rc analysis by Inkibj4H


									                               Two Full Solutions for a Simple RC Network

                                                Steve Keith


This paper will show how to find the voltage across a network containing a current source, a resistor and
a capacitor in parallel. The current source will be a pulse of width T. The first method will show a time
domain analysis, and the second method will show a frequency domain analysis that demonstrates how
to use residues and Fourier transforms.

1 – The circuit and the current source time graph

2 – Time Domain Analysis

The current analysis will be treated in two steps, thanks to superposition; a positive unit step at 0 and a
negative unit step at T. Assume that the circuit has no initial conditions before time=0.
Some equations to remember (v = Voltage, i=Current, R = Resistance and C = Capacitance:

Ohm’s Law for a resistor and an extension of Ohm’s Law for a Capacitor

KCL states that all of the currents entering and leaving a node must equal zero, so the current coming
into the top node has to equal the sum of the two currents leaving that node.

A few things to remember:

    -   The voltage across a capacitor cannot change instantaneously.
    -   A capacitor is like an open circuit to a signal that has been the same for a long time (DC)
    -   The current through a capacitor can change instantaneously
    -   t(0+) means the time as close to zero in the positive direction as possible.
    -   t(0-) means the time as close to zero in the negative direction as possible.

At t(0-) the current has not yet begun to flow, and since the voltage across the capacitor cannot
instantaneously change, then at t(0+) the voltage is still 0.

The first thing we will do is examine the natural, or source free response of this circuit. To do that, we
look at the circuit at t(0-), before the current is connected to the circuit. We set i(t) equal to zero in the
equation above, and find that:

After a little algebraic rearranging it turns out that:
Integrating both sides (t goes from 0 to t, v goes from v(0+) to v(t)):

Taking the antilog of both sides, rearranging and renaming v(0+) to       :

This is the form of the natural response, an exponentially decaying function that starts at the initial
value of the voltage and decays to zero. The rate of decay is dependent on the values of the resistor and
the capacitor. Here is a sample plot.






                                       1         2          3         4        5

This shows that if a circuit of this type has a voltage across the capacitor at time t(0+), and there are no
active sources, this voltage will decay over time. The capacitor gives up its charge by ‘bleeding’ through
the resistor. The charge is lost due to the generation and release of thermal energy.

Now that we know the natural (source free) response of the circuit, we are ready to take a look at what
happens when a source is applied. Using intuitive reasoning, we would assume that the voltage across
the capacitor would initially be zero and that it would ‘ramp-up’ exponentially to a maximum value that
it will maintain until the source is removed from the circuit. When that happens, the capacitor voltage
would exponentially decay to zero, bleeding its energy through the resistor. In fact, that is what

To determine the voltage response, we will use superposition to split the problem into two parts. We
will calculate the response for the rise of the current from 0 to 1 at t=0 and maintaining a value of 1 until
t=infinity. Then we will calculate the response for a drop in current from 0 to -1 at t=T, and maintaining
a value of -1 until t=infinity. Adding these two together gives us our pulse as defined in the first section.
See the figure below.

If we look at our circuit, and assume that the source is always on from t=0 to t=infinity, we can calculate
what the final value of voltage will be at t=infinity. Knowing that a capacitor acts like an open circuit to a
dc signal, we know that the voltage drop across the resistor due to current I is R*I. In our case, we know
that the current attains a maximum value of 1, so the maximum voltage is equal to R. We also know
that the circuit must act in accordance with the natural response equation we determined above.

Here is where initial and final conditions can help us out. We know that when t=0+, v(t) must be 0, and
we also know that at t=infinity, v(t) must be equal to R. In order to comply with these results and still
use our natural response equation, some inspection must be done. Plugging these time and voltage
values into the natural response equation and after some thought, we can determine that the full
response must be the following:


Try plugging 0 and infinity into this equation and you will see that at 0, v(t) = 0 and at infinity it equals R.

See the sample chart below for this function. It shows the voltage exponentially increasing from 0 to R
volts. For this sample chart, R=5.




