The whole of the Trust How to access
Shared by: HC120720032522
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 7/19/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 7
Document Sample


Document name: Disciplinary Appeals Guidance
Notes for Directors/Managers
Hearing Appeals
Document type: Human Resources Guidance
Staff group to whom it Directors and Managers hearing
applies: Appeals
Distribution: The whole of the Trust
How to access: Intranet and internet
Issue date: July 2004
Next review: January 2010
Approved by: Director of Human resources and
Workforce Development
Developed by: James Corson Human Resources
Manager
Director lead: Director of Human Resources and
Workforce Development
Contact for advice: James Corson Human Resources
Manager or other Human
resources Manager
CONTENTS
Page Number
1. Introduction 1
2. Purpose of the Disciplinary Appeal 1
3. Types of Appeal 2
4. Role of the Director/Manager 2
5. Role of the Human Resources Representative 2
6. Procedure at an Appeal 3
7. Evidence 3
8. Decision 3
9. Summary of the Main Points for Consideration 4
Appendix 1 - Procedure for the Appeal
DISCIPLINARY APPEALS
GUIDANCE NOTES FOR DIRECTORS/MANAGERS
1. INTRODUCTION
These guidance notes are designed to set out briefly the main points, which
need to be considered by Directors/Managers when hearing Appeals against
disciplinary warnings.
2. PURPOSE OF THE DISCIPLINARY APPEAL
The Trust's Disciplinary Procedure is based on accepted good employee
relations practice (namely the ACAS Code of Practice), current employment law
and the principles of natural justice. An important element of a fair and effective
Disciplinary Procedure is a mechanism for the employee, where dissatisfied, to
appeal against disciplinary action taken against him/her.
The Appeals mechanism serves as a safety net for both the organisation and
employee by providing an early opportunity to review the decision and where
there are errors, for these to be rectified quickly.
The purpose of an Appeal is to enable an independent review to be carried out
as to the 'reasonableness' of the previous manager's decision. It is particularly
important that the appeal does not become another disciplinary hearing but
focuses on reviewing the process followed and the reasonableness of the
decision, which has been taken. In considering reasonableness, the
Director/Manager will want to satisfy him/herself on the following points:
Has a thorough and sufficient investigation been conducted?
Was the manager's decision to take disciplinary action reasonable based on
the evidence relating to the case?
Was the disciplinary action decided upon reasonable, given the
circumstances of the case?
Is the treatment of the employee consistent with the Trust's general
approach to similar cases?
Has the matter been handled fairly and appropriately and is it consistent with
the Trust's Disciplinary Procedure?
Has the manager been (unknowingly) biased or prejudiced in anyway when
reaching the decision?
Is there any new evidence, which if known at the time would have altered the
decision?
1
Is there any new evidence, which should now be considered?
Particularly in cases of capability, has appropriate action been taken to try to
assist the employee to maintain an acceptable standard?
3. TYPES OF APPEAL
The Disciplinary Procedure gives the opportunity to appeal against formal
disciplinary action (ie oral, written, or final written warnings or dismissal).
The appeal is normally to the next level of management, who has not been
previously involved. In cases of dismissal, this would be a Sub Committee of
the Trust Board.
Where the appeal is to a Manager or Director, it may not be necessary for the
whole case to be re-heard. A review, rather than a re-hearing of the case, is
often appropriate. The Human Resources representative may find it
appropriate to facilitate discussion between the management and staff side
representatives to seek agreement as to what issues are in dispute and how
the appeal should be structured. If no agreement can be reached, it may be
necessary for the appeal to take the form of a rehearing.
4. ROLE OF THE DIRECTOR/MANAGER
The Director/Manager must not have been involved in the case previously.
In exceptional circumstances a professional adviser may be co-opted to assist.
This would normally only be used where there are a number of professional
issues involved in the case and the Director/Manager feels professional advice
is needed to enable the case to be reviewed.
The professional adviser would contribute to the decision making process, but
the final decision would remain with the Director/Manager.
The Director/Manager is responsible for ensuring the appeal is conducted in a
fair and proper manner. He or she will take responsibility for chairing the appeal
and ensuring the procedure is followed (see Appendix 1).
A member of the Human Resources Directorate will be present to advise the
Director/Manager. They will need to work closely together to ensure the smooth
running of the appeal and that the proceedings comply with the principles of
natural justice.
2
5. ROLE OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES REPRESENTATIVE
The Human Resources representative will be an experienced member of the
Human Resources Directorate.
