Get documents about "Waverly-Shell Rock Community School District
Document Sample
Waverly-Shell Rock Community School District
APPROVED 2008-09 DISTRICT K-12 GOALS
K-12 District Reading Goal: Targeted Area for Growth—Reading Comprehension
Reading Goal Statement: During the 2008-09 school year, the percentage of students with proficient reading
comprehension skills in each of the targeted cohort groups (refer to Table 1.0) will increase from fall 2007 to
fall 2009 as measured by the ITBS/ITED Reading Comprehension Test.
K-12 District Math Goal: Targeted Area for Growth—Math Concepts, Estimation, and
Problem Solving
Mathematics Goal Statement: During the 2008-09 school year, the percentage of students with proficient
math skills in each of the targeted cohort groups (refer to Table 2.0) will increase from fall 2007 to fall 2009 as
measured by the ITBS/ITED Math Concepts, Estimation, and Problem Solving Sub-tests.
K-12 District Science Goal: Targeted Area for Growth—Physical, Earth, Life Content
Knowledge and Inquiry Skills
Science Goal Statement: During the 2008-09 school year, the percentage of students with proficient science
skills in each of the targeted cohort groups (refer to Table 3.0) will increase from fall 2007 to fall 2009 as
measured by the ITBS/ITED Science Test.
K-12 District Technology Goal:
Part I: Measurable Component: During the 2008-09 school year, the percentage of 8th grade students with
proficient technology skills will increase from the 2-year average of 89% as measured by the district developed
8th Grade Technology Standards Assessment tool.
Part II: Process Component: During the 2008-09 school year additional W-SR technology standards-based
assessments will be developed and administrated at grades 3, 5, and one high school grade. Baseline data
showing percentage of students at targeted grades with proficient skills will be collected for use in determining
growth goals during the subsequent school year.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\3e604c5d-1a0e-4bef-9483-9a5c9b3f972e.doc
TABLE 1.0
Measurements for 2008-09 K-12 Reading Goals
Percentage of Proficient Students Within Cohort Group
ITBS/ITED Reading Comprehension Test Results
(Proficiently Skilled = > 41st NPR)
Targeted Grades Baseline Data Period Measurement Period
Goal Target
Percentage Proficient Percentage Proficient Fall 2009
Class of Fall 2007 Fall 2008 (> means “greater than”)
2017 _____ % > 90.5%
(currently 3rd grade) 90.5% (in 4th grad) (fall of 5th grade)
2016 _____ % >93.6%
(currently 4th grade) 93.6% (in 5th grade) (fall of 6th grade)
2015 _____ % >90.0%
(currently 5th grade) 90.0% (in 6th grade) (fall of 7th grade)
2014 _____ % >71.6%
(currently 6th grade) 71.6% (in 7th grade (fall of 8th grade)
2013 _____ % >86.2%
(currently 7th grade) 86.2% (in 8th grade) (fall of 9th grade)
2012 _____ % >82.0%
(currently 8th grade) 82.0% (in 9th grade) (fall of 10th grade)
2011 _____ % >79.0%
(currently in 9th grade) 79.0% (in 10th grade) (fall of 11th grade)
TABLE 2.0
Measurements for 2008-09 K-12 Math Goals
Percentage of Proficient Students Within Cohort Group
ITBS/ITED Math Test Results
(Proficiently Skilled = > 41st NPR)
Targeted Grades Baseline Data Period Measurement Period
Goal Target
Percentage Proficient Percentage Proficient Fall 2009
Class of Fall 2007 Fall 2008 (> means “greater than”)
2017 _____ % > 88.6%
(currently 3rd grade) 88.6% (in 4th grad) (fall of 5th grade)
2016 _____ % >92.1%
(currently 4th grade) 92.1% (in 5th grade) (fall of 6th grade)
2015 _____ % >86.4%
(currently 5th grade) 86.4% (in 6th grade) (fall of 7th grade)
2014 _____ % >79.7%
(currently 6th grade) 79.7% (in 7th grade (fall of 8th grade)
2013 _____ % >84.3%
(currently 7th grade) 84.3% (in 8th grade) (fall of 9th grade)
2012 _____ % >83.9%
(currently 8th grade) 83.9% (in 9th grade) (fall of 10th grade)
2011 _____ % >84.8%
(currently in 9th grade) 84.8% (in 10th grade) (fall of 11th grade)
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\3e604c5d-1a0e-4bef-9483-9a5c9b3f972e.doc
TABLE 3.0
Measurements for 2008-09 K-12 Science Goals
Percentage of Proficient Students Within Cohort Group
ITBS/ITED Science Test Results
(Proficiently Skilled = > 41st NPR)
Targeted Grades Baseline Data Period Measurement Period
Goal Target
Percentage Proficient Percentage Proficient Fall 2009
Class of Fall 2007 Fall 2008 (> means “greater than”)
2017 _____ % >91.5%
(currently 3rd grade) 91.5% (in 4th grad) (fall of 5th grade)
2016 _____ % >96.0%
(currently 4th grade) 96.0% (in 5th grade) (fall of 6th grade)
2015 _____ % >94.5%
(currently 5th grade) 94.5% (in 6th grade) (fall of 7th grade)
2014 _____ % >84.5%
(currently 6th grade) 84.5% (in 7th grade (fall of 8th grade)
2013 _____ % >89.3%
(currently 7th grade) 89.3% (in 8th grade) (fall of 9th grade)
2012 _____ % >89.5%
(currently 8th grade) 89.5% (in 9th grade) (fall of 10th grade)
2011 _____ % >93.0%
(currently in 9th grade) 93.0% (in 10th grade) (fall of 11th grade)
2008-09 Waverly-Shell Rock Board Goals
1. Address facility needs by utilizing recommendations from the community, staff, Facility
Task Force, McREL, and the administrative team.
2. Based on changing needs, continue to explore options for the re-distribution of special
education students in order to balance enrollment at attendance centers.
3. Monitor and evaluate the pre-school implemented at the Shell Rock Elementary School.
4. Explore methods of increased protection for students, staff, and facilities during disasters.
(Hazard Mitigation)
5. Continue to use the superintendent evaluation and board self-evaluation process developed by the
Iowa Association of School Boards, the Iowa Department of Education, and School
Administrators of Iowa.
6. Increase attendance at board of education professional development opportunities.
7. Continue to monitor and evaluate the district’s progress toward increased character education curriculum
by using building level presentations at monthly board meetings.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\3e604c5d-1a0e-4bef-9483-9a5c9b3f972e.doc
Related docs
Other docs by HC120717165852
Review of the standards for the regulation of VET Consultation Paper June 2012
Views: 0 | Downloads: 0
