The Highways Agency commented that the proposals are within the scope of the
Local Development Framework (LDF) Regeneration Development Plan Document
3
(DPD) consultation process. The Highways Agency will require a more
comprehensive traffic assessment to determine the implications on the main road
network as part of any planning applications.
20. Concerns were raised by the Town Centre Partnership about parking on the site,
possible access points and congestion once a new supermarket is opened.
21. Full details of all highways and access issues will be developed at a planning
application stage. The masterplan states that a full Transport Impact Assessment
will be required as part of any planning application. The masterplan sets out a
movement framework that will be important to the realisation of the vision. It is
envisaged that three junctions, provided along Newport Road, will serve the
redeveloped site. It is proposed that the improvements along Newport Road will
be of a nature that they will provide for a supercore public transport corridor. This
will form part of the network, linking Middlesbrough and Stockton town centres.
Furthermore, the North Middlesbrough Accessibility scheme will see a new access
road into Riverside Park, taking traffic direct from Newport Roundabout, freeing up
capacity on Hartington Interchange, thus assisting the accessibility of Cannon
Park.
22. Future car parking provision at Cannon Park must be sufficient to support existing
businesses and new development. The masterplan, therefore, seeks the
reprovision of existing car parking on site either on or off site, through a developer
providing a commuted sum or another financial instrument. Parking provision
within the rest of the scheme will need to be sufficient to serve the various new
retail and commercial uses and be assessed once more detailed proposals
emerge.
Wider approach to regeneration
23. West Middlesbrough Neighbourhood Trust raised an issue about the need for an
inclusive approach to regeneration of both sides of Newport Road.
24. The Boulevard and associated landscaping will incorporate both sides of Newport
Road. Major regeneration schemes are currently being progressed on the south
side of Newport Road. These include a new Erimus Housing development at St
Paul’s, the Gresham Housing Market Renewal Area, and the new Aldi superstore
and hotel in a key gateway location into the town. The masterplan proposes that
there will be opportunities to provide enhanced access to the Newport/Gresham
regeneration areas. Improvements to Cannon Park will generate an environment
for investment in the wider area.
Concerns over vitality and viability with the town centre
25. The North East Chamber of Commerce raised concerns regarding the location and
type of retail at Cannon Park, as well as the competition and vitality and viability
with the town centre.
26. The Middlesbrough Retail Study found that whilst there is a strong high street
comparison retail sector, focused in the town centre, the convenience (food
4
supermarket) sector is poorly represented. Just 42% of the expenditure by the
town’s residents is retained within Middlesbrough. This is directly as a
consequence of a comparatively low provision of supermarkets compared to the
surrounding areas. There is also an under representation of bulky goods retailers
in the town, with 68% of residents travelling outside the borough for such
shopping. Much of the expenditure is leaking to out of town centre facilities, such
as Portrack Lane and Teesside Park. A requirement therefore exists within the
town for an additional superstore and for additional bulky goods provision to meet
needs.
27. Policy guidelines on suitable land uses at Cannon Park are given within the
Regeneration Development Plan Document and reiterated within the masterplan.
The eastern end is identified for convenience (supermarket) retail, as this will
provide the greatest propensity for linked trips with the existing town centre. The
western end is identified for bulky goods warehousing, in recognition that this
format of retail development is likely to attract a higher proportion of car-borne
users. High street retail provision will be strictly controlled in this area, in order that
development complements rather than competes with the established core of the
town centre.
Sainsbury’s
28. As part of the consultation process, discussions have been held with Sainsbury’s
regarding its aspirations for the future of their Middlesbrough store and its
relationship with the Cannon Park redevelopment. Sainsbury’s is concerned
about the prospect of another superstore being opened at Cannon Park, but is
keen to positively progress options to enhance its own retail offer and to contribute
more widely to the growth of the town centre as a whole. It fully understands the
pivotal location of the site and of its relationship between the town centre and
Cannon Park in terms of design, connectivity and potential for redevelopment.
29. Further discussions will be held with Sainsbury’s and the outcome considered in
further reports on property and development matters.