He/she will organise the appeal, ensuring that when statements of case are
received, they are exchanged as soon as possible.
The role, in addition to ensuring that administratively the appeal runs smoothly,
is to advise the Director/Manager on procedural issues and to be available so
that the Director can draw on their experience of disciplinary matters and
possible precedents.
The Human Resources representative will be present throughout the appeal and
take notes on the case being heard.
The Human Resources representative will also ensure that the follow-up
documentation is sent out to all parties concerned.
6. PROCEDURE AT THE APPEAL
The procedure for the appeal is outlined in Appendix 1. Although minor
variations may be allowed by the Director/Manager (as long as they do not
jeopardise the process or disadvantage one party). Normally the procedure
should be carefully followed. The purpose of the appeal is for the
Director/Manager to hear the case in enough detail to reach a decision on the
procedure followed by the manager and the merits of the case.
The Management Side case can either be presented directly by the manager, or
a Management Side representative (eg Human Resources Manager). If the
case is not to be presented directly by the manager, he or she should still
normally be present throughout the hearing and be subject to questioning at any
time by the panel.
7. EVIDENCE
The Director will need to consider carefully the merits of the case and weight,
which should be given to the evidence presented by both sides in support of
their cases.
New evidence that has come to light following the manager’s decision should be
considered by the Director/Manager and may be taken into account when
deciding the outcome of the appeal.
8. DECISION
The burden of proof is different than that used in the Criminal Courts. The
decision should be that the manager taking the decision held a genuine belief
that the incident (or circumstances took place). The circumstances themselves,
being judged against the criteria of the "balance of probabilities", rather than
"beyond all reasonable doubt".
3
There are three decisions that can be reached:
1. Not to uphold the appeal.
2. To uphold the appeal.
3. To decide that the disciplinary action was too severe and not in the band
of reasonable action and, therefore, replace the original decision with a
lesser warning (this may be as a result of new evidence being available).
Additional supporting action (eg a development programme) may also be
suggested if appropriate. The Director/Manager cannot replace the
original decision with more severe disciplinary action. If he/she is not
satisfied with the investigation or any other material aspect of what has
gone before; it is for the Director/Manager to submit the matter, for further
investigation and/or a new disciplinary hearing. The reasons for the
decision are not usually given at the appeal.
9. SUMMARY OF THE MAIN POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION
1. To act in good faith and not be unduly influenced by what has gone before,
or be committed to upholding the previous decision.
2. To hear both sides of the case and to weigh up the pros and cons as
objectively as possible.
3. To be satisfied that the procedure has been followed properly and appreciate
that the appeal hearing can put right earlier procedural deficiencies.
4. To adjourn for further information or to refer a case back for further
investigation, if dissatisfied with the way in which the original decision was
reached.
5. To consider all matters raised which are relevant to the decision, whether
or not they were known to the manager at the time of taking the decision.
6. Be satisfied that a thorough investigation has taken place and all
reasonable efforts have been made to gather the relevant evidence.
7. Was the decision of the manager consistent with other similar disciplinary
decisions?
4
APPENDIX 1
PROCEDURE FOR THE APPEAL
1. The management representative shall state the management case, in the
presence of the appellant and his/her representative.
The appellant or his/her representative shall have the opportunity to
ask questions of the management representative.
The Director/Manager (and professional adviser if present) shall have
the opportunity to ask questions of the management representative(s)
2. The appellant or his/her representative shall put his/her case in the
presence of the management representative.
The management representative shall have the opportunity to ask
questions of the appellant or his/her representative.
The Director/Manager (and professional adviser if present) shall have
the opportunity to ask questions of the appellant or his/her
representative.
3. The management representative shall have the opportunity to sum up the
case if they so wish.
4. The appellant or his/her representative shall have the opportunity to sum
up their case if they so wish.
NB The appellant or his/her representative shall have the right to speak
last. In their summing up neither party may introduce any new
information.
5. The management representative, the appellant and his/her
representative shall withdraw, and are subject to being recalled if the
Director/Manager hearing the appeal wishes to clarify any particular
points.
6. The Director/Manager shall announce his/her decision to the parties
personally, if possible. The appellant shall, in any event, be notified of
the decision in writing within three working days.
NB Nothing in the foregoing procedure shall prevent those hearing the
appeal from inviting either party to elucidate or amplify any statement
he/she may have made.
The Director/Manager has the discretion to adjourn, in order that further
evidence may be produced by either party, or for any other reason.
Get documents about "