Fatigue Failure - PowerPoint
Shared by: HC120727203530
-
Stats
- views:
- 22
- posted:
- 7/27/2012
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 45
Document Sample


Fatigue Failure
Case Studies
Tacoma Bridge
Tacoma Narrows
Washington
Tacoma Bridge
• Built 1940
• Failed 7th November
1940
Tacoma Bridge
• Designed to withstand
winds of 120 mph.
• Failed during a 42
mph wind
Tacoma Bridge
• Failure due to
resonance
• The natural frequency
of the material
occurred at wind
speeds of 42 mph
Tacoma Bridge
• A cable supported
bridge is subject to
wind induced drag
(static), vibration and
buffeting .
Tacoma Bridge
• For modest span
bridges, drag generally
controls the strength
required to resist wind
forces.
Tacoma Bridge
• Vibration becomes
critical when the wind
reaches a critical
velocity that triggers a
self-exited unstable
condition.
Tacoma Bridge
• Buffeting influences
fatigue influences
fatigue of the bridge
materials
Silver bridge
Ohio River
Silver Bridge
• Built 1928
• Eye-bar suspension
bridge
• Total length 2,345 feet
Silver bridge
• The Silver Bridge
was the first eye-
bar suspension
bridge of its type to
be constructed in
the United States.
Silver bridge
• The bridge's eye-
bars were linked
together in pairs
like a chain.
Silver bridge
• A huge pin passed
through the eye and
linked each piece to
the next.
• Each chain link
consisted of a pair
of 2" x 12" bars and
was connected by
an 11" pin.
Silver Bridge
• The bridge collapsed
on 15th December
1967.
Silver bridge
• The cause of failure
was attributed to a
cleavage fracture in
the lower limb of
eye-bar 330 at joint
C13N of the north
eye-bar suspension
chain in the Ohio
side span
Silver bridge
• The fracture was
caused from a
minute crack
formed during the
casting of the steel
eye-bar
Silver bridge
Over the years,
stress corrosion and
corrosion fatigue
allowed the crack to
grow, causing the
failure of the entire
structure.
Hyatt Regency hotel
Kansas City
Hyatt Regency Hotel
• Built in Kansas City,
Missouri in 1978
• A state of the art
facility, this hotel
boasted a 40 story
hotel tower and
conference facilities.
• These two components
were connected by an
open concept atrium.
Hyatt Regency Hotel
• Within this atrium,
three suspended
walkways connected
the hotel and
conference facilities
on the second, third
and fourth levels.
Hyatt Regency Hotel
• Project began in 1976
• Gillum-Colaco
International Inc.
(G.C.E. Inc.) were the
consulting structural
engineering firm.
Hyatt Regency Hotel
• The proposed design
for the walkway’s
Hyatt Regency Hotel
• In the winter of 1978
Havens Steel
Company entered the
contract to fabricate
and erect the atrium
steel for the project
under the standards of
the American Institute
of Steel Construction
for steel fabricators.
The proposed structure of these
walkways was as follows:
• Wide flange beams were
to be used on either side of
the walkway which was
hung from a box beam
• A clip angle was welded
to the top of the box beam
which connected to the
flange beams with bolts
The proposed structure of these
walkways was as follows:
• One end of the
walkway was welded
to a fixed plate while
the other end was
supported by a sliding
bearing
The proposed structure of these
walkways was as follows:
• Each box beam of the
walkway was supported
by a washer and nut which
was threaded onto the
supporting rod Since the
bolt connection to the
wide flange had virtually
no moment, it was
modelled as a hinge.
Hyatt Regency Hotel
• The fixed end of the
walkway was also
modelled as a hinge
while the bearing end
was modelled as a
roller.
Hyatt Regency Hotel
• Due to disputes
between the G.C.E.
and Havens, design
changes from a single
to a double hanger rod
box beam connection
were implemented.
Hyatt regency hotel
• Havens did not want
to have to thread the
entire rod in order to
install the washer and
nut.
This revised design consisted of
the following:
• One end of each
support rod was
attached to the
atrium's roof cross
beams
This revised design consisted of
the following:
• The bottom end went
through the box beam
where a washer and
nut were threaded on
This revised design consisted of
the following:
• The second rod was
attached to the box
beam 4" from the first
rod - additional rods
suspended down to
support the second
level in a similar
manner
Failure
• The design's failure
was due to the
addition of another rod
in the actual design
the load on the nut
connecting the fourth
floor segment was
increased.
Failure
• The original load for
each hanger rod was to
be 90 kN, but with the
design alteration the
load was increased to
181 kN for the fourth
floor box beam
Failure
• Since the box beams
were longitudinally
welded, as proposed in
the original design,
they could not hold the
weight of the two
walkways
Failure
• During the collapse,
the box beam split and
the support rod pulled
through the box beam
resulting in the fourth
and second level
walkways falling to
the ground level.
Example of material failure.
Catastrophic storage tank failure
• October 2005 Antwerp.
• Tank D2; an atmospheric storage tank with a
floating roof and ‘cone-up base, containing
37,000m³ of crude oil failed.
• The tank was 54.5m dia. and 17m high
Section through base of tank
Tank contents
• 40,000m³ = @251600
bbl
• July 07: Brent crude $75
per bbl.
• @ $18 million
• 40,000m³ - assuming a
density of 1,000 kg/m³ =
168 kN/m²
• = 0.168 N/ mm²
Design details
• The base was designed as a cone-up base
• The purpose to allow the run off of any trapped
moisture.
• Due to the poor ground conditions on which the
tank was founded it is assumed a crease was formed
in the tank base during the initial hydrostatic test.
Cont..
• On unloading the steel returned to its original shape
and the crease went undetected.
• Originally constructed in 1971, the terminal
changed ownership in 1990, again the damage went
undetected.
• The crease formed what was effectively a gutter,
trapping water.
Tank base
• The steel in the
region of the crease
began to corrode
resulting in the base
eventually splitting.
• Rupture in base
@200mm wide and
35m in length
Cont..
• The force of the escaping oil resulted in the
sand base fluidising and the tank partially
overturning.
• Upon inspection the remaining tanks were
found to have identical defects.
Get documents about "