United Utilities
30. United Utilities operate the gasholders on behalf of Northern Gas Networks.
United Utilities advised that the gasholders are fully operational and there is no
current proposal to decommission the facility. However, it advises that
redevelopment of the site, in part or whole, has not been ruled out should suitable
redeveloped opportunities arise at some point in the future. However, the
gasholders are not subject to any development proposals within the masterplan
document.
31. Further discussions will be sought with United Utilities and the outcome covered in
a further report.
5
Royal Mail
32. In addition to the formal responses to the consultation exercise there has been
ongoing dialogue with Royal Mail regarding the potential impact of the masterplan
proposals on the sorting and delivery offices and possible relocation. Council
officers have been working to identify suitable alternative locations for these
facilities within the town.
Revising the masterplan
33. The comments received from the consultation period have been noted and
addressed within this report. However, it is not felt necessary to make any
revisions to the masterplan document. This is because comments received
required clarification, rather than seeking substantive changes to the strategy for
development. Some comments have led to more detailed discussions but
fundamentally no revisions are required.
PLANNING POLICY – UPDATED POSITION
34. Since the last Executive report in February 2008, the LDF Core Strategy has been
adopted. This sets out the broad principles for future development of the town
centre. Policy CS13 identifies Cannon Park as an area for town centre expansion
to provide opportunities for continued growth.
35. The Regeneration DPD, which has now been submitted to the Secretary of State,
provides a more detailed policy framework for the development of the town centre
and Cannon Park. Policy Reg 21 requires that a masterplan be prepared setting
out how the LDF policy criteria will be incorporated into the development
proposals. It will need to act as guidance for subsequent planning applications.
36. The Council cannot approve the masterplan as a formal Supplementary Planning
Document (SPD) until after the Regeneration DPD has been through a public
examination and is formally adopted. This is not likely until autumn 2009. An SPD
would provide statutory weight in the determination of a planning application. It is
therefore proposed that the masterplan be endorsed by the Council as an interim
planning document. This will allow the Council to use it as a material consideration
when assessing any planning application for the site, but this will have less weight
in any consideration given by the Secretary of State if any proposal is subject to a
public inquiry in the future.
Next steps
37. If the Executive agree to adopt the masterplan as an interim planning document,
the following steps will be necessary in order to progress implementation:
i. a separate report will be provided to look at the processes which will be
required to take the redevelopment forward and address the Council’s
own property interests; and,
6
ii. Council officers will continue to work with potential development
partners to bring forward achievable proposals for the redevelopment of
the site.
OPTION APPRAISAL/RISK ASSESSMENT
38. Options for the site were presented as part of the masterplan process and were
reported to the Executive on 12th February 2008. As part of the consultation
process, none of the comments received were against the principles of the
masterplan. There is consequently no requirement to make any amendments to
the document.
FINANCIAL, LEGAL AND WARD IMPLICATIONS
Financial implications
39. There are no direct financial implications as a consequence of this report. As
stated in the previous Executive report, the Council has considerable property
interests in the area and whilst there have been broad discussions with potential
interested development parties in respect of the proposals for redevelopment, no
detailed development schemes or cost models have been carried out. This will
form part of the next stages of the process of taking the scheme forward. A further
report detailing the Council’s property interests, the process of how the scheme
will be implemented and how best to optimise the benefits of the scheme will be
reported back to the Executive following this report (see paragraph 37).
Legal implications
40. There are no direct legal implications as a consequence of this report, which is
mainly concerned with reporting back to the Executive the response to the
consultation exercise.
Ward implications
41. The production of the masterplan will have implications for the Gresham Ward in
which Cannon Park is located. The area is directly south of the Middlehaven Ward
and will be beneficial in terms of economic development, potential employment
and environmental improvements.
RECOMMENDATIONS
42. It is recommended that the Executive:
i. note the comments and responses to the consultation exercise;
ii. approve adoption of the masterplan as interim planning guidance; and,
iii. require that a further report on the Council’s property interests be made
to the Executive.
REASONS
43. The recommendations are supported by the following reason:
7
i. to ensure the comprehensive redevelopment of the Cannon Park area
can proceed.
AUTHOR: Sophie White
TEL NO: 729055
sophie_white@middlesbrough.gov.uk
8
Get documents about "