Docstoc

More from DHS insider

Document Sample
More from DHS insider Powered By Docstoc
					More from DHS insider
                      Comment? Leave one at Canada Free Press
By Douglas J. Hagmann




                              18 June 2012: It was not one contact, but a series of
contacts over the last month from which the following information was developed from
my source within the Department of Homeland Security. My initial article citing this
specific source was published on May 8, 2012. This article details my subsequent
contacts with my source beginning after May 14, 2012. Actual dates, times and locations
have been omitted at the request of my source.
Our first meeting
The first words from “Rosebud’s” mouth were various expletives strung together in an
interestingly creative tirade. Based on the uncharacteristically profane welcome that I
thought was directed at me, it was quite obvious that my source was very angry.
“Do you know that the ‘[expletive deleted]-storm’ is still going on because of all the
attention to your article?” Thinking that the “bloom was off the rose” and I was about to
lose a valuable source, I began to remind my source that we agreed on what could be
printed and spoken publicly, and he seemed to have previously come to terms with the
initial blow-back created after the initial information he had given me made the rounds.
My explanation was interrupted by his sudden laughter, a welcome relief from the
tension I initially felt.
“Don’t worry my friend, it’s all good. I just didn’t think the information would have such
staying power. We did the right thing by getting this stuff out there, and I’m convinced of
that,” he stated. “We hit a nerve, and a big one,” he added, allowing me to relax a bit and
feel better about his use of the words ‘we’ and ‘our.’
“I should have told you this before. Having the information first published in Canada was
brilliant. It added a layer of inconvenience beyond their [DHS] containment and control,
and they [Canada Free Press] did a great job with exposure. Make sure you tell them
that. But the pressure is still on to find out where the leaks are coming from, so we’ve got
to change a few operational things. But you’ve got to keep getting the word out while I
take care of some things on my end,” my source instructed.
The first order of business was to establish a different communications protocol, followed
by some information my source wanted to make certain I had correctly or to
reemphasize. “We’re going to hit some more and even bigger nerves in due time, so just
be ready” he added. Ready for what, I wondered.
It’s the economy, stupid
“Before we get into the grit, I want to make sure you’re clear about what we talked about
before, especially about the economy. You know there’s talk at the highest levels about a
coming financial meltdown. When I say the highest levels, I mean the highest. But
certain information is being compartmentalized, and almost no information is being sent
to out-of-the-loop law enforcement agencies about why things are about to get ugly.
They’re getting bigger and better equipment and loving it – not questioning it beyond what
they’re told. But here’s what you need to make sure everyone understands when you
write about our talks: Despite the fact our economy is on life support, DHS will be
budgeting another trillion dollars in surveillance measures and equipment for police state
tactics for two reasons. The first is to protect the politicians and the elite who are
concerned about their physical safety, and rightfully so. This is why you hear no
meaningful objections from either party, because both sides are benefiting, at different
levels, from the controlled economic meltdown. They are all in the pockets of the big
banks, along with the regulators, and so on. They are paranoid. Even the few who aren’t
neck deep in graft – just knee deep. When everything starts to unravel, they will be
exposed as complicit, so they have been reminded not to object to the increase in police
state tactics,” said my source.
“Secondly, everything is preemptive. The power elite are enabling the looting process by
oppressing the truth, so they need to monitor everything. If the top can’t stop the details
from getting out, and I’m not talking about news from [expletive deleted] MSNBC or the
MSM news, but real news, they figure it’s going to get real ugly. DHS is not just being
used as the controlling mechanism to stop people from seeking revenge against the
people in power who caused the financial ruin or simply allowed it to happen, but to
control information through surveillance, intimidation, and force if necessary,” stated my
source.
In response, I told my source that it sounds as if he’s strayed from matters of DHS
concern to the venue of international banking. “I’ve developed my own sources, too, as
I’ve had to make some sense out of parts of this of this along with you. So to that extent,
I had to ask some questions from people I trust who work in that field. Things are very
connected – incestuous,” came his reply.
