Berkeley Bibliography.pdf

Document Sample
Berkeley Bibliography.pdf Powered By Docstoc
					                                Berkeley Bibliography
Abad, Juan Vázques. “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el opusculo sobre el movimiento
       de Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 35-44.
Abelove, H. “George Berkeley’s Attitude to John Wesley: the Evidence of a Lost Letter.” Harvard
      Theological Review 70 (1977): 175-76.
Ablondi, Fred. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (2005): 493-
_____. “Absolute Beginners: Learning Philosophy by Learning Descartes and Berkeley.”
       Metascience 19 (2010): 385-89.
Ackel, Helen. Über den Prozess der menschlichen Erkenntnis bei John Locke und George Berkeley.
       München und Ravensburg: Grin, 2008.
Adamczykowa, Izabella. “The Role of the Subject in the Cognitive Process after George Berkeley:
     Passive for Active Subject?” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1
     Philosophia-Sociologia 6 (1981): 43-57.
Agassi, Joseph. “The Future of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” International Studies in Philosophy 7
       (1975), 167-78.
Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8
       (1985), 9.
_____. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48
       (1987), 235-56.
_____. “The Chain and the Animal: Idealism in Berkeley’s Siris.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 224-
_____. “The Path of Fire: The Meaning and Interpretation of Berkeley’s Siris.” In Daniel, New
       Interpretations (2007), 261-81.
_____. “Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 87-106.
_____. “Active Principles and Trinities in Berkeley’s Siris.” Revue Philosophique de la France et
       de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 57-70.
_____. “Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in Berkeley’s Siris.” History of European Ideas 37 (2011):
_____. “Light and Causality in Siris.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 91-118.
_____ and Belfrage, Bertil, eds. Berkeley’s Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Newcastle upon Tyne:
       Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011.
Alejandra Manzo, Silvia. “Eter, espirito animal e causalidade no Siris de George Berkeley: uma
       visao imaterialista da analogia entre macrocosmo e microcosmo.” Scientiae Studia 2 (2004):
Alfonso, Louis, E. “The Notes on the Government and Population of the Kingdom of Naples and
       Berkeley’s Probable Route to Sicily.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 20-27.
Allaire, Edwin B. “Berkeley’s Idealism: Yet Another Visit.” In Muehlmann (1995), 23-38.
Ameeri, Javed Iqbal. “Factors and Main Trends in Early British Empiricism. An Overview.”

       Journal of European Studies 8 (1992): 78-93.
Ameriks, Karl. “Idealism from Kant to Berkeley.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 244-68.
Anapolitanos, D. A. “The Continuous and the Discrete: Leibniz versus Berkeley and Locke.”
      Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991): 1-24.
Andersen, K. “One of Berkeley’s Arguments on Compensating Errors in the Calculus.” Historia
      mathematica 38 (2011): 219-31.
Ariotti, Piero. “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as Anticipators of Recent Findings on the
        Moon Illusion.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 9 (1973): 328-32.
Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the Existence of God.” In Garber (1998), 305-30.
Armstrong, D. M. “The Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics: a Reply to Ernest Sosa.” Hermathena 139
      (1985): 162-64.
Arsi’c, Branka. The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett). Stanford, CA:
        Stanford University Press, 2003.
Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul. “Splendid Impositions: Gainsborough, Berkeley, Hume.”
       Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998): 403-32.
Asher, W. O. “Berkeley on Absolute Motion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 447-66.
Atherton, Margaret. “The Coherence of Berkeley’s Theory of Mind.” Philosophy and
       Phenomenological Research 43 (1983): 389-400.
_____. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
_____. “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.” Journal of the History
       of Philosophy 29 (1991): 47-67.
_____. “Berkeley without God.” In Muehlmann (1995), 231-48.
_____. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of
       Philosophy 4 (1996): 347-66.
_____. “How to write the History of Vision: Understanding the Relationship between Berkeley and
       Descartes.” In Levin (1997), 139-66.
_____, ed. The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Lanham, MD: Rowman
       & Littlefield, 1999.
_____. “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la Défense de la Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz
       (2003), 135-57.
_____. “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige est blanche.” In Charles (2004), 127-
_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception.” In Winkler (2005), 94-124.
_____. “The Objects of Immediate Perception.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 107-19.
_____. “ ‘The Books Are in the Study as Before’: Berkeley’s Claims About Real Physical Objects.”
       British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 85-100.
Ayers, Michael R. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and Kant’s Transcendental Idealism.” In Idealism
       Past and Present, ed. Godfrey Vesey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 51-
_____. “Berkeley and the Meaning of Existence.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 567-74.
_____. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003-61.

_____. “Ideas and Objective Being.” In Garber (1998), 1062-1107.
_____. “Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?” In Winkler (2005), 34-62.
_____. “Berkeley, Ideas, and Idealism.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 11-28.
Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003-
Baber, H. E. “Berkeley and the Tattletale Paradox.” Idealistic Studies 19 (1989): 79-82.
Baier, Annette. “The Intentionality of Intentions.” Review of Metaphysics 30 (1977): 389-414.
Baladi, Naguib. “Plotin et l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris.” In Plotino e il
        neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, ed. Enrico Cerulli. Roma: Accademia Nazionale
        dei Lincei, 1974, 597-604.
Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds. Individuation and Identity in Early Modern
       Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1994.
Bardout, Jean-Christophe. “Berkeley et les métaphysiques de son temps.” Journal of the History of
      Philosophy 46 (2008): 119-139.
Bar-On, A. Z. “Husserl’s Berkeley.” Analecta Husserliana 16 (1983): 353-63.
Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Two Motives Behind Berkeley’s Expressly Unmotivated Signs: Sure
      Perception and Personal Providence.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 145-77.
Baum, Robert J. “The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements of Berkeley’s Philosophy of
      Mathematics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 119-34.
Baxter, Donald. “Berkeley, Perception and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
       51 (1991): 85-98.
_____. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57
       (1997): 307-30.
Beal, M. W. “Berkeley’s Deletions.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1976): 455-78.
Belfrage, Bertil. “A New Dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977):
_____. “Notes by Berkeley on Moral Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 4-7.
_____. “Review of Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries, edited by George Thomas.” Berkeley
       Newsletter 2 (1978): 10.
_____. “Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10.
_____. “A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics in a Hitherto Unpublished Berkeleian Manuscript.”
       Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 1-4.
_____. “Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch, translated by Wolfgang Breidert.”
       Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 17-19.
_____. “Review of Edwin S. Gaustad, George Berkeley in America.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980):
_____. “Corrigenda to ‘A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics’.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 19.
_____. “Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas und Philonous. Introduced by
       Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 17.
_____. “The Newport Extract of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 6-9.

_____. “An Obscure Supplement to Volume One of Berkeley’s Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 6
       (1982/83): 17-21.
_____. “Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 7-13.
_____. “Facts Concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 17-22.
_____. “Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10-11.
_____. “The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 117-26.
_____. “The Order and Dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154
       (1985): 196-214.
_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643-
_____. “Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.” Revue philosophique de la France
       et de l’étranger (1986): 319-30.
_____. “Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
       (1986): 367-72.
_____, ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An editio diplomatica transcribed and
       edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Doxa, 1987.
_____. “A Response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’.” Berkeley Newsletter 12
       (1991/92): 1-10.
_____. “The Constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Cummins and Zoeller
       (1992): 167-86.
_____. “Berkeley.” In The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British Philosophers, ed. J. W. Yolton,
       J. V. Price, and J. Stephens. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999, 84-90.
_____. “Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003),
_____. “The Scientific Background of George Berkeley’s Idealism.” In Gersh and Moran (2006),
_____. “Berkeley’s Four Concepts of the Soul (1707-1709).” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley
       (2007), 172-87.
_____. “The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708).” In Lemetti and Piirimäe
       (2007), 37-52.
_____. “A Paradigm Shift in George Berkeley’s Philosophy 1707-1709.” Revue Philosophique de
       la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 71-82.
_____. “Berkeley’s Way towards Constructivism, 1707-1709.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),
Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David. “Berkeley’s Letters to le Clerc (1711).” Hermathena 146
      (1989): 7-23.
Benítez, Laura. “El espíritu como principio activo en Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 23-
Bennett, Jonathan. “On Translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into English.” Teaching Philosophy
       17 (1994): 261-69.
_____. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume.
       Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.

Benschop, Hans Peter. Berkeley on Method and Metaphysics. Ph. D. diss., University of Leiden,
_____. “Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997):
Benson, Charles. “Prior’s Authentic Narrative.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 14-15.
Ben-Zeev, A. “Reexamining Berkeley’s Notion of Suggestion.” Conceptus 23 (1989): 21-30.
Berchielli, Laura. “Conoscenza analogica e teoria del significato nell’Alcifrone. Novità e
       tradizione.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 383-92.
Berlioz, Dominique. “G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’.” Revue philosophique (1982): 45-57.
_____. “ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite de Berkeley.” Revue
       philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 331-38.
_____. Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (Paris: J. Vrin, 2000).
_____, ed. Berkeley: Langage de la perception et art de voir. Débats philosophiques. Paris: PUF,
_____. “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley.” in Charles (2004), 145-61.
_____, and Nef, Frederic. “Berkeley ou l’idée contre la représentation.” In Ong-Van-Cung (2006),
Berman, David. “Berkeley’s Letter to H. Clarke.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 9.
_____. “Mrs. Berkeley’s Annotations in her Interleaved Copies of An Account of the Life of
       Berkeley (1776).” Hermathena (1977): 15-28.
_____. “A New Berkeley Portrait.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 8-9.
_____. “A Note on Berkeley and his Catholic Countrymen.” Long Room 16-17 (1978): 26-28.
_____. “Berkeley’s Letter to Lord Orrey.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 12-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Departure for America: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophical Reception after America.” Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie
       62 (1980): 311-20.
_____. “Bishop Berkeley and the Fountains of Living Waters.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 21-31.
_____. “Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” Proceedings of the
       Royal Irish Academy (1981): 219-29.
_____. “Did Berkeley Write Guardian 130?” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 10-13.
_____ and Berman, Jill. “The Fountains Portraits of Bishop Berkeley.” Apollo (1982): 76-79.
_____. “Beckett and Berkeley.” Irish University Review (1984): 42-45.
_____. “Review of The Guardian, edited by John Calhoun Stephens.” Berkeley Newsletter 7
       (1984): 23-26.
_____. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 215-22.
_____. “George Berkeley: Pictures by Goldsmith, Yeats and Luce.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 9-23.
_____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Revolution: 19 November 1707 — 11 January 1708.” History of
       European Ideas 7 (1986): 603-8.
_____. “Berkeley’s Siris and the ‘Whiskey Patriots’.” Eighteenth-Century Ireland, 1 (1986): 200-
_____. “The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47
       (1986): 309-19.
_____, ed. George Berkeley. Eighteenth-Century Responses. New York-London: Garland, 1989, 2
       vols. In Pitcher (1988-1989).
_____, ed. George Berkeley, Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher: in Focus. London; New York:
       Routledge, 1993.
_____. George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
_____. Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. London and New York: Continuum, 2005.
_____. “Berkeley’s Life and Works.” In Winkler (2005), 13-33.
_____. “The Distrustful Philosopher: Berkeley between the Devils and the Deep Blue Sea of Faith.”
       In Parigi (2010b), 141-57.
Bermudez, Jose Luis. “The Adequacy of Simple Ideas in Locke: A Rehabilitation of Berkeley’s
      Criticisms.” Locke Newsletter 23 (1992): 347-54.
Bernabei, Andrea. “Il ‘cieco di Molyneux’: un problema di percezione visiva nella Francia
      illuminista.” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 30 (1975): 132-66.
Bertini, Daniele, ed. George Berkeley, Saggio su una nuova teoria della visione-Trattato sui
        principi della conoscenza umana. Milano: R.C.S., 2004.
_____, ed. George Berkeley, Alcifrone. Milano: R.C.S., 2005.
_____. “Berkeley”, in Enciclopedia filosofica, edited by V. Melchiorre. Milano: Rizzoli, 2006, vol.
       II, 1205-13.
_____. “Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Berkeley e il mito del contratto sociale.” Fenomenologia e
       Società 29 (2006): 128-45.
_____. “Hume e l’immaterialismo.” Aquinas 49 (2006): 621-35.
_____. Sentire Dio. L’immaterialismo come via per un’interpretazione mistica dell’esperienza.
       Assisi: Cittadella Editrice, 2007.
______. “Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Idealistic Studies 37
      (2007), 43-50.
______. “Μεστὰ πάντα σημείων: Plotinus, Leibniz, and Berkeley on Determinism.” In Late Antique
      Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth, ed. Panayiota Vassilopoulou and Stephen R. L. Clark.
      Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 211-27.
______. “Berkeley, Theology and Bible Scholarship.” In Parigi (2010b), 123-39.
______. “La critica berkeleiana dell’autonomia morale.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 309-
Bettcher, Talia Mae. “Berkeley on Self-Consciousness.” In Daniel, New Interpretations 2007, 179-
_____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology and the Elusive Subject. London:
       Continuum Publishing, 2007.
______ Berkeley: a guide for the perplexed. London, New York : Continuum, 2008.
______“Berkeley and Hume on Self and Self-Consciousness.” In Topics in Early Modern
      Philosophy of Mind, edited by Jon Miller. Netherlands: Springer (2009), 193-222.
_____. “Abstraction: Berkeley Against Locke.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 135-55.