                                         1        2        3        4        5

So this is the first part of our problem solved. Now we must find out what happens when the input
current is a transition in the negative direction (i.e. from 0 to -1) at t=0+. After we do this, we can adjust
the timing (slide negative pulse to the right) so that this negative pulse occurs at t=T and use the value
of our voltage at T (from the increasing exponential term) due to the positive pulse we just calculated.
Superposition tells us we can then add the two signals together to get the desired voltage response to
the complete current pulse.

Let’s start from scratch and have a negative step of 1 be applied at t=0. Forget about the positive step
we just calculated for now.
When this equation is manipulated, as above, we attain the same result for natural response, which we
would expect since the values of R and C haven’t changed.

However, in this case,    is a negative number, because of the polarity we chose for v(t).

Again, using our intuition, we know that the voltage at t(0+) will not change immediately, so it starts at
0. At t = infinity, the voltage would approach –R, and the approach is exponential as dictated by the
values of R and C. In order for these conditions to be met, we again need to inspect our natural
response and tailor it to fit the situation. We find that:


We are not done yet. We need to adjust this so that the negative pulse happens at t=T and not at t=0.
To do this, we need to adjust the exponential value of t as shown below.

Testing this out, we see that at t=T, the voltage is 0 and at t=infinity, the voltage is –R as we wish.

At this point, we have solved the two pulse responses and we need to add them together for the period
where they are both active (t>=T) as superposition dictates, to get the full response.


We can simplify this equation. Below are the two results, one is the voltage response during the
current pulse, and one is the voltage response after the pulse.

                                   Full Time Domain Solution:
This is the solution for the voltage response. Here’s a real world example.

Resistor = 5KΩ                          Capacitor=0.5µf              Current= 1 Amp Pulse of Period 7ms

3 – The frequency Domain Analysis using Residues and Fourier Transforms

We are going to use the same circuit we used before, and the same current pulse as a source. Here is
our strategy of attack.

1 – Write the circuit equation in the time domain and convert it to frequency domain.
2 – Fourier transform of the time domain of the supplied current into the frequency domain.
3 – Calculation of the frequency domain voltage from the frequency domain current.
4 – Conversion of frequency domain voltage to time domain voltage using residues.
5 – Compare with time domain answers.

This becomes much more mathematical than physical. To gain a feeling for what is going on here,
realize that even though we are dealing with physical circuits, we are translating them into ideal ‘mind
circuits’ with currents and voltages related to other circuit elements being just mathematical functions.
The variables dealt with when using these mathematical functions, to more widely encompass real
world situations can digress fully in complex math, which deals with imaginary numbers.

To that point, the voltage and current functions are examined for all possible values that could be
plugged into the variables. This means we will be using the complex plane where the x-axis contains real
values, the y-axis contains imaginary values and all other areas of the plane are a combination of both
real and imaginary (eg 1+i4). To capture all values, the functions are evaluated along the x axis as a
function of x, and in a semicircular area in either the upper half plane or the lower half plane as a
function of z, the complex variable (eg z=x+iy). This semicircular area is allowed to go to infinity. Any
singularities (poles or zeroes) that cannot be removed must be accounted for. If there happen to be
singularities along the x axis that cannot be removed, then the path of integration must go around them.
With the help of certain rules, we can shrink the semi-circle around these singularities on the x axis
down by letting the radius go to zero. This will be demonstrated in this example.


First some needed formulas and concepts; those are not derived, but merely stated, here.

FOURIER TRANSFORM PAIR – These two equations transform a time domain signal ( ) to a frequency
domain signal (   . A major reason for using the transform is that it can make problems that are
intractable or difficult in the time domain much easier to compute in the frequency domain.

Concept 1: In the time domain, if you have a derivative term, it transforms into a multiplication by the
complex frequency ( ) in the frequency domain. So here is what a capacitor current transforms into:

                             Time Domain =======Frequency Domain
                          Here the i in          is the imaginary number       .