As noted in my initial report, my source emphasized that an economic collapse and the
resultant societal chaos is now a common threat topic among top-level DHS officials.
[Janet] Napolitano is taking orders from Obama and some people and groups very close
to him and making sure they are carried out, without question.
Simply stated, it’s a two-part process that works together. “They [high-level DHS officials]
are working through their fusion centers to coordinate specific riot control measures with
certain municipalities, and already started the process in the big cities. That’s for ‘blow-
back.’ But they want to keep the specific information from getting out, which is for
control,” he added.
“Why do you think DHS added a bunch of silly domestic threat categories to their list, like
people overly concerned with the U.S. Constitution, the Federal Reserve, and so-called
conspiracies that in any world except their global financial shell game, makes absolutely
no sense,” my source asked rhetorically. “Just make sure you emphasize that there is a
degree of urgency at DHS over this that’s coming right from the top.”
Something drastically changed
“Speaking of threat categories, I’ve never seen the line between genuine terrorist threats
and political enemies blurred like this, ever. You know my history, but others don’t. And
you know we’ve talked before, but not to this extent, because there’s really something
wrong. I’ve been here since [specific month/year omitted, replaced with: during the G.W.
Bush administration] and I started to notice it in 2007. Then, after the financial ‘crisis’ of
late 2008, it seemed like everything changed. The mood under [Michael] Chertoff
became quite different in the latter part of his time at DHS. When [Janet] Napolitano
came in, it became clear that politics trumps true national security,” stated this source.
There is a growing impatience of the top DHS and administration officials. It’s easy to
recognize instructional commands that legitimately serve national security. Instead of
serving legitimate national security threats, it’s about protecting individuals in our
government, and not our country or the people. DHS and certain agencies under DHS
have evolved into a personal security apparatus of government officials, it’s that simple,”
he stated.
DHS is very busy monitoring people and groups considered threats to this
administration, not our country. FISA is disregarded, as is the general rule of law,
something with which this department, under this administration, remains unconcerned.
The ends, which are questionable at best, justify the means in all cases,” stated this
source.
The White House 2012 “war room”
“Right now, it seems as if the duties of DHS overlap those with political issues, such as
the re-election campaign. As I mentioned before and can’t stress enough, the line
between domestic terror threats and political ‘enemies’ is blurred beyond recognition,”
stated my source.
“Understand this: This administration has a very effective mechanism in place to monitor,
in real time, internet posters and postings. This is one group of people who understand
how the internet works, and is using their people to compile potential threats. Not Islamic
terrorist websites, either. American websites and social networks. We are spying on our
own people, not for domestic threats, but for political ones against this administration. it’s
called ‘the war room,’” stated this source. “This is different than the campaign war room
full of young volunteers hopped up on Red Bull and experienced in video games. This is
‘eyes only.’”
I asked for examples of “political surveillance,” and my source had plenty. “Drudge, of
course, [Andrew] Breitbart, although that threat seems to have been timely diminished,
Glen Beck, Sheriff Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse, [Alex] Jones, and a host of
conservative, anti-affordable health care, and anti-abortion sites for others. I’m not going
to get into other names, as we could compromise everything as the list is closely
guarded and updated constantly. And I don’t think I need to specifically mention your
group, do I,” he asked rhetorically.
“Also, this group is often proactive in terms of mitigating potential threats. Their process
is to ‘identify, infiltrate, disrupt, marginalize and ultimately, destroy.’” The last part,
“destroy,” got my attention. Asking how, my source provided a rather vague answer. “In
the most efficient manner possible. The tactics vary. You couldn’t just take down the
Drudge website, for example, but things could be done to weaken its effectiveness in a
number of areas. Remember, the infrastructure of the internet is being more tightly
controlled. Look at the proposed legislation. What do you think that’s for? And it also
depends on the nature of the [political] threat.”
Presuming the answer, I asked the following question nonetheless. What about the FOIA
process as a method of exposure of such tactics? After all, one would think such a
process could be fully corrupted. “Really, that’s your question,” he replied. Enough said.