_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Mind: Some New Models.” Philosophy Compass 6 (2011): 689-98.
Beyhl, Helmut. Bischof Berkeley, der Mann, der den gesunden Menschenverstand tanzen lässt: das
       ‘Problem’ des Beweises der Realität der Außenwelt. Ph. D. Diss. University of Berlin, 1990.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie. “L’expérience du rêve et l’extétiorité (de Descartes à Berkeley).” Revue
      philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 111 (1986): 355-66.
_____. “Philosophie et apologétique chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de
       l’étranger (1986): 377-84.
Bird, Graham, ed. A Companion to Kant. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006.
Blackith, Robert. “A Berkeleian Time-Warp.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 1-4.
Blake, J. B. “Addenda to Keynes: a Bibliography of Berkeley.” Bibliographical Society of America
       Papers 73 (1979): 337-40.
Blay, Michel. “Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal : Michel Rolle et George
       Berkeley.” Revue d’Histoire des sciences 39 (1983): 223-53.
Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Berkeley’s Objection to Abstract Ideas and Unconceived Objects,” in Sosa
       (1987), 61-81.
_____. “Berkeley and Mental Representation: Why Not a Lockean Theory of Ideas?.” In Daniel,
       New Interpretations (2007), 77-106.
_____. “Belief and Its Objects in Berkeley’s System.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 251-73.
Boman, Eugene C. “Casting Out Beams: Berkeley’s Criticism of the Calculus.” New York State
     Mathematics Teachers’ Journal 60 (2010): 9-13.
Bonk, Sigmund. Immaterialismus: Darstellung und Verteidigung von George Berkeleys
       Gottesbeweis und immaterialistischem Weltbild. München, 1990.
_____. “George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und
       Religionsphilosophie 36 (1994): 268-83.
_____. “George Berkeleys Nachweis einer gottlichen Vorsehung.” Neue Zeitschrift für
       systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 39 (1997): 176-90.
_____. “George Berkeley’s Theory of Time: ‘A-Total-Disaster’.” Studia Leibnitiana 29 (1997):
_____. “We see God”: George Berkeley’s Philosophical Theology. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997.
_____. Abschied von der Anima mundi: die britische Philosophie im Vorfeld der industriellen
       Revolution. Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1999.
Bordner, S. Seth “Berkeley’s ‘Defense’ of ‘Commonsense’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy
      49 (2011): 315-38.
Borges, Jorge Luis. “Berkeley’s Crossroads.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 5-12.
Botterill, George. “God and First Person in Berkeley.” Philosophy 82 (2007): 87-114.
Bouveresse-Quilliot Renée, ed. Cahiers d’histoire de la philosophie: Berkeley. Bourgogne: Centre
      Gaston Bachelard, 2000.
Bowen, Timothy W. Ontological Commitment in George Berkeley and David Lewis : the Role of
      Common Sense. Ph. D. dissertation. University of Oxford, 2008.
Božovič, Miran. Der grosse Andere: Gotteskonzepte in der Philosophie der Neuzeit. Wien: Turia
       und Kant, 1993.

_____; Klun, Branko; and Mervič, Stojan. Vprašanje Boga pri Berkeleyj : diplomska naloga.
       Ljubljana: [S. Mervič] (2008).
Bracken, Harry M. “Berkeley: Irish Cartesian.” Philosophical Studies 24 (1976): 39-51.
_____. “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 11 (1977): 227-45.
_____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat Missed [Abstract].”
       Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10.
_____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat Missed.” Hermathena
       139 (1985): 63-80.
_____. “On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4
       (1987): 435-46.
______.“The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment (review).” Journal of the
      History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 177.
Bradatan, Costica. “Berkeley and Liber Mundi.” Minerva. An Internet Journal of Philosophy 3
       (1999), University of Limerick, Ireland.
_____. “Waiting for the eschaton: Berkeley’s ‘Bermuda Scheme’ Between Earthly Paradise and
       Educational Utopia.” Utopian Studies 14 (2003): 36-50.
_____. “Philosophy as Palimpsest. In Search for an Immemorial Wisdom.” Existentia: An
       International Journal of Philosophy 14 (2004): 337-44.
_____. “ ‘God is Dreaming You’: Narrative as Imitatio Dei in Miguel de Unamuno.” Janus Head: A
       Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Continental Philosophy, Literature,
       Phenomenological Psychology and the Arts 7 (2004): 453-46.
_____. “Review: Branka Arsic, The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett).”
       Philosophy 24 (2004): 237-39.
_____. “‘One is All, and All is One.’ The Great Chain of Being in Berkeley’s Siris.” In O’Gorman
       and Donald (2005), 63-82.
_____. “George Berkeley’s ‘Universal Language of Nature’.” In Klaas van Berkel and Vanderjagt
       (2005), 71-84.
_____. Introduction to George Berkeley, Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.
       New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2006.
_____. “Rhetoric of Faith and Patterns of Persuasion in Berkeley’s ‘Alciphron’.” Heythrop Journal
       47 (2006): 544-61.
______. The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Re-enchantment. New York: Fordham
      University Press, 2006.
_____. “George Berkeley e a tradição platônica.” Tr. Jaimir Conte. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia
       16 (2009): 257-84.
Bradshaw, D. E. “Berkeley and Hume on Abstraction and Generalization.” History of Philosophy
      Quarterly 5 (1988): 11-22.
Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the Three-dimensional Optical
       Picture.” Ratio 17 (1975): 176-90.
Braund, Michael J. From inference to affordance: the problem of visual depth-perception in the
      optical writings of Descartes, Berkeley, and Gibson. St. Catharines, Ont.: Brock University,
      Dept. of Philosophy, 2008.

Bravo, Hamdi. “The Problem of Primary and Secondary Qualities in Locke and Berkeley” [in
       Turkish]. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences] 5
       (2008): 59-80.
Brayton, Alice. George Berkeley in Apulia. Boston: Merrymount, 1946 (republished 2007).
Breidert, Wolfgang. “Corrigendum.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 13.
_____. “Einleitung” to George Berkeley, Drei Dialoge. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980.
_____. “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18 Jahrhundert.” Revue internationale de
       philosophie 154 (1985): 223-41.
_____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Fridericana Zeitschrift der Universität Karlsruhe 36
       (1985): 3-13.
_____. “On Some Marginal Signs in the Philosophical Commentaries.” Berkeley Newsletter 8
       (1985): 7-8.
_____. “With the Infinite God Against the Mathematics of Infinity [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter
       8 (1985): 11-12.
_____. “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 12-14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1986): 185-91.
_____. “On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.” In Sosa (1987), 231-41.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie des Sehens und Die Theorie des Sehens ..
       verteidigt und erklär. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987.
_____. “Review: Essays on Berkeley, edited by John Foster and Howard Robinson.” Archiv für
       Geschichte der Philosophie 69 (1987): 315-21.
_____. “Schopenhauer und Berkeley.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69 (1988): 373-85.
_____. George Berkeley 1685-1753. Basel: Birkhauser, 1989.
_____. “Berkeley, George.” In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, vol. 2, 1994, col. 260.
_____, Einleitung in George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine Philosoph. Translated by Luise
       und Friedrich Raab; edited by Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996.
_____. “Berkeley’s Sources in Mathematics.” In Brykman (1997), 49-58.
_____. “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus.” In Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts,
       edited by Kreimendahl and Lothar. Darmstadt, 2000, 68-86.
_____. “Berkeley’s Defence of Infinite God in the Contrast to the Infinite in Mathematics.” In
       Koetsier and Bergmans (2005), 499-508.
_____. “Berkeley Poeticized.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 214-29.
_____. “Die Ambivalenz von Vorurteilen bei Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 287-
Breuninger, Scott Christopher. Morals, the Market, and History: George Berkeley and Social Virtue
       in Early Eighteenth-Century Thought. Ph. D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 2002.
________. “Rationality and Revolution: Rereading Berkeley’s Sermons on Passive Obedience.”
      New Hibernia Review 12 (2008): 63-86.
_______. Recovering Bishop Berkeley : Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context. New York :
      Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

_____. “Planting an Asylum for Religion: Berkeley’s Bermuda Scheme and the Transmission of
       Virtue in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World.” Journal of Religious History 34 (2010):
Brolley, Kevin G. “Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 22-23.
Brook, Richard. “Berkeley, Causality and Signification.” International Studies in Philosophy 27
       (1995): 15-31.
_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision, Transparency and Signification.” British Journal for the
       History of Philosophy 11(2003): 661-69.
_____. “Berkeley, Bundles, and Immediate Perception.” Dialogue 44 (2005): 493-504.
_____. “Is Geometry about Tangible Extension?” Berkeley Studies 20 (2009): 5-12.
_____. “Non-Conscious Agency and Berkeley’s Theory of Signs.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage
       (2011), 287-99.
Brown, Stuart. “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 13-14.
_____. “Platonic Idealism in Modern Philosophy from Malebranche to Berkeley.” in Cambridge
       Platonists in Philosophical Context. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher,
       1997, 197-214.
Brykman, Geneviève. “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le Dictionaire de Bayle.”
      Revue internationale de philosophie 29 (1975): 496-514.
_____. “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza.” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 2 (1978): 173-
_____. “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu.” Revue internationale de philosophie 3 (1979): 553-69.
_____. “The Close Inspection of Words and Ideas in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 3
       (1979): 9-10.
_____. “Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’ and ‘Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions
       abstraites chez Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15.
_____. “Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Recherches sur le XVIIème siècle 4
       (1980): 157-66.
_____. “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779.” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 4 (1980): 167-69.
_____. “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses.” Revue philosophique (1980): 421-32.
_____. “Philosophy and Apologetics in Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 12-16.
_____. “Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique (1983): 427-41.
_____. Berkeley: philosophie et apologétique. 2 vols. Lille: Atelier National de reproduction des
       thèses. Paris: Vrin, 1984.
_____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 12-
_____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 127-37.
_____. “Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées chez Berkeley.” Revue internationale
       de philosophie 154 (1985): 242-51.
_____. “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” History of European
       Ideas 7 (1986): 585-91.
_____. “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’: (1685-1985).” Revue de synthèse 109 (1988): 148-50.

_____. “Berkeley et l’analogie des noms.” Les Etudes philosophiques 3-4 (1989): 445-54.
_____. “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique et
       de morale (1991): 515-29.
_____. “Review: George Berkeley, De Motu, translated into Italian with an introduction by
       Mariapaola Fimiani.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 17.
_____. Berkeley et le voile des mots. Paris: Vrin, 1993.
_____. “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley.” In Monti (1995), 121-37.
_____, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme. Le Temps philosophique 2. Nanterre: Université Paris X-
       Nanterre, 1997.
_____., ed. Rassemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique. Le Temps
       philosophique 6. Nanterre: Département de Philosophie, Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1999.
_____. “Plaisir/douleur et passivité des idées dans l’immaterialisme de Berkeley. ” In Bouveresse-
       Quilliot (2000), 15-35.
_____. “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage de la Nature’ chez Locke et Berkeley.” In
       Berlioz (2003), 17-46.
_____. “On Human Liberty in Berkeley’s Alciphron VII.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007),
_____. “Berkeley, Spinoza and Radical Enlightenment.” In Parigi (2010b), 159-70.
_____. “Courte vue et vision synoptique chez Berkeley.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de
       l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 83-95.
_____. “La liberté humaine dans le Dialogue VII de l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz
       (2010), 331-40.
_____. “La sémantique dans le Dialogue VII.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 407-12.
_____. “Short-Sightedness and Long-Sightedness in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),
Bunnin, N. F. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
Burnyeat, M. F. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.”
      Idealism Past and Present (1982): 19-50.
Bustamante, Rodrigo. “La critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico.” Contrafuerte (1985): 28-34.
Byrne, P. A. “Berkeley, Scientific Realism and Creation.” Religious Studies 20 (1984): 453-64.
Caffentzis, C. George, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”: Vademecum zu einem irischen
       Klassiker der politischen Ökonomie. Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999.
_____. Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money. Dordrecht:
       Kluwer, 2000.
_____. “Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political Economy of Locke and
       Berkeley.” History of Political Economy 35 (2003: supplement): 204-33.
_____. “Algebraic Money: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics and Money.” Berkeley Studies
       18 (2007): 3-23.
_____. “Locke, Berkeley and Hume as Philosophers of Money. An Apology and Synopsis.” In
       Parigi (2010b), 57-71.
_____. “Did Hume Read Berkeley’s The Querist?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 157-74.

