poster eval form by zgCNc9

VIEWS: 0 PAGES: 1

									    GEODAZE                                         EVALUATION FORM                                                        2004


Presenter's name:                                                                                              TOTAL:         /45

Title of Poster:                                                                                               OVERALL
                                                                                                                             /10
                                                                                                             IMPRESSION:

Title of Session:
Evaluator: In addition to numerical scores, please provide answers to questions in parts III, IV, and use part V
for additional comments. This kind of feedback is much more valuable to presenters than numerical
grades!                        guide to scoring:
                                1 = POOR, substandard for a national meeting
                                3 = AVERAGE student presenting at a national meeting
                                5 = PERFECT, no room for improvement

I. Scientific Merit/Content

            A. Statement of problem                                                     1   2    3   4   5
            B. Method is clear and appropriate                                          1   2    3   4   5
            C. Objectivity and adequacy of data                                         1   2    3   4   5
            D. Conclusions clearly stated and supported by data                         1   2    3   4   5
            E. Significance of research                                                 1   2    3   4   5
                                                                                                TOTAL (out of 25)

II. Poster Presentation

            A. Balanced between quantity of information and readability                 1   2    3   4   5
            B. Clarity and quality of figures                                           1   2    3   4   5
            C. Organization of poster                                                   1   2    3   4   5
            D. Quality of overall design                                                1   2    3   4   5
                                                                                                TOTAL (out of 20)

III. What was the strongest part of this poster? (please feel free to use the back of this sheet for additional
space)




IV. What part of the poster could use the most improvement? (please feel free to use the back of this sheet for
additional space)




V. Additional comments,especially regarding parts I and II (please feel free to use the back of this sheet for
additional space)




                                                                              Evaluators Signature_________________________

								
To top