IncomeTax

Shared by: jennyyingdi
Categories
Tags
-
Stats
views:
8
posted:
7/6/2012
language:
English
pages:
35
Document Sample
scope of work template
							   Gross Income: The Scope of Section 61
       o Sec 61 defines gross income as all income from whatever source
           derived, minus statutory exclusions
       o Equivocal Receipt of Financial Benefit
                Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
                      Two cases were consolidated and sought to ask whether
                         punitive damages were includable as income
                      Income is present whenever there is an undeniable
                         accession to wealth, clearly realized, and over which
                         the taxpayer has full control
                      Here, both the actual damages and punitive damages is
                         considered income
                Cesarini v. United States
                      Taxpayer buys a piano and later finds a large sum of
                         money in it; At first claims the money as income, but
                         changes his mind
                      Here, the money is income because it fits the definition
                              It now becomes the taxpayers burden to point to
                                an exception
                      This is a windfall which is taxed
                              If you bought a chest hoping something valuable
                                is inside and there is, it is not a windfall and
                                would be taxed upon disposition
                Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner
                      Company agreed to pay employee's income tax on his
                         salary earned; IRS sought to include it as income
                      Because the tax payment was in return for services
                         rendered, it was considered income
                              It makes no difference the form of payment
                              "The discharge by a third person of an obligation
                                to him is equivalent to receipt by the person
                                taxed"
                              This goes to any payment of obligations owed by
                                the taxpayer
                Charley v. Commissioner
                      Through a complicated process, plaintiff would purchase
                         coach tickets but client would pay for first class; TA
                         would give the difference to plaintiff
                      Court saw the case in two ways:
                              Because the TA sent the money to the employer,
                                who then gave it to plaintiff, the money could be
                                viewed as additional compensation from the
                                employer, thus bringing it into the definition of
                                income
                              Alternatively, it could be viewed as a disposition
                                of personal property by plaintiff because in effect
                                he sold his frequent flyer miles for the cash
                Loans are not income because they are linked with the duty to
                  repay, and thus there is no accession to wealth
                Wealth acquired illegally is still income
       o Income Without Receipt of Cash or Property
                Helvering v. Independent Life Ins. Co.
                         The rental value of a building that is being used by the
                          owner is not income
                Revenue Ruling 79-24
                        When services are paid for with something other than
                          money (barter), the fair market value of the property or
                          services taken in payment is income
                               This includes when services or goods with equal
                                  fair market value are swapped
                               Value is the fair market value - what a
                                  reasonable buyer would pay
                Dean v. Commissioner
                        To secure a corporate loan, owners were required to
                          place the title to their house in the company; They still
                          lived their (the corporation paid the mortgage) and the
                          IRS sought to include the rental value that they didn't
                          have to pay as income
                        The court held that this was income
   Exclusion of Gifts and Inheritances
       o Section 102 - Gifts and Inheritances
                Section A - Gross income does not include the value of property
                  acquired by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance
                Section B - The income derived from property not taxed under
                  Section A is gross income
                Section C - Property transferred from employer to employee is
                  includable in gross income
                        Sections 74 and 132 create exceptions to this rule
       o The Income Tax Meaning of Gift
                Commissioner v. Duberstein
                        Taxpayer 1 received a Cadillac for a sales tip; Taxpayer
                          2 received $20,000 upon retirement; Neither wanted to
                          pay taxes
                        Rule: For tax purposes, a gift is something given out of
                          detached and disinterested generosity given out of
                          affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses
                               If the gift can be characterized as being given in
                                  return for services rendered, it is not a gift (quid
                                  pro quo)
       o Gifts to Employees (Exceptions to Section 102(c))
                Section 102(c) provides that gifts from employers to employees
                  are includebale in gross income unless excluded in sections
                  74(c) and 132(e)
                Section 74(c) - Employee Achievement Awards
                        Exclude from gross income if the value of the award
                          does not exceed the amount the employer can take as a
                          deduction
                        Section 274(j)
                               Is the gift an employee achievement award?
                                       An employee achievement award is an
                                          item of tangible property given in return
                                          for safety achievements or length of
                                          service, awarded in a meaningful
                                          ceremony, with no hint of disguised
                                          compensation
                                        Length of service awards are given
                                         every five years
                       Part of a qualified plan, or a non-qualified plan?
                         274(j)(3)(b)
                              To be qualified, the plan must be written
                                 and not discriminate against lower paid
                                 employees
                       Amount of exclusion
                              Qualified - Average cost of all gifts given
                                 by employer to all employees does not
                                 exceed $400 and the total received by
                                 individual employee cannot exceed $1600
                                      If you don't meet this, it becomes
                                         non-qualified award
                              Non-Qualified
                                      Total received by the employee
                                         cannot exceed $400
        Section 132 E - De Minimus Fringe
               A de minimus fringe benefit is any property or service,
                 the value of which, after taking into account the
                 frequency it is offered, is so small as to make accounting
                 for it unreasonable
                       Examples: Free coffee, limited copies, limited use
                         of secretary, occasional cocktail parties,
                         traditional birthday or holiday gifts, drinks (Gift
                         certificates are not de minimus per 1.132-
                         6(c))
                       Proposed Regulation 1.102-1(f) would exclude a
                         gift given from income if it could be considered
                         family
                       The higher the fmv, the larger the presumption
                         that the gift is disguised compensation
               Company cafeterias can be excluded from gross income
                 if the cafeteria covers its costs and the cafeteria does
                 not discriminate against non highly compensated
                 employees
o   Bequests, Devises, and Inheritances
        Lyeth v. Hoey
               Heirs at law contest will and receive money in a
                 settlement; State law defines who inherited, and
                 because they did not "inherit," IRS wants tax
               Rule: When there is a settlement of a will, and a
                 taxpayer receives a payment in the settlement because
                 of his status as an heir, Section 102 applies and the
                 income is not includable in gross income
        Wolder v. Commissioner
               Attorney is paid for his work by requesting that the
                 client include him in her will
               Rule: Looking to the substance of the transaction, if it is
                 compensation for services rendered it does not fall
                 within the exception in Section 102
                       "A transfer in the form of a bequest was the
                         method that the parties chose to compensate
                                Wolder for his legal services, and that transfer is
                                therefore subject to taxation, whatever its label"
   Employee Benefits
      o Section 132 - Certain Fringe Benefits
              Section B - No Additional Cost Services
                     An employee can receive a service provided by employer
                       for free and not include it in gross income if the service
                       is offered to customers, the employee works in that line
                       of business, and there is no substantial additional cost,
                       including lost revenue
                             The same line of business requirement is to
                               prevent unfair situations with employees of
                               conglomerates
                             Note that if there is a written agreement between
                               companies in the same line of business,
                               employees can take advantage of the other
                               company's services - Treas. Reg. 1.132-2(b)
              Section C - Qualified Employee Discount
                     If property is being sold to an employee at a discount,
                       the discount may not exceed the gross profit percentage
                             Gross Profit Percentage equals:
                       (aggregate sales price - cost)/ Aggregate Sales Price
                     If services are being sold to an employee at a discount,
                       the discount cannot exceed 20% of the price offered to
                       customers
                     The property must not be real property or property held
                       for investment and must be within the employee's line
                       of business
              Section E - De Minimus Fringe
                     A de minimus fringe benefit is any property or service,
                       the value of which, after taking into account the
                       frequency it is offered, is so small as to make accounting
                       for it unreasonable
                             Examples: Free coffee, limited copies, limited use
                               of secretary, occasional cocktail parties,
                               traditional birthday or holiday gifts, drinks (Gift
                               certificates are not de minimus per 1.132-
                               6(c))
                             Proposed Regulation 1.102-1(f) would exclude a
                               gift given from income if it could be considered
                               family
                             The higher the fmv, the larger the presumption
                               that the gift is disguised compensation
                     Company cafeterias can be excluded from gross income
                       if the cafeteria covers its costs and the cafeteria does
                       not discriminate against non highly compensated
                       employees
              Line of Business
                     If the employee performs work in more than one line of
                       business, that employee is eligible for discounts or no
                       additional cost benefits within any lines of business
                       where he has substantial involvement - Treas. Reg.
                       1.132-4(a)(1)(iii)
                        If an employee performs duties that directly benefit
                         more than on line of business, the employee is treated
                         as performing services in all such lines - Treas. Reg.
