Get documents about "CSPR Data Summary Presentation 2007 SEA Coordinator Meeting
Document Sample
State Comparison
SY 2009-2010
Inform the Department and Congress of Even
Start accomplishments
Determine where improvements are needed
State agencies may use data to inform
collaborators
2
This is a data reporting system, not an
evaluation.
There are limitations on extent to which data
can be analyzed.
Need to be cautious on drawing conclusions
about program impact based on data.
3
4
SY 2009-2010 Total Subgrants = 387*
$310,323 – $479,297 $544,762 – $965,591 $1,011,445 – $7,410,790
(20 States) (13 States) (18 States)
Average Number of
3 6 14
Subgrants per State
Median Number of
3 6 10
Subgrants per State
Range Number of
1–5 4 –11 6 – 58
Subgrants
Average Number of
31 34 40
Families per Subgrant
* Includes 49 states, DC and Puerto Rico
5
Reporting Year (total State Number of Subgrants, Number of Subgrants in
allocations/Our State allocation) National Data Our State Data
2009-2010 ($62 million/$______) 387
2008-2009 ($62 million/$______) 395
2007-2008 ($76 million/$______) 514
6
7
# of Adults Total # of
# of Families (%ELLs) # of Children Participants
Our State
2009-2010
2009-2010 14,325 15,027 (53%) 20,287 35,314
2008-2009 14,928 15,627 (59%) 21,929 37,556
2007-2008 18,163 18,966 (58%) 26,673 45,639
8
Of Participating Children:
41% were ages birth-two (___% Our State)
38% were ages 3-5 (___% Our State)
17% were ages 6-8 (___% Our State)
4% were over age 8 (___% Our State)
9
Newly enrolled families:
91% at or below the Federal poverty level (Our State ______%)
88% of newly enrolled adults without high school diploma and/or GED
(Our State ______%)
52% of newly enrolled adults had not gone beyond 9th grade
(Our State ______%)
10
Less
90
Days
365 + Nationally, percentage of families
Days 90 < 180 retained in each category has
Days
remained similar for the past two
years.
180 < 365
Days
11
12
National Even Start Data: Our State Even Start Data:
All states except 1 reported on this indicator ___ programs reported on this indicator
Definition of significant gains for TABE and Significant gain in our state for TABE and
CASAS determined by states CASAS is: _______________________
National Even Start Data Our State Data
# Adults Percent Adults with # Adults Percent Adults with
Measure Tested Significant Gains Tested Significant Gains
TABE 2,638 75%
CASAS 568 67%
Other 434 70%
13
14
National Even Start Data: Our State Even Start Data:
34 states reported on either the TABE and/or CASAS ___ programs reported on either the TABE and/or CASAS
33 states reported on either BEST, BEST Plus, BEST Literacy ___ programs reported on either BEST, BEST Plus and/or
and/or Other other
Definition of significant gains for measures determined by Definition of significant gain is_______________
states
National Even Start Data Our State Data
# Adults Percent Adults with # Adults Percent Adults with
Measure Tested Significant Gains Tested Significant Gains
TABE 348 67%
CASAS 2,802 75%
BEST 444 77%
BEST Literacy 1,200 73%
BEST Plus 2,108 79%
Other 171 67%
15
16
National Even Start Data: Our State Even Start Data:
32 states reported diploma data ___ programs reported diploma data
21 states reported GED data ___ programs reported GED data
14 states did not report data for this indicator ___ programs reported diploma and GED data
___ programs did not report data for this indicator
National Even Start Data Our State Data
Percent Percent Making
# Cohort Making Goal # Cohort Goal
Diploma 544 66%
GED 182 57%
17
National Even Start Data: Our State Even Start Data:
25 states reported diploma data ___ programs reported diploma data
45 states reported GED data ___ programs reported GED data
3 states did not report data for this indicator ___ programs reported diploma and GED data
___ programs did not report data for this indicator
National Even Start Data Our State Data
Percent Percent with
# Cohort Making Goal # Cohort Significant Gains
Diploma 155 64%
GED 1,332 66%
18
19
Percent of adults with significant learning gains
remained the same on CASAS and TABE
CASAS, BEST Literacy, and BEST Plus used most to
measure LEP learning gains
All states, except one, reported Diploma and/or
GED data
20
National Even Start Data: Our State Even Start Data:
Pool of 2,600 children who were age-eligible for ___ children were age-eligible for kindergarten and were
kindergarten and who were in Even Start for at in Even Start for at least six months
least six months ___ children exempted from testing
153 children exempted from testing
All except 2 states reported PPVT/TVIP data
National Even Start Data Our State Data
Percent with Percent with
# Cohort Significant Gains # Cohort Significant Gain
PPVT* 2,096 80%
* PPVT-III, PPVT-4, & TVIP
22
National Even Start Data: Our State Even Start Data:
1,536 children scored within “age ___ children scored within the “age appropriate”
appropriate” range of PPVT/TVIP range of PPVT
All except 2 states reported on this indicator
National Even Start Data Our State Data
Percent Percent
Scoring at 85 Scoring at 85
# Cohort or above # Cohort or above
PPVT* 2,132 72%
* PPVT-III, PPVT-4, & TVIP
23
24
National Even
Start Data Our State Data
National Even Start Data: PALS Pre-K
All states reported PALS data, Average #
18.4
Letters
except one
Recognized
2,098 children tested
Average # Letters Recognized
Reporting National Even
Our State Even Start Data:
Year Start Data Our State Data
___ programs did not report PALS data
___ children tested 2009-2010 18.4
2008-2009 18.4
2007-2008 17.9
25
Generally, the percent making gains and
demonstrating age-appropriate oral language
skills has been consistent over the last three
years, with Spring age-appropriate oral language
skills increasing steadily
Even Start children continue to score on the
higher range of the expected range on PALS–PreK
Upper-Case Letter Naming Subtask, 2009 - 2010
26
National Even Start Data: Our State Even Start Data:
All states except 2 reported on this indicator ___ programs reported data
National Even Start Data Our State Data
Percent Percent
# Cohort Making Goal # Cohort Making Goal
Kindergarten 1,476 79%
Grade 1 1,101 79%
Grade 2 833 78%
Grade 3 552 73%
28
National Even Start Data: Our State Even Start Data:
38 states reported PEP data ___ programs reported data
18 states reported data on other measures
All states reported on this indicator, except one
National Even Start Data Our State Data
Percent Percent
# Cohort Making Goal # Cohort Making Gain
PEP Scale I 4,898 81%
PEP Scale II 5,670 84%
PEP Scale III 2,720 82%
PEP Scale IV 2,104 80%
Other 3,969 91%
29
Related docs
Other docs by HC120704214135