Calazans, Alex. “Considerações a Respeito do Problema do Rigor Matemático em O Analista.”
       Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 391-418.
Campagnola, Francesco. “George Berkeley e la teoria dell'analogia divina.” Nouvelles-de-la-
     Republique-des-lettres 2 (2006): 25-76.
Camporesi, Cristiano. “Aporie berkeleyane.” Rivista di filosofia 73 (1982): 471-73.
Cantor, Geoffrey N. “Berkeley, Reid and the Mathematization of Mid-Eighteenth-Century Optics.”
       Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 429-48.
_____. “Two Letters Relating to Berkeley’s Social Circle.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 1-3.
_____. “Berkeley’s The Analyst Revisited.” Isis 75 (1984): 668-83.
Carlin, Laurence. “Selecting a Phenomenalism: Leibniz, Berkeley and the Science of Happiness.”
        Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (2007): 57-78.
______. The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed. London, New York: Continuum, 2009.
Casini, Paolo. “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment.” Notes and Records
        of the Royal Society of London 42 (1988): 35-52.
Cates, Lynn D. “Berkeley on the Work of the Six Days.” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 82-86.
Çetin, Ismail. “The ‘Language Metaphor’ and Its Implications in George Berkeley’s Philosophy.”
        Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of Philosophy] 14 (2010):
Chaney, Edward. The Evolution of the Grand Tour since the Renaissance. London: Franck Cass,
Charles, Sébastien. “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of Berkeley’s Dialogues.”
       Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 14-18.
_____. “The Siris in the Age of Enlightenment: Panacea or Imposture?” Hermathena 168 (2000):
_____. “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue
       between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796.” Hume Studies 27 (2001): 85-97.
_____. “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: Berkeley, lector critico de Malebranche.” Praxis Filosofica
       13 (2001): 27-42.
_____. “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières: Turgot lecteur de Maupertuis et
       Berkeley.” Lumen 21 (2002): 45-59.
_____. Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: J.
       Vrin, 2003.
_____. “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité et de la volonté chez Malebranche et
       Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 73-88.
_____, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley. Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Presses
       l’Université Laval, 2004.
_____. “Berkeley and the Lumières: Misconception and Reconstruction.” In Daniel, New
       Interpretations (2007), 283-309.
______. “Berkeley polémiste: des Sérmons sur l’obéissance passive (1712) aux Maximes sur le
      patriotisme (1750)” The European Legacy 13 (2008): 413-24.
_____. “Berkeley et Campailla: recontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Critico
       della Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39.

______. “The Animal According to Berkeley.” In Parigi (2010b), 189-99.
______. “Berkeley et l’imagination.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135
      (2010), 97-108.
______. “La réception de l’Alciphron en France au siècle des Lumières.” In Jaffro, Brykman,
      Schwartz (2010), 371-79.
_____. “Berkeley et Campailla: rencontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Critico
       della Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39.
_____. “Foi, croyance et raison selon Berkeley.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 135-47.
Cicekdagi, Caner. “Esse Est Percipi in Berkeley’s Book Three Dialogues between Hylas and
      Philonous.” Kaygi: Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of
      Philosophy] 10 (2008): 115-26.
Chibeni, Silvio Seno. “Berkeley: Uma física sem causas eficientes.” Cadernos de Historia e
      Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 357-90.
_____. “Berkeley e o papel das hipóteses na filosofia natural Berkeley and the role of hypothesis in
       natural philosophy.” Scientiae Studia 8 (2010): 389-419.
Chinn, Ewing Y. “The anti-abstractionism of Dignana and Berkeley.” Philosophy East and West 44
       (1994): 55-77.
Chiurazzi, G. “Il problema della mediazione nella filosofia di George Berkeley.” Filosofia 49
       (1998): 53-75.
Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on Berkeley’s Moral and Political
        Thought. New York: Garland, 1989.
_____. “Berkeley on Religion.” In Winkler (2005), 369-404.
Clarke, Desmond M. George Berkeley : Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University
       Press (2008).
Clasen, Uwe. Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley im Spiegel der Geschichte
       der physiologischen Optik. Aachen: Tecn. Hochsch. Diss., 1997.
Collingridge, D. G. “Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch.” Philosophy 53 (1978): 102-105.
Conley, Patrick T. Rhode Island’s Founders: from Settlement to Statehood. Charleston, SC: History
      Press, 2010.
Conroy, Graham P. “George Berkeley and the Jacobite Heresy: Some Comments on Irish Augustan
      Politics.” Albion 3 (1971): 82.
Conte, Jaimir. “A Oposição de Berkeley ao Ceticismo.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da
       Ciencia 18 (2008): 325-55.
Cope, Kevin L. “Moral Travel and the Pursuit of Nothing: Vathek and Siris as Philosophical
       Monologue.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 18 (1988): 167-86.
Coutinho, Maurício C. “Os Escritos Econômicos de Berkeley.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da
       Ciencia 18 (2008): 293-324.
Cover, J. A. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990.
Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o imaterialismo de Berkeley.”
       Revista Filosofia de Coimbra 6 (1997): 101-17.
Crain, Steven D. “Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist?” Religious Studies 33 (1997): 81-

Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: Critical Assessments. London; New York: Routledge,
       1991, 3 vols.
Crombie, Alistair C. George Berkeley Bicentenary. New York: Garland, 1988.
Cross, C. B. “Berkeley on Other Minds.” Auslegung 6 (1978): 45-50.
Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of
     Representation in Modern Philosophy. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing
     Company, 1992.
_____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.” Nous 9 (1975): 55-72.
_____. “Berkeley’s Unstable Ontology.” Modern Schoolman 67 (1989): 15-32.
_____. “Sections Nine and Ten of Berkeley’s Principles.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 1-5.
_____. “Berkeley on Minds and Agency.” In Winkler (2005), 190-229.
_____.”Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007),
Curtis, Benjamin L. “A New Look at Berkeley’s Idealism.” Heythrop Journal 50 (2009), 189-94.
Danaher, James P. “Is Berkeley’s World a Divine Language?” Modern Theology 18 (2002): 361-73.
Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Oxford:
       Oxford University Press, 1998.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous. Oxford: Oxford
       University Press, 2003.
Daniel, Stephen H. “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction.” American
       Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2000): 621-36.
_____. “The Ramist Context of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of
       Philosophy 9 (2001): 487-505.
_____. “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic.” Idealistic Studies 31 (2001): 55-72.
_____. “Berkeley’s Pantheistic Discourse.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49
       (2001): 179-94.
_____. “Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.” Journal of the History
       of Philosophy 39 (2001): 239-58.
_____. “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 163-70.
_____. “Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007),
______ “The Harmony of the Leibniz-Berkeley Juxtaposition.” In Leibniz and the English Speaking
      World, ed. Stuart Brown and Pauline Phemister. New York: Springer/Kluwer (2007), 163-
______, ed. New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy Books
      Series. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2007.
______, ed. Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007.
_____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Treatment of Representation.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25
       (2008): 41-55.

______. “How Berkeley’s Works Are Interpreted.” In Parigi (2010b), 3-14.
______. “Berkeley and Spinoza.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010),
_____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Divine Analogy.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 149-61.
_____. “Stoicism in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 121-34.
Darren, Hynes. “Berkeley’s Corpuscular Philosophy of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22
       (2005): 339-56.
Darwall, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” In Winkler (2005), 311-38.
Davis, John W. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960): 392-408.
De Almeida Marques, José Oscar. “Berkeley e o Problema de Barrow.” Cadernos de Historia e
      Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 419-45.
Dégremont, Roselyne. Berkeley. L’idée de nature. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995.
_____. Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 1999.
_____. “Le principe de la morale.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010),
De Waal, Cornelis. “The Real Issue Between Nominalism and Realism: Peirce and Berkeley
     Reconsidered.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 425-33.
______. “Having an Idea of Matter: A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan Immaterialism.” Journal
      of the History of Ideas 67 (2006): 291-313.
Dicker, Georges. “Two Arguments from Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Dialogues Between
       Hylas and Philonous.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982): 409-22.
_____. “Berkeley on the Immediate Perception of Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 201-
_____. “Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach.” Philosophical Quarterly
       56 (2006): 517-35.
______. “Anti-Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 335-50.
_____. Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Di Michele, Stefano. “George Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere.” Annali della Facolta di
      Lettere e Filosofia 39 (1996): 141-63.
Doney, Willis. “Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian Mind?” In Turbayne (1982), 273-82.
_____. “Berkeley’s Argument Against Abstract Ideas.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983):
_____. Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas. New York: Garland, 1989.
Dooren, W. Van. “Whether There Be Any Reason Why Berkeley Is So Often Misunderstood?”
      Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap 26 (1985-6).
Downing, Lisa J. “Berkeley’s Case Against Realism About Dynamics.” In Muehlmann (1995), 197-
_____. “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” British Journal for the History of
       Philosophy 3 (1995): 279-300.
_____. “Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.” In Winkler (2005), 230-65.

_____. “Occasionalism and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley, Fontenelle.” In Mercer and
       O’Neill (2005), 206-30.
Drebushenko, D. “Abstraction and a New Argument for the Esse-Is-Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena
      167 (1999): 35-58.
Drunga, Mykolas. “Berkeley and the Time-Gap Argument.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 55-
D’Souza, Paul. “Salvation in Non-Christian Religions: Aristotle and Berkeley. Philosophical
      Contribution to a Theological Question.” Divyadaan 16 (2005): 17-32.
Dubois, Pierre. L’oeuvre de Berkeley. Paris: Vrin, 1985.
Dunn, John; Urmson, J. O; and Ayer, A. J. The British Empiricists: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford:
       Oxford Univeristy Press, 1992.
Dupas, Jean-Claude. “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley.” Études irlandaises (1986): 45-56.
Easton, Patricia A., ed., Logic and the Workings of the Mind. Atascadero: Eastview, 1997.
Eaton, Jeffrey C. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and the Scientific Promise of the Christian Doctrine of
       Creation.” Harvard Theological Review 80 (1987): 431-47.
Eberwein, Robert. “Samuel Johnson, George Cheyne, and the ‘Cone of Being’.” Journal of the
      History of Ideas 36 (1975): 153-58.
Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago. “‘Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la filosofia de George
      Berkeley.” Revista colombiana de filosofia de la ciencia 3 (2002): 179-208; republished in
      Estudios de filosofia 27 (2003): 127-48.
Egan, Frances. “The Moon Illusion.” Philosophy of Science 65 (1998): 604-23.
Eisenstein, G. “Berkeley’s Presence: Metaphysical Development and Dialectical Tension.”
       Idealistic Studies 18 (1988): 207-29.
El-Bizri, Nader. “A Philosophical Perspective on Alhazen’s Optics.” Arabic Sciences and
       Philosophy 15 (2005): 189-218.
Emundts, Dina. “Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’s Concept of Objectivity.” In Kant and the Early
     Moderns ed. Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse. Princeton: Princeton University
     Press, 2008, 117-41.
Enright, J. T. “The Moon Illusion Examined from a New Point of View.” Proceedings of the
       American Philosophical Society 119 (1975): 87-107.
Eric, Dietrich. “The Bishop and Priest: Toward a Point-of-View Based Epistemology of True
       Contradictions.” Logos Architekton. Journal of Logic and Philosophy of Science 2 (2008):
Evans, J. D. G. “Berkeley on Conceiving the Unconceived.” Irish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985):
Everitt, Nicholas. “Quasi-Berkelyan Idealism as Perspicuous Theism.” Faith and Philosophy 14
        (1997): 353-77.
Falkenstein, Lorne. “Intuition and Construction in Berkeley’s Account of Physical Space.” Journal
       of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994): 63-84.
Faris, J. A. “Review of Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays edited by C. M. Turbayne.”
        Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 26-32.
Fau, Martina. Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre Bedeutung für die Philosophie

       des Immaterialismus und ihre historischen Würzeln. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993.
Fedriga, Riccardo. “Oggetti e aspetti intenzionali nella teoria dell’astrazione di George Berkeley.”
       Dianoia: Annali di Storia della Filosofia 15 (2010): 147-66.
Feuer, Lewis F. “Materialism, Idealism and Science.” Philosophy of Science 15 (1948): 71-75.
Fimiani, Mariapaola. George Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine. Cosenza: Lerici, 1979.
Fincham, R. M. “Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of the External World.” Journal of the
      History of Philosophy 49 (2011): 221- 41.
Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley’s Notions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1985):
       407-25, reprinted in George Berkeley: Critical Assessments, edited by Walter E. Creery,
       London and New York: Routledge (1991), 404-24.
_____.“Berkeley on Abstraction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 483-501;
       reprinted in Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas, edited by Willis Doney, in The
       Philosophy of George Berkeley Series, New York: Garland (1988).
_____. Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions: a Reconstruction Based on his Theory of Meaning. London:
       Croom Helm, 1987.
_____. “Relative Ideas and Notions.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 235-53.
_____. “Berkeley, Individuation and Physical Objects.” In Barber and Gracia (1994), 133-54.
_____. “George Berkeley.” In The Encyclopedia of Empiricism, edited by Don Garrett and Edward
      Barbanell. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press (1997), 44-55.
_____. “Berkeley’s Archetypes.” Hermathena 171 (2001): 7-31.
_____. "Berkeley’s Principles, Section 10." Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2003): 543-
_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34
       (2004): 25-60.
_____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006).
_____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Reflection.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 7-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Three Dialogues.” In Daniel (2008), 45-75.
_____. “Was Berkeley and Ethical Egoist?” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 3-18.
_____. “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 361-72.
_____. “Remarks on Professor Grandi’s Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 379-80.
_____. “Analysis in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 35-53.
Fleming, N. “Berkeley and Idealism.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 300-325.
_________. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34
      (2004): 25-60.
__________.“Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Three Dialogues.” In Daniel, New
      Interpretations (2007): 47-75.
Fleming, Patrick. “Berkeley’s Immaterialist Account of Action.” Journal of the History of
      Philosophy 44 (2006): 415-29.
Flew, Anthony. “Was Berkeley a Precursor of Wittgenstein?” In Berman (1993), 214-26.

