BBVA - Brazil Economic Outlook

Document Sample
BBVA - Brazil Economic Outlook Powered By Docstoc
					Economic Outlook
Brazil

Second Quarter 2012   • Government and Central Bank act to permanently bring
Economic Analysis
                        interest rates down. We expect the SELIC to soon reach 8.25%,
                        an all-time low. Real interest rates will be below neutral levels
                        for a long time.

                      • Growth and inflation have been surprising to the downside,
                        but we expect both to pick-up following the adoption of a
                        lax monetary policy. GDP is forecasted to grow 3.3% in 2012,
                        still below the potential, and inflation is expected to reach 5.4%
                        by the end of the year, above target. In 2013 GDP should grow
                        4.3% and inflation should be around 6.0%.

                      • A more depreciated real will impact growth and external
                        accounts positively and inflation negatively. The real
                        depreciated more than 15% since the end of February
                        following increasing intervention in exchange rate
                        markets, the reduction of interest rates and, especially, a
                        deterioration of the global optimism towards the country.

                      • The transition to a new macroeconomic equilibrium based
                        on lower interest rates and a more depreciated exchange rate
                        brings challenges. Main risks continue to come from the external
                        environment, even though idiosyncratic risks are now higher.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Second Quarter 2012




                           Index
                           External environment: global recovery, but risks reign........................................................................3

                           Government and Central Bank act to permanently
                           bring interest rates down......................................................................................................................................................................................................5

                           Growth and inflation have been surprising to the downside, but
                           we expect both to pick-up following the adoption of a lax
                           monetary policy............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6

                           Fiscal policy: committed to achieving the primary surplus target,
                           not necessarily to driving public demand down ..................................................................................................8

                           Macro-prudential policies: flexibility to manage
                           macroeconomic conditions ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 9

                           Current account: still under pressure in spite of the resilience
                           of commodity prices and the weakness of the real ..................................................................................10

                           Main risk continue to come from the external environment,
                           but idiosyncratic risks are now higher ............................................................................................................................................. 11

                           Box: “The increasing power of public sector banks in Brazil:
                           back to the past?” ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12

                           Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................15




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Closing date: May 16, 2012



REFER TO IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES ON PAGE 16 OF THIS REPORT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Page 2
                                                                                        Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                        Second Quarter 2012




External environment: global recovery, but risks reign
After a gradual deceleration during 2011, especially in the last quarter, the global economy is starting
to show signs of increased dynamism. Global growth in 2012Q1 is expected to have been higher than
in Q4, given stronger growth in Asia ex China (including Japan) and Latin America and sustained
–but modest– dynamism in the US. We estimate that global growth will continue increasing and
surpass 1% quarter-on-quarter at the end of 2012 (0.6% in 2011Q4). This recovery will also be quite
heterogeneous, increasing the divergence in growth rates between the main economic areas. The
increase in growth in 2012 will be more evident in Asia, given the rebound from natural disasters in
Thailand and Japan (affecting regional supply chains) and the partial turnaround of policy tightening
measures implemented until mid-2011. Also, growth in Latin America is likely to pick up, as Brazilian
growth rates increase on the back of easier monetary policy and Mexico maintains growth over
3.5% helped by US demand, improved competitiveness and supportive funding conditions. On
the other hand, the US will continue sustaining quarterly growth rates of around 0.6% in 2012 and
2013, significantly lower than in previous recoveries. Still, this will be better than a basically stagnant
activity in the euro-area in 2012, dragged in peripheral countries by aggressive fiscal consolidation
and persistently high financial stress, after tensions eased temporarily in the first quarter.
Therefore, emerging economies will recover their growth differential vis-à-vis developed economies,
of around 4 percentage points, for the whole of 2012 and 2013. In turn, Europe and the US also
will continue to increase their growth gaps in the next two years, even as we expect European
authorities to continue taking decisive actions which will slowly lower financial tensions.
All in all, our growth projections are not very different from those of our previous Global Economic
Outlook (published in February). We expect global growth of 3.6% in 2012 and 4% in 2013, with
emerging economies contributing around 80% of that increase in global activity (Chart 1). But, as
mentioned before, this scenario is conditioned on the evolution of the crisis in Europe, and thus
risks to these projections are still strongly tilted to the downside.
In this context, monetary policies in advanced economies will continue to be very accommodative
for an extended period, fulfilling the role of bridging the slump in activity towards the medium and
long-run. However, the effectiveness of further intervention (conventional or not) is decreasing, while
at the same time the costs increase –including the risk of reduced central bank independence and
the collateral damage from unconventional measures–. Thus, it is time for other policymakers and
institutions in the US and Europe to decisively take up part of the burden of reviving growth from
central banks, implementing economic and institutional reforms and managing fiscal risks. While
these measures take effect, central banks should continue supporting an adequate functioning of
the monetary transmission mechanism.
Easy monetary policies in advanced economies will mean favourable financing conditions in
emerging countries. Here central banks will have to weigh the pressure from capital inflows and an
uncertain external demand against inflationary risks (in part from oil prices) and strong domestic
demand. The difference in inflation projections in Asia and Latin America –declining in the former
but stable in the latter- will condition a different outlook for monetary policies. We expect the easing
cycle to have ended in much of emerging Asia (except, notably, in China and India), and a cautious
tightening bias in most of Latin America, except in Brazil.
In the last months, there have been some advances towards the solution to the European crisis, but
there are still many important pending issues. First, Greek sovereign debt held by the private sector
was restructured, although substantial doubts about its long-run sustainability persist, including
reform fatigue and a possible deeper recession than projected. Second, the European Stabilization
mechanism (ESM) was provided with a fresh lending capacity of 500bn EUR (on top of 200bn
already committed by the EFSF). However, that has not been enough to quell market anxiety, given
its falling short of Spain and Italy’s financing needs for the next 3 years and the presumption that ESM
loans would be senior to existing private bondholders, thus seriously impairing its catalytic effect on
further financing from the private sector. Further, it was not clear to what extent the increase in IMF
resources by 430bn USD (approximately 330 bn EUR) could be targeted to European countries.
Also, the fiscal compact was sanctioned (pending national approval), committing governments to



