The Shrinking Fraternity: Possible Solutions
Document Sample


The Shrinking Fraternity:
Possible Solutions
A presentation designed by:
J. Eddy Roberts for presentation to:
Argenta Lodge #3 F&AM of Utah
Based on “Laudable Pursuit: A 21st Century
Response to Dwight Smith.”
The Problem…
Freemasonry is shrinking…
We will never again see the
membership numbers of the 1940’s,
1950s and 1960s. Historically, these
were an aberration, that we shouldn’t
expect.
We’ve lost about two generations.
The Baby-boomer rejected
Freemasonry and most other things
that their fathers felt important.
We’re at a crossroads and have three
real options
Become a service club, like Lions or
Kiwanis
Join the “Animal Fraternities” and turn
our lodges into Bars and Billiard halls
Return to our roots, and go back to the
Fraternity that George Washington,
Benjamin Franklin and Mozart knew.
PGM Dwight Smith’s Questions and
Pitfalls
In the 1960s PGM Dwight Smith of Indiana asked 10
important questions to the Craft about why we are on
the current path.
Additionally, he remarked on 10 major problems or
pitfalls that he saw, that in his opinion hinder our
progress and undermine our goals.
These questions are presented in his booklet “Whither
Are We Traveling” and the pitfalls in “Why This
Confusion In The Temple?” Both of these works are as
relevant today as when they were written.
Question #1
“Can we expect Freemasonry to retain its past
glory and prestige unless the level of leadership
is raised above its present position?”
• PGM Smith is concerned with the quality of the men
we are placing in the Master’s Chair. Are these men
with Vision? Are they devoted to the Craft? Or are
they just going through the progressive Chairs because
we need a warm body to fill them?
Question #2
“How well are we guarding the west gate?”
• How well are we investigating candidates? Are we
getting the best men possible, or have we lowered our
standards out of concern for falling numbers?
• How long do men labor with us as Entered
Apprentices or Fellowcrafts? How well is the man
known when he is Raised?
Question #3
“Has Freemasonry become too easy to obtain?”
• In 1897, It was estimated that the average lodge
member spent $50 on Dues and Insurance, and $200
on Initiation Fees, paraphernalia, banquets, and travel.
The Income for a factory worker was around $400-500
per year.
• In 2002, these numbers adjusted for inflation would be
$1037 for dues and $4151 for Initiation, etc. on an
adjusted salary of $8301 per year.
• Have we made it too cheep to join? Too easy to obtain?
Question #3 Continued…
• To fix the “shrinking problem,” we have tried a lot of
things, one-day classes, reduced proficiency, etc. These
aren’t helping, much…
• We have tried to appeal to younger men by changing
things that don’t matter to them, but we’re neglecting
the things that they are seeking, the tie to the past – To
Washington, Franklin, and the other masons of history.
• Masonry today lacks the “Specialness” that it once had,
in part, because its too easy and doesn’t require the
commitment that it once did.
Question #4
“Are we worshipping at the altar of bigness?”
• We have too few lodges, and too many buildings.
Historically, and currently (outside the United States),
lodges were no bigger than 50 men, each designed to
appeal to an interest group, profession, or hobby.
Many US Lodges are 100-500 men.
• Many of our buildings sit dark and empty for 25-29
nights of the month. They look old and abandoned
because we aren’t using them. More smaller lodges
would make these buildings look fuller and more used.
Question #5
“What can we expect when we have permitted
Freemasonry to be subdivided into a score of
organizations?”
• For far too long, the blue lodges have allowed
themselves to be the front door for the appendant
organizations, like the Rites, the Shrine, the Grotto, and
Order of the Eastern Star. Many lodges have become
stepping-stones to these organizations, and we have lost
brothers to them. This needs to stop. Although these
organizations all have benefits, they should not be a
substitute to the Blue Lodge.
Question #6
“Has the American passion for bigness and
efficiency dulled the spirit of Masonic Charity?”
• What are lodges doing for the community? The figure
tossed around is that Masons give $2 million a day.