Fogelin, Robert. “Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility.” Philosophical Review
       97 (1988): 47-69.
_____. “The Intuitive Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13
       (1996): 331-44.
_____. Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge,
Forest, Denis. “Language visuel, communication universelle.” Revue philosophique de la France et
        de l’étranger 4 (1997): 429-46.
Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration.
        Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
Fourny-Etchegaray, Claire. “Note sur les rapports entre raison et sens commun chez Stillingfleet et
      Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 357-60.
________. “Les diverses conceptions du sens commun et de son role dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro,
      Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 393-405.
Fox, Christopher. “Locke and the Scriblerians: the Discussion of Identity in Early Eighteenth
       Century England.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 16 (1982): 1-25.
Frangiotti, Marco Antonio. “Transcendental Idealism and Phenomenalism.” Critica 26 (1994): 73-
Frankel, Henry. “Berkeley’s Concept of Mind as Presented in Book II of the Principles.” Southern
       Journal of Philosophy 15 (1977): 37-51.
Frankel, Melissa. “Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley,
       Meaning, and Minds.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 381-402.
_____. “Berkeley, Meaning and Minds: Remarks on Glezakos’ Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009),
Frederick, R. “Berkeley and the Argument from Conceiving.” Philosophy Research Archives 13
       (1987/88): 481-87.
Friedman, Lesley. “Pragmatism: the Unformulated Method of Bishop Berkeley.” Journal of the
      History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 81-96.
Fugate, Courtney David. “Berkeley’s Aesthetic of Transcendence.” Yearbook of the Irish
       Philosophical Society 2005: 92-117.
Furlong, E. J. “A Berkeleian Nod?” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 3.
_____. “Some Puzzles in Berkeley’s Writings.” Hermathena 120 (1976): 63-73.
_____. and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and The Ladies Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 4
       (1980): 4-13.
Ganson, Todd; and Ganson, Dorit. “Everyday Thinking about Bodily Sensations.” Australasian
      Journal of Philosophy 88 (2010), 523-34.
Garber, Daniel, and Ayers, Michael R., eds. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century
       Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
________, and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University
      Press (2008).
Garcia Varas, Ana. “Ideas e imagenes: un estudio de la teoria de las ideas abstractas en Hume.”
       Revista de Filosofia 66 (2010): 93-106.

Garrett, Aaron. Berkeley's Three dialogues : a reader's guide. London ; New York : Continuum
Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel viceregno austriaco: Joseph Addison, Lord Shaftesbury, George
        Berkeley. Napoli: Vivarium, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000.
_____, and Pugliese Carratelli, G. “Per una storia intellettuale dell'eta Augustea in Inghilterra: Il
       Catalogue della biblioteca di Joseph Addison.” Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei.
       Rendiconti Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 14 (2003): 224-39.
Gaukroger, Stephen, ed. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.
Gaustad, Edwin S. “George Berkeley and the New World Community.” Church History 48 (1979):
_____. George Berkeley in America. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979.
_____. “When in the Course.” William and Mary Quarterly 52 (1995): 479-82.
Gersh, Stephen and Moran, Dermot, eds., Eriugena, Berkeley and the Idealist Tradition. Notre
       Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.
Ghosh, Kuntal and Bhaumik, Kamales. “Complexity in human perception of brightness: a historical
       review on the evolution of the philosophy of visual perception.” OnLine Journal of
       Biological Sciences 10 (2010): 17-35.
Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia. “George Berkeley’s Visual Language and the New England
      Portrait Tradition.” Centennial Review 31 (1987): 122-45.
Glauser, Richard. “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley.” Studia Philosophica 42 (1983):
_____. “Berkeley, Collier, et la distinction entre l’esprit fini et le corps.” In Brykman (1997), 91-
_____. Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siècle: perception et scepticisme. Sprimont: Mardaga,
_____. “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie berkeleyenne de la vision.” in Berlioz
       (2003), 103-34.
_____. “The Problem of the Unity of a Physical Object in Berkeley.” In Daniel, Reexamining
       Berkeley (2007), 50-81.
_____. “Optique géométrique, images rétiniennes et corpuscules chez Berkeley.” Revue
       Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 7-18.
Glezakos, Stavroula. “Comments on Melissa Frankel’s ‘Something-We-Know-Not-What,
      Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning and Minds’.” Philosophia 37 (2009),
Glombíček, Petr; and Hill, James. George Berkeley: průvodce jeho filosofií. Praha: Filosofia, 2009.
Glouberman, Mark. “Abstraction and Determinacy: the Ideological Background of Berkeleianism.”
      Idealistic Studies (1982): 14-34.
_____. “Consciousness and Cognition: from Descartes to Berkeley.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982):
_____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism: a Reply to Moked.” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical
       Quarterly 40 (1991): 315-18.
_____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 2 (1994):

Gottenbarn, Donald. “Berkeley: God’s Pain.” Philosophical Studies 28 (1975): 245-54.
Gozzano, Simone. “Mental Images and Their Ontology.” Epistemologia 17 (1994): 225-52.
Graham, Jody. “Common Sense and Berkeley’s Perception by Suggestion.” International Journal
      of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997): 397-423.
Grandi, Giovanni Battista. “Comments on Daniel E. Flage’s ‘Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.’”
       Philosophia 37 (2009), 373-78.
Granja, Dulce Maria. “Realismo et idealismo en Berkeley.” Contrafuerte (1985): 19-27.
Gray, J. “Berkeley’s Theory of Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1978): 415-34.
Grayling, Anthony C. Berkeley: the Central Arguments. London: Duckworth, 1986.
_____. “Berkeley’s Argument for Immaterialism.” In Winkler (2005), 166-89.
Greco, John. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big Idea?” Philosophy and
       Phenomenological Research 55 (1995): 279-96.
Greenberg, A. R. “Reid, Berkeley, and Notional Knowledge.” Monist 61 (1978): 415-34.
Gruner, Rolf. “Berkeley on General Ideas.” Dialogue 8 (1969): 481-85.
Grush, Rick. “Berkeley and the Spatiality of Vision.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45
       (2007): 413-42.
Grzeliński, Adam. “The Berkeleyan Conception of Nature.” Вісник Національного авіаційного
       університету. Філософія. Культурологія" Збірник наукових праць. Київ 2 #12 (2010):
_____. Człowiek i duch nieskończony. Immaterializm George’a Berkeleya [The Man and the Infinite
       Spirit: The Immaterialism of George Berkeley]. Toruń, Poland: Nicolaus Copernicus
       University Press, 2010.
Guérineau, Roselyne. “Berkeley et les Bermudes.” Revue philosophique de la France et de
       l’étranger (1986): 309-17.
Gutiérrez, Pedro Stepanenko. “La conception berkeleyana del yo.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 13-
Hall, Richard A. S. “Did Berkeley Influence Edwards: Their Common Critique of the Moral Sense
       Theory,” in Jonathan Edwards’s Writings, ed. Stephen J. Stein. Bloomington: Indiana
       University Press, 1996, 100-121.
Hall, Roland. “ ‘New Words in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 4-8.
Hamou, Philippe. “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la Nouvelle Théorie de la vision.”
     In Berlioz (2003), 47-78.
_____. “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de l’autopsie instrumentale.” In Charles
       (2004), 103-26.
_____. “L'optique des Voyages de Gulliver.” Revue d'histoire des sciences 60 (2007): 25-45.
Hanson, Norwood Russell. “The Dematerialization of Matter.” Philosophy of Science 29 (1962):
Hanratty, Gerald. “A Voice in the Wilderness: Berkeley’s Response to Enlightenment.” Neue
       Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 32 (1990): 319-37.
Hara, Kira. “Depth and Distance in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” History of Philosophy Quarterly

       21 (2004): 101-17.
Hardwick, Charles. Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas Tech. University (1981), 81-85.
Harris, James. “Berkeley on the Inward Evidence of Freedom.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz
        (2010), 341-50.
Harris, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Argument from Perceptual Relativity.” History of Philosophy
        Quarterly 14 (1997): 99-120.
Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In Garber (1998), 953-1002.
Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David. “A New Approach to Berkeley’s Ideal Reality.” In
     Muehlmann (1995), 47-66.
_____ and _____. “On Allaire’s ‘Another Visit’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 39-46.
_____ and _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Dilemma: Beyond the Incoherence Model.” History of
       Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 221-38.
Hausman, David B. Descartes’s Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy.
     Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.
Hayry, Matti and Hayry, Hetta. “Obedience to Rules and Berkeley’s Theological Utilitarianism.”
       Utilitas 6 (1994): 233-42.
Hendrix, John; Williams, Roger; Carman, Charles H. Renaissance Theories of Vision. Aldershot:
      Ashgate, 2010.
Henze, D. F. “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a Study in Early Modern Metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy
       8 (1977): 147-63.
Hestevold, H. S. “Berkeley’s Theory of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990): 179-92.
Hight, Marc A. “Why We Do Not See What We Feel.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002):
_____. “Defending Berkeley’s Divine Ideas.” Philosophia 33 (2005): 97-128.
_____. “Berkeley's Half-Way House.” Philosophy Compass 1(2006): 28-35.
_____. “Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 443-
_____. “Why My Chair is Not Merely A Congeries: Berkeley and the Single Idea Thesis.” In
       Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 82-107.
_____. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park: Penn
       State University Press, 2008.
_____. “New Berkeley Correspondence: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 16-21.
_____. “Berkeley’s Metaphysical Instrumentalism.” In Parigi (2010b), 15-29.
_____. “How Immaterialism Can Save Your Soul.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de
       l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 109-22.
_____. “Berkeley on the Difference between Brutes and Men.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),
_____. “Preserving the Torments of Hell: Berkeleian Immaterialism and the Afterlife.” Science et
       Esprit 63 (2011): 179-92.
_____ and Bohannon, Joshua. “The Son More Visible: Immaterialism and the Incarnation.” Modern
       Theology 26 (2010): 120-48.

_____. and Ott, Walter. “The New Berkeley.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 1-24.
Hill, James. “The Synthesis of Empiricism and Innatism in Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions.”
        Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 3-15.
Hill, Jonathan. “Gregory of Nyssa, Material Substance and Berkeleyan Idealism.” British Journal
        for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009): 653–83.
_____. “Berkeley’s Missing Argument: The Sceptical Attack on Intentionality.” British Journal for
       the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 47-77.
Hochschild, Joshua P. “George Berkeley and a Theory of Analogy.” The Downside Review 122
      (2004): 157-68.
Hoffmann, Yoel. “ ‘Dream-World’ Philosophers: Berkeley and Vasubandhu.” Philosophy East-
      Philosophy West (1978): 247-68.
Hollingshead, G. “Bishop Berkeley and the Gloomy Clerk: Pope’s Final Satire on Deism.” Durham
       University Journal (1982): 19-27.
Hollingshead, G. “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer.” Scottish Literary Journal 11
       (1984): 20-35.
_____. “Pope, Berkeley, and the True Key to the Dunciad in Four Books.” English Studies in
       Canada 10 (1984): 141-55.
_____. “The Case for Berkeley’s Authorship of The Vanity of Philosophical Systems.” Eighteenth-
       Century Life 9 (1985): 51-64.
_____. “Sources for the Ladies’ Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 1-9.
Holtzman, Matthew. “Berkeley on Common Sense, Theology, and Matter.” Ph.D. dissertation:
      Johns Hopkins University, 2010.
Hone, Joseph M. Bishop Berkeley: His Life, Writings, and Philosophy. London: Faber & Faber,
Houghton, Raymond. “International Berkeley Society.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 14-15.
Howell, T. J. “The Bond of Society: Berkeley’s Theory of Social Reality.” Berkeley Newsletter 3
      (1979): 16.
Hughes, M. “Hermes and Berkeley.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1992): 1-19.
Hurley, Michael. “Berkeley and Methodism: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 1-2.
Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera. “La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de Berkeley.” Analisis
       Filosofico 6 (1986): 13-22.
Ichinose, Masaki. “Berkeley on Practical Spirit.” Philosophical Studies 14 (1995): 1-17.
Imlay, Robert A. “Berkeley and Scepticism: a Fatal Dalliance.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 501-10.
_____. “Berkeley and Action.” In Muehlmann (1995), 171-82.
Isermann, Michael M. “George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and the Occult Tradition of
       Linguistic Platonism. Part II: George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and Linguistic
       Platonism.” Language & Communication 28 (2008): 57.
Jacob, Alexander. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More, Cudworth and Berkeley.” In
       Gaukroger (1991).
Jacovides, Michael. “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.” Philosophia 37 (2009):