                         1.132(a)(1)(iv)
               Section (H)(2)
                      The spouse and dependant children are treated as if
                         they were the employee
   Gains from Dealings in Property
       o Basis
               Section 1001 - Determination of Amount of And Recognition of
                 Gain or Loss
                      Section A - Computation of Gain or Loss
                              Gain from a sale of property equal the amount
                                 realized minus the adjusted basis
                              Loss from a sale of property equals the adjusted
                                 basis minus the amount realized
                      Section B
                              Amount realized from a sale of real property
                                 equals that amount of money received plus the
                                 fmv of any property received
                      Section C
                              Except as otherwise stated, recognize all gains or
                                 losses on the sale of property
                 __________________________________________________
                 __________
                      We need a realization event
                              The satisfaction of a debt with appreciated
                                 property counts
                              Destroyed Property
                                      Section 1033 allows for non-recognition of
                                        destroyed property and insurance
                                        settlements if similar property is
                                        purchased
                                             Basis is whatever the original basis
                                                was
               Section 1011(a) - Adjusted Basis For Determining Gain or Loss
                      Adjusted basis equals basis plus any adjustments
                         allowed under Section 1016
               Section 1012 - Basis of Property - Cost
                      The basis of property shall be the cost of the property,
                         not including any real property taxes
                              So, if you purchase an option to buy a house for
                                 $50k and then exercise the option for an
                                 additional $100K, your basis is $150k
                              Amount borrowed is still considered part of the
                                 cost
                      Philadelphia Park Amusements Co. v. United States
                              Rule: While Section 1012 says that the basis of
                                 property is the cost of such property, the basis of
                                 property received for property is the value of the
                                 property received
                                      This is necessary to ensure that neither
                                        party is under or over taxed
          Estate of Franklin
                Rule: The Prudent Investor Rule states that if at
                   the time of purchase, the amount you borrow on
                   a non-recourse basis outstrips the value of the
                   property, none of the loan is includable in basis
                        So, recourse debt is includable in basis
                           and non-recourse debt is includable if it
                           does not outstrip the fmv of the property
   Section 1015 - Basis of Property Acquired by Gifts and
    Transfers in Trust
        Section A
                If the property is acquired by gift, the basis is the
                   same as it would be in the hands of the donor
                   (transferred basis)
                However, if the basis is greater than the fmv at
                   the time of the gift and you are calculating a loss,
                   use the fmv of the gift at the time of transfer
                        This prevents losses from being
                           transferred
   Section 1016 - Adjustments to Basis
        Section A
                Adjust basis for expenditures, receipts, losses, or
                   other items properly chargeable to capital
                   accounts and for the exhaustion, wear and tear,
                   obsolescence, amortization, and depletion of
                   property
                        Expenditures are chargeable to capital
                           accounts if it is money that improves the
                           asset
                                Money spent on services
                                   (gardening . . .) does not qualify
                                Look for permanent changes to the
                                   property
                        The depreciation adjustments allow tax
                           free recovery of investment before
                           realization event
                Taxes are not includable as basis
   Section 1019 - Property on Which Lessee has Made
    Improvements
        If property is excludable from gross income under
           Section 109, it does not affect the basis of property
        Section 109 - Improvements by lessee on Lessor's
           Property
                If a lessee improves the property of a lessor,
                   there is no effect on the lessor's gross income
                   upon termination of the lease
        The combination of these two sections really only delays
           when the tax is paid
   Section 267 - Losses with Respect to Transactions Between
    Related Taxpayers
        Section A
                Taxpayers cannot take losses (but do take gains
                   unless covered by Section 1041) on sales to
                   people listed in section b, which are family
                   members and the like
                         This is to prevent the transfers of losses
        Section B
                 This section lists the relationships
        Section D
                 On a future sale, the gain can be recognized to
                   the extent it exceeds the previous loss
                         Thus, the loss that was denied before can
                           be taken now
   Part sale, part gift (Check to see if the sale is for less than FMV)
        Transferor's Gain
                 Per Treas Reg 1.1001-1(e), transferor has a gain
                   to the extent that the amount realized exceeds
                   his adjusted basis in the property
                 But, there is no loss if the amount realized is less
                   than the adjusted basis
        Transferee's Basis
                 For determining gain
                         Basis is the greater of:
                                 The amount paid by transferee
                                 The transferor's adjusted basis for
                                    the property at the time of the
                                    transfer
                 For determining loss
                         Not greater than the fmv of the property
                           at the time of transfer
   Property Acquired Between Spouses or incident to Divorce
        Section 1041
                 Section A
                         No gain or loss shall be recognized on
                           transfers of property from an individual to
                           a spouse or former spouse incident to
                           divorce
                 Section B
                         The transfer is treated as a gift and the
                           basis of the transferee is the adjusted
                           basis of the transferor
                                 This is true even if computing a
                                    loss
                 Section C
                         Transfer of property is incident to divorce
                           if it occurs within one year after the date
                           the marriage ends or is related to the
                           cessation of the marriage
                 Policy reasons for statute
                         The IRS views the taxable entity as the
                           marriage, not the individuals
                         Contrary view would create a tax barrier
                           for divorce
                 Note that this section is similar to Section 267,
                   but that section only covers losses while this
                   section covers both gains and losses
        Property Acquired from a Decedent
              Section 1014 - Basis of Property Acquired From a
                 Decedent
                      The basis of property acquired from a decedent is
                        the fair market value at the time of the
                        decedent's death (stepped up basis)
                             The consequences of this rule is that the
                                losses and gains evaporate
                             Note that Section 1041 would not apply
                                when a husband dies leaving property to a
                                spouse - step up the basis
                      However, if a person transfers appreciated
                        property to a decedent within a year before his
                        death and the donor receives the property back
                        from a decedent upon death, the donor's basis is
                        the adjusted basis in the hands of the decedent
                        (no upward adjustment of basis)
o   Amount Realized
       Section 1001(b) says that amount realized is equal to the
         amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property
         received
       International Freighting Corporation v. Commissioner
              Bonus plan paid employees $24k worth of stock which
                 cost $16K
              Rule: While Section 1001(b) says to include the fair
                 market value of property received in amount received,
                 property must include services as well
                      Because there is a presumption of equal dealing,
                        the value of the services received (and thus the
                        amount received) is deemed to equal the fair
                        market value of the property received
       Crane v. Commissioner
              Taxpayer receives property encumbered with a non-
                 recourse loan when husband dies
              Rule: Because section 1014 steps up basis when
                 property is acquired from a decedent, taxpayer's basis is
                 the value of the property, undiminished by any
                 mortgage
                      So, if the property is worth $200k and has a
                        $200k mortgage, the basis is still $200k
              Rule: When determining amount realized when a
                 purchaser has bought property subject to a mortgage,
                 amount realized equals any cash or property received,
                 plus the face value of the mortgage
                      The treatment is the same for recourse and non-
                        recourse loans
       Commissioner v. Tufts
              Partnership had a $1.8M non-recourse loan for property;
                 After deductions, adjusted basis was $1.4M; Once the
                 fair market value of the property was less than $1.4M,
                 the property was sold for assumption of loan
              Rule: The assumption of the non-recourse loan by the
                 purchaser must be included in the amount received of
                         the taxpayer, even when the fair market value of the
                         property is less than the mortgage
                              Non-recourse loans are treated the same as
                                   recourse loans
                 Treas Reg 1.1001-2(a)(4)(iii)
                      Includes as a disposition a gift to which satisfaction of
                         liabilities is a part
                      Apply part gift part sale rules

   Life Insurance Proceeds and Annuities
        o Life Insurance
                There are two types of life insurance
                       Term Life Insurance
                              This is life insurance for a set term of years and if
                                 you die within the term, you get paid
                       Whole Life Insurance
                              Higher premiums are paid, and a portion of the
                                 payment contributes to the cash surrender value
                                      The amount attributable to cash surrender
                                        value grows tax deferred
                Section 101 - Certain Death Benefits
                       Amounts payable on a life insurance contract by reason
                         of death are not included in gross income
                       However, if the life insurance policy is transferred for
                         valuable consideration, one may only exclude the
                         amount attributable to the consideration
                              But, don't apply this part if there is another
                                 method for determining basis (such as Section
