castells by HC12072709405

VIEWS: 0 PAGES: 17

									Crisis or Opportunity?
              Modes of development
•   The technological arrangements through which labor acts upon matter to
    generate the product, ultimately determining the level of surplus. (Agrarian,
    Industrial, and informational). Each MOD is defined by the element that is
    fundamental in determining the productivity of the production process.

•   Each MOD has a structurally determined goal, or performance principle,
    around which technological processes are organized:

•   Industrialism: oriented toward economic growth, that is, toward maximizing
    output

•   Informationalism: oriented toward technological development, that is
    toward the accumulation of knowledge. While higher levels of knowledge
    will result in higher levels of output, it is the pursuit and accumulation of
    knowledge itself that determines the technological function under
    informationalism.

•   Modes of Production (including capitalism) evolve with the process of
    historical change. In some instances, this leads to their abrupt
    supersession; more often, they transform themselves by responding to
    social conflicts, economic crises, and political challenges, through a
    reorganization that includes, as a fundamental element, the utilization of
    new technical relationships that may encompass the introduction of a new
    MOD.
             Three Different MODs

• i. Pre-Industrial (Agrarian MOD)

• Extractive: economy based on agriculture, mining, fishing, timber.
  Increases in surplus result from quantitative increases in labor and
  means of production, including land.

• ii. Industrial- (Industrial MOD)

• Fabricating: using energy and machine technology for the
  manufacture of goods. Source of increasing surplus lies in the
  introduction of new energy sources and in the quality of the use of
  such energy.

• iii. Post-Industrial- (Informational MOD)

• One of processing in which telecommunications and computers are
  strategic for the exchange of
                   Mode of Production:

• A mode of production is characterized by
  the structural principle by which surplus is
  appropriated, thus designating the
  structural beneficiary of such
  appropriation, namely the dominant class.

•   Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: information technology, economic restructuring, and
    the urban-regional process. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass., USA, B. Blackwell: Chap. 1.
                                              Production:
•   The action of humankind on matter (low entropy matter-energy) to
    appropriate and transform for its benefit by obtaining a product, consuming
    part of it (in an unevenly distributed manner), and accumulating the surplus
    for investment in accordance with socially determined goals.

•   Humankind: labor and the organizers of production

•   Labor: internally differentiated and stratified according the role of the
    producers in the production process.

•   Matter: nature, human-modified nature, and human-produced matter.

•   Technology: The type of relationship established between labor and matter
    in the production process through the intermediation of a given set of means
    of production enacted by energy and knowledge.

•   Surplus: The share of the product that exceeds the historically determined
    needs for the reproduction of the elements of the production process

    •Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process.
    Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass., USA, B. Blackwell: Chap. 1.
 The capitalist and statist modes of production
The capitalist mode of production is characterized by:

1. separation between producers and their MOP (means of production)

2. the commodification of labor

3. private ownership of the MOP on the basis of control of commodified surplus
    (capital--e.g., machinery, buildings, tools, computers)

These three features determine the basic principle of appropriation and
   distribution of surplus by the capitalist class.

Capitalism is oriented toward profit-maximizing, that is, toward increasing the
  amount and proportion of surplus appropriated on the basis of control over
  the MOP.

Under the statist mode of production (in the centrally planned economies of
  communist countries) the control of surplus is external to the economic
  sphere: it lies in the hands of the power-holders in the state, that is, in the
  apparatus benefiting from the institutional monopoly of violence. The
  allocation and distribution of goods and services is determined by central
  planning (as opposed to the market as in capitalism). From Castells (1989)
The MAIN PROCESS in the transition to a "post-industrial
  society" is NOT the shift from goods to services. Rather it is
  the emergence of information processing as the core,
  fundamental activity conditioning the effectiveness and
  productivity of all processes of production, distribution,
  consumption, and management (Castells, 1991:10).

The new centrality of information processing results from a series of
  developments in the spheres of: (1) production, (2) consumption, and (3)
  of state intervention.