_____. “Remarks on Smalligan Marušić’s Comments.”Philosophia 37 (2009), 437-39.
Jacquette, Dale. “Berkeley’s Continuity Argument for the Existence of God.” Journal of Religion
       65 (1985): 1-14.
_____. “Reconciling Berkeley’s Microscopes in God’s Infinite Mind.” Religious Studies 29 (1993):
Jaffro, Laurent. “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence perçue’.” In Ressemblances et
        dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre,
        Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91.
_____. “La paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception thérapeutique de la
       philosophie.” In La philosophie comme médecine de l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G.
       Brykman, Université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-73.
_____. “Le cogito de Berkeley.” Archives de philosophie 67 (2004): 85-111.
_____. “Berkeley’s Criticism of Shaftesbury’s Moral Theory in Alciphron III.” In Daniel,
       Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 199-213.
_____. “L’évidence de l’existence d’autrui est-elle un modèle pour la connaissance de Dieu?
       Berkeley, Hume, Reid, et l' ‘argument irrégulier.’” HAL – CCSD (2010).
_____. “Ėducation moderne et tradition antique selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz
       (2010), 277-86.
_____. “Ist die Evidenz der Existenz des Anderen ein Modell für die Gotteserkenntnis? Berkeley,
       Hume, Reid und das ‘Argument des Irregulären’.” Aufklärung: Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch
       zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte 21 (2009): 51-74.
Jaffro, Laurent; Brykman, Geneviève; Schwartz, Claire, eds. Berkeley’s Alciphron. English Text
        and Essays in Interpretation. Hildesheim: Olms, 2010.
_____. “ ‘Reid said the business, but Berkeley did it.’ Ferrier interprète de l’immatérialisme.” Revue
       Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 135-49.
Jakapi, Roomet. Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: a Critique of the Non-Cognitivist
        Interpretation. Ph. D. diss., University of Tartu. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2002.
_____. “Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” British Journal for
       the History of Philosophy 10 (2002): 401-11.
_____. “Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defence of the Christian Religion (in
       Alciphron)”, The Modern Schoolman 80 (2002): 23-34.
_____. “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘Non-Cognitive’ Propositions in
       Scripture.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003): 86-90.
_____. “Was Berkeley a Utilitarian?” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007), 53-68.
_____. “Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 24-28.
_____. “Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism.” In Daniel, Reexamining
       Berkeley (2007): 188-98.
_____. “Berkeley’s Defence of the Scripture in Alciphron VI.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz
       (2010), 353-56.
Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst. A Modern Edition with
       Introductions and Commentary. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academy, 1992.
_____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

_____. “Berkeley, God, and Explanation.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 183-206.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Winkler (2005), 266-310.
_____. “Faith and Fluxions: Berkeley on Theology and Mathematics.” In Daniel, New
       Interpretations (2007), 247-60.
Jessop, T. E. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Journal of Theological
        Studies 9 (1958): 197-98.
Jolley, Nicholas. “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition.” In Cover (1990), 227-44.
______. “Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34
      (1996): 535-48.
Jones, Nick. Starting with Berkeley. London: Continuum, 2009.
Jones, Tom. Pope and Berkeley: the Language of Poetry and Philosophy. Houndmills, Basingstoke:
       Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
______. “George Berkeley and Thomas Secker: A Note.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006), 14-19.
Kabitoglou, E, Douka. “On the Discrimination of Platonisms in Eighteenth Century England.”
       Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993): 20-45.
Kail, P. J. E. “Causation, Fictionalism and Non-Cognitivism: Berkeley and Hume.” In Parigi
        (2010b), 31-40.
_____. “Berkeley, the Ends of Language, and the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Proceedings of
       the Aristotelian Society 107 (2009): 265-78.
Kamio, Mitsuo. “The Semantics of Perception: A Romantic Phrase of the Consciousness.” Journal
      of the School of Letters 4 (2008): 13-35.
Karásek, Jindrich. “Mind and the Other [in Czech].” Filosoficky Casopis 57 (2009), 61-69.
Kasam, A. “Can Berkeley Be Called an Imagist?” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1989): 75-88.
Kassavine, Illia. “Berkeley Revisited: on the New Metaphysics for Social Epistemology. 90 Years
      after Materialism and Empiriocriticism.” Epistemologia 19 (1996): 157-74.
Kearney, John. “Thought, Language and Meaning in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” The New
      Scholasticism 49 (1975): 480-94.
Kearney, Richard. “Berkeley and the Irish Mind.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25.
Keefe, Jenny. “The Return to Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2007),
Kelly, Patrick. “Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist [Abstract].”
        Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14.
_____. “Berkeley and Money: Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist.”
       Hermathena 139 (1985): 101-16.
_____. “Berkeley and Ireland.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25.
_____. “Berkeley’s Servants.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 13-14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Economic Writings.” In Winkler (2005), 339-68.
Keynes, Geoffrey. “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley.” The Book Collector (1981): 177-81.
Kijaczko, Stanislaw. Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba interpretacij filozofii
       George’a Berkeleya. Opole: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002.

Kingston, F. Temple. The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Irish Philosopher.
       Lewiston: Mellen, 1992.
Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo, eds., The Book of Nature in Modern Times. Leuven:
       Peeters Publishers, 2005.
Klein, Lawrence E. “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the Meaning of Politeness.” Studies in Eighteenth-
       Century Culture 16 (1986): 57-68.
Klemme, Heiner F. “Causality.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed.
     Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, vol. 1, 368-88.
_____. “Substances and Modes, Space and Time.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-
       Century Philosophy, ed, Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006,
       vol. 1, 343-67.
Kline, David A. “Berkeley’s Theory of Common Sense.” International Studies in Philosophy 19
       (1987): 21-31.
_____. “Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.” In Berman (1993), 185-99.
Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc, eds., Mathematics and the Divine. A Historical Study.
       Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.
Kohlenberg, Philip. “Bishop Berkeley on Religion and the Church.” Harvard Theological Review
      66 (1973): 219-36.
Kohler Ryan, Renee. “De profundis clamavi ad te Domine: The Existential Significance of Depth
       for Berkeley, Merleau-Ponty and Desmond.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society
       2005: 237-53.
Kopper, Joachim. Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das philosophische Denken.
      Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004.
Kroustallis, Basileios. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21
       (2004): 151-66.
Kulenkampff, Arend. George Berkeley. München: Beck, 1987.
_____. Esse est percipi. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George Berkeleys. Basel: Schwabe, 2001.
Kupfer, Joseph. “Universalization in Berkeley’s Rule-Utilitarianism.” Revue internationale de
       philosophie 28 (1974): 511-31.
Lambert, Richard. “Berkeley’s Use of the Relativity Argument.” Idealistic Studies (1980): 107-21.
_____. “The Literal Intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues.” Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982): 165-70.
Lamers, Robert. “Berkeley and Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (1981): 120-43.
Leary, David E. “Berkeley’s Social Theory: Context and Development.” Journal of the History of
       Ideas 38 (1977): 635-49.
Lebrun, G. “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui.” Manuscrito 11 (1988): 33-48.
Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le ‘langage optique’.” Revue
      philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997): 409-27.
Lee, R. N. “What Berkeley’s Notions Are.” Idealistic Studies 20 (1990): 19-41.
Le Jallé, Ėléonore. “Mandeville dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 297-308.
Lemetti, Juhana and Piirimäe, Eva, eds. Human Nature as the Basis of Morality and Society in
       Early Modern Philosophy. Acta Philosophica Fennica 83. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of

       Finland, 2007.
Lennon, Thomas M. “Berkeley and the Ineffable.” Syntheses 75 (1988): 231-50.
_____. “George Berkeley and the Act-Object Distinction.” Dialogue 40 (2001): 651-67.
_____. “The Significance of the Barrovian Case”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science
       38 (2007): 36-55.
_____. “The Genesis of Berkeley's Theory of Vision Vindicated” History of European Ideas 33
       (2007), 321-29.
____. “The Historical Consistency of Berkeley’s Idealism.” British Journal for the History of
       Philosophy 16 (2008): 101-24.
_____. “The Main Part and Pillar of Berkeley’s Theory: Idealism and Perceptual Heterogeneity.”
       Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 91-115.
Lavine, Michael. “How to Make a Mistake.” Philosophia 22 (1993): 29-37.
Levin, David Michael, ed. Sites of Vision. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 1997.
Levin, Janet. “Molyneux Meets Euthyphro: Does Cross-Modal Transfer Require Rational
       Transition?” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2008): 289-97.
Levin, Yakir. “Idealism and Relativism: Locke, Berkeley, Kant, and Wittgenstein” [in Hebrew].
       Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2010): 128-42.
Levine, Michael. “Berkeley’s Theocentric Mentalism: Pantheism?” Sophia (1987): 30-41.
_____ and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘Bad Faith’ or Naive Idealism?” Idealistic Studies 22
       (1992): 163-78.
Levy, David M. “Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy Consequences of Strict Finitism.”
       Hume Studies 18 (1992): 511-36.
_____. “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’: Learning in Society.” Hume Studies
       19 (1993): 223-26.
Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre. “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley.” Revue de theologie et de philosophie
      (1980): 241-52.
Lievers, Menno. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1992): 399-
Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel. “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’.” Berkeley Newsletter 14
      (1995/96): 1-4.
Lloyd, Peter B. Consciousness and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999.
_____. Paranormal Phenomena and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999.
Lord, S. K. “Berkeleian Linguistics.” Linguistics 213 (1978): 5-28.
Louet, D. “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et Berkeley.” Revue de
       métaphysique et de morale 93 (1988): 447-68.
Lowe, E. J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. New York: Oxford University
      Press, 2008.
Lucash, Frank S. “The Nature of Mind.” Giornale di Metafisica 13 (1991): 89-107.
Luce, A. A. “Berkeley and the Living Thing.” Hermathena 123 (1977): 19-25.
Luce, J. V. “Yale College and the Acquisition of Whitehall.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 19-

Lutterfelds, Wilhelm. “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den korrecten Realismus.”
        Perspektiven der Philosophie 22 (1996): 305-40.
Lyons, William. “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s Childhood Home.” Berkeley Newsletter 12
       (1991/92): 11-15.
Mahon, James Edwin. “Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy by Peter Walmsley.”
      Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 15-17.
Maia Neto, José R. “Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.” Journal of the History of
      Ideas 58 (1997): 199-220.
Malherbe, Michel. “Husserl critique de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de
      l’étranger (1986): 355-66.
Malherbe, Michel. “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon Berkeley.” History of
      European Ideas 7 (1986): 623-32.
Mall, Ram Adhar. Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Freiburg, Breisgau:
       Alber, 1984.
Mancino, Michele. “Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in Italia’ di George Berkeley.” In
      Atti delle giornate di studio: Il turismo culturale in Campania. Napoli, Quaderni
      dell’Università degli studi “Federico II”, 2004, 271-304.
Mandal, Nathaniel. Idee und Intention. Die Ideen- beziehungsweise Bedeutungstheorie John Lockes
      und ihre Wiederbelebung in der Theorie der Sprecherbedeutung bei Paul Grice. Munich:
      Grin Verlag, 2010.
_____. Qualitäten der Wahrnehmung. Lockes Unterscheidung zwischen Qualitäten primärer und
       sekundärer Art und Berkeleys Immaterialismuseinwand. Munich: Grin Verlag, 2010.
Marciano, Bruno. George Berkeley. Estetica e idealismo. Genova: Nova Scripta, 2010.
Martinello, Francesco. “Direzioni del moto e direzioni nello spazio: Berkeley e Kant.” Rivista di
       Filosofia 102 (2011): 105-23.
Mathauser, Zdenek. “The Theory of Reflection in Aesthetics and the Heritage of George Berkeley.”
      (in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11 (1974): 30-52.
Mattey, G. J. “Kant’s Conception of Berkeley’s Idealism.” Kantstudien 74 (1983): 161-75.
McCracken, Charles J. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?” Archiv für Geschichte der
      Philosophie 61 (1979): 280-92.
_____. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
_____. “Berkeley’s Conception of Idea [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14-16.
_____. “Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 597-602.
_____. “Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24
       (1986): 19-40.
_____. “Berkeley’s Cartesian Concept of Mind: the Return Through Malebranche and Locke to
       Descartes.” Monist 71 (1988): 596-611.
_____. “Berkeley on the Relation of Ideas to the Mind.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 187-200.
_____. “Godless Immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley.” In Muehlmann (1995), 249-60.