                                 1041) or the transfer is to the insured, a partner,
                                 a partnership, or a corporation in which the
                                 transferor is a shareholder
                       The interest paid on any amount held by an insurer that
                         is otherwise excludable under subsection (a), is not
                         excludable
                       When the insurer is paying beneficiary the proceeds for
                         a certain time period, the payments must be prorated so
                         that only the prorated portion is excludable principal and
                         the remainder is taxable interest
                              The amount held is equal to the amount payable
                                 at death
                              Unlike subsection (c), this section applies when
                                 the payments consist of principal and interest
                              If the specified period is life and the taxpayer
                                 outlives his life expectancy, the exclusion ratio
                                 continues, unlike the case in annuities
                                      But note that there is no unrecovered
                                        principal deduction as in annuities
                              Divide principal into term to know what is tax
                                 free
                       Subsection (g) allows for early payments in the case of
                         terminal or chronic illness that do not have to be
                         included in gross income
        o Annuities
                Section 72 - Annuities
                      As a general rule, the amounts received under an
                        annuity contract are includable in gross income
                      However, it does not include the portion of the payment
                        that can be considered return of capital
                             Ratio = (Amount Paid/Total Expected Payments)
                                x Payment Amount
                             Note that unlike life insurance proceeds, once the
                                principal is recovered, everything is taxed, even
                                if the term is exceeded
                      If the beneficiary dies before the principal is fully
                        recovered, the unrecovered portion is a deduction on the
                        final income tax return
   Separation and Divorce
       o Section 71 - Alimony and Separate Maintenance Payments
               The general rule is that amounts received as alimony or
                 separate maintenance payments are includable as gross income
                      Alimony or separate maintenance payments are defined
                        as:
                             Cash payments (checks and money orders are
                                OK, but not promissory notes)
                             Made under an instrument of divorce or
                                separation
                             Instrument does not designate the payment as
                                something other than alimony
                                      If the document says it is not alimony, it
                                        is not alimony
                             Payee and payor are not members of the same
                                household
                             Payments do not continue after death
                                      Be careful - if payments are required for
                                        10 years, that means 10 years even if
                                        death, and thus are not deductible
                             There is no filing of joint returns
                      Child support is not includable as alimony because it is a
                        personal living expense
                             If alimony and child support are combined, only
                                the portion allocatable to alimony is excludable
                             But note that if the payment is not sufficient to
                                meet full obligation, count child support first
                      Payments can be made on behalf of the ex-spouse
                        (thus, one spouse can pay rent payments and still
                        qualify)
                             But, payor can't own the property the other
                                spouse is using
                      Excess alimony payments are thought to be property
                        settlements and thus not excludable from the payor's
                        gross income
                             Calculate as follows:
                                      Second Year Formula
                                             2d Year - (3d year + 15,000)
                                      First Year Formula
                                Total excess is the sum of the two excesses
                                The formulas only apply to the first three years
                                 and only for front loading; back loading is OK
                              Exceptions to Recapture
                                      If front loading is the result of death, it is
                                         ok
   Damages and Related Receipts
      o Raytheon Production Corp. v. Commissioner
              Raytheon sues RCA for various anti-trust violations and is
                awarded damages; The main question here is what are the tax
                consequences
              Rule: To determine the effect of damage awards on tax
                liability, the essential question to ask is: "In lieu of what were
                the damages awarded?"
                     If lost profits, the award is taxable
                              Per Glenshaw Glass, punitive damages are
                                 income
                     If lost capital, the basis of the capital award is not
                         taxable, but any gain is
                              Lost capital includes loss of goodwill
                              If the basis is hard to determine (as here), the
                                 basis is fixed at zero
      o After parties agree on a settlement amount, the characterization of the
         award has important tax effects
              But, only the parties are bound by the agreement
              The IRS will look to the substance of the settlement to
                determine tax liability
                     So, make sure the complaint is carefully drafted
      o If appreciated property is used to pay damages, recharacterize as a
         cash transaction
              Payor "sells" property and takes any gain
              Payee's basis has to be the amount the property is being used
                meet
                     This is in line with the payor's realization event
      o Damages for Personal Injuries
              Section 104 - Compensation for Injuries or Sickness
                     Gross income does not include:
                              Amounts received under workers' compensation
                                 acts as compensation for personal injuries or
                                 sickness
                              Amount of any damages (but not punitive
                                 damages) received (by suit, agreement) on
                                 account of personal injuries or phusical sickness
                                      Can be either a lump sum or periodic
                                         payments
                                      While typically lost profits are includable
                                         as income, if they can be linked to
                                          personal injury or sickness, Section 104
                                          would exclude them from income
                                       If emotional harm can be linked to the
                                          personal injuries or sickness, any amount
                                          of award attributable to them can be
                                          excluded
                                               If emotional harm damages do not
                                                  meet the exclusion, one does not
                                                  have to pay taxes on the portion of
                                                  award that relates to medical
                                                  expenses
                               Amounts received via accident or health
                                  insurance for personal injuries or sickness that
                                  are not attributable to employer contributions
                               Amounts received for personal injuries or
                                  sickness resulting from military service in any
                                  country
                               Amounts received as compensation for personal
                                  injuries or sickness as a result of terrorism or war
               Structured Settlements
                       The best situation for plaintiff and defendant is for
                          defendant to purchase an annuity that pays directly to
                          plaintiff
                               While under annuity rules the interest is taxable,
                                  Section 104 provides that it would not be taxable
                               Thus, the defendant can pay the award for a
                                  cheaper amount
   Discharge of Indebtedness
       o United States v. Kirby Lumber Co.
               Defendant sold bonds at $1.2 million and later repurchased
                  some of them; The difference between the sale price and the
                  repurchase price was $137,000 less than the sale price, thus
                  relieving the Defendant of an obligation at less than face value
               Rule: "If the corporation purchases and retires any of such
                  bonds at a price less than the issueing price or face value, the
                  excess off the issuing price or face value over the purchase
                  price is gain or income for the taxable year"
               Two arguments for taxation here:
                       There is an accession to wealth because defendant is
                          $137,000 better off by repaying his obligations at less
                          than he was obligated to
                               $137,000 has been freed up
                       Because the bonds were loans whose proceeds are not
                          taxed, Defendant has to be taxed on the lessening of the
                          obligation otherwise the tax free loan is converted into
                          tax free gain
       o Zarin v. Commissioner
               Plaintiff gambled on credit at casino; Casino illegally provided
                  him credit to a total of $3.5 million; Plaintiff and casino settled
                  the debt for $500,000; IRS wants the difference taxed
               Rule: To have indebtedness that can be cancelled, debtor must
                  be personally liable for the debt or hold property subject to the
                  debt
                 If a loan is illegal, personal liability does not attatch
                 Regarding casino chips, they are evidence of the casino's
                  debt to player, so player does not hold them subject to
                  his debt to the casino
         Rule: The contested liability doctrine says that if a taxpayer
           in good faith disputes the amount of a debt, a subsequent
           agreement by the parties on the amount of the debt is treated
           as the amount of the original debt for tax purposes
                Here, because of the illegal nature of the debt, it can be
                  disputed in good faith
o   Section 108 - Income from Discharge of Indebtedness
         If taxpayer is insolvent or in a chapter 11 proceeding,
           discharged debt is not included in income, but only up to the
           amount of the insolvency
                Section 108(d)(3) says to determ9ine insolvency by
                  subtracting fmv of assets from liabilities and if liabilities
                  are greater than assets, insolvency results
         If Section 108(a) applies, certain tax attributes need to be
           reduced
                Net Operating Losses
                General Business Credits
                Minimum Tax Credit
                Capital Loss Carry Over
                Basis Reduction
                       Look to Section 1017 to determine how to reduce
                          basis
                               Reduce basis of property in the first
                                   taxable year following the discharge
                               Determine how much reduction is needed:
                                        Basis of all property owned after
                                           the discharge minus all liabilities
                                           after the discharge equals the total
                                           amount of reduction (Sec.