                                                                                                              Page 3
                                                                                                             Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                             Second Quarter 2012




structural deficits not bigger than 0.5% of GDP. This is a significant change towards controlling
member’s budgets, but the allowance for deviations to the rule under “exceptional circumstances”
may depict it as not strong enough to justify a more forceful action by hardliners at the ECB of core
countries in Europe. In addition, there have been no advances towards a fiscal union or Eurobonds.
All in all, a clear roadmap to where Europe is heading continues to be missing.
                                                         Chart 2
Chart 1                                                  European sovereign risk premia
Global GDP growth (%qoq)                                 (10yr bond spreads to Germany, bps)
6                                                        800
                        5.1
5
                                3.9     3.6       4.0    600
4
          2.8
3
                                                         400
2
 1                                                       200
0
-1                                                          0
                -0.6
                                                             Oct-11


                                                                         Mov-11


                                                                                  Dec-11


                                                                                           Jan-12


                                                                                                    Feb-12


                                                                                                                Mar-12


                                                                                                                         Apr-12
-2
      2008      2009    2010   2011(f) 2012(f) 2013(f)
                                                                      Ireland        Spain       Italy        Belgium
     Emerging Economies         Adv. Economies
     Baseline Feb-12            Baseline May-12                       France         Netherlands      Austria

Source: BBVA Research                                    Source: Datastream abd BBVA Research



Undoubtedly, one of the most important actions in the last four months was the provision of long-
term liquidity by the ECB. This allowed, at least until March, a significant reduction in liquidity risk
in European banks, a timid opening of wholesale funding markets and a compression of sovereign
spreads in peripheral countries (Chart 2). But these positive effects proved temporary, as markets
(i) detected some complacency on the part of policymakers as risk premia decreased in the first
quarter of 2012, and (ii) they both doubted the ability of many peripheral countries to reach their
fiscal targets and feared the fallout on growth of actually achieving them. Thus, since March, risk
premia increased rapidly in Italy and Spain, in the latter to levels similar to the high tensions reached
back in November (Chart 2).
The short-lived effect of the long-term liquidity injections and the conundrum between fiscal
consolidation and restoring growth highlight two conclusions. First, ECB actions can only bridge
the short-run while the underlying economic and institutional problems are tackled. This means
that talk of exit strategies for the ECB should not come too soon, but it also implies that economic
reforms should be pushed forward, at the same time as demand is rebalanced within the Euro zone,
with core countries stimulating it. Second, it is imperative to reconsider fiscal consolidation paths
in a coordinated way (or risk being singled out by markets), targeting structural deficits –consistent
with the spirit of the fiscal compact– in a more gradual trajectory. In exchange for more gradualism,
member states must produce explicit, comprehensive, detailed and multi-annual consolidation
plans. This way, sound public finances could be achieved without big damage to short-term growth.
At the same time, this will allow to reap the benefits of long-term structural reforms that are being
implemented in peripheral countries.
In this context, we still see a new flare-up of the European crisis as the main risk, with potentially very
negative consequences for global growth. Increased tensions can come about from reform fatigue
in peripheral countries coupled with bailout fatigue in core countries, in the context of electoral
processes –and a referendum– in many European countries: France, Greece, Germany –two states–,
Ireland and the Netherlands are holding them in the first half of this year.
A second threat to the global economy is a further increase in oil prices. The recent spike at the
beginning of 2012 can be traced back in part to tightening fundamentals (demand and supply) but
also to an increase in the geopolitical risk premium to around 10-15 USD per barrel, given tensions