1. production: emergence of large corporations, the shift from capital-labor
   as key to knowledge (science, technology, management) as key to
   increase surplus

2. consumption: constitution of mass markets, info gathering/info
   distribution. The rise of the welfare state the and millions of jobs in
   information handling

3. State intervention: depends on steering by manipulating info networks,
   increasingly complex administration
Commodity Production: The inner core of capitalist society consists of commodity
production. Commodity production may be characterized as a general social process in
which capitalist firms take materials and equipment, combine these with labor, and then
sell the output for a profit. Process (Castells 1989)


                           LP

 M-C                                  ...P...C' - M‘(etc.)
                           MP
  M = money
  C = commodity
  LP = labor power
  MP = means of production (i.e., tools, machinery, factory, nature)
  P = production
       History and long waves of capitalism i-ii
I. The Great Depression of the 1930s and the decline of the
   laissez-faire model of the pre-Depression era

II. Post-WWII Restructuring, emergence of a new model
    (Keynesianism), based 3 structural modifications:

1. social pact between big capital and big labor (limited
   capital-labor accord)
2. regulation and intervention by the state (limited capital-
   citizen accord)
3. emergence of new global institutions to control the
   international economic order (IMF).

These changes ushered in the golden age of western
  capitalism, a quarter century of unprecedented economic
  growth
History and long waves of capitalism iii-iv
•   III. Crisis of the system in the 1970s. Mechanisms established in the 1930s
    and 1940s created contradictions that thwarted growth in the capitalist
    economy:

     –   *labor steadily increased its share of the product
     –   *social movements imposed constraints
     –   *fiscal crisis strapped the state
     –   *international competition intensified
     –   *oil shock

•   IV. Current period: Capitalist Restructuring in the 1990s and the creation of
    a new model of socio-economic organization based on three fundamental
    processes:

     – 1) the appropriation by capital of a significantly higher share of surplus from the
       production process (click for synical image)
     – 2) a substantial change in the pattern of state intervention, with the emphasis
       shifted from social redistribution to capital accumulation (click for historical data)
     – 3) accelerated internationalization of all economic processes

•   New information technologies have been decisive in the implementation of
    these three fundamental processes of capitalist restructuring.
        Market Rationality vs. Social Rationality
A COMMODITY is the form products (e.g., washing machines, clothes, fast
   food) take when production is organized through exchange in a market
   system. The commodity has two powers: first, it can satisfy some human
   want, that is, it has USE VALUE; second it has the power to command
   other commodities in exchange, a power of exchangeability referred to
   as EXCHANGE VALUE.

Survival in a capitalist economy demands a constant renewal of investment
  aimed at reaching larger and larger markets. This involves market
  rationality.

Market Rationality
Logic tied to the economic pursuit of the highest possible profit. Emphasis
  is placed on the realization of exchange value.

Social (and ecological) Rationality
Logic that takes into account community and solidarity relations (and
  biophysical reality) in a way that prioritizes use value (and sustainability)
  as opposed to the realization of exchange value.
Emphasis on sustainability puts Environment-
 Development interdependencies in a new light.


from       D E       (1960’s-1980’s)


to         ED         (1980’s-2000+)


However, much work needs to be done to get a
 clearer picture of the poverty-environment-equity
 nexus.
To what extent does poverty contribute to environmental degradation?
To what extent do environmental hazards contribute to poverty?


                                      Wealth




        Environment                                                    Development




                                       Poverty

  •There is little evidence of urban poverty being a significant contributor to environmental
  degradation but strong evidence that urban environmental hazards are a major cause or
  contributor to urban poverty. David Satterthwaite (2002)

  •Characterization of a North-South divide is outdated: Globalized rich and localized poor
  (Wolfgang Sachs 2002); Graham and Marvin (2001) Splintering Urbanism

  •Most definitions of poverty used in the South fail to consider health (or access to basic services
  which are essential for health). We need a broader definition of urban poverty (see Friedmann’s
  work on poverty and access to the bases of social power—e.g., defensible life space/housing,
  access to surplus time above the needs of subsistence, social networks, and participation in social
  organizations; esp books on Empowerment 1992, and the Prospect of Cities 2002). Also see
  Evans (2002) Livable Cities.

								
To top