                                           1017(b)(2))
                                                Consider cash here
                                        Basis must exceed liabilities to
                                           have a reduction in basis
                Passive activity loss and credit carryovers
                Foreign tax credits carryovers
         Loan Financed by Seller
                If a loan is financed by a seller and the buyer is
                  SOLVENT, and the reduction of the loan would typically
                  be a cod, the reduction in the loan is a reduction in
                  purchase price (Thus, basis is reduced
o   When a debt is paid for in something other than cash, recharacterize
    as a cash transaction and the lender's basis is the amount of the debt
         If services are used, the value of the services is equal to the
           amount of the debt
o   Discharge of Indebtedness and Recourse and Non-Recourse Loans
         If there is a recourse debt that is satisfied by deeding property,
           the amount realized on the transfer is the fair market value of
           the property
                          This is necessary because the lender can go after the
                           debtor personally
                        If the lender chooses to forgo collection of the
                           remainder, that amount is subject to the cancellation of
                           indebtedness rules
                If there is a non-recourse debt that is satisfied by deeding
                  property, the amount received is the face value of the loan
       o Cancelation of indebtedness can arise by operation of law
                Example: X owes W money; X dies and W fails to file a claim
                  for repayment from estate and statute of limitations expires
                        This cancels the debt owed
       o Note that a loan can be converted to a gift, and thus not subject to cod
           taxation, if the relationships of the parties support it
                Also, Section 102 can apply
   Exclusion of Gain from Sale of Principal Residence
       o Section 121 - exclusion of Gain from Sale of Principal Residence
                If a residence has been owned and used by taxpayer as a
                  principal residence for two of the preceding five years, a gain
                  does not have to be recognized
                        This statute can only be used once every two years
                        Gain limited to $250,000 for singles, $500,000 for
                           married couples
                                Only apply $500k exclusion if:
                                        Either spouse meets ownership
                                           requirement
                                        Both spouses meet the use requirements
                                        Neither spouse has used Statute in past 2
                                           years
                If a sale or exchange happens before two years is met and it
                  occasioned by employment, health, or unforeseen
                  circumstances, prorate the exclusion
                        Number of months in house/24
                If depreciation has been taken on property, recapture that by
                  not including as an exclusion any amount attributable to
                  depreciation
   Assignments of Income
       o Income From Services
                Lucas v. Earl
                        Taxpayer entered in contract with wife before he was
                           entitled to any money giving her 50% of his earnings
                        Rule: Anticipatory agreements do not change tax
                           liability; Whoever has earned the money must pay taxes
                           on it
                Commissioner v. Giannini
                        Taxpayer is entitled to portion of profits as salary, but
                           only takes a small amount of what he is entitled to; He
                           tells the company to do whatever they want with it;
                           Company creates a foundation at UofC and the IRS
                           wishes to tax taxpayer on what was given to the
                           university
                        Rule: When one does not receive money and does not
                           control its disposition, it is not beneficially received by a
                           taxpayer and thus he owes no taxes on it
                        Control is the key component: If the taxpayer
                         said: "Don't pay me, pay him," tax would be due
        Rev. Ruling 66-167
               Taxpayer serves as executor of wife's estate and is
                 entitled to a portion of the estate as compensation;
                 Taxpayer elects not to take entitlement and the IRS
                 questions whether he should pay taxes on what he was
                 entitled to
               Rule: Where one renders services with the intent that
                 they be gratuitious, there is no tax liability on what he
                 would have been entitled to
                      Timing, purpose, and effect of waiver can show
                         that a benefit was received, likely from controling
                         where the money went
                      Methods of waiving: Formally saying so within 6
                         months of appointment, implied waiver by not
                         including commissions in filings
        Rev. Ruling 74-581
               A law school professor works at a clinic and per a federal
                 statute, is paid for representing a client; Professor signs
                 check over to school and so the issue is whether the
                 professor is taxed on the money
               Rule: When the income is endorsed directly to an
                 employer per an earlier contract with the employer, it is
                 not income to taxpayer
o   Income from Property
        Helvering v. Horst
               Father transfers interest coupons from bonds to son
                 shortly before they came due; The IRS wishes to tax
                 father on the interest the coupons represent
               Rule: Because the power to dispose of income is equal
                 to owning it, the transfers of rights to income is treated
                 as if the donor earned it and thus he is taxed on such
                 income
                      Here, it does not matter when the income is
                         earned because the coupons represent the rights
                         to such income and taxpayer has received the
                         benefit of the income by giving it to son
        Blair v. Commissioner
               Taxpayer had a life interest to income from a trust; The
                 interest was assigned to his children and the IRS sought
                 to tax the taxpayer on the income
               Rule: The valid assignment of an interest without
                 reservation will not cause donor to be taxed
                      Note the difference if the taxpayer had given only
                         a portion of the income
        Estate of Stranahan v. Commissioner
               Taxpayer was taking a large loss so wished to accelerate
                 future income to offset the loss; He sold future rights to
                 dividend income to son for valuable consideration;
                 Consideration was reported as income by father and son
                 reported dividend income; IRS feels taxpayer should be
                 taxed
                               The outcome of this case depends on how it is
                                characterized
                                      If it is a loan, father is taxed
                                      If it was a valid sale, son is taxed
                      Rule: Although the general rule is that assignment of
                        income from property retained by taxpayer will not end
                        tax liability, where the income is sold for valuable
                        consideration, the taxpayer will escape liability
                             Note that this was not a loan because the son
                                took the risk that the company would go
                                bankrupt
               Susie Salvatore
                      Salvatore owns a gas station that Texaco wants to buy;
                        Before the sale, Salvatore transferred shares in the
                        property to her children; On their tax returns, the
                        children reported their shares and Salvatore reported
                        her share of the gains from sale
                      Rule: This case shows how the IRS looks to the
                        substance of the transaction to see that this transfer
                        was really designed to lower tax liability
               Dividend Situations
                      The key in determining tax liability depends on who
                        owns the stock on the date of record
                      Note that the right to the dividend cannot be the only
                        thing transferred, the stock must be transferred as well
   Business Deductions
       o Section 162 - Trade or Business Expenses
               One may deduct from gross income all ordinary and necessary
                 expenses paid or incurred during a taxable year in carrying on
                 any trade or business, including:
                      Reasonable salaries for services rendered
                      Traveling expenses while away from home in the pursuit
                        of business
                      Rentals for business property
               Ordinary and Necessary
                      Only ordinary and necessary expenses are currently
                        deductible, thus making capital expenditures not
                        currently deductible, per section 263
                      Welch v. Helvering
                             Taxpayer worked with a company that went
                                bankrupt and once it emerged from bankruptcy,
                                obtained grain contracts with Kellogg; To
                                reestablish good will, taxpayer paid the debts of
                                the bankrupt company and seeks to deduct those
                                payments
                             Rule: An expense is necessary if it is helpful in
                                carrying on business
                             Rule: Ordinary does not necessitate habitual
                                expenses, but rather looks to the community
                                      This is where this case failed
               Expenses
                      Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co.
          Rule: Cost associated with acquiring an asset,
           such as construction costs, are capital
           expenditures and are not deductible
                 This includes wages paid in constructing,
                   even though those are normally currently
                   deductible
   Midland Empire Packing Co. v. Commissioner
         Company paid money to line floor with concrete
           to prevent oil from leaking into building which
           was disrupting storage activity
                 Issue is whether this is a capital
                   expenditure or an expense
         Rule: Repairs keep the property in an efficient
           operating condition and do not add value or life
           to the property. They are a currently deductible
           expense.
                 This case qualified as a repair and was
                   deductible
         Rule: Improvements or additions prolong the life
           of property, increase its value, or create a new
           use for property. These are capital expenditures
           that are not currently deductible.
   Mt. Morris Drive-In Theater Co. v. Commissioner
         When the theater was built, the drainage system
           was not properly installed and needs to be
           repaired; Is this an expense or capital
           expenditure?
         While this looks like a repair, it was treated as a
           capital expenditure because it creates a system
           for fraud because builders would improperly
           construct things so they could be "repaired" and
           deducted instead of depreciated over time
   INDOPCO v. Commissioner
         Taxpayer was being acquired by another
           company; To facilitate the transaction
           accountants, bankers, and attorneys were hired;
           Taxpayer wished to deduct these expenses while
           the IRS characterized them as capital
           expenditures
         Rule: If an expenditure creates or enhances an
           asset or the benefit from the expenditure reaches
           beyond the tax year, it is a capital expense
                 Depreciate or amortize over the life of
                   asset; If no life, deduct upon disposition
   INDOPCO created a rule where many previously
    deductible expenses could be capitalized because their
    benefit is long lasting. Thus, the IRS allows some long
    term benefits to be deductible:
         Advertising, repairs, training costs . . .