When asked who ultimately receives briefings about political threats, this source stated
that “after proper ‘formatting’ and ‘coding’ the information ends up at the White House.”
“But in whose hands,” I pressed. Sounding incredulous, he stated “you want me to name
names?” “Yes, I’d really like that” was my reply. “I don’t know all of them as more than
one type of report is compiled, but I can tell you that Valerie Jarrett gets a copy, maybe
the first one. So does [David] Axelrod, but as he’s not on the premises, I don’t know all of
what he gets. But I’ve said all I can about this. Just understand that the level in which this
administration is involved in monitoring and reporting open source communications for
political gain, under the pretext of national security is staggering.”
Drones over America
The bipartisan move to make all U.S. real estate a battle ground was instrumental for a
number of reasons, from the use of drones to the implementation of many of Obama’s
executive orders. “Especially the drones,” said my source. He added that drones are
being used not as they should, but as personal weapons for the advancement of this
administration’s domestic goals. And don’t think that some aren’t armed. They are, and
for a reason.
“Here’s something to look for, a trial balloon of sorts,” stated my source. “Pick a state in
the desert southwest, and consider a hideous threat to our national security. Now, wait
for Obama, Napolitano and representatives of other agencies appear in a solemn news
conference saying that they saved the country from a nearly successful attack on our soil
by using an armed drone to strike a target on the ground before the terrorist attack could
succeed. And the majority of Americans will applaud with pride. It will all be staged,
although the true facts confined to only the highest levels of government.”
The purpose of such an exercise? Condition Americans to believe we need both
surveillance and armed drones flying over our skies to keep us safe.
Connecting the dots
“As I said when you first wrote about our conversation, Obama and his crew don’t have
any obvious plans of going anywhere in 2013. They have no plans to accept any
Supreme Court decision striking down ‘Obama-Care,’ and intend to implement certain
aspects by executive edict, regardless of the decision. I am obviously limited to the
extent of my direct experiences and sources, but Obama is surrounded by a very loyal
group of people in positions of extreme power. The DHS in particular is working on
turning inward on Americans who disagree or stand in the way of his policies. People
need to understand that the DHS is Obama’s personal army. The DOJ, EPA, other
government and non-government agencies and his economic advisors are all working
together to changing this country. They’re all power hungry and lack morality. They’ll
stop at virtually nothing to see that our country is changed and broken beyond repair.
The financial sector is out of control and lining the pockets of our elected leaders. Think
Jon Corzine and Jamie Dimon. Our debt is unsustainable. The class divide, due to crony
capitalism is getting worse. From my vantage point, considering the people I overhear
and am in touch with, these events are not only anticipated, but are being orchestrated in
a deliberate, controlled manner.
Whatever the event, they intend to extend their stay another four years to finish what’s
been started. We will be a Marxist nation and a Banana Republic.”
False Flag – always an option
My source continued: “As we’ve discussed, I heard something that troubled me deeply,
and still does. As Obama’s approval rating dips, desperation becomes more of an issue.
There is much discussion about the racial divide in this country, and as we talked about,
there is an anticipation over the Trayvon Martin case. Depending on how things go, they
are determined to inflate this into a much larger issue, and plan to fan the flames of racial
division to cause a much broader divide resulting in a chaos on the streets.
But a back-up plan might be in the works. Remember, this is just rumor, just talk, but it
makes sense. Something that would cause deep sympathy for Obama and even the First
Family – a false flag operation where Obama or his family would not be in any actual
danger, but it would appear that way. Some sort of a threat or incident against them
carried out by a person or group fitting the fictitious threat categories identified earlier.
Perhaps by a pro-Second Amendment, constitutionalists and racists as well – making the
most out of the fantasy threats to our country. Something that will fool a whole lot of
people and justify police-state like practices. Something that will change the hearts and
minds of as many people as possible, perhaps convincing them that there is a danger
and Obama is right. Just the thought of such a thing is chilling.”
Concluding, my source reminded me of the quote by Adolph Hitler’s Propaganda
Minister Joseph Goebbels: “The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it.”
