Health and Environmental Concerns
Document Sample


Health and
Environmental
Concerns
Background
Radiation
Natural Background Radiation
Background Radiation
• Remember that
these characteristics
of radiation still
apply
– Time
– Distance
– Shielding
Environmental Impact of
Nuclear Power Plants
1. Impact due to the construction process
2. Effects of nuclear fuel production (fuel
cycle)
3. Radiation exposure to workers and
public during normal operation of the
plant
4. Potential radiation exposure resulting
from an accident
Energy Footprints
Land required for emissions-free generation of 1000 megawatts
Method Requirement / Description Land Area (sq. miles)
Photovoltaic 100 km2 @ 10% efficiency 40
Wind 3,000 Wind Turbines @ 1 MW ea. 40 – 70
Biogas 60,000,000 pigs or 800,000,000 chickens ??
6,200 km2 of sugar beets 2,400
Bioalcohol 7,400 km2 of potatoes 2,800
16,100 km2 of corn 6,200
272,000 km2 of wheat 104,000
Bio-oil 24,000 km2 of rapseed 9,000
Biomass 30,000 km2 of wood 12,000
Nuclear <1 km2 1/3
Idaho National Laboratory & General Atomics Corporation
Environmental Pathways
http://web.ead.anl.gov/resrad
Environmental Modeling
http://web.ead.anl.gov/resrad
Groundwater Modeling
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
"Life-Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Systems and Applications for Climate Change Policy Analysis," Paul
J. Meier, University of Wisconsin-Madison, August, 2002.
Greenhouse Concerns
2 x CO2 4 x CO2
of Existing of Existing
Levels Levels
EPRI
Temperature Rise
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Nuclear Power is Clean
• Without nuclear, CO2 emissions would increase
by between 160 and 180 MMTCe every year, an
increase of at least 10%.
– Annual U.S. CO2 emissions today are 1,600 MMTCe, and this
level is 240 MMTCe over our 1990 annual level of 1,360
MMTCe, our goal under the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
– The carbon savings value of U.S. nuclear plants is over $4
billion each year, based on the National Commission on
Energy Policy report recommended initial price ceiling for
allowances $7/tCO2.
• Without nuclear, U.S. electricity sector NOx and
SOx emissions would increase by 25%.
Environmental Release
• Acid Rain
Contribution
• 1000 MWe
– Nuclear
• SO2 - 0
– Coal (1.5% S)
• SO2 - 90,900 tons
– Fuel oil (0.37% S)
• SO2 - 22,496 tons
Radiation from Burning Coal
• 1 – 10 ppm Uranium
• Thorium ~2.5 times
greater concentration
than Uranium
• Average of 1.3 and 3.2
ppm, respectively
• Effective radiation dose
100 times greater from
a coal plant than a
nuclear plant
http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html
Meteorological Factors
• To understand the relationship between
the rate of discharge and the ground
level concentration
– Atmospheric stability
• (temperature gradient)
– Velocity
– Type of terrain
– Inversion height
– Chimney height
www.fluent.com
Plume Modeling
Gaussian Plume
Q
1 y 2 H 2
C(x, y) exp 2 2
y zU
2 y z
H
h
(X,0,0)
(X,Y,0)
Atmospheric stability
• Pasquill’s categories
A - extremely unstable
B - moderately stable
C - slightly unstable
D - neutral conditions
E - slightly stable conditions
F - moderately stable
conditions
(G - extremely stable
conditions)
Look up the factors in
charts (next slide)
Introduction to Nuclear Engineering,
Lamarsh, 2001.
Pasquill’s Categories
y G y F z G z F
2 3
3 5
Radionuclides
in the Body
• Whole Body • Bone
– 3H – 90Sr
– 14C – 137Cs
– 24Na – 226Ra
– 60Co – 235U
• Submersion – 239Pu
– 41Ar • Thyroid
– 87Kr – 131I
• Lung
– 222Rn
Effects of Whole-Body Exposure Lamarsh,
to Acute Radiation Doses 2001.
Acute dose
Probable observed effect
(rems)
Chromosomal aberrations and temporary depression of white
5 to 75
blood cell levels in individuals. No other observable effects.
Vomiting in 5 to 50% of exposed individuals within a few hours,
75 to 200 with fatigue and loss of appetite. Moderate blood changes.
Recovery within a few weeks for most symptoms.
For doses of 300 rems or more, all exposed individuals will
exhibit vomiting within 2 hours. Severe blood changes, with
hemorrhage and increased susceptibility to infection, particularly
200 to 600 at the higher doses. Loss of hair after 2 weeks for doses over
300 rems. Recovery from 1 month to a year for most individuals
at the lower end of the dose range; only 20% survive at the upper
end of the range.
Vomiting within 1 hour. Severe blood changes, hemorrhage,
infection, and loss of hair. From 80 to 100% of exposed
600 to 1000
individuals will succumb within 2 months; those who survive will
be convalescent over a long period.
Cancer Rates around Nuclear Plants
• Nuclear plant workers have LOWER mortality
than Americans overall
– 35% lower for all cancers
– 66% lower for all non-cancer deaths
• Americans receive more radiation from natural
sources than from nuclear energy plants
– Average resident gets 360 millirem a year from natural
sources
– Average nuclear energy plant worker receives 160
millirem a year
– The limit at plant fence is 5 millirem a year
Nuclear Energy Institute
Energy means Life
Africa China CEE EU France North America
C
20
70
15
60
10
50 5
40 0
0 2,5 5 7,5
Energy consumption per Capita (toe/y)
Life expectancy (years)
% of children dying before the age of 5
World Market for Nuclear Energy, A. Bugat, October 22, 2003, Washington D.C.
Improved Health from Nuclear
Health effect Study Cases/Yr
• Mortality HEI, Pope 30,100
• Respiratory Hospitalizations 4 pooled 20,100
• Asthma ER visits Schwartz 7,160
• Chronic Bronchitis Pooled 18,600
• Asthma attacks Whittemore 603,000
• Lost work days Ostro 5,130,000
• Minor restricted activity Ostro 26,300,000
Abt Associates, Clean Air Task Force, October 2000
Nobody in the U.S. has ever been injured by nuclear energy!
In Case of an Accident
• Emergency Planning Zone
– Plans set in place and public informed
about what to do should an accident occur
• Shelter versus Evacuation
– Extent of radiation release determines
whether to hide in shelters or move away
from the accident
• KI for 72 hours keeps radioactive iodine
from concentrating in your thyroid
Risk Comparisons
Cochran and Tsoulfanidis, 1990
Examples and Problems
• Plume Model
Other docs by HC12072703244
They can use the biogas on site as a replacement for the farm s own natural gas or
Views: 7 | Downloads: 0
Get documents about "