Docstoc

More from DHS Insider - Department of Homeland Security

Document Sample
More from DHS Insider - Department of Homeland Security Powered By Docstoc
					Department of Homeland Security




More from DHS Insider
          - Doug Hagmann Wednesday, June 20, 2012
          (19) Comments | Print friendly | Email Us
          http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/47420



                                   Northeast Intelligence Network

                                   It was not one contact, but a series of contacts over the last
                                   month from which the following information was developed from
                                   my source within the Department of Homeland Security. My initial
                                   article citing this specific source was published on May 8, 2012.

                                   This article details my subsequent contacts with my source
                                   beginning after May 14, 2012. Actual dates, times and locations
                                   have been omitted at the request of my source.

Our first meeting

The first words from “Rosebud’s” mouth were various expletives strung together in an interestingly
creative tirade. Based on the uncharacteristically profane welcome that I thought was directed at me,
it was quite obvious that my source was very angry.

“Do you know that the ‘[expletive deleted]-storm’ is still going on because of all the attention to your
article?” Thinking that the “bloom was off the rose” and I was about to lose a valuable source, I
began to remind my source that we agreed on what could be printed and spoken publicly, and he
seemed to have previously come to terms with the initial blowback created after the initial
information he had given me made the rounds. My explanation was interrupted by his sudden
laughter, a welcome relief from the tension I initially felt.

“Don’t worry, my friend, it’s all good. I just didn’t think the information would have such staying
power. We did the right thing by getting this stuff out there, and I’m convinced of that,” he stated.
“We hit a nerve, and a big one,” he added, allowing me to relax a bit and feel better about his use of
the words ‘we’ and ‘our.’

“I should have told you this before. Having the information first published in Canada was brilliant. It
added a layer of inconvenience beyond their [DHS] containment and control, and they [Canada Free
Press] did a great job with exposure. Make sure you tell them that. But the pressure is still on to find
out where the leaks are coming from, so we’ve got to change a few operational things. But you’ve
got to keep getting the word out while I take care of some things on my end,” my source instructed.

The first order of business was to establish a different communications protocol, followed by some
information my source wanted to make certain I had correctly or to reemphasize. “We’re going to hit
some more and even bigger nerves in due time, so just be ready” he added.
Ready for what? I wondered.

It’s the economy, stupid

“Before we get into the grit, I want to make sure you’re clear about what we talked about before,
especially about the economy. You know there’s talk at the highest levels about a coming financial
meltdown. When I say the highest levels, I mean the highest. But certain information is being
compartmentalized, and almost no information is being sent to out-of-the-loop law enforcement
agencies about why things are about to get ugly. They’re getting bigger and better equipment and
loving it - not questioning it beyond what they’re told. But here’s what you need to make sure
everyone understands when you write about our talks: Despite the fact our economy is on life
support, DHS will be budgeting another trillion dollars in surveillance measures and equipment for
police state tactics for two reasons.The first is to protect the politicians and the elite who are
concerned about their physical safety, and rightfully so. This is why you hear no meaningful
objections from either party, because both sides are benefiting, at different levels, from the controlled
economic meltdown. They are all in the pockets of the big banks, along with the regulators, and so
on. They are paranoid. Even the few who aren’t neck deep in graft - just knee deep. When
everything starts to unravel, they will be exposed as complicit, so they have been reminded not to
object to the increase in police state tactics,” said my source.

“Secondly, everything is preemptive. The power elite are enabling the looting process by
oppressing the truth, so they need to monitor everything. If they top can’t stop the details from
getting out, and I’m not talking about news from [expletive deleted] MSNBC or the MSM news, but
real news, they figure it’s going to get real ugly. DHS is not just being used as the controlling
mechanism to stop people from seeking revenge against the people in power who caused the
financial ruin or simply allowed it to happen, but to control information through surveillance,
intimidation, and force if necessary,” stated my source.

In response, I told my source that it sounds as if he’s strayed from matters of DHS concern to the
venue of international banking. “I’ve developed my own sources, too, as I’ve had to make some
sense out of parts of this of this along with you. So to that extent, I had to ask some questions from
people I trust who work in that field. Things are very connected - “incestuous,” came his reply.

As noted in my initial report, my source emphasized that an economic collapse and the resultant
societal chaos is now a common threat topic among top-level DHS officials. [Janet] Napolitano is
taking orders from Obama and some people and groups very close to him and making sure they are
carried out, without question.