Concept 2: Cauchy-Gorsat Theorem – If the function you are working with is analytic (no singularities)
in any closed contour in the z-plane (the complex plane), then the value of the integral of that function
around the contour is zero.
Concept 3: L’Hopital’s Rule – This will be useful to us in determining whether a singularity is removeable
or not. If you have a function that has a numerator [g(z)] and a denominator [h(z)], and at some point,
   , both the numerator and denominator are zero, and if both numerator and denominator are
differentiable at this point, and       , then

(The apostrophe means the derivative of).

The benefit here is that if the function is undefined (eg zero/zero) at a location, there may be a non-
infinite value, which can be found by taking the derivative of the numerator and denominator and
calculating the value of that. If this produces a non-infinite number, then the singularity at that point is

Concept 4: Jordan’s Lemma – for any rational function P(z) / Q(z), if the degree of the polynomial Q(z)
exceeds that of P(z) by at least one, and if the exponent of the e term below is positive, then the integral
around a semicircular arc contour in the upper half complex plane is zero:

r is the radius of the semicircular contour in the upper half plane. V>0.
There is a similar rule for when v<0, in which case, the semicircular area in the lower half plane is used,
and the direction of the contour integration is reversed.

Concept 5: Residues – If a function f(z) has only one singularity at , and you enclose this singularity
within a closed contour in the complex plane, then the residue can be calculated with the following

There are a number of ways to find residues. Residues are useful in determining what the integral of the
function f(z) is. In some cases, using residues is the only way to integrate difficult functions. More
details on deriving formulas useful in residue calculus are beyond the scope of this paper, but one more
formula is provided below that will be helpful in our example:

                                            at the point . If there are more than one singularity, you
calculate the residue at each singularity and add them together.

Multiplying by           above will eliminate the singularity in the denominator, as will be demonstrated

Concept 6: Dealing with singularities on the real axis (Integrals involving indented contours).
If f(z) has a simple pole at , and an arc is drawn with this singularity as the focal point, and the arc
subtends an angle of α radians, then

The integration is done in the counter-clockwise direction. (If the integration is done in the clockwise
direction, put a negative sign in front of the equation above.) This formula is useful for dealing with
singularities on the x axis as will be demonstrated later.


The information provided above should be enough to allow us to continue our discussion of the RC
circuit presented in the time domain section, repeated here for convenience.

The gory details

We start with the same time domain equation that we wrote for the circuit earlier and convert it into
the frequency domain equation using concept 1.

                            Time Domain ==========Frequency Domain

After rearranging terms we see that:

The Fourier transform for the current as a function of frequency (from the equations above) is:

Since the current is a pulse of 1 unit between 0 and T, we can confine the limits and rewrite this
equation as:

The integral evaluates to this:

Plugging this into the equation above for

Using the Fourier Transform to move from Frequency to Time Domain:

Here is where the usage of residues is useful in evaluating the integral above.

The first step is to determine the singularities in this horrendous looking equation. Let’s look at the first
term after some algebraic manipulation:

So you see that when              this term blows up! This is one of our singularities.
Next we see that there is an omega (      in the denominator. However, looking at the equation as a
whole, when you substitute            in the numerator, then the numerator and the denominator both go
to zero. This is where we need concept 3, L’Hopital’s Rule.

In our case, g(z), the numerator is

And the h(z), the denominator is

We need to take the derivative of these two equations (with respect to omega), plug in the value             ,
and calculate the value of the whole function at that point (the singularity). If we can do that and get a
non-infinite, non-zero value, we can remove this singularity from the calculation.

The derivatives are easy to calculate and you can also use Wolfram Alpha (interface available at
http://www.baselines.com/) to do the derivatives for you.

The derivative of the numerator is

The derivative of the denominator is

When 0 is substituted for omega, this reduces to

This is the value of our function when    =0. Since it is not an infinite value, we can remove this
singularity from our calculations.