_____. “Demons that Deceive, Gods that Perceive, and the Limits of Skepticism.” In Brykman
       (1997), 73-89.
_____. “Knowledge of the Existence of Bodies.” In Garber (1998), 624-48.
_____. “George Berkeley.” In Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Steven Nadler. Oxford:
       Blackwell, 2002, 437-55.
_____. “Berkeley’s Realism.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 23-44.
_____ and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials.
       Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
_____. “Leibniz and Berkeley on Body.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 175-92.
McDonough, Jeffrey K. “Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism.” Journal of the
     History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 567-90.
McGowan, William. “The Dream of Ezra Stiles: Bishop Berkeley’s Haunting of New England.”
     Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture (1982): 181-98.
McGowan, William. “Did Berkeley Write The Irish Blasters?” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 1-
_____. “George Berkeley’s American Declaration of Independence.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century
       Culture 12 (1983): 105-13.
_____. “Berkeley Kicking His Own Stones.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1989): 81-102.
McIntyre, J. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Scottish Journal of
      Theology 15 (1962): 420-23.
McKim, Robert. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neoplatonism in Berkeley.” Journal of the
     History of Ideas (1982): 665-71.
_____. “The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: a Reply to Bertil Belfrage.” Hermathena 139 (1985):
_____. “Luce’s Account of the Development of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Journal of the History
       of Ideas 48 (1987): 649-69.
_____. “Review of Theodore Young: Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern
       Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 13-16.
_____. “What Is Berkeley’s God Doing in the Quad?” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88):
_____. “Review of Ernest Sosa, Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley.” Berkeley
       Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 28-32.
_____. “Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 215-33.
_____. “Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98):
_____. “Berkeley’s Notebooks.” In Winkler (2005), 63-93.
McKinnon, Rhys. “Dismantling the Straw Man: An Analysis of the Arguments of Hume and
     Berkeley Against Locke’s Doctrine of Abstract Ideas.” Sorites: An International Electronic
     Magazine of Analytical Philosophy. 16 (2005), 38-45.
McRae, Robert. “’Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century.” Journal of the
     History of Ideas 26 (1965): 175-90.

Meattini, Valerio. “Berkeley e l’Italia.” Critica storica 19 (1982): 3-21.
Mel’vil’, I. K. And Sushko, S. A. “Argument Doktora Dzhonsona: Semiuel Dzhonson kak kritik
       Berkli.” Voprosy Filosofii 3 (1981): 133-44.
Menichelli, Caterina. “Was Berkeley A Spinozist? A Historiographical Answer (1718-1751).” In
      Parigi (2010b), 171-88.
Mensch, Jennifer. “Kant and the Problem of Idealism: On the Significance of the Göttingen
      Review.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2006): 297-317.
Mercer, Christia and O’Neill, Eileen, eds. Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and
      Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Migely, Geneviève. “Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007),
Mirarchi, L. A. “Force and Absolute Motion in Berkeley’s Philosophy of Physics.” Journal of the
       History of Ideas 38 (1977): 705-13.
_____. “A Rejoinder to Bruce Silver’s Reply.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 716-18.
Moked, Gabriel. Particles and Ideas: Berkeley’s Corpuscularian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford
      University Press, 1988.
Moked, Gabriel. “A Note on Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.” Iyyun 40 (1991): 95-99.
_____. “Two Central Issues in Bishop Berkeley’s ‘Corpuscularian Philosophy’ in the Siris.”
       History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643-49.
Montero, B. H. “La realidad en Kant y Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa
      Rica 23 (1985): 49-69.
Monti, Maria Teresa. “Theories ‘providentialistes’ de la vision. Chirurgiens et philosophes entre
       Berkeley et Molyneux.” in Wissenschaften und Musik unter dem Einfluß einer sich
       ändernden Geisteshaltung, edited by M. Büttner. Bochum: Universitätsverlag N.
       Brockmeyer, 1992, 69-76.
_____. “’Scrittura’ e ‘commento’: il codice berkeleiano della percezione. Problemi medici e teorie
       filosofiche.” In L’interpretazione nei secoli XVI e XVII , edited by Guido Canziani and
       Yves-Charles Zarka. Milano: F. Angeli, 1993, 387-406.
_____, ed., Teorie della visione e problemi di percezione visiva nell’età moderna. Milano: Franco
       Angeli, 1995.
_____. “Isomorphisme, signes naturals et “prophéties”: les suggestions de Descartes et les solutions
       de Berkeley.” In Brykman (1997), 117-48.
de Montluzin, Emily Lorraine. “Attributions of Authorship in the Gentleman’s Magazine, 1731-36:
      A Supplement to the Union List.” A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews
      21 (2008): 11-24.
Mooney, Timothy. “Irish Cartesian and Proto-Phenomenologist: The Case of Berkeley.” Yearbook
     of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 213-36.
Moreau, J. “Berkeley et le schématisme.” Kantstudien 79 (1988): 286-92.
Morgan, Vance. “Kant and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defence of Kant’s Refutation of Berkeley.”
      Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (1993): 217-37.
Morris, David. “Optical Idealism and the Languages of Depth in Descartes and Berkeley.” Southern
       Journal of Philosophy 35 (1997): 363-92.

Mourant, John A. “Berkeley and Religious Language.” In Explanation. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973,
Muehlmann, Robert G. “Berkeley’s Ontology and the Epistemology of Idealism.” Canadian
      Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 89-111.
_____. “The Role of Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of
       Philosophy 29 (1991): 397-425.
_____. Berkeley’s Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.
_____, ed., Berkeley’s Metaphysics. Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. Pennsylvania:
       Pennsylvania State Press, 1995.
_____. “Berkeley’s Problem of Sighted Agency.” In Muehlmann (1995), 149-70.
_____. “The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Muehlmann (1995), 89-106.
_____. “Strong and Weak Heterogeneity in Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Daniel, New
       Interpretations (2007), 121-44.
Mugnai, Paolo F. Segno e linguaggio in George Berkeley. Roma: ed. dell’Ateneo, 1979.
Mun Seong-Hwa. Berkeley und Hegel: eine Untersuchung zur logischen Dingkonstitution und zur
      dialektischen Bewußtseinsdeskription. Ph. D. diss., University of Düsseldorf, 1997.
Munoa Roiz, J. L. “George Berkeley (1685-1753) (II).” Archivos de la Sociedad Española de
      Oftalmología 82 (2007): 121-22.
Murray, Patrick. “Berkeley and Money: Money, Wealth, and Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs: a Reply
      to Patrick Kelly.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 152-56.
Nadler, Steven. “Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction.” Canadian
       Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 47-61.
_____, ed. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University
       Press, 1993.
_____. A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.
Nanavati, Shaun. “A history and experimental analysis of the moon illusion.” The New School
      Psychology Bulletin 6.
Neri, Luigi. “’Filling the World with a Mite’: un paradosso dell’infinita divisibilità negli scritti
       giovanili di George Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 71 (1980): 67-97.
_____. “Esperienza, metafisica e geometria nel pensiero di Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 76 (1985):
_____. “Il caso Siris, ovvero la ‘seconda filosofia’ di George Berkeley vescovo di Cloyne.”
       Giornale critico della filosofia italiana (1990): 320-41.
_____. George Berkeley. Filosofia e critica dei linguaggi scientifici. Bologna: CLUEB, 1991.
_____. “Fenomenismo e realismo in George Berkeley.” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 3
       (2005): 470-94.
Newburgh, R. “Did Berkeley foreshadow Mach?” American Journal of Physics 76 (2008): 189-190.
Nezinska, E. “To Make Truth Glide Into the Soul [in Czechoslovakian].” Filozofia 47 (1992): 310-
Nielsen, Harry. “A Categorical Difficulty in Berkeley.” Philosophy Research Archives (1980).
Norton-Smith, T. M. “Sending an Irishman ‘Realing’: Constructive Realism and George Berkeley’s

       Philosophy of Arithmetic.” Midwest Quarterly 42 (2001): 199-211.
Nuchelmans, G. “Berkeleys betekenisleer.” Wijsgerig perspectief 26 (1985-86).
Nurock, Vanessa. “La conscience morale selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010),
Oaklander, L. N. “The Inherence Interpretation of Berkeley: a Critique.” Modern Schoolman 54
      (1977): 261-69.
Oakes, Jason Benjamin. In Him We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Philosophical Theology in
       Nicolas Malebranche and George Berkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: University of Oklahoma,
Oakes, Robert A. “God and Physical Objects.” International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion
       9 (1978): 16-29.
O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form of
       Existence. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.
Oekerijee, S. K. “Descartes, Berkeley, and the External World.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 23
       (1996): 77-93.
Oertel, Hans Joachim. George Berkeley und die englische Literatur. Unveränd. Reprogr. Nachdr. D.
        1 Aufl., Halle a. d. Saale: Niemeyer 1934 (Walluf bei Wiesbaden: Sändig, 1973).
O'Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana, eds., Ordering the World in the Eighteenth Century. Palgrave
      Macmillan, 2005.
O’Grady, Paul. “Review of Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst: a Modern Edition with
      Introductions and Commentary. Edited by Douglas M. Jesseph.” Berkeley Newsletter 13
      (1993/94): 4-8.
O’Higgins, J. “Browne and King, Collins and Berkeley: Agnosticism or Anthropomorphism?”
      Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976): 88-112.
Olscamp, Paul. Some Suggestions about the Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley. Baltimore:
      Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.
Olszewski, Mikołaj. George Berkeley: Alkifron. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki, 2008.
Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang, ed. La voie des idées? Le statut de la représentation XVIIè-XXè siècles.
      Paris: CNRS éditions, 2006.
Orlando, Eleonora. “Sobre el idealismo de Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia 7 (1992): 53-68.
Ott, Walter. “The Cartesian Context of Berkeley’s Attack on Abstraction.” Pacific Philosophical
       Quarterly 85 (2004): 407-24.
_____. “Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: the Fourth Distinction.” British Journal for the History of
       Philosophy 14 (2006): 437-50.
_____. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University
       Press (2009).
Pabst, Manfred. Berkeley, Joyce, Beckett: Reflexionen und Interpretationen. Wiesbaden:
       Volkshochschule Wiesbaden e. V., 1997.
Pappas, George. “Ideas, Minds and Berkeley.” American Philosophical Quarterly (1980): 181-94.
_____. “Adversary Metaphysics.” Philosophy Research Archives 9 (1983): 571-86.
_____. “Abstract Ideas and the Esse is Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 47-62.

_____. “Abstract Ideas and Unperceived Existent Sensible Objects [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter
       8 (1985): 16.
_____. “Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2
       (1987): 105-14.
_____. “Berkeley and Common Sense Realism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1991): 27-42.
_____. “Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances.” In Muehlmann (1995), 127-48.
_____. “The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753.” International Studies in Philosophy 29
       (1997): 126-27.
_____. “Berkeley and Scepticism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1999): 133-49.
_____. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2000.
_____. “Les idées abstraites et la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” In Charles (2004), 37-58.
_____. “Berkeley’s Assessment of Locke’s Epistemology.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley
       (2007), 29-49.
_____. “Certainty and Knowledge of Objects in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 275-
Parigi, Silvia. “George Berkeley e l’illusione lunare.” Rivista di storia della scienza 4 (1987): 51-
_____. “La quaestio di Barrow: un’aporia della visione tramite lenti.” Nuncius 3 (1988): 65-69.
______. “Il problema di Molyneux: avventure filosofiche di ciechi, neonati e di alcuni animali.”
      BioLogica 4 (1990): 171-207.
_____. “’The Horse Is in the Stable, the Books are in the Study as Before’: appunti per una storia
       della storiografia berkeleiana.” Bollettino filosofico dell’Università della Calabria 9 (1991):
_____. “I filosofi e il microscopio: da Descartes a Berkeley.” Rivista di storia della scienza 1
       (1993): 155-72.
_____. Il mondo visibile. George Berkeley e la ‘perspectiva’. Firenze: Olschki, 1995.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Opere filosofiche Torino: UTET, 1996.
_____. “Is There a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism?” In Brykman (1997), 23-48.
_____. “Caverne, terremoti, fossili e vulcani negli Scritti di storia naturale di George Berkeley.” In
       Segni e percorsi della modernità, edited by Ferdinando Abbri and Marco Segala. Arezzo:
       Università degli studi di Siena, 2000, 77-105.
_____. “Teoria e storia del problema di Molyneux.” Laboratorio dell’ISPF 1 (2004):
_____. “Review: Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.” Philosophy in
       Review 27 (2007): 407-409.
_____. Spiriti, effluvi, attrazioni. La fisica curiosa dal Rinascimento al Secolo dei Lumi. Napoli:
       Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2010a.
_____, ed. George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht:
       Springer, 2010.
______. “Scire per causas Versus scire per signa: George Berkeley and Scientific Explanation in
      Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 107-19.

