Technology Fee Information

W
Shared by: HC120706022743
Categories
Tags
-
Stats
views:
2
posted:
7/5/2012
language:
pages:
6
Document Sample
scope of work template
							      Technology Fee Information

Technology Fee Recommendation: $7.00 per credit
                (Capped at 12 credits)




              Student Technology Roundtable
                                                  2002 – 2003

                                           Members:
                                                Kristin Ruder
                                               Katie Guetter
                                              Brandon Yerks
                                               Jayson Read

              Meets: Thursdays at 5:00 in MSSA Conference Room
                        Technology Fee Information
                          Student Technology Roundtable
                                         2002 – 2003

What’s in here:
       Technology Advancements & Improvements
            o   A brief description of where technology has been put in place over the last few
                years and how much it has advanced.
            o   Currently, there aren’t very many figures, but we are working on getting some
                statistical information such as what percentage of total spending for different
                tasks has come from technology fee
                      A taste of that can be seen in the Classroom Technology section
            o   The website where more information can be found is provided.

       Technology Fee Usage
            o   This outlines what the technology fee will be used for.
            o   There has been some skepticism as to what the money collected from students
                is used for and this clarifies some of the misconceptions.
            o   There are also some excerpts from the MnSCU Board Policy concerning
                technology fee assessment, usage, and development.
                      The website where the entire policy can be found is provided.

       Technology Focus Sheet:
            o   This outlines the list of priorities that the Student Technology Roundtable has
                developed throughout the year.
            o   This is what Mark Johnson, Vice President of Technology, uses when he
                implements the technology fee.
            o   As you will see, four of the items are ongoing commitments.
                     These are initiatives that have already been in place and we would like to
                         see continue to thrive at the university
                     The committee has expressed that these ongoing commitments have the
                         highest priority
            o   The information that was gathered to make these recommendations came
                throughout the entire year through presentations by ITS staff and through group
                tours that the committee attended.
            o   As you may find out by asking any of the members, a lot of work is put into
                developing this focus sheet.

       Current Spending
           o Shows where funds have been spent this current year and how much was
                budgeted for this academic year.
            o   Note:
                    Spending for ACC is substantially under budget because a good part of
                       the funds are spent shortly after the spring semester is over when they
                       purchase Tier I machines.

       Next Year’s Budget
           o This budget is based on a committee recommendation of a Technology Fee of
                $7.00 per credit (capped at 12).
            o   By comparing this year’s budget (2002-2003) to next year’s budget (2003-2004),
                you will see that budgeted spending hasn’t changed.


Any questions pertaining to the information in here can be directed to me, Jayson Read. If I can’t
give you the answer right away, I will get the information for you. Feel free to call or email.

Phone: 507.385.0160                      Email: jayson.read@chartermi.net
      Technology Advancements & Improvements
                        Student Technology Roundtable
                                 2002 – 2003
Academic Computer Center and Satellite Labs

      200 new machines placed in the ACC
           o Replaced old machines in sections A, B, & D and Rooms 115, 125, & 125A
      Switch to Gigabyte Ethernet
           o Allows faster communication
      4 new satellite labs
           o AH203, AH204, Athletics, & Biology
           o Brings total number of labs to 18
                     Carkoski, Gage, CSU, ASA, Nelson Hall, Armstrong Hall, Otto Arena,
                         and Trafton
      Increases over the past three years in Satellite Labs:
           o Existing Prior to 2001-02: 7
           o 2001-02: Added 7
           o 2002-03: Added 4
      Providing over 700 machines to students
           o 400+ in ACC & 300+ in Satellite Labs
      Total value of all assets throughout ACC and Satellite Labs: $4.15 Million

Enhanced Learning Environments

      MavMAIL
          o Official online email and scheduling for MSU
      MavDISK
          o Dedicated space for file sharing, storage, and backup
          o Accessible both on campus and off
      MavNET
          o Wireless Technology providing an internet connection to those students with
             laptops and a wireless network card

Instructional Management (UCompass)

      Student enrollment increasing
           o From 6634 in FY02 to 21,644 in FY03

Classroom Technology

      Now up to 101 classrooms upgraded with multimedia presentation systems
           o Laptop connection, Projector, Document Camera, VCR, DVD, Internet
               Connection
      Increase from 86 to 101 FY03, increase from 15 to 86 FY02, and increase from 0 to 15 in
       FY01
      Cost for these improvements:
           o FY01 – $51,583 (Tech Fee Contribution - $0)
           o FY02 - $1,412,000 (Tech Fee Contribution - $510,000)
           o FY03 - $374,234 (Tech Fee Contribution - $296,400)

This Information was gathered from the following website provided by ITS:
             http://www.mnsu.edu/its/about/2002improv.html
                     Technology Fee Usage
                   Student Technology Roundtable
                                   2002 - 2003



What the Technology Fee is used for:

      Computers and computing devices used by students throughout MSU.

