McKnight NASAWorkUpdate
Document Sample


Aviation Safety and Security Program Accident Mitigation and Fuel Tank Inerting
NASA Glenn
Progress in Fire Protection Research
International Aircraft Systems
Fire Protection Working Group Workshop
Atlantic City NJ. 5-6 November, 2003
Bob McKnight robert.c.mcknight@ nasa.gov
Al Linne alan.a.linne@nasa.gov
Clarence Chang clarence.t.chang@nasa.gov
Jennifer Xu jennifer.c.xu@nasa.gov
1
Aviation Safety and Security Program Accident Mitigation and Fuel Tank Inerting
Organization- Accident Mitigation Project
Accident Mitigation Project
Manager -- Bob McKnight
Fire Prevention Element
Manager-Clarence Chang
Inerting/Oxygen Fire Safe Fuels Cargo Fire Detection
Manager-Clarence Chang Manager-Martin Rabinowitz Manager- Gary Hunter
Advanced Elevated Flash Low False Alarm
OBIGGS/OBOGS Point Fuels / Fire Detection
Fuel Tank Inerting Flammability 2
Aviation Safety and Security Program Accident Mitigation and Fuel Tank Inerting
Recent Accomplishments
Fuel Tank Inerting
-Flight test planning JSC B-747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft
-Valcor PH II -testing of small scale advanced high temp membrane
-Honeywell PH II-identified high temp materials and solvents for advanced
membrane manufacturing process
-Security program planning
-Flammability feed-back control sensors, algorithms
-Participation in Air Force Large Aircraft Survivability Initiative (LASI)
Low False Alarm Fire Detection
-Testing at NIST
-Testing at Boeing Commercial
-Proposal for hidden fire detecting and locating on technology
Elevated Flash-Point Fuels
-Fuel modification concepts identified. 3
Aviation Safety and Security Program Accident Mitigation and Fuel Tank Inerting
Security-Fuel Tank Inerting Background
Civil transport aircraft are now subject to what was once
only a military threat –MANPADS and Small Arms
(Man Portable Air Defense System)
Their proliferation has resulted in numerous shoot-downs and
close-calls involving civil passenger aircraft.
From 1975-1998, 585 passengers and crewmembers of commercial
transport aircraft died from MANPADS missile attacks. The attacks
brought down 24 aircraft and severely damaged 10. (1) .
They have long reach to arriving/departing aircraft Figure 1. The five foot long Stinger is seen
approaching the C–130 from the rear.(3)
Key to the threat is the difficulty of securing the 100 or more square
miles of land surrounding civil airports. (2)
They use the fuel system against the aircraft
The explosion of a 2 lb MANPADS warhead or impact effects of small
arms can induce a far larger explosion of fuel tanks. Moderate damage
can be magnified to make the aircraft unflyable.
Countermeasures to throw off guidance systems are limited
Countermeasures can be defeated
Small arms operate without automatic guidance
1. National MANPADS Workshop, Redstone Arsenal AL, 1998
Figure 2. The missile’s 2.2 pound warhead
2. “The Vexing Problem of Protecting Airliners from MANPADS” Aircraft
Survivability Magazine, spring 2003 detonates inside the engine nacelle.(3)
3. Aircraft Survivability Magazine, spring 2003 4
Get documents about "