The 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing

Document Sample
The 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing Powered By Docstoc
					      The 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing




                                      AMERICA BETRAYED
  27 June 2005: Preliminary Investigative Report: The Congressional Hearings on the Oklahoma
                                  City Bombing (PDF Format)

          Exclusive Interview on 1995 Oklahoma City bombing &
                      congressional report whitewash
29 December 2006: Taking no prisoners and disassembling the “investigative report” issued by the Oversight
  and Investigations Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee chaired by Congressman
 Dana Rohrabacher, Douglas J. Hagmann, director of the Northeast Intelligence Network appeared as a guest
   on the Roth Show last evening. Mr. Hagmann methodically debunked the congressional investigation,
     proving that the agenda of the investigation was never to prove a Middle Eastern or Islamic terrorist
                                                  connection.

  Listen to this fact-filled program as Mr. Hagmann explains why the events of April 19, 1995 led to those of
   9/11, and why two administrations, congressmen, senators, and others have “blood on their hands” and
                                               betrayed America.

          Download the broadcast segments (in three parts) to your computer, iPOD or MP3 player:

                               The Roth Show, Part 1 Length: 38:37; 6.7MB

                               The Roth Show, Part 2 Length: 38:28; 6.6MB

                               The Roth Show, Part 3 Length: 38:28; 6.6MB

   Overview of Rohrabacher’s hapless investigative
                      inquiry
                     EXCLUSIVE TO THE NORTHEAST INTELLIGENCE NETWORK

 “It is my honest opinion that if the Department of Justice and the federal investigative agencies
 had not ignored Jayna Davis and instead accepted the mass of creditable evidence compiled by
her, indicating direct Middle Eastern involvement in the bombing, the course of future events may
   have been altered. Had those investigators taken their duty seriously and followed up on the
      investigation of that information, it is entirely likely that the Twin Towers would still be
standing.”–Attorney David Schippers, former federal prosecutor who served as the House chief investigative
                        counsel for the 1998 impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton.
                                                By Jayna Davis
 29 December 2006: Congressman Dana Rohrabacher’s inquiry into the 1995 Oklahoma Bombing has been
billed as an independent examination of a possible foreign connection, but in reality, has amounted to nothing
                      more than the fruitless pursuit of repudiated conspiracy theories.
In early 2005, Rohrabacher publicly announced that he was looking into the evidence set forth in my book, The
    Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing, which documents the sworn
   testimonies of twenty-two eyewitnesses who implicated a Middle Eastern terrorist cell aiding and abetting
            Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols in the plot to destroy the Alfred P. Murrah Building.
   Yet, much to my bewilderment, the congressman has not yet demanded that the FBI fully investigate the
multiple sightings of Iraqi Republican Guardsman Hussain Al-Hussaini in the presence of Timothy McVeigh prior
to the bombing, exiting the bomb-laden Ryder truck the morning of April 19, and escaping the ill-fated Murrah
 Building in a getaway vehicle pursued by the FBI in an all-points-bulletin issued for Middle Eastern terrorists.

   More significantly, two federal court rulings establish that this Iraqi soldier has no provable alibi for the
 morning of the bombing. Yet, Congressman Rohrabacher has expended most of his investigative energy and
 dollars chasing decade-old phantoms and empty leads, trying to implicate dead or imprisoned suspects that
                             were officially cleared by the government years ago.
  Here is his angle of research in brief: Rohrabacher primarily focused upon two groups of suspects with anti-
  government views. The first alleged culprit was German national Andreas Strassmeier. Strassmeier formerly
served as a security officer for Elohim City, a white-separatist religious compound located in eastern Oklahoma.
     Rohrabacher expressed to me on a number of occasions his belief that Strassmeier could have been a
 government informant in a sting operation gone awry. However, the FBI informed the congressman in writing
                        that Strassmeier was never an employee of the U.S. government.

The second group of suspects that Rohrabacher pursued included jailed members of the Aryan Republic Army
              who perpetrated a host of Midwestern bank robberies during the early 1990s.