   So…..
         Capital expense if an improvement or a situation
           where the benefit is realized longer than as year
   Per Section 1016, increase basis for capital expenditures
   Carrying on any trade or business
         Morton Frank v. Commissioner
                 Taxpayer was looking to buy a business and
                  traveled around the country seeking a suitable
                  candidate; Now wishes to deduct those expenses
                  and IRS says no
                 Rule: Because the statute presupposes an
                  existing business, expenses of investigating to
                  purchase a new business are not incurred while
                  carrying on a business
                       Because they are not deductible expenses,
                          looks to section 195 to determine if they
                          are allowable start up expenditures
         Expenses while seeking employment
                 The costs of a job search can be deducted if:
                       If payment to a recruiter is contingent on
                          finding employment and not due until that
                          time, Hundley v. Commissioner supports
                          deducting the expense because at the
                          time of payment, taxpayer is carrying on a
                          business
                       If you are looking for a job in the same
                          type of business as currently employed,
                          the costs are deductible even if
                          unsuccessful
                       If first job, the costs of searching will not
                          be deductible
                       Consider the time between employment
   Reasonable Salaries (Sec. 162(a)(1))
         Exacto Spring Corporation v. Commissioner
                 Rule: A salary should be based on the rate of
                  return investors seek. If the sought after return
                  can be met which a certain salary, that salary is
                  reasonable. The thought is that no reasonable
                  investor would pay a salary that would hurt the
                  rate of return.
                       Note that this test is not widely used
         Harolds Club v. Commissioner
                 Rule: While a salary might seem high, if it was
                  paid via a free bargain and was reasonable when
                  it was decided upon, a deduction will be allowed
                       Free bargain may not be present if there
                          is a strong family relationship
   Travel Away from Home (Sec. 162(a)(2)) [Must meet
    documentation requirements of Section 274 and 50%
    limitation]
         Rosenspan v. United States
                 Traveling salesman attempts to deduct travel
                  expenses but he has no home and spends all his
                  time on the road; His argument is that the
                  corporate home should be his home
                 Rule: In order to deduct travel expenses while
                  away from home, one must have a home
         United States v. Correll
               Rule: Travel away from home requires a
                  taxpayer to be gone overnight and eats alone
        Andrews v. Commissioner
               Taxpayer has two businesses, one in New
                  England and the other in Florida; He has a house
                  in each state and seeks to deduct the duplicate
                  living expenses from the Florida as travel away
                  from home
               Rule: "Where business necessity requires that a
                  taxpayer maintain two places of abode, and
                  thereby incure additional and duplicate living
                  expenses, such duplicate expenses are a cost of
                  producing income and should be deductible"
        Revenue Ruling 99-7
               Rule: Commuting expenses are generally not
                  deductible, however:
                        Deductible if the work place is temporary
                          and outside the metropolitan area
                               Temporary means not expected to
                                  last, and does not last, longer than
                                  a year
                               If one discovers employment will
                                  outlast a year, no more deduction
                        If there are multiple work locations, there
                          can be a deduction for commuting to a
                          temporary work place regardless of
                          location
                        If the residence is the taxpayer's primary
                          place of business, he can deduct travel to
                          other work locations
   Education Expenses
        Hill v. Commissioner
               Taxpayer was a teacher and it to keep
                  certification needed either college courses or a
                  test over five books; Seeks to deduct the cost of
                  the courses, IRS says hell no
               Rule: If the education expenses are required by
                  an employer, even if there are other options,
                  they fit within the necessary and ordinary
                  language of section 162
        Coughlin v. Commissioner
               Tax attorney attended overnight conference and
                  seeks to deduct the tuition and travel expenses;
                  Guess what, IRS says no deduction
               Rule: A professional need to acquire knowledge
                  in order to perform ongoing work will create a
                  deductible expense
                        If the expense allows taxpayer to work in
                          new field, even if he does not intent to do
                          so, it will not be deductible
        Section 274(m)(2) provides that travel as a form of
          education is not deductible
          Business Meals and Entertainment With Clients
               Section 274 - Disallowance of Certain Entertainment
                  Expenses
                       No deduction is allowed for entertainment,
                          amusement, or recreation expenses unless the
                          taxpayer establishes that the expense was
                          related to, or preceded or followed a business
                          event, the active conduct of business
                       No deduction under sections 162 or 212 for any
                          traveling expense, any item considered
                          entertainment, amusement, or recreation unless
                          the expense is collaberated
                       Attendance at conventions - Sec. 274(h)
                       Business Meals - Sec. 274(k)
                               Food and drink can be deducted if the
                                  expense is not lavish under the
                                  circumstances and the taxpayer is present
                                  at the meal
                       Entertainment Tickets - Sec. 274(l)
                               Amount deductible cannot exceed the face
                                  value of the ticket
                                       However, does not apply to certain
                                         charitable sporting events
                                       If the tickets are for a skybox, only
                                         the seats are deductible and the
                                         amount is limited to non-skybox
                                         seats
                       Food and beverage expenses and entertainment,
                          amusement, or recreation expenses are limited
                          to a 50% deduction - Sec. 274(n)
o   Section 195 - Start-up Expenditures
        Generally, no deduction for start up expenses, except as
           provided in this section
        If a taxpayer elects to apply this section, the deduction will be
               FIRST YEAR: Whichever is less: Start up expenses or
                  $5000 reduced by the amount of start up expenses that
                  exceed $50k
                       This applies to the first year deduction
                       Per the phase out, if your expenses are over
                          $55k, you would deduct zero in year one
               REMAINDER: Divide the rest by 180 and take that
                  amount each month
               What happens if business is sold before 180 months?
                       Deduct what remains per 165 as a business loss
        Start Up Expenses
               Investigating the creation or acquisition of an active
                  trade or business
               Creating an active trade or business
               Any activity engaged in for profit in anticipation of the
                  activity becoming an active trade or business
        Must make election in first year, if you do not, you're fucked
        Make sure that the trade or business actually starts
o   Section 165 - Losses
          A deduction is allowed for any loss sustained during the year
           that is not compensated by insurance
                So, after finding out what loss is allowed, subtract what
                   was given by insurance
          The basis for determining loss shall be the section 1011
           adjusted basis for loss
          In the case of individuals, the loss is limited to:
                Losses incurred in a trade or business
                Losses incurred in any transaction entered into for
                   profit, though not connected with a trade or business
                Losses of property not connected with a trade or
                   business or a transaction entered into for profit, if such
                   loss arises from causalty
                        Per Treas. Reg. 1.165-7(b)(1), when there is a
                            causalty loss the amount of the loss deductible is
                            the lesser of either:
                                 FMV before the loss minus the FMV after
                                   the loss
                            OR
                                 The section 1011 adjusted basis, unless
                                   the property is used in trade or business
                                   or for the production of income and is
                                   totally destroyed and the FMV is less than
                                   the basis. In that case, use the higher
                                   adjusted basis.
