Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out

The future for translators looks bright

VIEWS: 6 PAGES: 5

									The future for translators looks bright, but they will
have to reinvent the profession first
Seven predictions and a survey presented at the 19th FIT Conference, San Francisco, August
2011.

Translators in the 21st century find themselves in a difficult position. On the one hand there is a
steadily growing demand for translation as a result of increasing global trade and communication
generally. On the other hand it becomes harder and harder for the professional translator to meet
this demand. Delivery times grow shorter and prices go down.

Technology is often thought of as an answer to this kind of pressure. But along with the
technology come many new challenges. It is simply impossible for a translator who is trained in
the language arts to keep up with the technology. And if she tries, frustration grows when she
finds out that translation tools do not really work together very well. (See report Individual
translators and data exchange standards.)

Then there are the economics. As the owner of a small business, translators must weigh the
return-on-investment on time and money very carefully. Tools do not come for free and every new
tool takes time to be mastered. What if these same tools – or machine translation – one day take
over the job of human translators, as many of our colleagues fear. You might prefer to live on
another planet, or at least work in another profession.

For the 19th FIT Conference held in San Francisco, 1-4 August 2011, TAUS ran a survey among the
translators attending the conference. This article references a summary of the survey, and then
makes seven predictions as a follow up to the keynote I gave to close the FIT event. The
conclusion: the future for translators looks bright, but they will have to reinvent the profession
first.

Crisis. What crisis?

In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, sixty-four (37%) of the survey respondents reported
that translation rates continue to be under pressure. There seems to be a slight decline in
translation volume, while the palette of languages seems to be broadening slightly. Thirty-seven
respondents (21%) see business continuing as usual, while respectively 12% and 10% of them see
opportunities for automation and innovation in the currently unstable market.

Which of the following technologies and/or innovations will translators apply in the coming two
years? Sixty percent of the respondents say ‘no’ to machine translation, while 19% are already
using it, and 21% expect they will use MT within the next two years. The main concerns about MT
are the poor quality of MT output (76%) and the poor quality of source documents (54%). Those
who look at MT on the bright side see cost reduction as the greatest benefit (39%) and the
possibility of real-time delivery of translation as a secondary benefit (35%).

A majority of the respondents are interested in sharing translation memories and terminology: 35%
already do so and 39% expect to be sharing language data within two years. However, another
much larger poll by ProZ.com of 1,000 translators indicates that 49% would not consider sharing
their translation memories. Translators are concerned about ownership of TMs and their relevance
to the job at hand. But they do see the benefits of terminology searches of massive TM resources
and the productivity gains these bring.
Click here for a summary of the full survey.

The future looks bright, but …

… change is the name of the game. And reinventing the profession is extremely hard if your days
are spent just getting the jobs done and trying to make a modest living. Yet, for the first time in
the history of the planet, translation is a really strategic activity. Thanks to Google Translate,
Yahoo! Babelfish and Microsoft Bing, every soul on our planet now knows what translation means.

Hundreds of millions people press the translate button every day which makes them realize how
difficult it is to get a good, accurate translation. As professionals we must realize that our
community is far too small (just 250,000 or so professional translators in a world of 6,000
languages?) to serve the needs of seven billion citizens.

We are only scratching the surface. As professional translators – and as a global translation
industry – our mission is to help the world communicate better. (That sounds better than being a
lawyer or a banker, right?) For we now have the means to deliver on that mission. We simply need
to find a way to do it properly. Here is how TAUS sees the future in seven predictions.

1. MT is here to stay
Let’s face it: machine translation will never be perfect. Every speaker of a language has the right
to introduce new words, give existing words new meanings and change the spelling and grammar
of his language. The point is: that’s what people do every day – witness Twitter or online chat,
popular songs or political revolutions.
Computers just cannot keep up with these evolving nuances and associations in hundreds of
domains and linguaspheres created by speakers of just one language. Yet, MT for all its
mechanical faults is here to stay. Why? For the simple reason that we humans just cannot deliver
enough translations in real-time.