   Despite two years of investigation, Rohrabacher could not make the connection between these neo-nazi
suspects and the 1995 Oklahoma bombing. But he is not alone in his futile venture. The FBI, with hundreds of
              investigators and millions of dollars in resources, failed to establish a link as well.

But you can’t fault the FBI for a lack of trying. The Bureau conducted 25,000 witness interviews in a Herculean
effort to tie the neo-nazi suspects to the Oklahoma City bombers. After all, they were cut from the same cloth
as Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. They would have fit the profile of anti-government, angry white males
       who were capable of avenging their hatred of the establishment by destroying a federal building.
   Collaring a militiaman from the Aryan Republican Army gang of bank robbers or German national Andreas
Strassmeier would have satisfied the public demand to apprehend the infamous John Doe 2, the man who was
the target of the greatest international manhunt of the 20th century. After investigating this terrorist attack for
   more than a decade, I have concluded that the FBI desired to arrest McVeigh’s accomplice only if he was
                                            Caucasian, not foreign.

             Rohrabacher’s insistence to pursue debunked conspiracies despite no proof

 A string of court rulings and a book authored by the lead investigator for the FBI Oklahoma Bomb Task Force
      establish that the most prodigious federal investigation in U.S. history failed to uncover any evidence
        implicating Andreas Strassmeier, residents of Elohim City, and the band of Midwest bank robbers.
     Despite the Bureau’s comprehensive investigation, it could not produce one eyewitness account,
 fingerprint, motel registration log, or phone record linking these alleged conspirators to “any overt act in
                                         the commission of the crime.―
 Moreover, in 2004, FBI agents were forced to testify under oath during Terry Nichols’ Oklahoma murder trial
 that the Aryan gang of bank robbers, Andreas Strassmeier, and his former neighbors at Elohim City all have
 provable alibis and have been officially cleared of suspicion by the FBI. Therefore, the presiding judge ruled
        that this avenue of research amounted to nothing more than “hyperbole and a dry hole.”

      Rohrabacher ignores definitive court ruling which repudiates findings in his final report

  The Oklahoma court’s 2004 ruling that established there was no proof to support the rightwing conspiracy
   theories was conspicuously absent from Rohrabacher’s final report on the Oklahoma City bombing. In my
opinion, this omission is both flagrant and deliberate. I say that because I informed the congressman about the
 court’s repudiation of the neo-nazi conspiracy theories during several recorded phone conversations in 2005.
                           Rohrabacher’s record casts doubt upon his motives

     Congressman Rohrabacher’s personal inquiry into my research has been cursory, limited to a phone
  conversation with the former CIA Director Jim Woolsey and brief interviews with only two of my witnesses,
                                whom he has publicly described as “credible.”

     In summer 2005, bombing convict Terry Nichols told Rohrabacher in a face-to-face interview that the
 substance of evidence outlined in The Third Terrorist “could be correct.” Upon exiting his prison meeting
  with Nichols, the congressman told me in a recorded phone conversation that I had developed
 “the heaviest evidence of foreign complicity,” yet my 368-page copiously documented book warranted
 only five paragraphs in his final report, neglecting to mention any and all major elements of my investigation.

 In spring 2005, I complied with the congressman’s request to draft twenty questions and a list of evidentiary
 exhibits to subpoena from the FBI. Nearly two years have passed, Rohrabacher has issued his final report on
   the Oklahoma bombing, and not one of my submitted questions was posed to the Department of Justice.
   In May 2005, Chicago lawyer David Schippers, a former federal prosecutor who served as the House chief
investigative counsel for the 1998 impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, conducted videotaped interviews
  with the principal witnesses featured in The Third Terrorist. Afterward, Mr. Schippers shared his evaluation
  with Congressman Rohrabacher and several high-ranking congressional leaders stating that the credibility of
 the witnesses could deliver an indictment against the Iraqi soldier accused of assisting Timothy McVeigh with
                                          just “one day of testimony.”

