propertytax
Shared by: HC120729222048
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 7/29/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 17
Document Sample


Property Tax Reform
An In-Depth Look at the Most
Effective Way of Local
Governments Raising Revenue
Report Compiled By:
• John Kessanis
• Angela Kwon
• Jacob McAreavy
– Professor Richard Lee
November 29, 2006
What is Property Tax?
• Most effective and
efficient means of
raising own-source
revenue for local
governments.
• Role has shrunk due
to legal, political, and
economic constraints
and will continue to
shrink without reform.
The Dilemma…
• Local Government must have a
dependable source of revenue that they
can control and that can raise sufficient
revenue.
– Only property tax can do this, yet without
reform local governments will continue to
relinquish control over basic services to the
state.
NEW JERSEY PROPERTY TAXES
• NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation
• One of the 37 states that collect property taxes at both the state and local levels.
As in most states, local governments collect far more.
- Fiscal Year 2004: at local level NJ collected $18,225,594,000 in property
taxes + at state level NJ collected $3,660,000 in property taxes = combined
state/local property taxes $18,229,254,000.
- At $2,099 NJ’s combined per capita collections were highest in the nation
REASON FOR TAX INCREASE
• Property taxes are based on home values. As home values
appreciate, property taxes rise as well.
• Homeowners living in neighborhoods with rapidly increasing
home prices are hit hardest
• Many homeowners feel property taxes are unfair because taxes
can rise even if homeowners’ income levels don’t increase
– These taxes can increase at a faster rate than income levels
– Can have dramatic effect on homeowners who bought their highly
appreciated homes decades ago at low prices
– Homeowners with fixed income levels, such as retired seniors, may
have to sell their homes because they can no longer afford the
increased property taxes.
• Good idea for New Jersey homeowners to challenge the
assessed value of their home. In many instances, assessments
can get lowered due to correcting assessor mistakes.
WHAT IS BEING DONE?
• The Senate and Assembly passed Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 3 that created
four bicameral, bipartisan joint committees to review and formulate proposals that
address property tax reform
– Joint Legislative Committee on Public School Funding Reform
• Review and formulate proposals that address the manner in which government provides for
maintenance and support of a system of free public schools
• May consider proposals to: provide State support based on student needs rather than
geographic location; eliminate disincentives to regionalization of school districts; control
school district spending, particularly administrative spending; improve effectiveness of current
law limiting increases in school district spending
– Joint Legislative Committee on Government Consolidation & Shared Services
• Review and formulate proposals that address sharing of services and regionalization of
functions at all levels of government
• Consider proposals to consolidate or eliminate State agency functions and State agencies or
commissions
– Joint Legislative Committee on Public Employee Benefits Reform
• Review and formulate proposals that address abuses of system of benefits provided to public
employees, to control the costs of the State and its political subdivisions for public employee
retirement, health care and other benefits.
– Joint Legislative Committee on Constitutional Reform and Citizens Property Tax
Constitutional Convention
• Review and formulate proposals that address property tax reform through amendments to the
Constitution of the State of New Jersey.
• Determine whether amendments to the State Constitution should be recommended to the
Legislature for submission directly to the voters or whether such amendments should be
referred to a citizens property tax constitutional convention to be convened for the purpose of
reforming the system of property taxation.
So….
What are the
ALTERNATIVES?
Alternative #1
• LOCAL-OPTION SALES TAX
– Limited by the inability of local governments to
tax services and necessities, by inter-
jurisdictional competition, and by the various
problems associated with remote sales and
by electronic commerce.
Alternative #2
• LOCAL-OPTION INCOME TAX
– Has a strong political opposition
– It is believed that it will drive wealthy residents
to re-locate.
Alternative #3
• NON-TAX OPTIONS
– User Fees & Charges: adding fees to services
like parks, sanitation, hospitals, parking, etc.
(i.e. Proposition 13 in California)
– Non-tax options are incapable of financing
large portions of local governments.
Alternative #4
• STATE AID
– Federal Aid is almost non-existent in these
days.
– Depends on legislature and is increased or
decreased with little input from individual
cities and counties.
– When states face their own budget deficits,
they often cut state aid to local government.
– State aid hampers local fiscal autonomy.
Solutions
4 Recommendations
For Strengthening
The Property Tax
Solution #1
• EDUCATE THE PUBLIC ON THE VIRTUES OF
PROPERTY TAX
– Negative connotation in “property tax,” yet there are a
number of safeguards in place to protect those
vulnerable to high prop. taxes.
– Property and federal income taxes are the two most
visible taxes which leads to their public hatred.
– If government links tax with the services it provides-
police and education- citizens might be more willing to
accept the tax.
– Residents know what they are paying for and can see
their returns.
Solution #2
• EXPAND THE PROPERTY TAX BASE
– Shrinking tax base= less effective prop. tax.
• Main reason for decline in the tax base is exemptions.
– Limit the amount of acres qualifying for exemptions.
– Setting dollar limits on the amount of property that
can be exempt.
– Imposing user charges on tax-exempt organizations.
– Having the state reimburse local governments for the
costs of exemptions.
Solution #3
• ADOPT A SPLIT-RATE PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM
– Today the tax is levied primarily on the value of the land and improvements
(buildings, etc).
– A simple-rate tax system simply means taxing the property at a different rate
than improvements.
– Property owners accumulate benefits after purchasing the property that are not
based on work or further investment, but rather the work and investment of
others and the prosperity of the society where the property is owned.
• Property owners who are holding land are making money without any economic
contribution.
– In a split-rate system, the land is taxed at a much higher rather than that of the
improvements= encouraging efficient land use= higher cost to hold land=
pressure to use land more productively.
• The improvements however, are taxed at a lower rate and therefore give land owners
more incentive to improve the land.
– Can kill two birds with one stone
• It raises revenue to pay for basic services and also fosters economic growth and
development.
“FIN”
THE END
Get documents about "