Two other factors will also influence the rapid growth of MT. First, MT is getting better and better
as we keep feeding the engines with human translated sentences to improve their domain
knowledge and we keep tweaking the rules to improve the word order and forms. Second, a new
generation of users are growing up, they are more forgiving, and open to self-service. Users may
even step in and offer better terminology and forms of expression as a way to help others and
themselves.

MT is here to stay and will be called “translation”. It will be embedded on every website, mobile
and car app. Translation will become a utility, just like electricity, water and Internet: a basic
resource and a basic human right.

2. High-quality translation will gain recognition
As machine translation becomes so universally available, it is clear that there isn’t just one single
translation of a text that fits all. To differentiate their product offerings and appeal to specific
customer groups, buyers will recognize the need for high-quality translation - call it
personalization, transcreation or hyper-localization. This means that, machines will not replace
human translators.

On the contrary, non-perfect MT output will stimulate the need for high-quality translation in a
broad range of communication situations. The challenge we face as an industry is to agree on the
criteria and the measurements for the level of quality that is needed for each situation.
Sometimes MT is simply not an option. Sometimes MT is the only option.

3. Post-editing will come and go
Information travels fast and loses its value quickly. This is especially true for news,
entertainment, online shopping and customer support content, but increasingly also for business-
to-business and government information.

There is a fundamental shift from static “cast in stone” content to dynamic “on the fly” content.
Instead of one or two releases per year, companies are shipping product updates on a weekly if
not daily basis. And consumers, citizens and patients are increasingly sharing their reviews, tips
and tricks in user blogs and social media in almost real time. Any chunk of information may be
relevant and interesting to someone somewhere.

The key attraction of MT in this new information age is that it can deliver real-time translation to
meet these changes. Potential cost reduction is only a secondary benefit. And the widespread fear
that all human translators will soon be downgraded to mere post-editors of MT output is
ungrounded.

Why? Well, in the next few years post-editing will grow quickly, but then we will see it diminish.
But if there is no time for translation, then there is time for post-editing either. Real-time is real-
time, right? In any case, MT technology will get better, using machine intelligence to learn from
its mistakes and not make them again.

Translators who choose to work with computers will customize and personalize MT engines to
specific tasks, customers and domains, rather than do stupid, repetitive error fixing. They will be
promoted to ‘language quality advisors’ if you like.

4. Translators win when supply chains get shorter
More so than most other industries, the translation industry consists of a complex cascade of
suppliers. There may be three or four levels between the translator and the end-user: translation
agency, global multi-language vendor, corporate translation department and often an external
quality reviewer or subject matter expert.

All these functions add a cost to translation but are they adding any real value in proportion to
that cost? Tasks are often replicated and functions overlap. Disintermediation (i.e., ‘cutting out
the middleman’) hasn’t really bitten into the translation industry yet as it has in the travel and
banking industries, for example. But change is on the way, under pressure from the overarching
need to translate more words into more languages.

Corporate and government buyers will analyze their supply chains to reduce their costs, and
functions such as project management, quality assurance, vendor selection and translation
memory management, will probably be streamlined, simplified or shared. Yet there will be no
question about the critical role of the translator at the end of the chain.
Even though MT will be used to translate content streams requiring real-time translation, there
will always be a need for a professional translator to tell good from bad language in the
communication process.

5. The list of languages keeps growing
As global business is shifting from an export mentality to a world of open trading on a flat playing
field, the nature of publishing and communications is also changing fundamentally.
In the old 20th century model the global manufacturer and publisher used to push information out
to the world. They would select their markets, pick their most important language communities
and translate their own instructions for use, brochures and web pages.

They would probably start with four to six languages and gradually add more languages if the
markets prove to be worthwhile. In the new 21st century model, companies are realizing that
their customers are not sitting there waiting for the information to be pushed out by
manufacturers and publishers.

They are browsing the Internet and pulling down information wherever they find it. And if they
can’t find it, they write their own reviews and comments that yet others may then translate to
help their local peers. In the old world, content was owned by publishers; in the new world
content is shared and earned.

