EMSA presentation Comby

Document Sample
EMSA presentation Comby Powered By Docstoc
					Production of reliable and
comparable statistical
information in EMSA:
from raw data to maritime
knowledge

Béatrice Comby                            1


Project Officer - Production and
development of maritime statistics
International Maritime Statistics Forum
Gdansk, 28-30 April 2008
               Raw data



                                                    2



                          Statistical information

Maritime knowledge
1 - Raw data
               3
Scope

  –     Data collected by EMSA belong to Member
        States (“Top up”)
          •   Safe Sea Net => index server
          •   Port State Control => Paris MoU Secretariat
                                                            4

  –     Data purchased with restricted use
          •   Non commercial
          •   Internal


  –     Other data processed with limited mandate
          •   Equasis
          •   Pilot projects with Member States (HNS)
Type

1 – Information systems managed by EMSA

       •   Vessel Traffic Monitoring (Safe Sea Net)
       •   Port State Control (THETIS)
                                                      5
       •   LRIT EU Data Center
       •   Accident investigation
       •   Satellite monitoring (Clean Sea Net)
       •   AIS (STIRES)


2 - Data purchased from commercial providers
   Mainly:
      • Ship particulars
      • Ship movements
Use
Example: calculation of risk profile



                                       At the time of the
SIRENAC (current)
                                       LAST INSPECTION
                                                            6




                                       At the time of the
THETIS (after 2010)                          CALL
            PORT STATE CONTROL COMMITTEE INSTRUCTION 36/2003/04P

              Target factor (TF) =              9



Generic Factor (elements on ship profile)


     4      Targeted Flag                                     1 - MEDIUM Risk                7

     5      Targeted Ship Type                      2 - Gas Carrier more than 10 years old

     0      Recognised Organisation            Yes

     0      Age                             <13 years

     0      Flag State                                   All main conventions ratified

     0      Class                                        1 - Excess of Average ≤0%



                                  Scenario 1
                                 history factor = 0
            PORT STATE CONTROL COMMITTEE INSTRUCTION 36/2003/04P

              Target factor (TF) =             26          X 2,8 compared to scenario1


Generic Factor (elements on ship profile)


    20      Targeted Flag    + 16                          4 - VERY HIGH Risk
                                                                                          8
     5      Targeted Ship Type                   2 - Gas Carrier more than 10 years old

     0      Recognised Organisation           Yes

     0      Age                             <13 years

     1      Flag State           +1                 All main conventions NOT ratified

     0      Class                                       1 - Excess of Average ≤0%




                                        Scenario 2
                                   Scenario 1 + Flag change
            PORT STATE CONTROL COMMITTEE INSTRUCTION 36/2003/04P

              Target factor (TF) =              32           X 3,5 compared to scenario1


Generic Factor (elements on ship profile)


    20      Targeted Flag                                  4 - VERY HIGH Risk
                                                                                           9
     5      Targeted Ship Type                    2 - Gas Carrier more than 10 years old
                                 +3
     3      Recognised Organisation             No

     1      Age                  +1         13-20 years

     1      Flag State                               All main conventions NOT ratified

     2      Class                +2                  3 - Excess of Average >2% - 4%




                                            Scenario 3
                                      Scenario 2 + Class change
              Target factor (TF) =              52
                                                                  X 5,8 compared to scenario 1

Generic Factor (elements on ship profile)


    20      Targeted Flag                                    4 - VERY HIGH Risk

     5      Targeted Ship Type                      2 - Gas Carrier more than 10 years old

     3      Recognised Organisation             No

     1      Age                             13-20 years

     1      Flag State                                All main conventions NOT ratified

     2      Class                                     3 - Excess of Average >2% - 4%
                                                                                                                                 10
History Factor (in the previous 12 months)


            Start date                      28/04/2007

    20      First Time in a Region Port        Yes                   + 20                                Scenario 4
     0      No Inspection < 6 months            No                                                 Scenario 3 + History change
     0      Detained                            No

     0      Number of Deficiencies             1-5

     0      Nb of Outstanding Deficiencies
                                                0            Rectify deficiency at next port
                                                0            Rectify deficiency before departure
                                                0            Rectify deficiency within 14 days
                                                0            Other
     0      All deficiencies rectified          No
2 – Statistical information
                              11
Methodology

Avoid double counting
         •   Flag: the sum of each Member State total does not
             equals the EU total
         •   Late reporting = possible overlaps (ex conflict
             MMSI/flag)
                                                                     12

Ensure correct definitions apply
         •   Ex: build year = 4 different definitions according to
             regulations

Audit quality

Document methodology
Products

Yearly statistics
           •   EQUASIS Publication
           •   Report to COM (RoRo Ferry surveys, banned ships,
               etc..)

Monthly statistics
                                                                  13
           •   EU waters
           •   EU fleet
           •   Key indicators

Ad-hoc
           •   Impact studies
           •   Preparation of visits to Member States
           •   Technical reports
14
15
16
17
18
3 – Maritime knowledge
                         19
Main areas


  –   Coding

  –   Vessels     20




  –   Movements

  –   Cargo
Coding
Example: flag

   –   EU fleet?
   –
   –   Difference between flag and registers. Ex: GB possible registers :
          •     Isle of Man
          •     Bermuda                                                     21
          •     Gibraltar
          •     Cayman Islands
          •     Falkland Islands
          •     British Virgin Islands
          •     St Helena
          •     Antigua
          •     Turks and Caicos Islands
          •     Jersey
          •     Guernsey
          •     Montserrat
Vessels
Example: MMSI / Flag


 SafeSeaNet
                                       National
                                                      22

    LRIT                            administrations
                        Checks
                            /
   THETIS              Validation
                         rules
   STIRES

                                     Other sources
Movements
Example: UNLOCODES




                     23
24
Cargo
Example: Pilot project on HNS transportation


    –   Top up approach at the request of MS

    –   Data collected by national administration
                                                        25




    –   Risk assessment / anti pollution preparedness
      Thank you      26




www.emsa.europa.eu

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:9
posted:7/29/2012
language:
pages:26