Simply stated, it’s a two-part process that works together. “They [high-level DHS officials] are
working through their fusion centers to coordinate specific riot control measures with certain
municipalities, and have already started the process in the big cities. That’s for ‘blowback.’ But they
want to keep the specific information from getting out, which is for control,” he added.

“Why do you think DHS added a bunch of silly domestic threat categories to their list, like people
overly concerned with the U.S. Constitution, the Federal Reserve, and so-called conspiracies that in
any world except their global financial shell game, makes absolutely no sense,” my source asked
rhetorically. “Just make sure you emphasize that there is a degree of urgency at DHS over this that’s
coming right from the top.”
Something drastically changed

“Speaking of threat categories, I’ve never seen the line between genuine terrorist threats and
political enemies blurred like this, ever. You know my history, but others don’t. And you know we’ve
talked before, but not to this extent, because there’s really something wrong. I’ve been here since
[specific month/year omitted, replaced with: during the G.W. Bush administration] and I started to
notice it in 2007. Then, after the financial ‘crisis’ of late 2008, it seemed like everything changed. The
mood under [Michael] Chertoff became quite different in the latter part of his time at DHS. When
[Janet] Napolitano came in, it became clear that politics trumps true national security,” stated this
source.

There is a growing impatience of the top DHS and administration officials. It’s easy to recognize
instructional commands that legitimately serve national security. Instead of serving legitimate
national security threats, it’s about protecting individuals in our government, and not our country or
the people. DHS and certain agencies under DHS have evolved into a personal security apparatus
of government officials, it’s that simple,” he stated.

DHS is very busy monitoring people and groups considered threats to this administration, not our
country. FISA is disregarded, as is the general rule of law, something with which this department,
under this administration, remains unconcerned. The ends, which are questionable at best, justify
the means in all cases,” stated this source.

The White House 2012 “war room”

“Right now, it seems as if the duties of DHS overlap those with political issues, such as the re-
election campaign. As I mentioned before and can’t stress enough, the line between domestic terror
threats and political ‘enemies’ is blurred beyond recognition,” stated my source.

“Understand this: This administration has a very effective mechanism in place to monitor, in real
time, internet posters and postings. This is one group of people who understand how the internet
works, and is using their people to compile potential threats. Not Islamic terrorist websites, either.
American websites and social networks. We are spying on our own people, not for domestic threats,
but for political ones against this administration. it’s called ‘the war room,’” stated this source. “This is
different than the campaign war room full of young volunteers hopped up on Red Bull and
experienced in video games. This is “eyes only.’”

I asked for examples of “political surveillance,” and my source had plenty. “Drudge, of course,
[Andrew] Breitbart, although that threat seems to have been timely diminished, Glen Beck, Sheriff
Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse, [Alex] Jones, and a host of conservative, anti-affordable health
care, and anti-abortion sites for others. I’m not going to get into other names, as we could
compromise everything as the list is closely guarded and updated constantly. And I don’t think I need
to specifically mention your group, do I,” he asked rhetorically.

“Also, this group is often proactive in terms of mitigating potential threats. Their process is to
‘identify, infiltrate, disrupt, marginalize and ultimately, destroy.’” The last part, “destroy,” got my
attention. Asking how, my source provided a rather vague answer. “In the most efficient manner
possible. The tactics vary. You couldn’t just take down the Drudge website, for example, but things
could be done to weaken its effectiveness in a number of areas. Remember, the infrastructure of the
internet is being more tightly controlled. Look at the proposed legislation. What do you think that’s
for? And it also depends on the nature of the [political] threat.”
Presuming the answer, I asked the following question nonetheless. What about the FOIA process as
a method of exposure of such tactics? After all, one would think such a process could be fully
corrupted. “Really, that’s your question,” he replied. Enough said.

When asked who ultimately receives briefings about political threats, this source stated that “after
proper ‘formatting’ and ‘coding’ the information ends up at the White House.” “But in whose hands,” I
pressed. Sounding incredulous, he stated “you want me to name names?” “Yes, I’d really like that”
was my reply. “I don’t know all of them as more than one type of report is compiled, but I can tell you
that Valerie Jarrett gets a copy, maybe the first one. So does [David] Axelrod, but as he’s not on the
premises, I don’t know all of what he gets. But I’ve said all I can about this. Just understand that the
level in which this administration is involved in monitoring and reporting open source
communications for political gain, under the pretext of national security is staggering.”