  Did Congressman Rohrabacher then fly to Oklahoma to view the witness interviews? He did not. Did he fly
         David Schippers and me to Washington, D.C. to view the witness interviews? He did not.

Instead, Rohrabacher found the financial resources to fly himself and his family to Germany to execute a dead-
 end search for Andreas Strassmeier. Upon returning, he flew with several staff members to the Philippines to
 track down empty leads regarding allegations posed by dead witnesses. Yet he could not afford plane fare to
bring attorney David Schippers and me to Washington to present more than a dozen witness interviews before
                                       members of his subcommittee.
 Rohrabacher made no attempt to speak with retired FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel who took possession of my
twenty-two sworn witness affidavits that were later withheld from the defense teams for McVeigh and Nichols.
Such an act could constitute obstruction of justice because the evidence contained in those sworn statements
  mitigated the roles of the bombing defendants to button pushers, not masterminds of this heinous crime.

    More importantly, I suggested to the congressman that his probe would yield an investigative coup by
  declassifying intelligence reports and alerts issued by the U.S. Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and
  Unconventional Warfare. As former co-chairman and a member of the Congressional Task Force, Chairman
                    Rohrabacher retained the authority to unseal the spring 1995 warnings.

  I possess portions of those warnings which predicted, weeks before the zero hour of 9:02 A.M. on April 19,
 that Iran-sponsored Islamist terrorists had recruited “two lily whites” (i.e. Timothy McVeigh and Terry
    Nichols) to carry out the bombing of an American federal building somewhere in the “heart of the U.S.”
   Once again, Rohrabacher ignored my request. As a result, the prior warnings that strongly suggest foreign
 state sponsorship of the largest U.S. terrorist attack before September 11, 2001 remain conspicuously absent
                                  from the Rohrabacher’s final bombing report.
      Iraqi suspect’s foreknowledge of 9-11 ominously omitted from Rohrabacher’s findings

  Confidential psychiatric records confirm that in 1997, Hussain Al-Hussaini, the Iraqi Republican Guardsman
whom witnesses named as McVeigh’s principal accomplice, made a foreboding prediction about a future event
 to take place at Boston Logan International Airport, the point origin for two of the four hijacked flights that
slammed into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Rohrabacher egregiously omitted this startling
   revelation from his final report – evidence which establishes that the Iraqi suspect might have harbored
                    foreknowledge of the Al-Qaeda plot, four years before Black Tuesday.

 The congressman cannot explain why the man who has been implicated as a key participant in the Oklahoma
  City bombing later suffered anxiety so acute regarding his airport job at Boston Logan International that he
checked into a psychiatric hospital to seek treatment for recurring panic attacks. When asked about the source
           of his trepidation, he told his therapist “if something happens there, I will be a suspect.”

 Was Al-Hussaini’s hysterical prediction a bizarre coincidence or a clear indicator of terrorist complicity? At the
 time he made these shocking statements to his psychiatrist, he was residing with two former Iraqi Gulf War
         veterans who provided food catering services for the commercial airlines at Boston Logan.

 It is important to note that in the wake of the 2001 aerial suicide attacks, law enforcement speculated that
food services workers, who were cleared for unlimited access to secured areas, could have easily planted box
                                      cutters aboard the doomed flights.
Could Al-Hussaini’s apprehension about something sinister that might occur at Boston Logan Airport constitute
the “silver bullet” that National Security Advisor Condi Rice assured the 9-11 Commission did not exist prior to
                                           the September 2001 attacks?
   Attorney David Schippers answers that question unequivocally in the introduction to The Third Terrorist.

