Get documents about "PP_07_ArizonaAz
Shared by: king0fpunjab
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 6/12/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 4
Document Sample
Community Development Block Grant Performance Profile
ARIZONA, AZ
Program Year From 7/1/2007 To 6/30/2008
Data as of 09/30/2008
Program Year 2007 Funds 1
2007 CDBG Allocation $11,958,557.00 Expenditures By Type of Activity
Program Income Receipted During Program
Economic Development
Year 2007 $25,401.68 4%
Administrative and Planning
Total Available $11,983,958.68 15%
Acquisition
0%
2
Expenditures
Other Expenditures
Type of Activity Expenditures Percentage 1%
Housing
Acquisition $33,626.00 0.42% 33%
Economic Development $302,935.33 3.78%
Housing $2,631,222.74 32.84%
Public Services $146,401.33 1.83%
Public Improvements $3,593,484.11 44.84%
Public Services
Other Expenditures $95,438.75 1.19% Public Improvements 2%
45%
Administrative and Planning $1,210,025.09 15.10%
Total Expenditure $8,013,133.35
Program Targeting
Percentage of Expenditures Assisting Low- and
Moderate-Income Beneficiaries 3 90.27%
Percentage of Expenditures That Benefit
Low/Mod Income Areas 38.86%
Percentage of Expenditures That Aid in The
Prevention or Elimination of Slum or Blight 7.25%
Funds Expended in Community Revitalization
Strategy Areas and by Community Development
Financial Institution. $0.00
Percentage of Funds Expended in Community
Revitalization Strategy Areas and by Community
Development Financial Institution 0.00%
CDBG Beneficiaries by Racial/Ethnic Category 4
Race Total Hispanic
White 82.40% 8.42%
Black 2.50% 0.12%
Asian Pacific Islander 0.00% 0.00%
American Indian/Alaskan Native 2.34% 0.47% Income of CDBG Beneficiaries 4
Asian 0.85% 0.03%
Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.10% 0.00%
American Indian/Alaskan Native & White 0.72% 0.35% 100.00%
Asian & White 0.20% 0.09% 90.00%
Black & White 0.17% 0.07% 80.00%
American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black 0.05% 0.02% 70.00%
Hispanic Ethnic 0.00% 0.00% 60.00%
Other Multi-Racial 10.67% 9.71% 50.00%
40.00%
Income of CDBG Beneficiaries 4 30.00%
20.00%
Income Level Income Group Percentage
10.00%
Extremely low Income (<=30%) Extremely Low 2.45%
0.00%
Low Income (30-50%) Low 4.97%
Extremely Low Low Mod Total Low Mod Non Low Mod
Moderate Income (50-80%) Mod 53.36%
Total Low and Moderate Income (<=80%) Total Low Mod 60.78%
Non Low and Moderate Income (>80%) Non Low Mod 39.22%
Program Year 2007 Accomplishments
Number of Actual Jobs Created or Retained 0
Number of Households Receiving Housing
Assistance 698
Number of Persons Assisted Directly, Primarily
By Public Services and Public Facilities 36,033
Number of Persons for Whom Services and
Facilities were Available 5 163,862
Number of Households for Whom Services and
Facilities were Available 5 1,348
Number of Units Rehabilitated - Single Units 694
Number of Units Rehabilitated - Multi-unit Housing 0
Funds Leveraged for Activities Completed
During Program Year 2007 $2,827,446.71
Notes:
1
Also, additional funds may have been available from prior years.
2
The return of grant funds is not reflected in these expenditures.
3
Derived by dividing annual expenditures for low-and moderate-income activities by the total expenditures for all activities (excluding planning and administration, except
when State planning activities have a national objective) during the program year.
4
For entitlement communities, these data are only for those activities that directly benefit low- and moderate-income persons or households. They do not include data for
activities that provide assistance to low- and moderate-income persons on an area basis, activities that aid in the prevention and elimination of slums and blight, and
activities that address urgent needs. For states, these data are reported for all activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons or households, aid in the
prevention and elimination of slums and blight, and address urgent needs.
5
This number represents the total number of persons/households for whom services/facilities were available for [in many cases] multiple area benefit activities as
reported by grantees. A service or facility meeting the national objective of benefiting low- and moderate-income persons on an area basis is available to all residents of
the area served by the activity. If one or more activities had the same or overlapping service areas, the number of persons served by each activity was used to calculate
the total number served; e.g., if two activities providing different services had the same service area, the number of persons in the service area would be counted twice;
once for each activity.
Data Limitations:
● These profiles capture grantee performance information for only one year. Many CDBG-funded activities are multi-year efforts that do not achieve results in each year
of their existence. This is especially true for economic development and public facilities activities. While grantees may be working diligently to carry out such activities,
this may not be evident in reviewing a grantee's performance for only a one-year period. Therefore, these data must be considered in the context of the local program.
● Errors and omissions in reporting performance information in IDIS may occur and will result in inaccurate data appearing in these profiles. Grantees are working hard
to correct erroneous data and supply missing data in IDIS, and HUD has instituted edits to prevent many of the errors. However, the effort to improve the quality of data is
not complete.
● Information on accomplishments is for most, but not all, eligible activities. Accomplishments include those reported on the Selected Accomplishments website, as well
as accomplishments for additional eligible activities.
● The number of persons served for activities may vary greatly depending on whether or not they are available to all persons residing in a service area or are available to
a limited clientele. Certain activities may be made available to all residents in their service areas when at least 51 percent of the residents are low- and moderate-income
persons. For these activities, grantees report the number of persons residing in the service area as the number of persons served by that activity. In contrast, when
activities are intended to benefit a limited group of persons (rather than all persons in an area) of whom at least 51 percent are low- and moderate-income, grantees
report only those persons actually served by the activity. For example, a nieighborhood library is available to all persons residing within a designated service area, while a
day care program would require participants to qualify based on family size and income.
● The number of persons served may include activities where grantees report the number of times a service was provided rather than an unduplicated count of persons
served. For example, some grantees report the number of meals served to its elderly clients by their Meals on Wheels program, while others report the number of elderly
persons receiving meals. The CDBG program anticipates issuing guidance to make reporting for such activities more uniform.