Drones over America

The bipartisan move to make all U.S. real estate a battleground was instrumental for a number of
reasons, from the use of drones to the implementation of many of Obama’s executive orders.
“Especially the drones,” said my source. He added that drones are being used not as they should,
but as personal weapons for the advancement of this administration’s domestic goals. And don’t
think that some aren’t armed. They are, and for a reason.

“Here’s something to look for, a trial balloon of sorts,” stated my source. “Pick a state in the desert
southwest, and consider a hideous threat to our national security. Now, wait for Obama, Napolitano
and representatives of other agencies appear in a solemn news conference saying that they saved
the country from a nearly successful attack on our soil by using an armed drone to strike a target on
the ground before the terrorist attack could succeed. And the majority of Americans will applaud with
pride. It will all be staged, although the true facts confined to only the highest levels of government.”

The purpose of such an exercise? Condition Americans to believe we need both surveillance and
armed drones flying over our skies to keep us safe.

Connecting the dots

“As I said when you first wrote about our conversation, Obama and his crew don’t have any obvious
plans of going anywhere in 2013. They have no plans to accept any Supreme Court decision striking
down ‘Obama-Care,’ and intend to implement certain aspects by executive edict, regardless of the
decision. I am obviously limited to the extent of my direct experiences and sources, but Obama is
surrounded by a very loyal group of people in positions of extreme power. The DHS in particular is
working on turning inward on Americans who disagree or stand in the way of his policies. People
need to understand that the DHS is Obama’s personal army. The DOJ, EPA, other government and
non-government agencies and his economic advisors are all working together to changing this
country. They’re all power hungry and lack morality. They’ll stop at virtually nothing to see that our
country is changed and broken beyond repair.

The financial sector is out of control and lining the pockets of our elected leaders. Think Jon Corzine
and Jamie Dimon. Our debt is unsustainable. The class divide, due to crony capitalism is getting
worse. From my vantage point, considering the people I overhear and am in touch with, these events
are not only anticipated, but are being orchestrated in a deliberate, controlled manner.

Whatever the event, they intend to extend their stay another four years to finish what’s been started.
We will be a Marxist nation and a Banana Republic.”
False Flag - always an option

My source continued: “As we’ve discussed, I heard something that troubled me deeply, and still
does. As Obama’s approval rating dips, desperation becomes more of an issue. There is much
discussion about the racial divide in this country, and as we talked about, there is an anticipation
over the Trayvon Martin case. Depending on how things go, they are determined to inflate this into a
much larger issue, and plan to fan the flames of racial division to cause a much broader divide
resulting in a chaos on the streets.

But a back-up plan might be in the works. Remember, this is just rumor, just talk, but it makes sense.
Something that would cause deep sympathy for Obama and even the First Family - a false flag
operation where Obama or his family would not be in any actual danger, but it would appear that
way. Some sort of a threat or incident against them carried out by a person or group fitting the
fictitious threat categories identified earlier. Perhaps by a pro-Second Amendment, constitutionalist
and racist as well - making the most out of the fantasy threats to our country. Something that will fool
a whole lot of people and justify police-state like practices. Something that will change the hearts
and minds of as many people as possible, perhaps convincing them that there is a danger and
Obama is right. Just the thought of such a thing is chilling.”

Concluding, my source reminded me of the quote by Adolph Hitler’s Propaganda Minister Joseph
Goebbels: “The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it.”

Note: My source promised more information about the “pass” given to illegal immigrants shortly.
There’s more behind this than votes.




                                                           Doug Hagmann
                                                           Most recent columns




NEW message from a DHS insider
copy and paste this, they are actively going from one site to the next and taking
them offline.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1903696/pg1



18 June 2012: It was not one contact, but a series of contacts over the last month from
which the following information was developed from my source within the Department of
Homeland Security. My initial article citing this specific source was published on May 8,
2012. This article details my subsequent contacts with my source beginning after May 14,
2012. Actual dates, times and locations have been omitted at the request of my source.

Our first meeting
The first words from “Rosebud’s” mouth were various expletives strung together in an
interestingly creative tirade. Based on the uncharacteristically profane welcome that I
thought was directed at me, it was quite obvious that my source was very angry.

“Do you know that the ‘[expletive deleted]-storm’ is still going on because of all the
attention to your article?” Thinking that the “bloom was off the rose” and I was about to
lose a valuable source, I began to remind my source that we agreed on what could be
printed and spoken publicly, and he seemed to have previously come to terms with the
initial blow-back created after the initial information he had given me made the rounds. My
explanation was interrupted by his sudden laughter, a welcome relief from the tension I
initially felt.