 “It is my honest opinion that if the Department of Justice and the federal investigative agencies
 had not ignored Jayna Davis and instead accepted the mass of creditable evidence compiled by
her, indicating direct Middle Eastern involvement in the bombing, the course of future events may
   have been altered. Had those investigators taken their duty seriously and followed up on the
      investigation of that information, it is entirely likely that the Twin Towers would still be
                                               standing.”
 Sadly, the congressman did not consider this disturbing evidence which establishes the nexus between 4-19
                                 and 9-11 relevant to his two-year inquiry.
 Summary of Rohrabacher’s notable failures to conduct a legitimate probe of The Third Terrorist

Rohrabacher has refused to pose any questions to the FBI regarding the Islamic connection presented in The
 Third Terrorist, including the evidence that refutes Hussain Al-Hussaini’s alibi. He has not demanded the FBI
explain why it failed to investigate affidavits from witnesses who positively identified Al-Hussaini delivering the
       48-hundred pound fertilizer/fuel oil bomb to the doomed Murrah Building. Even more shocking is
 Rohrabacher’s decision to ignore the disappearance of those sworn statements from the FBI Oklahoma City
                  field office where FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel took custody of them in 1999.

Rohrabacher has refused to declassify the Congressional Task Force warnings that indicate Iran sponsored the
                             bombing of an American federal building in 1995.
   And finally, he has refused to pay for my plane fare to Washington, D.C. so that he could review recorded
 interviews with the majority of the confidential witnesses featured in The Third Terrorist while ensuring their
                                            anonymity and security.
                      Statements of undisputed fact that Rohracher cannot refute

 I say without compunction that Congressman Rohrabacher has issued a shamefully incomplete report on the
Middle Eastern connection to the Oklahoma City bombing, and in so doing, has performed a grave disservice to
                                  the truth and the slain of April 19, 1995.
 After a two-year investigation, it is inexcusable that Chairman Rohrabacher has uncovered nothing to refute
                                          the following undisputed facts:

   1. More than a decade has passed, and to this day, the FBI has refused to issue an official on-the-record
  statement exonerating Hussain Al-Hussaini. Why has the Bureau declined Al-Hussaini’s publicly broadcast
requests to clear him as a suspect in the worst act of mass murder in the annals of American criminal history?

 The Bureau has publicly cleared dozens of men who were collared and questioned because they bore a slight
      resemblance to the sketch of John Doe 2. Hussain Al-Hussaini remains the exception to the rule.
2. Rohrabacher has not established the alibi of the man whom multiple witnesses have identified as John Doe
                                                      2.

3. The FBI has not explained why it refused to question Hussain Al-Hussaini about his location when the bomb
                                        destroyed the Murrah Building.

4. Federal court records reveal that the FBI previously suspected Hussain Al-Hussaini’s Oklahoma City employer
                                of ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization.

  5. The FBI has refused to surrender to Congress the original motel registration logs which corroborate the
  testimony of witnesses who claim Timothy McVeigh rented a room in the company of an Iraqi associate of
                               Hussain Al-Hussaini on the eve of the bombing.
 6. The FBI took custody of the brown Chevrolet pickup that witnesses claim carried Middle Eastern suspects
 from the bomb site. The Oklahoma City police found fingerprints inside the recovered truck. However, those
   prints were not compared to the immigration files of the three Middle Eastern nationals, whom witnesses
                observed in that getaway vehicle before, during, and after the bombing. Why?
    7. Congressman Rohrabacher has not compelled the Department of Justice to explain why it failed to
investigate the twenty-two witness affidavits that I delivered to FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel. Those affidavits
 were never turned over to the lawyers for McVeigh and Nichols and are now classified as “missing”• by the
                                                   FBI. Why?

   8. The intelligence reports and prior warnings issued by the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and
  Unconventional Warfare that predicted an Islamic attack in the “heart of the U.S.” remain classified. These
 documents have never been investigated as an indicator of Iranian state sponsorship of the 1995 bombing of
                                         the Alfred P. Murrah Building.
                Why Rohrabacher’s Oklahoma City bombing report betrays the truth
In summary, the FBI has been unable to connect the citizen militia movement, neo-nazi bank robbers, Elohim
City white supremacists, or alleged government informants such as Andreas Strassmeier to the 1995 heartland
                                                  bombing.

