Geographical Indications in Asia Problems in implementation
Document Sample


Geographical Indications in Asia
Institutional framework
Results from FAO questionnaires
• Questionnaires sent out with the official
FAO-EC letter of invitation
• 22 completed questionnaires received and
two blanks: 63% response rate
• 15 countries contributed out of 17 invited
Countries using identification tool
Collective trademark
GI
Country
Tradition
Geographical area
None
DOP
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Governments declaring objectives
of legal framework
Promote rural
development
Ensure fair
competition
Protect natural and
cultural heritage
Develop new
markets
Protect the
consumer
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Countries where products are
concerned by legal framework
Agricultural
Processed
Handicraft
Wines and
spirits
Herbal medicine
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Applications status
Country Number of Number of Registered /
successful applicants applications
registrations
Bhutan 0 0 n.a.
Cambodia
Philippines
India 10 100 10%
Pakistan 1 10 10%
Indonesia 1 9 11%
Mongolia 2 10 20%
China 172 816 21%
Viet Nam 13 39 33%
First conclusions and questions
• How do countries choose which tool to use?
• Main objectives: both local development and fair
competition in international markets
• Total number of applications varies
• Ratio registered / applications is not correlated
to total number of applications
– Possible explanation: long scrutiny process
– Industry stakeholders are preparing their application
carefully
Get documents about "