______. “Lo spirito etereo e l’acqua di catrame.” In Parigi (2010a), 248-51.
______. “Siris and the Renaissance: Some Overlooked Berkeleian Sources.” Revue Philosophique
      de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 151-62.
Park, Désirée. Complementary Notions: a Critical Study of Berkeley’s Theory of Concepts. The
       Hague: Nijhoff, 1972.
_____. “Notions: the Counter-Poise of the Berkeleyan Ideas.” Giornale di Metafisica 12 (1981):
_____. “Prior and Williams on Berkeley.” Philosophy (1981): 231-41.
_____. “Supplement to the Editor’s Introduction to the Philosophical Commentaries.” In The Works
       of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. Nendeln,
       Lichtenstein: Kraus Reprint, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Anselm’s Argument.” Anselm Studies 1 (1983): 103-9.
_____. “Facts and Reasons Concerning Berkeley’s Reprinted Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 7
       (1984): 14-16.
_____. “The Berkeleyan Scheme of Things and Some Consequences.” Giornale di Metafisica 19
       (1988): 17-41.
Patey, Douglas. “Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone Again.” Journal of the
       History of Ideas 47 (1986): 139-47.
Pearce, Kenneth L. “The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley.” Religious Studies 44 (2008):
Perler, Dominik; and Haag, Johannes. Ideen. Reprasentationalismus in der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin,
        New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2010.
Peterschmitt, Luc. “La critique du réalisme leibnizien dans le De Motu de Berkeley.” Astérion
       ( 1 (2003): 112-26.
_____. “Berkeley et les hypothèses mathématiques.” Archives internationales d´histoire des
       sciences 150-151 (2003): 184-97.
_____. Sciences de la nature et philosophie dans la pensée de Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Université
       Lille 3, 2005.
_____. “Can Berkeley Be an Instrumentalist? Towards a Reappraisal of Berkeley’s Philosophy of
       Science.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 19-31.
_____. “Berkeley and Chemistry in the Siris. The Rebuilding of a Non-Existent Theory.” In Parigi
       (2010b), 73-85.
_____. “Un impensé des principes de la connaissance humaine: la physique mathématique.” Revue
       Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 19-29.
______. “L’aspect formel du langage de la physique dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman,
      Schwartz (2010), 413-22.
_____. “Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision: Science or Metaphysics?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage
       (2011), 15-33.
_____. “Quelle preuve de l’existence de quel Dieu? À propos de la ‘demonstration de l’existence de
       Dieu’ dans Alciphron IV.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 193-204.
Philipse, H. “Leidt consequentie altijd naar de duivel? Een analyse van de argumentatie voor
       Berkeleys immaterialisme.” Wijsgerig perspectief (1985-86).

Phillips, Mariléne. “Berkeley sur la volonté: Quelques ‘notes philosophiques’.” Revue
        internationale de philosophie 39 (1985): 252-58.
_____. “L’actualité et l’immaterialisme de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de
       l’étranger (1986): 373-76.
_____. “On Translating Berkeley’s Principles.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 609-16.
Piper, William Bowman. “Kant’s Contact with British Empiricism.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 12
       (1978/79): 174-89.
Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.
_____. “Berkeley on the Perception of Objects.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986):
_____. Berkeley on Vision: a Nineteenth-Century Debate. New York: Garland, 1988.
_____, ed., The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Garland, 1988-1989, 15 vols.
Popkin, Richard H., ed., Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: a Pan-American Dialogue.
       Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
Porter, Noah. Two-hundredth Birthday of Bishop George Berkeley [1885]. Reprint. Whitefish, MT:
        Kessinger, 2010.
Priest, Stephen. The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer. London: Penguin, 1990.
Printz, Amanda Lewis. The Scope and Significance of George Berkeley's Language Model. Ph. D.
        Dissertation: University of Southern California, 2007.
Pucelle, Jean. “Berkeley a-t-il été influencé par Malebranche?” Etudes philosophiques 1 (1979): 19-
Pycior, H. M. “Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley.” Journal of
        the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 265-86.
Quintanilla Navarro, Ignacio. George Berkeley (1685-1753). Madrid: Ediciones del Orto, 1995.
_____. Materia y sentido en George Berkeley. Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Servicio de
       Publicaciones Contribuidor Rábade Romeo, Sergio Fecha de Publicación (2002).
Rabate, Jean-Michel. “Berkeley entre Joyce et Beckett.” Études irlandaises 11 (1986): 57-76.
Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and McCarty, Richard ; with Allhoff, Fritz and Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash,
       eds. Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Malden, MA Oxford:
       Blackwell, 2007.
Raiger, Michael Kenneth. Coleridge, Hartley, and Berkeley: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics,
       1794-1796, Ph. D. diss., New York University, 2002.
Raine, Kathleen. “Berkeley, Blake and the New Age.” Thought 51 (1976): 356-77.
Rashid, Salim. “Berkeley’s Querist and its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought
       12 (1990): 38-60.
_____. “Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money.” History of
       Political Economy 34 (2002): 818-19.
_____. “Berkeley’s Querist and Its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12
       (1990): 38-60.
Raynor, David. “Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume.” Dialogue 19 (1980): 196-200.
_____. “Review of Pierre Dubois, L’Oeuvre de Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 19-21.

_____. “Berkeley’s Ontology.” Dialogue 26 (1987): 611-20.
_____. “Hume and Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish
       Enlightenment, ed. M. A. Stewart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 231-50.
_____. “Berkeley et la théorie des minima sensibilia.” In Charles (2004), 89-102.
Rebaglia, Alberta. “Essere e percepire una struttura linguistica: il pensiero di George Berkeley
       quale presupposto filosofico.” Epistemologia 12 (1989): 125-52.
Reininger, Robert. Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Reprint d. Ausg. München: E. Reinhardt, 1922.
       Nendeln/Liechtenstein: Kraus, 1973.
Richetti, John J. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard
       University Press, 1983.
Richmond, Alasdair. Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: A Reader’s Guide. London:
      Continuum, 2009.
_____. “New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy
       18 (2010): 724-26.
Rickless, Samuel C. “Review of John Roberts, A Metaphysics for the Mob.” Philosophical Review
       118 (2009): 244-47.
Rioux-Beaulne, Mitia. “Plaisir sensible et beauté morale dans le troisième dialogue de l’Alciphron:
      Berkeley face à la naissance de l’esthétique.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 205-22.
Risse, Heinz. Berkeley und der Demiurg: Requiem auf das Spiel in der Sackgasse. Bielefeld:
       Merlin, 1983.
Roberts, John R. A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York:
       Oxford University Press, 2007.
_____. “‘Strange Impotence of Men’: Immaterialism, Anaemic Agents, and Immanent Causation.”
       British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010), 411-31.
Robinson, Howard M. ‘Abstract Ideas’ and Immaterialism.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986):
_____. “Berkeley” in Bunnin (1996), 694-708.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Oxford:
       Oxford University Press, 1996.
_____. “Review: Berkeley’s Thought.” Mind 113 (2004): 571-75.
_____. “Two Berkeleian Arguments about the Nature of Space.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),
Robles, José A. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley I.” Diánoia 26 (1980): 151-77.
_____. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley II.” Diánoia 27 (1981): 166-85.
_____. “Matemáticas hasta el siglo XVIII. ¿Qué son los números?” Diánoia 28 (1982): 155-71.
_____. “Berkeley y su crítica a los fundamentos del cálculo.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia
       10:2 (1984): 141-50.
_____. “Génesis de la noción de sustancia espiritual en la filosofia de Berkeley.” Diánoia 30
       (1984): 67-87.
_____. “George Berkeley, Commentarios filosoficos, Introduccion y traduccion.” Contrafuerte
       (1985): 4-11.

_____. “Berkeley y los minima.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 1-12.
_____. “Berkeley: argumentacion filosofica.” Revista Latino Americano de Filosofia 12 (1986): 45-
_____. “The Mottoes in the Analyst Debate.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 15-16.
_____. “Berkeley: distinción y separación.” Dialogues 24 (1989): 81-102.
_____. “Hobbes, Berkeley y las ideas abstractas.” Revista de Filosofia 12 (1989): 43-54.
_____. The Mathematical Ideas of George Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Stanford University, 1990.
_____. Estudios berkeleianos. Mexico:Universidad Autónoma de México, 1990.
_____.”Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility.” In Popkin (1996).
_____. “Filosofia natural y religion. Los casos de Newton, Boyle y Berkeley.” Revista Patagonica
       de Filosofia 2 (2001): 43-56.
_____. “Philosophie naturelle et religion: les cas de Newton, Boyle et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004),
_____. “Newton y Berkeley: atomistas epicureos.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 30 (2004):
Rodrigues da Silva, Marcos. “Instrumentalismo e explicaçao cientifica no De motu de Berkeley.”
      Scientiae Studia 4 (2006): 101-14.
Rogers, Karen. “Two Mistakes About Berkeley.” Philosophy (1980): 552-53.
Ronchi, Vasco. Commento alla Nuova teoria della visione di George Berkeley. Firenze: Baccini &
      Chiappi, 1973. Estratto da: Atti della fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 29 (1974).
Rose, Thomasine. Verbivocovisual: the Presence of Bishop Berkeley in Finnegans Wake. S. L.:
       Bellefonte Editeur, 1981.
Rosenbaum, S. E. “Berkeley’s World of Ideas.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985): 421-34.
Ross, Ian Campbell and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and the Authorship of The Memoirs of
        Signor Gaudentio di Lucca.” Irish University Review 41 (2011): 196-201.
Rotem, Ornan. “An Encounter Between Philosophy and Religion.” Asian Philosophy 3 (1993): 15-
Ryann, Todd. “A New Account of Berkeley’s Likeness Principle.” British Journal for the History
       of Philosophy 14 (2006): 561-80.
Ryder, John. “Cadwallader, Colden, Samuel Johnson, and the Activity of Matter: Materialism and
       Idealism in Colonial America.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996):
Saidel, Eric. “Making Sense of Berkeley’s Challenge.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993):
Santos, Antônio Carlos dos. “Berkeley face à Mandeville: de Fable des abeilles à la Lettre à Dion.”
       Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 163-77.
Sanyal, Shyamali. “George Berkeley on the Problem of Universals.” Indian Philosophical
       Quarterly 10 (1983): 7-12.
Saporiti, Katia. Die Wirklichkeit der Dinge : eine Untersuchung des Begriffs der Idee in der
       Philosophie George Berkeleys. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2006.
Sasso, Javier. “Immaterialismo y verificacionismo en Filosofia del entendimiento.” Revista

       Latinamericana de Filosofia 8 (1982): 247-54.
Scala, André. Berkeley. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2007.
Scallett, Jeffrey. “A Sequel to Berkeley’s Dialogues: Excerpts.” Dialogue 17 (1974): 1-6.
Schabas, Margaret. “Hume's Monetary Thought Experiments.” Studies in History and Philosophy of
      Science 39 (2008), 161-69.
Schliesser, Eric. “On the Origin of Modern Naturalism: The Significance of Berkeley's Response to
       a Newtonian Indispensability Argument.” Philosophica (Belgium) 76 (2005), 45-66.
_____. “Wijsbegeerte tussen wetenschap en moraal in een post-newtoniaanse wereld: Berkeley,
       Hume, en Adam Smith.” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 100 (2008):
Schumacher, R. “Critique of Representationalism and Immaterialism. An Overview of the Scholarly
      Literature on the Theories of George Berkeley.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58
      (2004): 279-97.
_____. “The Cognitive Impenetrability of Optical Illusions. George Berkeley's Theory of Visual
       Perception in the Context of New Approaches”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58
       (2004): 505-26.
_____. “Berkeley on Visible Figure and Extension.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 108-
_____.“Action in perception? Empirical and philosophical arguments against the enactive approach
       to perception.” Perception 37 (2008): 433-45.
Schwartz, Claire. “Berkeley and His Contemporaries: The Question of Mathematical Formalism.”
      In Parigi (2010b), 43-56.
_____. “Berkeley et les idées générales mathématiques.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de
       l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 31-44.
_____. “Berkeley et la norme mathématique: de l’Alciphron à l’Analyste.” In Jaffro, Brykman,
       Schwartz (2010), 423-33.
Schwartz, Robert. Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
_____. “Seeing Distance from a Berkeleian Perspective.” In Muehlmann (1995), 217-30.
_____. Visual Versions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
Sherry, David. “The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: Rigor Mathematicae?” Studies in History and
       Philosophy of Science 18 (1987): 455-80.
_____. “Don’t Take Half the Way: On Berkeley’s Mathematical Reasoning.” Studies in History and
       Philosophy of Science 24, 2 (1993): 207-25.
Silver, Bruce. “The Conflicting Microscopic Worlds of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” Journal of
        the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 343-49.
_____. “The Invisible World of Berkeley’s New theory of vision.” New Scholasticism 51 (1977):
_____. “A Reply to Professor Mirarchi.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 714-15.
Silver, Bruce. “Boswell on Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Revisiting the Stone.” Journal of the
        History of Ideas 54 (1993): 437-48.
Skemp, Sheila. “George Berkeley’s Newport Experience.” Rhode Island History 37 (1978): 53-63.