Linking an examination of these baseless theories that the courts have dismissed as a “dry hole” with the solid
     evidence of Middle Eastern complicity, effectively taints the Islamic connection by association. It’s the
                        proverbial saying, “throwing the baby out with the bath water.”
Congressman Rohrabacher’s misguided belief that homegrown terrorists have escaped justice in the slaughter
of 171 men, women, and children, turned up no hard proof in his congressional investigation, despite his two-
                                               year effort.
  His decision to ignore the most important facts raised by my investigation is reprehensible. By his acts of
omission, Rohrabacher has allowed the FBI to get away with a horrible injustice concerning credible and willing
               witnesses who solidly identified Arab men in critical phases of the bombing plot.

The fact that an FBI Agent, Dan Vogel, of the Oklahoma City field office stated emphatically that he personally
 took possession of sworn witness affidavits that I delivered to him, but later those documents went missing,
                    made no difference to Rohracher. Instead, he gave the Bureau a pass.
  The victims of the Oklahoma City bombing deserve better, and no matter how often the FBI boasts about
dedicating thousands of man hours and hundreds of agents to the aggressive pursuit of all leads in this case, I
can present one of their own, a twenty-eight year veteran agent, who can attest to the Bureau’s investigative
            negligence when failing to follow up on the evidence set forth in The Third Terrorist.

             Letter of cooperation by Jayna Davis to
                Congressman Dana Rohrabacher
                                                June 24, 2005
                                        Via Fed-Ex and Facsimile
                                      Congressman Dana Rohrabacher
                                                 Chairman
                             House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
                                     2338 Rayburn House Office Building
                                           Washington, DC 20515

   Re: Congressional viewing of videotaped witness interviews establishing Mideast connection to the 1995
                                            Oklahoma bombing
                                       Dear Congressman Rohrabacher,

It is my understanding that you would like to view the videotaped interviews conducted by David P. Schippers,
      the former Chief Impeachment Counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, during his May 2005 trip to
Oklahoma City. With the acumen of a seasoned prosecutor and litigator, Mr. Schippers probed the memories of
 the primary witnesses featured in my book, The Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma
City Bombing. His tough line of questioning will ultimately provide you and other congressional leaders with the
  House International Relations Committee an objective evaluation of veracity and character of the witnesses
under cross-examination. I believe you will find the statement of veteran FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel (retired)
 most pertinent to your inquiry into the disturbing disappearance of the twenty-two witness affidavits from the
                                              FBI’s bombing archive.
   Given your pressing timetable to render a decision whether or not to recommend hearings on the evidence
 presented in my book, it is my sincerest desire to accommodate your research. As you stated during our May
    28 telephone conference call with David Schippers, you would attempt to arrange your schedule to fly to
  Oklahoma City to review the witnesses’ recorded statements in the presence of my home state senators, Jim
 Inhofe and Tom Coburn. Such an offer is more than generous, given your repeated reminders to me that you
   have not yet been granted a budget to conduct a thorough investigation of the facts set forth in The Third
     Terrorist. As a result of those financial constraints, your personal investigation of my research has been
cursory, limited to a brief conversation with the former DCI James Woolsey and two short telephone interviews
with two of my witnesses, whom you publicly described as “credible― during your April 19, 2005 speech
                                           in the House of Representatives.

 In order to streamline expenses, I have consolidated your investigative process to one viewing session of the
    most critical aspects of the witnesses’ recorded testimonies, thereby sparing Congress and the American
   taxpayers the expense of flying me to Washington D.C. You have expressed immense appreciation for Mr.
 Schippers’ contribution, donating legal expertise and travel expenses to perform a firsthand evaluation of the
 witnesses’ commitment to their sworn affidavits a decade later. Presently, I anxiously await your scheduler to
           arrange an Oklahoma meeting so that you receive the maximum benefit from our efforts.

Meanwhile, I have been more than delighted to provide, at your request, a brief list of questions for the FBI.
 However, during our recent conference call, you stated that my queries, which were remitted to you months
ago, have yet to be presented to the Bureau. I assume the delay is due to your efforts to uncover the alleged
        complicity of the convicted Midwest bank robbers and German national, Andreas Strassmeier.