Note: My source promised more information about the “pass” given to illegal immigrants
shortly. There’s more behind this than votes.




The planned re-election of Obama,
revolutionary style
The Obama administration, including his czars and along with his closest Progressive
supporters, are planning a manufactured insurgency against America.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
The Contact
 7 May 2012: It was not the proverbial 3:00 a.m. phone call, but close enough. And it
was not made to the White House, but to my house, which is not white nor is it in DC. It
was about 2:30 a.m. on 25 April 2012, and the call itself was somewhat unexpected. I
had anticipated the telephone call from my DHS insider much earlier the previous day,
but our schedules didn’t synch up. I was traveling on an investigative assignment, while
my source was in meetings all day. I had just fallen asleep, and was slumbering no more
than 20 minutes when the phone rang.
In most households, a ringing phone at that time of night causes concern for everyone
who hears it. In my household, it seems to surprise only my surly, 140 pound light-
sleeping German Shepherd. He let out an objective grunt as I stepped over him to take
the call in another room. It was “Rosebud,” the code name given of my insider source.
About Rosebud
Just a little bit here about my source and his “super-secret code name.” I’ve known this
government insider since 1979, when he first became a municipal patrol officer. He took
a job in a bigger city and had a very successful run as a cop. Before retirement and after
the events of 9/11, he was tapped by the feds, where he worked in various capacities
under the umbrella of DHS. He worked his way up, and suddenly found himself in what
he terms the inner sanctum of the “TEC” building. TEC, he explains, is an acronym for
what he calls “The Estrogen Challenged,” which houses the upper echelon of the
Department of Homeland Security. I’ll leave it at that.
As far as his code name, it originates from an incident that occurred at the end of the
disco era. It is something that we both privately laugh about, but rarely ever talk about.
His “code name” is known to him, me, and at the time, a young woman who has since
vanished amid the glitter of a disco balls and constant replays of the Bee Gees in a dark
nightclub some 32 years ago and has no “cloak and dagger” origins.
But he is real, his position serious, and his knowledge vast. Unfortunately, that’s what
makes the whole situation frightening and deadly serious.
The information
It began on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 with a 45-minute interview on TruNews with Rick
Wiles when I first disclosed the information I received the previous week from my source.
The information I relayed “went viral,” as they say, across the internet.
To support the statements I made during that interview, I am showing my handwritten
notes taken contemporaneously during our conversation. My notes consist of two pages
and are, at various points, admittedly difficult to decipher. I ask that points not be
deducted for my penmanship given the time of the morning which they were taken.
According to my source, there is talk among the highest levels of the uppermost echelon
of the Department of Homeland Security, which he describes as effectively under the
control of Barack Hussein Obama. During this call, he said that the DHS is actively
preparing for massive social unrest inside the United States. He then corrected himself,
stating that “a civil war” is the more appropriate term. Certain elements of the
government are not only expecting and preparing for it, they are actually facilitating it,”
stated my source.
“The DHS takes their marching orders from the Obama administration, from Obama
himself, but mostly from his un-appointed czars. And Jarrett, especially Valerie Jarrett.
Don’t think for a minute that the administration is doing anything to stabilize events in the
U.S. They are revolutionaries, and revolutionaries thrive on chaos,” he added.
My source stated that he has not seen things this bad since he began working within
DHS. “It’s like they [DHS agency heads] don’t care about what the American people see
or feel about what the DHS agencies are doing. They figure that if the average American
will put up with being “sexually groped and nuked” just to fly, they’ll accept almost
anything. “That’s why their actions are becoming more overt. ”It’s in your face and the
brass actually chuckle about it” said my source.
New Information
Astounded by the information my source provided “going viral,” I spoke to him again
early Sunday morning. This was a scheduled telephone call (as noted on page 2 of my
notes) based on a high level meeting of DHS personnel that was scheduled for and took
place in Chantilly, Virginia on Saturday, 5 May 2012. He hoped to provide me with more
information to supplement that which he already given. Although he was not personally
present, his source was. While he would not say who was at the meeting on Saturday or
give its precise location, he said that the many of the names would be recognizable. He
spoke to his source late Saturday night.
