Waverly-Shell Rock Community School District

W
Shared by:
Categories
Tags
-
Stats
views:
1
posted:
7/17/2012
language:
pages:
3
Document Sample

```							                              Waverly-Shell Rock Community School District

APPROVED 2008-09 DISTRICT K-12 GOALS

Reading Goal Statement: During the 2008-09 school year, the percentage of students with proficient reading
comprehension skills in each of the targeted cohort groups (refer to Table 1.0) will increase from fall 2007 to
fall 2009 as measured by the ITBS/ITED Reading Comprehension Test.

K-12 District Math Goal: Targeted Area for Growth—Math Concepts, Estimation, and
Problem Solving

Mathematics Goal Statement: During the 2008-09 school year, the percentage of students with proficient
math skills in each of the targeted cohort groups (refer to Table 2.0) will increase from fall 2007 to fall 2009 as
measured by the ITBS/ITED Math Concepts, Estimation, and Problem Solving Sub-tests.

K-12 District Science Goal: Targeted Area for Growth—Physical, Earth, Life Content
Knowledge and Inquiry Skills

Science Goal Statement: During the 2008-09 school year, the percentage of students with proficient science
skills in each of the targeted cohort groups (refer to Table 3.0) will increase from fall 2007 to fall 2009 as
measured by the ITBS/ITED Science Test.

K-12 District Technology Goal:
Part I: Measurable Component: During the 2008-09 school year, the percentage of 8th grade students with
proficient technology skills will increase from the 2-year average of 89% as measured by the district developed
8th Grade Technology Standards Assessment tool.

Part II: Process Component: During the 2008-09 school year additional W-SR technology standards-based
assessments will be developed and administrated at grades 3, 5, and one high school grade. Baseline data
showing percentage of students at targeted grades with proficient skills will be collected for use in determining
growth goals during the subsequent school year.

C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\3e604c5d-1a0e-4bef-9483-9a5c9b3f972e.doc
TABLE 1.0
Measurements for 2008-09 K-12 Reading Goals
Percentage of Proficient Students Within Cohort Group
(Proficiently Skilled = > 41st NPR)

Targeted Grades                           Baseline Data Period                             Measurement Period
Goal Target
Percentage Proficient      Percentage Proficient                  Fall 2009
Class of                    Fall 2007                  Fall 2008                   (> means “greater than”)
2017                                                    _____ %                         > 90.5%
2016                                                    _____ %                              >93.6%
2015                                                    _____ %                              >90.0%
2014                                                    _____ %                              >71.6%
2013                                                    _____ %                              >86.2%
2012                                                    _____ %                              >82.0%
2011                                                    _____ %                              >79.0%

TABLE 2.0
Measurements for 2008-09 K-12 Math Goals
Percentage of Proficient Students Within Cohort Group
ITBS/ITED Math Test Results
(Proficiently Skilled = > 41st NPR)
Targeted Grades                           Baseline Data Period                             Measurement Period
Goal Target
Percentage Proficient      Percentage Proficient                  Fall 2009
Class of                    Fall 2007                  Fall 2008                   (> means “greater than”)
2017                                                    _____ %                         > 88.6%
2016                                                    _____ %                              >92.1%
2015                                                    _____ %                              >86.4%
2014                                                    _____ %                              >79.7%
2013                                                    _____ %                              >84.3%
2012                                                    _____ %                              >83.9%
2011                                                    _____ %                              >84.8%

C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\3e604c5d-1a0e-4bef-9483-9a5c9b3f972e.doc
TABLE 3.0
Measurements for 2008-09 K-12 Science Goals
Percentage of Proficient Students Within Cohort Group
ITBS/ITED Science Test Results
(Proficiently Skilled = > 41st NPR)
Targeted Grades                          Baseline Data Period                          Measurement Period
Goal Target
Percentage Proficient   Percentage Proficient                  Fall 2009
Class of                    Fall 2007               Fall 2008                   (> means “greater than”)
2017                                                 _____ %                          >91.5%
2016                                                 _____ %                              >96.0%
2015                                                 _____ %                              >94.5%
2014                                                 _____ %                              >84.5%
2013                                                 _____ %                              >89.3%
2012                                                 _____ %                              >89.5%
2011                                                 _____ %                              >93.0%

2008-09 Waverly-Shell Rock Board Goals

1.   Address facility needs by utilizing recommendations from the community, staff, Facility

2.   Based on changing needs, continue to explore options for the re-distribution of special
education students in order to balance enrollment at attendance centers.

3.   Monitor and evaluate the pre-school implemented at the Shell Rock Elementary School.

4.   Explore methods of increased protection for students, staff, and facilities during disasters.
(Hazard Mitigation)

5.   Continue to use the superintendent evaluation and board self-evaluation process developed by the
Iowa Association of School Boards, the Iowa Department of Education, and School

6.   Increase attendance at board of education professional development opportunities.

7.   Continue to monitor and evaluate the district’s progress toward increased character education curriculum
by using building level presentations at monthly board meetings.

C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\3e604c5d-1a0e-4bef-9483-9a5c9b3f972e.doc

```
Related docs
Other docs by HC120717165852
Student/Parent Information Sheet