The next step is to calculate the residue at the remaining singularity

Lets draw out the situation in the complex plane here, showing the contour path and the singularity:
The singularity i/RC is right on the Y axis, as it is a pure imaginary number.

Here is our equation again, copied from above.

We will refer to the integrand as       .

Concept 5 reformulated for our situation:



So, if we can calculate the residue, we can determine what v(t) is (by multiplying the residue by       .

You may have noticed that v(t) has integration limits of -∞ to +∞, and that          is a contour integral.
We capture all values of        by letting the radius of the semicircle go to infinity in the contour
integration. This allows us to go from -∞ to +∞ in the integration for v(t).

We will try to see if this equation is in a format where we can take advantage of Concept 4, Jordan’s
We can see that the numerator has a polynomial of order 1, and that the denominator has a polynomial
of order 2 (           . In addition, if t > T, we can be assured that the exponential term is positive.
Thus, the two conditions in Jordan’s Lemma are met. Given this, the integration around the upper semi-
circular arc is zero as r (the radius) goes to infinity, and we only need to worry about the integration
around the rest of the closed contour, which is the real axis from –r to +r as r tends toward infinity.

We use the upper half plane for the integration to find out what the voltage is during the time when t>T,
because this is when the exponential term is positive (Jordan’s Lemma). We will still need to calculate
what the voltage is when t<T. We will do that later.

For now, when t>T:

Using concept 5 :

We multiply our          by        and plug the singularity in for , we get:

(Remember                               Also remember that

Again using concept 5,

So if we multiply the residue by     , we will determine the value of the voltage integral we are looking
We’ve successfully calculated what v(t) is for t>=t.

If you compare this with what we obtained during the time domain portion of this paper, you see they

All that is left is to calulate what the voltage will be for the period of time during the current pulse, t>0
and t<=T. This is a bit more work! When t<T, this equation has a negative component in the
exponential term, so Jordan’s lemma does not hold for the upper half plane. We will need to use the
lower half plane when the exponent goes negative. So lets restate the equation and break it into two
simpler parts.

Again we call the integrand        :
One advantage in doing this is that we can use the upper half plane for      since the exponent here is
positive…this however leads to another complexity which we will deal with next.

Now that we have broken the equation apart, we can no longer treat the singularity at             as
removable. If you plug         into both    and     equations, you see that the numerator becomes 1 and
the denominator becomes 0, the sure sign of a pole that cannot be overlooked. We will have to
evaluate residues at this pole as well as the one at i/RC in the upper half plane, and then add the two
together. Let’s get that part done now before dealing with the lower half plane.

In this graph, the light blue area is the closed path we will be integrating. You see the singularity at i/RC
as before, and also the new non-removable singularity at 0. The process will be finding the residue at
i/RC as before, and then using concept 6 to determine the residue at the origin. Again, to capture the
complete solution, we will let the radius of the large semicircle go to infinity and we will allow the radius
of the smaller semi-circle to shrink to 0.

Concept 5:
                                                due to the singularity at i/RC.

Concept 6: (Here, r is the radius of the small semicircle.

We have a small semicircle around the singularity at zero, so                                     .

We combine both factors and we have our answer for

The only remaining task is to calculate        and use       and        to calculate total v(t) for t<T.

The difficulty here is that when t is less that T, the exponent term is negative, so we must evaluate this
function in the lower half complex plane. The one benefit is that the singularity i/RC is no longer in play.
It is in the upper half plane. All we need to worry about is the non-removable singularity at          The
semicircle is a mirror of the one used in the upper half plane. Since this is a mirror image, the direction
of integration in the lower half plane is opposite that of the upper half plane, so the result will have a
negative sign in front of it (clockwise integration as opposed to counter-clockwise).

Since there is no singularity within the large semicircle, all we need to do is evaluate the residue at 0
using concept 6.

As shown above, the total solution for the voltage during the current pulse is:

                                     Full Residue Solution:
               Full Time Domain Solution:

Thankfully, the solutions agree and we are finished. Time for a beer!

To top