      The Technology Fee, in absolutely no way, is used to provide any means
       of technology for use by MSU faculty, staff, or administration.

      According to MnSCU board policy:
          o Technology Fee will be used for “the acquisition, upgrading and/or
             maintenance of technology for academic and student support
             activities.”
                  Subpart C, #1
          o “To provide or enhance student access to technology.”
                  Subpart C, #2
          o “The revenue from the fee shall be used according to a plan
             developed annually by a campus technology committee. … The
             campus student association shall have an opportunity to review and
             comment on the plan prior to its delivery to the college or university
             president.”
                  Subpart C, #3
          o “Changes in this fee shall be made after consultation with the
             campus student association.”
                  Subpart C, #5
          o The exact policy for Technology Fee can be found at the following
             website:
                  http://www.mnscu.edu/Policies/Procedures/511p1.html

      To enhance the education of MSU students by providing additional means
       of instruction to professors and educators.

      To provide knowledge of current technology that may be used in the
       careers that students at MSU are pursuing through their degree.
               Technology Fee Focus: 2003 – 2004

                    Student Technology Roundtable

Priorities
     Academic Computer Center (ongoing commitment)
         o Continue funding of the ACC and Satellite Labs and look at additional features
            that would enhance the student experience within the general lab environment.
         o Continue the comprehensive machine cycle to keep technology movement
            between labs and other student areas up to date.
         o Look into extending Satellite Labs with additional tier computers.


     Network Infrastructure (ongoing commitment)
         o Increase security and performance of networking infrastructure including wireless
            technology.
         o Install additional access devices and maintain existing devices to improve
            accessibility and speed.
         o Research a more comprehensive infrastructure replacement cycle.


     Classroom Technology (ongoing commitment)
         o Continue emphasis on equipping classrooms and labs with devices that enhance
             both student learning and skills.
         o Continue emphasis on integrating available instructional technology into the
             curriculum.
         o Implement a replacement cycle for instructional technology equipment to ensure
             adequate resources.
         o Maintain and enhance instructional management software
         o Continue training opportunities for students and faculty on instructional
             technologies.

     Technology Orientation/Communication (ongoing commitment)
         o Provide information about MSU Technology and IT Initiatives for all students.
                 In forums such as FYE Orientation, open houses, Information tables in
                    CSU, etc.
         o Identify a one-stop-location to receive additional MSU Technology information.
         o Start off all new students on standard collaboration application.

     Student Study Areas
         o Redesign and equip heavily used student study areas to make the space more
             technologically useable.
         o Continue installing power and mobile communications support.
         o Continue designing space to improve both collaboration for group study and
             comfort for individual study.
         o Possible Areas for improvement:
                  Outside Academic Computing Center
                  Outside Weiking Auditorium
                                            st     nd
                  Morris Hall Crossroads (1 and 2 levels)




                                                                           (cont on next page)
   MSU Portal
      o Integrate a collaboration application that supports mail, calendaring, collaboration
          and file sharing.
      o Emphasize communication and information delivery of IT Initiatives.
      o Provide one site for login access to Instructional Management (UCompass) and
          other campus systems.
      o Incorporate E-Commerce facilities to improve information availability and
          accessibility.
      o Provide a direct link to registration and the DARS system.
      o Provide customizable features to allow student selection of news, weather,
          sports, etc. information.
      o Implement a campus wide events calendar
                Research campus wide events calendar for all student activities.
                Discuss with Deans & VPs prior to implementations to ensure
                   commitment of content providers.

						
Related docs
Other docs by HC120706022743
Newhaven Monitoring Mtg Pres
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
healthmarketinnovations
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
HOTBED Metadata draft
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
ESP Galaxy Pre-Conference
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
However - DOC 1
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
ACTIF Members
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
SECTION IG ENERAL
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Practical 1
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0