                        Determine basis in non-destroyed property by
                            subtracting insurance proceeds and loss
          Note that when property is not totally destroyed, the insurance
           proceeds will reduce the basis

o   Sections 167 and 168 - Depreciation
        Section 167 - Depreciation
               There shall be allowed as a depreciation deduction a
                  reasonable allowance for the exhaustion, wear and tear,
                  and obsolescence
                      To qualify, property must be used in the trade or
                        business or be property held for the production of
                        income
                             Land does not fit in these categories
                                because it is not subject to wear and tear
                                and is thus not deprecible
        Section 168 - Accelerated Cost Recovery System
               To depreciate elligible property, you must determine:
                      The depreciation method
                      The recovery period
                      The convention
                      The adjusted basis
               Depreciation Method
                      200 Percent Decline Balance Depreciation
                        Method
                             Determine the straight line depreciation
                                percentage and double it; Apply that
                                percentage as the deduction, and reduce
                basis accordingly; Switch to straight line
                when the straight line percentage will
                result in higher deductions
              This method is the general method which
                applies to most property
       150 Percent Declining Balance Method
              This is similar to the 200 Percent Declining
                Balance Method, except use 150% instead
                of 200%
              This applies to the following property:
                     15 or 20 year property not
                        requiring the straight line method
                     Any property used in a farming
                        business
                     Any property that does not require
                        straight line method which
                        taxpayer wishes to elect to use this
                        provision
                             Not that if this election is
                                taken, it applies to all
                                property in the class and
                                cannot be revoked
       Straight Line Depreciation Method
              Divide years to depreciate over the cost of
                the property to get the percentage; Apply
                that percentage every year
              This method applies to the following
                property:
                     Nonresidential real property
                     Residential rental property
                     Any railroad grading or tunnel bore
                     Elected property
                             Not that if this election is
                                taken, it applies to all
                                property in the class and
                                cannot be revoked
                     10 year property described as
                        single purpose agricultural
                        structure or fruit or nut tree
                     Water utility property
                     Qualified leasehold improvement
                        property
                     Qualified restruant property
   Applicable Recovery Period
       3 year property is recovered in 3 years
       5 year property is recovered in 5 years
       7 year property is recovered in 7 years
       10 year property is recovered in 10 years
       15 year property is recovered in 15 years
       20 year property is recovered in 20 years
       Water utility property is recovered in 25 years
       Residential rental property is recovered in 27.5
          years
          Nonresidential real property is recovered in 39
           years
        Railroad gradings or tunnel bores are recoverable
           in 50 years
   Applicable Conventions
        Generally, apply the half year convention
        Mid-Month Convention
                Nonresidential real property
                Residential rental property
                Railroad grading or tunnel bore
        Mid-Quarter Convention
                If the aggregate bases of property that
                  was placed into service during the last 3
                  months of a year is equal to 40%, use the
                  mid-quarter convention
                However, this section does not apply to
                  property covered by the mid-month
                  convention or property placed into service
                  and disposed of in the same year
   Classification of Property
        Residential Renal Property
                Any building or structure if 80% of the
                  gross rental income is from dwelling units
        Non-Residential Real Property
                This constitutes section 1250 property
                  which is not residential rental property or
                  property with a class life of less than 27.5
                  years
        3 Year Property
                Any race horse which is more than 2 years
                  old at time placed in service
                Any horse, other than a race horse, that is
                  more than 12 years old when placed in
                  service
                Any qualified rent to own property
        5 Year Property
                Automobile or light truck
                Seni conductor manufacturing equipment
                Computer based telephone central office
                  switching equipment
                Qualified technological equipment
                Section 1245 property used for research
                  and experimentation
                Certain power equipment (look at statute)
        7 Year Property
                Rail road tracks
                Motorsports entertaiment complex
                Any Alaska natural gas pipeline
                Any property which does not have a class
                  life and is not residential rental property
        10 Year Property
                Single purpose agricultural structure
                Tree or vine bearing fruit or nuts
                         15 Year Property
                               Municipal wastewater plant
                               Telephone distribution plan and
                                 comparable equiment used for 2 way
                                 exchange of voice or data
                               Section 1250 property used to sell gas
                               Qualified leasehold improvement property
                               Qualified restruant property
                               Initial clearing and grading land
                                 improvements with respet to gas utility
                                 property
                        20 Year Property
                               Initial clearing and grading land
                                 improvements with respect to electric
                                 utility transmission and distribution
        Simon v. Commissioner
               Taxpayer had an antique violin bow which had
                  substantially appreciated while being used; As the
                  property was used in business and had been subject to
                  wear and tear, taxpayer seeks to depreciate it and the
                  IRS says no because it appreciates
               Rule: Because depreciation only requires that property
                  be subject to wear and tear of exhaustion, it does not
                  matter if the property appreciates while being used to
                  qualify for the depreciation deduction
o   Section 179 - Election to Expense Certain Depreciable Business Assets
        A taxpayer may elect to treat qualified property as an expense
           not chargable to a capital account
        Limitations
               Expense cannot exceed $25,000, or $100,000 if
                  between 2002 and 2008
               If the property costs more than $200,000, or $400,000
                  if the property is purchased between 2002 and 2008,
                  reduce allowable deduction
o   Section 212 - Expenses for the Production of Income
        Individuals are allowed to deduction all the ordinary and
           necessary expenses paid during the taxable year for:
               The production or collection of income
               For the management, conservation, or maintenance of
                  property held for the production of income
               In connection with the determination, collection, or
                  refund of any tax
        Higgins v. Commissioner
               Taxpayer lived off his many investments and incurred
                  many costs that were associated with managing them;
                  Taxpayer seeks to deduct them as business expenses
               Here, the court found that these were not business
                  expenses and thus not deductible. This was a watershed
                  case that encouraged Congress to pass Section 212
                  which would have allowed the deductions.
        Bowers v. Lumpkins
               Taxpayer purchased stock and the state attorney
                  general sought to invalidate the sale; Over a number of
           years, taxpayer incurred attorney's fees and sought to
           deduct those
        Rule: Attorney's fees that are expended to defend title,
           protect title, recover property, or develop property are
           not ordinary and necessary and thus are capital
           expenses that are attributable to the cost of property
                This is the same result as under section 162, as
                   section 212 incorporates it
   Surasky v. United States
        Taxpayer owned a significant share of a corporation and
           sought to influence its management; In order to do this,
           he contributed money to a proxy battle so he could get
           his way; IRS says this is not an ordinary or necessary
           expense
        Rule: Deductions of expenses under section 212 are
           allowed if incurred in the exercise of reasonable business
           judgment in an effort to produce income, even if the
           expenditure is far from the proximate cause of the
           income
        Rev. Ruling 64- 236
                This ruling modifies Surasky by declaring that the
                   IRS will require the expenditure to be the
                   proximate cause of the income generated
   Meyer J. Fleischman v. Commissioner
        Taxpayer is getting divorced and wife is trying to
           invalidate pre nup; Husband wants to deduct the
           expenses of fighting this under section 212 on the
           theory that he is conserving property
        Rule: In determining the deductibility of expenses, do
           not look to the effect of a claim, but rather the origin of
           the claim
                Thus, these expenses were not deductible, but
                   any expense regarding alimony would because of
                   the tax effects
                Here, note Section 212(3) and the tax planning
                   provision
   Random Section 212 notes
        Any commissions paid are costs of acquisition added to
           basis
                Upon sale, any commissions reduce the amount
                   received
        In determining if travel expenses to corporate meetings
           are deduct, look to see if they are ordinary and
           necessary
                It is not ordinary and necessary for a small time
                   investor to go to these meetings
        Section 271(h) prohibits deductions for seminars
   Conversion of Non-Income Producing Property to Income
    Producing Property
        Horrmann v. Commissioner
                Taxpayer received house from mother when she
                   died and he moved in; A few years passed and
                   he determined the house was too expensive and
                        he left; Tried to rent and sell the property, and
                        finally sold it for $20.8k (worth $60k when he got
                        it; $45k at abandonment)
                      Rule: To depreciate and take deductions for
                        property that was previously personal, the
                        property must be converted to property held for
                        income. While mere abandonment of such
                        property is not sufficent, efforts made to rent the
                        property are indicative of the conversion even if
                        the property is never rented.
                      Rule: In order to take a loss on property, the
                        transaction must have been entered into for
                        profit. When property has been used as a
                        personal residence, conversion here requires
                        more than abandonment and listing the property
                        for sale or rent. The property needs to be sold or
                        rented to convert it.