“Don’t worry my friend, it’s all good. I just didn’t think the information would have such
staying power. We did the right thing by getting this stuff out there, and I’m convinced of
that,” he stated. “We hit a nerve, and a big one,” he added, allowing me to relax a bit and
feel better about his use of the words ‘we’ and ‘our.’

“I should have told you this before. Having the information first published in Canada was
brilliant. It added a layer of inconvenience beyond their [DHS] containment and control, and
they [Canada Free Press] did a great job with exposure. Make sure you tell them that. But
the pressure is still on to find out where the leaks are coming from, so we’ve got to change
a few operational things. But you’ve got to keep getting the word out while I take care of
some things on my end,” my source instructed.

The first order of business was to establish a different communications protocol, followed by
some information my source wanted to make certain I had correctly or to reemphasize.
“We’re going to hit some more and even bigger nerves in due time, so just be ready” he
added. Ready for what, I wondered.

It’s the economy, stupid

“Before we get into the grit, I want to make sure you’re clear about what we talked about
before, especially about the economy. You know there’s talk at the highest levels about a
coming financial meltdown. When I say the highest levels, I mean the highest. But certain
information is being compartmentalized, and almost no information is being sent to out-of-
the-loop law enforcement agencies about why things are about to get ugly. They’re getting
bigger and better equipment and loving it – not questioning it beyond what they’re told. But
here’s what you need to make sure everyone understands when you write about our talks:
Despite the fact our economy is on life support, DHS will be budgeting another trillion
dollars in surveillance measures and equipment for police state tactics for two reasons. The
first is to protect the politicians and the elite who are concerned about their physical safety,
and rightfully so. This is why you hear no meaningful objections from either party, because
both sides are benefiting, at different levels, from the controlled economic meltdown. They
are all in the pockets of the big banks, along with the regulators, and so on. They are
paranoid. Even the few who aren’t neck deep in graft – just knee deep. When everything
starts to unravel, they will be exposed as complicit, so they have been reminded not to
object to the increase in police state tactics,” said my source.

“Secondly, everything is preemptive. The power elite are enabling the looting process by
oppressing the truth, so they need to monitor everything. If the top can’t stop the details
from getting out, and I’m not talking about news from [expletive deleted] MSNBC or the
MSM news, but real news, they figure it’s going to get real ugly. DHS is not just being used
as the controlling mechanism to stop people from seeking revenge against the people in
power who caused the financial ruin or simply allowed it to happen, but to control
information through surveillance, intimidation, and force if necessary,” stated my source.

In response, I told my source that it sounds as if he’s strayed from matters of DHS concern
to the venue of international banking. “I’ve developed my own sources, too, as I’ve had to
make some sense out of parts of this of this along with you. So to that extent, I had to ask
some questions from people I trust who work in that field. Things are very connected –
incestuous,” came his reply.

As noted in my initial report, my source emphasized that an economic collapse and the
resultant societal chaos is now a common threat topic among top-level DHS officials. [Janet]
Napolitano is taking orders from Obama and some people and groups very close to him and
making sure they are carried out, without question.

Simply stated, it’s a two-part process that works together. “They [high-level DHS officials]
are working through their fusion centers to coordinate specific riot control measures with
certain municipalities, and already started the process in the big cities. That’s for ‘blow-
back.’ But they want to keep the specific information from getting out, which is for control,”
he added.

“Why do you think DHS added a bunch of silly domestic threat categories to their list, like
people overly concerned with the U.S. Constitution, the Federal Reserve, and so-called
conspiracies that in any world except their global financial shell game, makes absolutely no
sense,” my source asked rhetorically. “Just make sure you emphasize that there is a degree
of urgency at DHS over this that’s coming right from the top.”

Something drastically changed

“Speaking of threat categories, I’ve never seen the line between genuine terrorist threats
and political enemies blurred like this, ever. You know my history, but others don’t. And you
know we’ve talked before, but not to this extent, because there’s really something wrong.
I’ve been here since [specific month/year omitted, replaced with: during the G.W. Bush
administration] and I started to notice it in 2007. Then, after the financial ‘crisis’ of late
2008, it seemed like everything changed. The mood under [Michael] Chertoff became quite
different in the latter part of his time at DHS. When [Janet] Napolitano came in, it became
clear that politics trumps true national security,” stated this source.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:6/21/2012
language:
pages:7