This figure is nearly fifteen years out of date, and relies
on the Shrine for most of that donation. Lets stop
promoting ourselves on the coat-tails of the Shrine’s
philanthropy.
• What has the lodge done for its community? For its
widows and orphans? For its older members? Charity
has been one of our hallmarks, Lets go practice some.
Question #7
“Are we paying enough attention to the Festive
Board?”
• Far too much time in the fraternity is spent in boring
business meetings debating on paying the bills and
reading correspondence from the appendant bodies
wanting us to come support this or that… Are we
paying enough attention to Fellowship? Are we having
fun with our brethern? Lets bring back the festive
board and make it a fundamental, vital part of our lodge
activities.
Question #8
“What has become of that ‘course of moral
instruction, veiled in allegory and illustrated by
symbols,’ that Freemasonry is supposed to be?”
• We need to work on Masonic education. Quit lowering
standards of proficiency. We need to be raising our
standards, not lowering them.
• Additionally, we need to quit racing men to the
Master’s seat. In many lodges when a dedicated
brother is found, he is stuck into a stewards chair and
rushed on up to master. This needs to stop.
Question #9
“Hasn’t the so called ‘Century of the Common-
Man’ contributed too making our fraternity a
little too common?”
• We’ve done ourselves a disservice by expunging the
word temple from our buildings. They should be
temples of learning and ideas. We need to return to
Masonry as a philosophy.
• Dress codes? Every lodge should have one. How
serious can we take ourselves when the master shows
up in shorts and a t-shirt?
Question #10
“Are there not too many well-meaning brethern
who are working overtime to make Freemasonry
something other than Freemasonry?”
• We need to try to return to the roots of freemasonry.
That is what the young men who are looking at the
fraternity are looking for – the masonry of Washington
and Franklin, Mozart and Voltaire.
• Additionally, we need to make ourselves more visible.
We need to take advantage of the free publicity that
movies like “National Treasure” give us.
What are the Pitfalls???
PGM Smith recognized several trends in the
fraternity that he saw as pitfalls and wanted
stopped. Many of them are still happening, lets
put an end to them once and for all.
The Pitfalls 1-4
1. “Abandon the ‘free will and accord’ rule which has
placed our Craft far above the mine run of societies
and permit outright solicitation.”
2. “Ape the service clubs. Get busy on ‘projects’ galore
in the best Babbitt fashion”
3. “Go into the organized do-good business in a big
way. Find an area of the human body that has not
been exploited. Exploit it. Set a quota, have a kick off
dinner, ring the doorbells.”
4. “Subsidize other organizations right and left, and in
the doing, ignore, neglect and starve the parent
body.”
The Pitfalls 5-7
5. “Feminize the Fraternity. Carry “togetherness” to
even more ridiculous extremes than we have already.”
6. “Hire press agents to tell the world, like Little Jack
Horner, what great boys we are. (‘Masonry is not
getting its proper share of publicity’ complains one
Grand Master.) Never mind actions, concentrate on
words.
7. “Imitate Hollywood. Stage an extravaganza. Bring in
all the groups that ever fancied themselves remotely
related to Freemasonry. Form the parade, blow the
bugle, beat the drums, and cheapen the Fraternity.”
The Pitfalls 8-10
8. “Let Freemasonry ‘take a position’ on the public
issues of the day. Stand up and be counted
(assuming, of course, that the position our craft takes
is in like with our own pet prejudices.)”
9. “Go all out for materialism. Raise money; spend it.
Build temples, institutions. Subsidize; endow.
Whatever can be had by writing a check, get it.”
10. “Centralize, centralize, centralize. Pattern
freemasonry after Washington bureaucracy. Let
nothing be done modestly by an individual or a
Lodge; do everything on state or national level the
super-duper way. Make a great to-do about local self
government, but accept no local self-responsibility.”
Sources
“Laudable Pursuit: A 21st Century response to
Dwight Smith” by Nights of the North, 2005.
Internet Produced.
Grand Lodge of Utah Website
Get documents about "