                 Lowry v. United States
                      Taxpayer owns a house and decides he does not
                        need it any longer; Shuts house down to personal
                        use; Opens and closes house for seasons; Puts
                        the house up for sale for more than FMV and
                        does not try to rent it
                      Rule: To convert property, it is not necessary to
                        rent it if it is clear the house was being held not
                        residentialy, but rather for the post conversion
                        appreciation
                             Consider:
                                       Length of time the taxpayer
                                          occupied the house
                                       Availability of house for personal
                                          use after conversion
                                       Recreational character of property
                                       Attempt to rent
                             The sale price must be a significant price
o   Interest
         Section 163 - Interest
              All interest paid or accrued on indebtedness is deductible
                     However, if a case of a taxpayer other than a
                        corportation, the amount allowed as a deduction
                        for investment interest shall not exceed the net
                        investment income of the taxpayer for the
                        taxable year
              If the taxpayer is other than a corporation, there is no
                 deduction for personal interest paid
                     The following are the allowable deductions for
                        personal interest:
                             Interest paid on indebtedness allocable to
                                a trade or business
                             Investment interest
                             Qualified residence interest
              Qualified Residence Interest
                     Acquisition Indebtedness
                          Acquisition indebtedness is debt which is
                           incurred in acquiring, constructing, or
                           substantially improving a qualified
                           residence and is secured by the residence
                                Refinancing indebtedness qualifies
                                  to the extent of what is refinanced
                        There is a $1,000,000 limit
                Home Equity Indebtedness
                        Home equity indebtedness is debt that is
                           not acquisition indebtedness that is
                           secured by a qualified residence to the
                           extent that the debt does not exceed the
                           FMV of the residence minus the amount of
                           acquisition indebtedness
                        There is a $100,000 limit
                Qualified Residence
                        This is the principal residence of the
                           taxpayer and any one other residence
        Rev. Ruling 69-188
                Rule: Interest is the amount one has contracted
                   to pay for the use of ome and is the
                   compensation paid for the forbearance of the use
                   of the money
                        Thus, a negotiated bonus or premunim
                           paid to a lender to obtain a loan is interest
                        Look to see if the funds were obtained to
                           pay the fee
                                If not, it is interest
   Section 221 - Interest on Educational Loans
        Individuals are allowed a deduction for an amount equal
           to the interest paid for qualified educational loans
        The amount of the deduction cannot exceed $2500 and
           is adjusted based on Modified Adjusted Gross Income
                (MAGI - $50k (or $100k if married))/$15k (or
                   $30k if married)
                        This means that if your MAGI is over
                           $65k, or $130k if joint return, there is no
                           deduction
        Determine MAGI by figuring AGI without regard to
           sections 199, 221, 222, 911, 931, 933, and after
           applying sections 86, 135, 137, 219, and 469
        Qualified Education Loans
                Needs to be solely used to pay higher education
                   expenses
                The funds must be expended for the taxpayer,
                   spouse, or dependent
                The funds are expended within a reasonable time
                   of incurring debt
   Section 7872 - Treatment of Loans with Below-Market Interest
    Rates
        In the case of any below-market loan which is a gift loan
           or a demand loan, the forgone interest shall be treated
                       as transferred from the lender to to borrower and
                       retransfered by the borrower to the lender as interest
                             The transfer is made on the last day of the year
                      If it is not a gift or demand loan, the lender is treated as
                       having transferred and the borrower is treated as having
                       received on the date of the loan an amount equal to the
                       excess of the amount loaned minus the present value of
                       all payments which are required to be made under the
                       term of the loan
                      Classify gift and demand loans as follows:
                             Gift Loan - Was the loan a gift?
                             Compensation Related Loans - Below market
                                loans between employer and employee or
                                independent contractor and a person the
                                contractor provides services to
                             Corporation Shareholder Loans
                             Tax Avoidance Loans
                      J Simpson Dean v. Commissioner
   Personal Expense Deductions
       o Section 213 - Medical, Dental, Etc. Expenses
               Non insurance compensated medical expenses of taxpayer,
                 spouse, or dependent to the extent that the expenses exceed
                 7.5% of AGI
                      All drugs must be prescribed or insulin
               Medical care means amounts paid for:
                      The diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention
                       of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any structure
                       or function of the body
                      Essential medical transportation
                      Section 7702B(c) qualified long term services
                      Insurance
               Medical care does not include cosmetic surgery unless it is
                 necessary to fix a deformity arising from a congenital
                 abnormality, personal injury, or disfiguring disease
               Non lavish lodging, under $50, can be deducted
               Raymon Gerard v. Commissioner
                      Daughter needed an air conditioner because of her
                       health condition; The issue was whether it can be
                       deducted as a medical expense because it increased the
                       value of the house
                             Note that because it improved the house, it is a
                                capital expense
                      Rule: When there is a medical expenditure that is a
                       capital expenditure, it is only deductible to the extent
                       that the expenditure exceeds the increase in the value
                       of the house
               Revenue Ruling 2002-19
                      Are uncompensated amounts paid for participation in
                       weight loss programs that have been ordered by doctors
                       as treatment for disease deductible?
                      Rule: While participation in weight loss programs to
                       improve appearances are not deductible, the costs of
                       doctor ordered programs are
                              Note that this does not extend to food purchases
       o   Section 170 - Charitable Deductions
               Deductions are allowed for any charitable contribution made in
                  the tax year
                       A charitable contribution is a gift to a government or
                         foundation
                              Foundation must be organized under US law,
                                 operate for certain charitable goals, no income
                                 from donation inures a private benefit to
                                 shareholder, no political issues
               Contribution Base
                       Contribution base is AGI without any section 172 net
                         operating loss
               Limitations on Amount of Deductions
                       Donation limited to 50% of contribution base for:
                              Church or association of churches
                              Educational organization with regular faculty and
                                 curriculum and has regular students
                              An organization whose principal purpose is
                                 medical care, education, or research
                              An organization which gets majority of funding
                                 from state or national government or from
                                 contributions from the general public and is
                                 operated to benefit a college or university
                              A governmental unit
                              A section 170(c)(2) organization whose funding
                                 comes from the government or general public
                              A private foundation as described in Section
                                 170(e)
                              A section 509(a)(2) organization
                       Donation limited to 30% of contribution base, but total
                         cannot exceed 50% of contribution base for all other
                         charities
               Sales to charitable organization - Section 1011(b)
                       If there is a section 170 deduction by reason of a sale,
                         the adjusted basis shall be determined by the following
                         ratio:
                              The portion of the adjusted basis which bears the
                                 same ration to the adjusted basis as the amount
                                 realized bears to the FMV
                                      X = AR/FMV; X(adjusted basis) = Basis
                                         for determining loss or gain
                       Charity's basis is cost plus what was received
   Bringing Deductions Together
        o Section 62 - Adjust Gross Income Defined
               Adjusted gross income is gross income minus deductions
                  allowed by this chapter
                       These are above the line deductions
                       Any deduction that is not covered here becomes a
                         section 63 below the line deduction
               Allowable Deductions
                       Trade or Business deductions not by an employee
                         State taxes from operating property are
                          deductible here; however, state income taxes are
                          deducted per section 63
                Reimbursed Expenses of Employees
                       Per Treas. Reg. 1.62-1T(e)(1), only expenses
                          reimbursed per agreement or expense allowance
                          are deducted here
                       If the expense is not reimbursed, deduct under
                          section 63
                Certain Expenses of Performing Artists
                Certain Expenses of Officials
                Certain Expenses of Elementary and Secondary School
                  Teachers
                Certain Expenses of Members of Reserve Components of
                  the Military
                Loss from the Sale or Exchange of Property
                Deductions Attributable to Rents and Royalties
                Certain Deductions of Life Tenants and Income
                  Beneficiaries of Property
                Pension, Profit Sharing, and Annuity Plans of Self
                  Employed Individuals
                Retirement Savings
                Penalties Forfeited Because of Premature Withdrawal of
                  Funds from Time Savings Accounts or Depositis
                Alimony
                Reforestation expenses
                Certain Repayments of Supplemental Unemployment
                  Compensation Benefits
                Jury Duty Pay Given to Employer
                Clean Fuel Vehicles and Refueling Property
                Moving Expenses
                Archer MSA
                Interest on Education Loans
                Higher Education Expenses
                Health Savings Accounts
                Costs Involving Discrimination Suits
o   Section 63 - Taxable Income Defined
        Taxable income equals AGI minus either the standard deduction
           or itemized deductions
        Standard Deductions
                Generally, standard deduction means the basic standard
                  deduction plus any additional standard deduction
                Basic standard deduction
                       If the taxpayer is filing a joint return or is a
                          surviving spouse, the basic standard deduction is
                          $9700
                       If the taxpayer is a head of household (sec.