 A string of court rulings and a book authored by Jon Hersley, the former lead investigator for the Oklahoma
  Bomb Task Force, establishes that the prodigious FBI investigation failed to produce one motel log, phone
 record, fingerprint, or eyewitness account that tied the jailed Aryan Republican Army gangsters, Elohim City
  residents, or Andreas Strassmeier to any overt act in the commission of the crime. Moreover, much to the
 chagrin of federal agents, the FBI was forced to testify under oath before Judge Steven Taylor during Terry
    Nichols’ 2004 murder trial that the alleged neo-nazi suspects and/or “government informants in a sting
operation gone awry” have established alibis and have been officially cleared of suspicion. Hence, Judge Taylor
 ruled that such conspiracy theories amount to nothing more than “hyperbole” and a “dry hole.” Therefore, I
   am confident you are still actively seeking to prove or disprove the multiple sightings of Iraqi Republican
   Guardsman Hussain Al-Hussaini in the presence of Timothy McVeigh prior to the bombing, seated in the
passenger seat of the bomb-laden Ryder truck the morning of April 19, and exiting that truck in front of the ill-
                                              fated Murrah Building.
 In May, I complied with your request to provide a detailed inventory of evidentiary items that your committee
might decide to subpoena from the FBI in order to further validate my investigative work. I was elated to learn
during our recent telephone conversation with Mr. Schippers that Chairman Henry Hyde had agreed to sign any
    subpoenas that you choose to issue. Such an exploratory tool will provide definitive answers to the most
                               troubling questions raised in The Third Terrorist:

1. Why has the Justice Department/FBI not issued an official on-the-record statement exonerating Hussain Al-
    Hussaini of complicity in the Oklahoma City bombing? Has the DOJ provided Congress with Hussain Al-
              Hussaini’s whereabouts for the critical hours of the morning of April 19, 1995?

                  2. Why did the FBI never question Hussain Al-Hussaini about the bombing?
3. Why did the FBI previously suspect Al-Hussaini’s employer of ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization?
    4. Why were the original motel registration logs where witnesses testified McVeigh checked in with Al-
    Hussaini’s Iraqi cohort the evening of April 18, 1995, never returned to the establishment’s owner?
5. Whatever happened to the brown Chevrolet pickup that was seen carrying Middle Eastern suspects from the
bomb site? The Oklahoma City police found fingerprints inside the recovered truck. Why were these prints not
   compared to the immigration files of the three Middle Eastern nationals whom witnesses observed in that
                          getaway vehicle before, during, and after the bombing?
  6. Why did the Bureau rebuff my efforts to surrender the witness statements and supporting evidence in
 September 1997? Why did the FBI withhold from the defense teams the twenty-two witness affidavits that I
                        delivered to FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel in January 1999?
  7. Why were the prior warnings issued by the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional
   Warfare that predicted an Islamic attack in the “heart of the U.S.” disregarded as an indicator of foreign
                                                 participation?
  The publicity generated by my recent interview on the nationally syndicated Glenn Beck radio program has
 brought about a surfeit of media inquiries regarding Chapter 17: Prior Warning. As the former co-chairman of
   the Congressional Task Force, I believe you will want to personally address pressing questions about the
  Spring 1995 alerts that predicted, weeks before the zero hour of 9:02 A.M. on April 19, that Iran-sponsored
  Islamist terrorists had recruited “two lily whites” (i.e. McVeigh and Nichols) to carry out the bombing of an
   American federal building. Meanwhile, I am poised to provide copies of the warning in my possession to a
                                              reporter of my choosing.

     I look forward to speaking with you as soon as possible to arrange a personal meeting to inspect the
 videotaped witness interviews with Mr. Schippers. I also await answers to my questions to the FBI and Terry
                           Nichols regarding his Philippine connection to Al-Qaeda.

                                                   Sincerely,

                                                    [signed]
                                                  Jayna Davis

                                          cc: David Schippers, Esquire
                                               Senator Jim Inhofe
                                              Senator Tom Coburn

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:1
posted:6/21/2012
language:
pages:7