I contacted him on his cellular phone early Sunday morning to get the promised update.
“Geez, nice job on getting the word out about what’s really going on at DHS and in this
administration,” were the first words out of his mouth, followed by “thanks a lot.” I asked
him why he would be thanking me. “I just wanna tell you that I’m going to have to hire
someone to start my car, and I’m surely not going for any rides in small planes in the
immediate future,” he said with a bit of nervous laughter. “I hope no one finds out who I
am or it’s going to be more than my pension I’ll have to worry about.”
“I can tell you word is getting out that people are starting to wake up, which is causing a
lot of ‘pissed off brass.’ I can’t tell if they are more desperate or upset about the
exposure, but the tone is starting to become a lot more tense. I hope that we’re having
something to do with that,” he added.
With that, he provided me with additional information to supplement that which he
already given me on 25 April. For clarity purposes, I have combined the information
together from both contacts. The following information includes the updated information
provided to me Sunday morning.
Obama the revolutionary
Metaphorically speaking, there’s a revolution going on in the U.S., propped up by three
legs. Economic chaos, chaos through racial division, and chaos through class division,
all joined by one core element: Barack Hussein Obama and his stable of unelected
czars. Obama is using the lessons learned in 1968 as the template for 2012, and many
of those who were active in the late 1960′s are now calling the shots for 2012.
“The Obama administration and many of the un-appointed ‘czars,’, either directly or
indirectly, are engaged in covert activities with the occupy movement, various labor
protests, and other subversive activities inside the U.S.,” stated my source. Using
untracked campaign funds, they are paying people to infiltrate the various movements to
cause physical destruction of property and disrupt commerce. That began last year, but
has increased ten-fold already this year,” stated this source. He added that they are
using some lower level DHS agents to make the payments under the context of tracking
subversives, but they are the unwitting subversives. “It’s like Fast & Furious” but in the
social realm,” he added.
“Obama is using some high profile people as pawns to foment the revolution. I heard
several times through very credible sources that [Louis] Farrakhan is on the CIA payroll.
Other have been named as well, but I’m not prepared to identify them yet. Farrakhan is
to coordinate the Blacks and the Muslims to prepare for riots this summer, using any
means necessary.”
“Mentioned at the meeting Saturday were methods to use pawns to simulate the rioting
in the Arab Spring countries, but to the benefit of this administration. A controlled chaos
thing,” stated my source. They envision rioting starting in the urban areas first, such as
New York and other major cities, followed by a disruption of business and commerce.
This will allow the DHS to mobilize their various teams into the streets of America without
objection of the people,” stated my source.
“They want to restrict travel, if not through high energy prices, then by checkpoints and
curfews mandated by rioting and unrest. They understand we are the most well-armed
nation in the world, yet they are aware of our vulnerabilities and intend to fully exploit
them,” he added. The whole purpose is to keep Obama in office for another term, no
matter how unpopular he is, as he is not finished changing our country from a
Constitutional Republic. This is the run-up to the 2012 elections, or perhaps causing
enough chaos to delay them – indefinitely.”
One statement that rattled me more than anything was that a great number of those
already in power, whether in appointed or elected positions, actually want to see Obama
stay in power, according to this source. “This is what we’ve been working toward and
we’re closer now than we’ve ever been. If we lose now, we might not have another
chance.”
This chilling common goal also explains the lack of interest in the Constitutional
legitimacy of Obama. It is common knowledge that Obama is not an American, and
neither is his agenda. Of course, criticism of his bona-fides feeds into the cries of racism,
despite the massive fraud perpetrated on the American people. Party lines are
meaningless when the common objective is the revolutionary overtaking of America.