                          2(b)), the basic standard deduction is $4850
                       All other cases result in a standard deduction of
                          $3850
                Additional Standard Deduction for Aged and Blind
                              The additional standard deduction is $600 if
                               taxpayer is 65, spouse is 65, taxpayer is blind,
                               spouse is blind
                                    Add them all up
                                    If not married or a surviving spouse, use
                                       $750
                      An individual is not elligible for the standard deduction
                        if:
                             Spouse files separate return and itemizes
                             Taxpayer is a non-resident alien
                             Estate, trust, or partnership
                 Itemized Deductions
                      Itemized deductions are deductions other than those
                        used to determine AGI (sec. 62) and the section 151
                        personal exemptions
                      Section 67 - Two Percent Floor on Itemized Deductions
                             Itemized deductions can only be taken to the
                               extent they exceed 2% of AGI
                             However, this limitation does not apply to the
                               following deductions:
                                    Section 163 interest deductions
                                    Section 164 tax deductions
                                    Casualty or theft losses under section 165
                                       or wagering losses under section 165
                                    Section 170 charitable deductions
                                    Section 213 medical expenses
                                    Impairment related work expenses
                                            Defined in section 67(d)
                                    Section 691(c) estate tax deduction
                                    Deductions allowable from personal
                                       property involved in short sale
                                    Section 72(b03) deduction where annuity
                                       payments cease before investment
                                       recovered
                      Section 68 - Overall Limitation on Itemized Deductions
                             If AGI exceeds $100,000, itemized deductions
                               are reduced by the lessor of:
                                    3% of the excess of AGI minus $100,000
                                    80% of the amount if itemized deductions
                                       allowable
                             However, this limitation does not apply to the
                               following:
                                    Section 213 medical expenses
                                    Section 163(d) investment interest
                                    Casualty losses
                             Apply this section last
   Capital Gains
       o Mechanics
                Step One: Netting and other Determinations
                    o Net short term capital gains against short term capital
                       losses
                            If there as any short term capital gain, it is taxed
                              as ordinary income
              o   Net long term capital gains against long term capital
                  losses
        Step Two: Determine Capital Gain Net Income
              o Capital gain net income is the excess of all capital gains
                  from sales or exchanges minus the losses for such sales
        Step Three: Determine Net Capital Gain
              o Net capital gain is the figure which receives special tax
                  treatment
                       If this is zero, no amount of capital gains are
                          entitled to favorable tax treatment
              o Net capital gain is determined by taking the net long
                  term capital gain and subtracting the net short term
                  capital loss
        Step Four: Determine Net Capital Loss (Gives you carry
          over)
              o Net capital loss is determined by taking the losses from
                  sales or exchanges of capital property and subtracting
                  the allowable loss amount under section 1211(b)
                       This is total losses, not net losses
                       When finding gains in Section 1211(b), use
                          regular gains, not nets
        Step Five: How Large a Deduction
              o Capital losses are allowed to the extent of capital gains
                  plus any excess not over $3000
                       Ex: Capital gains = $100,000 Capital losses =
                          $102,000: Full loss allowed
                       Ex: Capital gains = $100,000 Capital losses =
                          $105,000: Current deduction is $103,000 with a
                          $2000 remainder
        Step Six: What to do with any Remainder
              o If there is a net capital loss:
                       Start with Sec. 1212(b)(2)(A) and add $3000 to
                          short term capital gain (NOT NET)
                       The excess of the net short term capital loss over
                          the net long term capital gain for such year shall
                          be a short term capital loss in the succeeding tax
                          year
                       The excess of the net long term capital loss over
                          the net short term capital gain for such year shall
                          be a long term capital loss in the next tax year
o   Characterization
        Section 1221 - Capital Asset Defined
               Capital assets are property held by the taxpayer but
                  does not include:
                       Stock in trade
                       Property which is used in trade or business that is
                          of a character which is subject to the allowance
                          for depreciation or real property
                       Copyrights . . .
                       Accounts receivable
                       Hedging transactions
        Section 1223 - Holding Period of Property
          If the basis in the property is the same as the property
           exchanged and the property exchanged was a 1221
           capital asset
         If the owner's basis is the same as the transferor's
           basis, one may tack on the transferor's ownership
         If property is acquired through section 1040 and the
           property is disposed of within one year of decedent's
           death, and the person buying the property is an heir,
           then the person making the sale is deemed to have held
           the property for more than one year
   Section 1271 - Treatment of Amounts Received on Retirement
    or Sale or Exchange of Debt Instruments
         Amounts received by the holder on retirement of any
           debt instrument shall be considered as amounts
           received in exchange therefor
   Defining a Capital Asset
         Mauldin v. Commissioner
                160 acres of land bought for cattle ranching, but
                   land was never used for that purpose; Land
                   ultimatly subdivided; Plaintiff admits that for two
                   years he was in the business of selling land, thus
                   denying him capital gains treatment; However,
                   plaintiff contends that in year three, he was in
                   the lumber business and thus any sale of the land
                   was for investment purposes and should have
                   capital gains treatment
                Rule: To characterize as capital gains income,
                   the sale must not have been in the furtherance of
                   an occupation of the taxpayer
                        Here, because of the subdivision and
                           substantial income derived from the sale,
                           plaintiff was involved in the sale of land
                        Subdivision alone does not destroy capital
                           treatment, examine section 1237
         Malat v. Riddell
                Partnership buys land to either rent or sell;
                   Interior lots subdivided and sold and reported as
                   ordinary income; Exterior lots eventually sold and
                   plaintiff wants capital gains treatment
                Rule: If the property is being held for
                   appreciation (invvestment) it is entitled to capital
                   gains treatment; however, if offered for sale in
                   the regular course of business, it will be ordinary
                   income
         Section 1237 - Real Property Subdivided for Sale
                Subdivided property is entitled to capital
                   treatment if:
                        The land was not previously held for
                           business
                                Once in business, always in
                                   business
                        No structures have been built that
                           enhance value
                                  Minor enhancements OK, but not
                                   grading
                         Held for five years
        Section 1236 - Dealers in Securities
                 If you are trading for yourself, you are not
                   working with customers and capital treatment is
                   alright
                 But, if you are a dealer, you will not get capital
                   treatment
   Sale or Exchange Requirement
        Kenan v. Commissioner
                 Decedent devised $5m and will allows securities
                   to be given to meet the devise; Devise ends up
                   being part cash and part securities; IRS says
                   trustees have capital gains on the exchange
                 For starter, note that devisee's basis would be
                   value of claim surrendered
                 Rule: Because the devisee had a claim against
                   the estate and the estate used appreciated
                   property to settle such claim, it realized capital
                   gains on the transfer
                         The exchange is the claim for the money
                           and securities
                         The stock survived the exchange
        Hudson v. Commissioner
                 A person was owed $75,000 and sells that
                   judgment to taxpayer for $11,000; The judgment
                   was fulfilled for a total of $21,000; IRS wants this
                   to be ordinary income
                 Rule: Because the settlement of the claim
                   extinguished the debt, nothing was transferred
                   and the gain is not entitled to capital gains
                   treatment
                         The judgment did not survive the
                           exchange
   Judicial Gloss on the Statute
        Hort v. Commissioner
                 A lease was canceled for $140,000; This amount
                   was less than what would have been received for
                   the full term lease; Two questions: 1) is this
                   ordinary income or capital gain; 2) did the
                   taxpayer realize a loss due to the fact that the
                   full value of the lease was not realized?
                 Rule: Because the payment was in satisfaction of
                   the right to future income and the right to future
                   income was not effected by the payment, the
                   amount realized must be included in ordinary
                   income and not capital income
                         Note that the income producing asset was
                           not sold
        Metropolitan Bldg. v. Commissioner
                 Leasee subleased building to subtenant;
                   Subtenant wants to work directly with owner and
    buys out the lease for leasee; Does this result in
    ordinary income or capital income for the leasee?
   Rule: Because the income producing asset was
    fully exchanged, the disposition resulted in a
    capital gain

						
Related docs
Other docs by jennyyingdi
Montegrappa Exclusive Cufflinks
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
DOMAIN Ill Cognitive Development
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Taddle Creek Family Health Team
Views: 27  |  Downloads: 0
Engaging Clients in Fire Prevention
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
reading eyechart pub
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
HOME RETENTION SOLUTIONS INTAKE PACKET
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS April and
Views: 175  |  Downloads: 0
Patterson Elementary School
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES
Views: 106  |  Downloads: 0
TJF Red Light Appeal Opening Brief
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0