In this radically changing environment, the range of languages for content is constantly growing.
Successful global companies need to facilitate communications in a hundred-or more languages
instead of the old standard set of seven or at the most twenty.

Translators in many more countries will benefit from this “democratization” of globalization.

6. Sharing data becomes the norm
Our concept of a ‘translation memory’ is about to change. Translation memories and translation
memory tools have long been cultivated as our proprietary productivity weapon, perhaps offering
a competitive edge in an environment where one fifth of professional translators (according to a
recent ProZ.om poll) still don’t even use translation memories.

Yet, we have now reached the limits of potential productivity gains, and, let’s face it, translation
memory technology itself – in its current and mostly used form – is no longer state-of-the-art. Most
translation memory tools are stuck in a technology time warp and cannot leverage the power of
corpus linguistics (see article The Future is Corpus Linguistics). A new generation of translation
productivity tools will emerge that allow us to leverage any length of strings of text from very
large corpora of translations.

These new tools will in many respects be using features and components that emerged from
statistical MT technology, except for the fact that they leave the professional translator in full
control of the processes. They will unleash the translational power hidden inside very large
corpora of text. They will allow us to do semantic searches and clustering, synonym identification,
automatic cleaning and correction of language data, sentiment analyses and predictive
translations.

In anticipation of this next generation translation technology, many translators and companies
have already started consolidating their translation memory data into large, searchable
repositories. Some (more than you think) are even harvesting these language data from the
Internet, meaning that they have computers crawling translated web sites, aligning the sentences
from these web sites, and reconstructing translation memory files.
Call them pirates if you like. But as we have seen in other industries, they are the drivers of
innovation. We at TAUS truly believe that it is this kind of innovation that is needed to unleash
the power of the translation industry and enable it to prosper.

The TAUS Data Association was established in 2008 as a legal, not-for-profit member-driven
organization aimed at hosting and sharing translation memories for all stakeholders in the global
translation industry. The publicly accessible and searchable database already contains four billion
words of high-quality translation data in 350-plus language pairs.

7. Translation becomes a business of choices
The future of translation either looks bright or gloomy: it depends on whether you want to
change, reinvent yourself and adapt. Admittedly, this is not an easy choice. Nor is there a lot of
time to consider all the options, but at least translators now have the luxury of choosing. In the
past, you became a translator and you were in it for life. Unless of course you became a literary
translator, in which case none of the above applies.

Today, you can choose to be a ‘boutique’ translator, specializing in a domain and providing hyper-
localization or transcreation services. In this case, you will drift away from the original concept of
a translator once you start specializing in your domain. You may be asked to create local content
instead of translating text written for a different culture.

You may be asked to do brand checking for new product names. Your job title may change to
‘language consultant’ or ‘communications adviser’. If what you like is linguistics and computers,
you may choose to become a specialist in training domain- and customer-specific MT engines, or in
translation optimization, or in new functions such as language data cleaning, data selection on the
basis of semantic search, search engine optimization, or sentiment and cultural analysis using
customer feedback data.

The availability of language data in so many languages will open a much larger range of choices
for specialization and innovation. And yes, you can also opt for post-editing machine translation
output. Not so much fun if it is not your first choice, but in many ways this option is similar to the
first wave of automation our profession experienced in the 1980s with the arrival of translation
memory tools.

The good news now, is that the MT engines will soon learn from the corrections made by post-
editors, so you will not have to make the same corrections again and again. And translators (or
whatever their new title might be) will become much less solitary and grow closer to their
colleagues and end customers.

Collaborative networks will bring language workers together. And buyers of translation and
language-related services will eliminate one or two handovers in the supply chain and be able to
connect directly with you.

Translation may, in many ways, become a commodity and a utility but that does not spell the end
of the profession. On the contrary, it will stimulate the need for differentiation, specialization
and value added services. It is up to the world’s translators to rise to the challenge, and open up
to these changes, and reinvent their future.

http://www.eostraductores.net/2011/12/future-for-translators-looks-bright-but.html

								
To top