Obama, the professor of Keynesian economics
“The Obama administration is working closely with Bernanke, Geithner and others not to
save our economy, but to outright destroy it. He is not the first or only one to try this, but
the most effective and most vetted for that purpose. Do you actually think that the fact
that Timothy Geithner’s father worked with Obama’s mother in Indonesia was
coincidental,” stated my source rhetorically. “What we’re seeing now is the fourth quarter
of a game that started long ago, which also currently involves the Clintons. Obama would
not be where he is if it were not for the Clintons, and to a lesser extent, Bush, but that’s
for other reasons. Don’t be fooled, the Clintons never left or lost power,” he added.
“There are file drawers full of papers, heavily guarded papers at the ‘TEC building’ so I
can only imagine what’s in them, about international financial dealings going back
decades. I do know, or at least I was told, that they involve organizations that are the so-
called conspiracy fringe groups, such as the Bilderberg group, the Trilateral Commission,
and people including George Soros, Henry Kissinger, and current leaders of big industry.
Some are fossils. They’ve been around a long time. Others are up-and-coming. They’ve
got one thing in common though, and that is to put in place a global system of
governance, including a common currency. Economics is a huge part of this revolution,
and they want to replace the dollar, to see it collapse. They expect, that is, they are
working toward this very goal, and when this happens, it will cause chaos like never seen
before in the history of this country.”
“Why do you think Jon Corzine is not only walking around, but heavily involved in Obama
fundraising? They know it’s just a matter of time that Europe will implode economically,
and when it does, start counting the days before we see massive hyperinflation and the
ultimate collapse of the U.S. dollar,” stated this insider. ”What will it look like in the
streets of America when the general population realizes that there is no money? That’s
right, chaos.”
Obama & the planned racial divide
According to this insider, the Trayvon Martin case is just the tip of the iceberg. “You
certainly don’t have to be a genius to understand how Obama and his team played the
public on this issue, and it’s far from over. But that’s not the sole element of what we’ll
see this summer.”
“Remember the shots fired at the White House not too long ago,” asked my source.
There was an element of outrage that was squandered, according to ‘team Obama.’ In
fact, Obama and some of his closest advisors, especially [Valerie] Jarrett were incredibly
angered that the outrage was seemingly tempered. It should have been an opportunity to
use our force against the Tea Parties, the gun clingers, the Constitutionalists, and
everyone who has complained about Obama. DHS should have stepped in right then,
and used that event to start the clampdown,” this source stated about White House
comments.
This source stated that from that point on, the DHS must become more responsive and
aggressive.
 Watch for a false flag event against Obama or his family, something that will outrage
‘black America.’ It will be carefully choreographed, but executed in a manner that will
evoke the ugliest of reactions and create racial chaos in this country that will make the
Watts riots, 1968 and the Rodney King riots pale in comparison. That’s the third leg in
this.”
The planned end-game
Does Obama look worried about the upcoming elections? Look at his lavish vacations,
his limited work schedule, and those with whom he is working. This is a very dangerous
man who has, as his closest advisors, people who have orchestrated the revolutions of
the 1960′s. They know the “trigger points” in America.
The Obama administration, including his czars and along with his closest Progressive
supporters, are planning a manufactured insurgency against America. He is using the
media to his advantage to garner both sympathy and support for his unfinished goals. He
is desperately seeking a way to remain in office, even if it means the surreal prospect of
an indefinite postponement of elections – if it can be pulled off. So far, he’s got the
support of the majority of the DHS “brass” behind him, according to my source.
“They’re power hungry, and they want to remain in charge,” stated this source.
The “surreal” aspect of suspended elections won’t look so surreal when you see any or
all of the “trigger points” take place in the not-so-distant future.
“The end-game plan for America is its destruction as a Constitutional Republic, with the
assistance of the agencies under the umbrella of the DHS.”
My source stated one more thing that seemed to tie things together. He urged me to
recall the quote by made by Henry Kissinger who was speaking at a Bilderberg meeting
at Evian, France, on 21 May 1992:
Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order;
tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an
outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very
existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver
them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with
this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well
being granted to them by their world government.
That threat need not be from beyond. All it might take is a world of starving, broke and
desperate people.
Note: My source promised more information at a later time.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:7/29/2012
language:
pages:10