Smalligan Marušić, Jennifer. “Comments on Michael Jacovides’ ‘How Berkeley Corrupted His
       Capacity to Conceive’.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 431-36.
Sorensen, Roy. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
Sosa, Ernest. “Russell, Berkeley y la materia objectivo.” Critica 7 (1975): 35-41.
_____. “Berkeley’s Master Stroke [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16-18.
_____, ed., Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.
Souza, José Carlos de. “Deus na Filosofia Empírica.” Caminhando 13 (2008): 105-20.
Spicker, Gideon. Uber das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaft der Philosophie: Kant, Hume und
       Berkeley. Hildesheim: Olms, 2006.
Spiegel, James S. “The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Faith and
       Philosophy 13 (1996): 216-35.
_____. “The Christian Psychology of George Berkeley.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 17
       (1998): 335-46.
Spinicci, Paolo. La visione e il liguaggio: considerazioni sull’applicabilità del modello linguistico
       all’esperienza. Milano: Guerini, 1992.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Teoria della visione. Milano: Guerini, 1995.
Stack, George J. “Berkeley’s Concept of Existence.” Modern Schoolman 53 (1976): 281-89.
_____. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception. New York: Lang, 1991.
Stadelmann, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich selbst: Berkeley und Kant.
       Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1999.
Stammler, Gerhard. Berkeleys Philosophie der Mathematik. Unveränd. Neudr. D. Ausg. Berlin
      1921.Vaduz: Topos, 1978.
Stanford, W. B. “Berkeley and the Libyan Monster.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 10-11.
Steinkraus, Warren E. “A Piece of Sensible Bread.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1978): 619-
_____. “Review of Houghton, Berman, Lapan, Images of Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986):
Stepanenko, Pedro. “La concepcion berkeleyana del yo.” Contrafuerte (1985): 12-18.
Stephens, John, ed., The Guardian. Kentucky: The University Press, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley and Lady Burlington: a Footnote.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 16-17.
Sterling, M. C. “Berkeley contra el realismo.” Sapienta 33 (1978): 153-55.
Stewart, Jon. “Borges and the Refutation of Idealism: A Study of ‘Tlon Uqbar, Orbis Tertius’.”
       Ideas y Valores (1996): 64-99.
Stewart, M. A. “William Wishart, an Early Critic of Alciphron.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83):
_____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 19.
_____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 25-46.
_____. “Add MS. 39305 [Review].” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 6-11.
_____. “Review of Berkeley, Oeuvres, tom. I, edited by Geneviève Brykman.” Berkeley Newsletter
       10 (1987/88): 10-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 10-19.
_____. “Reid on Locke and Personal Identity: Some Lost Sources.” Locke Newsletter 28 (1997):
Stoneham, Tom. Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford
       Univeristy Press, 2002.
_____. “Review: Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Mind 112 (2003): 126-30.
_____. “George Berkeley: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” In Central
       Works of Philosophy: The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. John Shand. Montreal:
       McGinn-Queen’s University Press, 2005.
_____. “Catching Berkeley’s Shadow.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 116-36.
Storhoff, Gary. “The Artist as Universal Mind: Berkeley’s Influence on Charles Johnson.” African
       American Review 30 (1996): 539-48.
Stroll, Avrum. “Two Lines of Argumentation in Berkeley’s Principles: a Reply to George S.
        Pappas.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 139-44.
Stroud, Barry. “Berkeley vs. Locke on Primary Qualities.” Philosophy 55 (1980): 149-66.
Stuart, James. “Berkeley’s Appearance/Reality Distinction.” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8
        (1977): 119-30.
Stubenberg, L. “Divine Ideas: the Cure-All for Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Southern Journal of
      Philosophy 28 (1990): 221-49.
Szabo, Zoltan Gendler. “Berkeley’s Triangle.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995): 41-63.
_____. “Sententialism and Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Philosophical Quarterly 55 (2005): 462-
Szalek, Piotr. “O genezie Berkeleyowskiej definicji ‘istnienia’ [“On the Genesis of the Berkeleian
       Definition of ‘Existence’ (in Polish)].” In Stanislaw Janeczek, ed. Oblicza filozofii XVII
       wieku [Faces of the XVIIth-Century Philosophy]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL [Catholic
       University Press], 2008, 93-113.
_____. “On the Origins of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’.” Studies in Logic, Grammar,
       and Rethoric 15 (2009): 145-59.
Szymańska, Marta. “George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Polish Studies.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008),
Taranto, Domenico. “Berkeley critico di Mandeville. Note su etica ed epistemologia nella polemica
       con i freethinkers.” Pensiero politico 14 (1981): 243-61.
Taranto, Pascal. Du déisme à l’athéisme: la libre-pensée d’Anthony Collins. Paris: Editions Honoré
       Champion, 2000.
_____. “Le personnage de Diagoras.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 361-70.
_____. “Alciphron ou la théorie du complot.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 223-36.
Taylor, C. C. W. “Berkeley’s Theory of Abstract Ideas.” Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1978): 97-
Tennant, R. C. “The Anglican Response to Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity.” Journal of the
      History of Ideas 43 (1982): 73-90.

Thaliath, Babu. Der prozeß der geometrisch-optischen Perspektivierung in der visuellen
       Raumwahrnehmung. Freiburg: Universität Freiburg, 2001.
Thomas, Andrew. “God, Vision and Power.” Studia Theologica: Nordic Journal of Theology 62
     (2008): 80-97.
Thomas, George H. “Berkeley’s God Does Not Perceive.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14
     (1976): 163-68.
_____, ed., “George Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries; Explanatory Notes by A. A. Luce.”
       Alliance, Ohio: Mount Union College, 1976.
Thrane, Gary. “Berkeley’s Proper Objects of Vision.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977):
Tipton, Ian. “ ‘Ideas’ in Berkeley and Arnauld.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 575-84.
_____. “Berkeley’s Imagination.” In Sosa (1987), 85-102.
_____. “Descartes’ Demon and Berkeley’s World.” Philosophical Investigations 15 (1992): 111-30.
Tommy, C. A. “A Berkeleian Model of Memory.” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical
     Research 22 (2005), 93-121.
Torode, Brian. “A Berkeleian Correction.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15.
Trapnell, W. H. The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers of the Natural Light from
       Descartes to Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.
Tricaud, François. “L’immaterialisme est-il réfutable?” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 591-
Triepke, Sandra. Berkeleys Immaterialismus: In Bezugnahme auf sein Hauptwerk “Prinzipien über
       die Menschliche Erkenntnis.” Norderstedt Germany: Grin (2009).
Tsai, Denis Hsin-An. “God and the Problems of Evil in Berkeley.” Philosophical Review 6 (1983):
Turbayne, Colin M. “Grosseteste and an Ancient Optical Principle.” Isis 50 (1959): 467-72.
_____, ed., Berkeley. Critical and interpretive essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,
_____. “Hume’s Influence on Berkeley.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 259-69.
_____. Metaphors for the Mind: The Creative Mind and its Origin. Columbia: University of South
       Carolina Press, 1991.
Tweyman, Stanley. “Berkeley’s Denial of the Denial of Blind Agency: a Reply to Kenneth P.
     Winkler.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 145-51.
Umbaugh, Bruce. On Berkeley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson, 2000.
Urmson, J. O. Berkeley.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 562-
_____. “Berkeley on Beauty.” In Berman (1993), 179-84.
Vermeulen, Ben. “Berkeley and Nieuwentijt on infinitesimals.” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 1-5.
Vesey, Godfrey, ed., Berkeley: Reason and Experience. London: Open University Press, 1982.
Vernon, David. “Review of Robert Schwartz, Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes.”

       Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94) : 9-14.
Vienne, Jean-Marie. “Les rapports entre raison et foi a la lumière de la vision.” Revue
      philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1997): 45-58.
_____.“La substance, de Descartes à Berkeley. ” In Brykman (1997), 149-63.
Vienne, Jean-Michel. “Suggestion, habitude et jugement: la part cachée de la Théorie de la vision
      de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 79-102.
_____. “Notions métaphysiques, notions physiques.” In Charles (2004).
Vincente Burgoa, Lorenzo. “Critica de las ideas abstractas: la abstraccion como simple semantica.”
      Revista de Filosofia (Daimon) 12 (1996): 49-60.
Wahl, Russell and Westphal, Jonathan. “Descartes, Leibniz and Berkeley on Whether We Can
      Dream Marks on the Waking State.” Studia Leibnitiana 24 (1992): 177-81.
Waldenfels, B. “Esse est percipi. Studies on George Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Philosophische
      Rundschau 49 (2002): 271-72.
Walker, Ralph Charles Sutherland. The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley’s Relation to Kant. New York:
      Garland, 1989.
Walmsley, Peter. The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Ward, Ian D. S. “George Berkeley: Precursor of Keynes or Moral Economist on
       Underdevelopment?” Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959): 31-40.
_____. “George Berkeley as an Economist: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 68 (1960): 307-
Warnock, Geoffrey J. Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.
_____. “On Passive Obedience.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 555-62.
Watson, Richard A. “Berkeley Is Pronounced Barclay.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 1-3.
Waxman, Wayne. Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding. New York: Oxford
     University Press, 2005.
_____.“Kant’s Debt to the British Empiricists.” In Bird (2006), 93-107.
Weinberg, Julius R. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three Essays in the History of Thought.
      Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1965.
Weldon, Susan. “Direct Realism and Visual Distortion: A Development of Arguments from
      Thomas Reid.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1982): 355-68.
Wenz, Peter. “Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 537-
_____. “The Books in Berkeley’s Closet.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 33-40.
_____. “Berkeley and Kant on the Analytic and Synthetic a priori.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981):
_____. “Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Impossibility: a Reply to McKim.” Journal of the History of
       Ideas 43 (1982): 673-80.
Wheeler, Kathleen M. “Berkeley’s Ironic Method in the Three Dialogues.” Philosophy and
      Literature 4 (1980), 18-32.
Wilke, Andrea-Ursula. Philosophie und Stil: eine Verhältnisbestimmung dargestellt an Berkeley,

       Kant und Wittgenstein. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2006.
Williamson, Timothy. “Review of Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, edited by John
       Foster and Howard Robinson.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 5-7.
Williford, Kenneth. “Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction”,
       British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 271-301.
_____, and Jakapi, Roomet. “Berkeley’s Theory of Meaning in Alciphron VII.” British Journal for
       the History of Philosophy 17 (2009):99 – 118.
Wilson, Catherine. “On Imlay’s ‘Berkeley and Action’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 183-96.
Wilson, Fred. “Berkeley’s Metaphysics and Ramist Logic.” In Easton (1997).
Wilson, Margaret Dauler. “The ‘Phenomenalisms’ of Berkeley and Kant.” in Self and Nature in
      Kant’s Philosophy, ed. A. W. Wood. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1984,
_____. “Berkeley on the Mind-Dependence of Colors.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987):
_____. “The Phenomenalisms of Leibniz and Berkeley.” In Sosa (1987), 3-22.
_____. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton
       University Press, 1999.
_____. Kant and “The Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,
Winkler, Kenneth P., ed. George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human
      Knowledge. Hackett, 1982.
_____. “The Authorship of Guardian 69.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 1-6.
_____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency [Abstract].” Berkeley
       Newsletter 8 (1985): 20.
_____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency.” Hermathena 139 (1985):
_____. “Berkeley on Abstract Ideas.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65 (1985): 63-80.
_____. “Berkeley, Newton and the Stars.” Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 17
       (1986): 23-42.
_____. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
_____, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
_____. “Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs.” In Winkler (2005), 125-65.
_____. “Marvellous Emptiness: Berkeley on Consciousness and Self-Consciousness.” In Airaksinen
       and Belfrage (2011), 223-50.
Wintzer, Heinrich. George Berkeley: vernachlässigte Ressourcen des logischen Positivismus.
      Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1998.
Wisdom, J. O. “Berkeley’s Criticism of the Infinitesimal.” British Journal for the Philosophy of
     Science 4 (1953): 22-25.
Woolhouse, R. S. “Berkeley and ‘A Famous Man of Modern Times’.” Berkeley Newsletter 3
      (1979): 5-8.
Woozley, A. D. “Berkeley on Action.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 293-307.

_____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions and Theory of Meaning.” Journal of the History of
       Philosophy 14 (1976): 427-34.
Yolton, John W. “Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.” Journal of the
       History of Philosophy 13 (1975): 145-65.
_____. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.
_____. Thinking Matter. Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.
_____, ed., Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.
       Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press, 1990.
_____. “The Term ‘Idea’ in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy.” In Idea, ed.
       Marta Fattori and Massimo Luigi Bianchi. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1990, 237-54.
Young, Theodore A. Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy. Lanham,
      Md.: University Press of America, 1985.
Zakatistovs, Atis. “Berkeley a-t-il anticipé le problème de l’induction?” In Charles (2004), 23-36.


Shared By:
zhaonedx zhaonedx http://