                                                                                                                                   Page 4
                                                                                                                                  Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                                                  Second Quarter 2012




around Iran and very reduced market buffers (oil inventories and producer’s spare capacity). In
our baseline scenario, we consider prices around 120 USD per barrel of Brent oil for much of 2012,
around 15% higher than in our February forecasts. In our view, this will only have a moderate negative
impact on global growth, as central banks in advanced countries will view this as a temporary
shock and their weak cyclical positions will prevent them from tightening monetary policy, one
of the traditional channels of transmission to lower growth. Nevertheless, should the conflict in
the Gulf escalates, there could be a very large spike in oil prices, and even if central banks still do
not react, growth could be damaged through the associated increase in global risk aversion. We
consider that the probability of an escalation in the Gulf is relatively reduced, but it is a scenario that
would have a significant impact on global growth should it materialize.



Government and Central Bank act to permanently
bring interest rates down
Interest rates are now at the heart of the macroeconomic debate in Brazil. Both Federal Government
and Central Bank have been making efforts to permanently bring down domestic interest rates.
This is a legitimate objective as domestic rates have been, for many years, among the highest in
the world. Nonetheless, permanently cutting down interest rates involves many risks, especially if it
follows a political determination rather than a technical decision.
Since mid-2011 the Central Bank has been cutting the SELIC and surprising markets to the downside:
the policy interest rate is currently at 9.0%, 350bps less than in July 2011 and significantly less than
most analysts expected some months ago. The reduction of the SELIC observed since the middle
of the last year follows a sharp deterioration of the external environment and also of domestic
conditions. In our view, however, the adoption of a more lax monetary policy is also related to the
monetary authority intention to bring the SELIC permanently closer to international standards,
which might imply more tolerance with inflation.
The monetary authority has recently introduced in its official communication references to the
fact that the real interest rate has been declining over the last years. As the Chart 3 below shows,
the real interest rate has, effectively, trended downwards in the last years. According to the Central
Bank, this is a consequence of a series of structural improvements such as lower risk premium
(due to “meeting inflation targets for the eighth year in a row, macroeconomic stability and
institutional advances”), a change in the structure of financial and capital markets, deeper credit
markets, reduction of the public debt, and increasing (and cheaper) supply of external savings. After
accounting for all these improvements, we – and most Brazil analysts - estimate neutral interest
rates to be around 4.0%, which is similar to the current level of real interest rates.

Chart 3                                               Chart 4
Real Interest Rates (%)                               SELIC (%)
  16                                                    16
  14                                                     14
  12                                                     12
 10                                                     10
   8                                                     8
  6                                                      6
   4                                                     4
   2                                                     2

  0                                                      0
                                                                                Jan-09


                                                                                                  Jan-10
                                                              Jan-08




                                                                                                                             Jul-11


                                                                                                                                               Jul-12


                                                                                                                                                                 Jul-13
                                                                                         Jul-09


                                                                                                           Jul-10
                                                                       Jul-08




                                                                                                                    Jan-11


                                                                                                                                      Jan-12


                                                                                                                                                        Jan-13
        Jul-06
       Jan-00




       Sep-04




        Jan-12
       May-08

       Mar-10




        Nov-13
        Dec-01




       Apr-09

        Feb-11
       Dec-00



       Oct-03




        Dec-12
       Nov-02




       Jun-07
       Aug-05




Source: BBVA Research and Bloomberg                   Source: BBVA Research and Bloomberg




                                                                                                                                                                          Page 5
                                                                                        Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                        Second Quarter 2012




Reducing interest rates is, explicitly, one of the priorities of President Dilma’s government.
Accordingly, some measures have been adopted to support the Central Bank action. Fiscal policy
has been made less expansionary to make room for a more lax monetary policy, as we have been
highlighting since the beginning of 2011 (see, for example our Q2 – 2011 Brazil Economic Outlook as
well as the section below about fiscal policy).
In addition to that, the Government has recently announced a change in the remuneration of
a popular form of savings accounts (the “contas de poupança”) to help the SELIC to continue
declining. Previously, these savings accounts would get 0.5% per month plus a small monetary
correction (in the last years around half of official inflation), tax-free. This scheme created a floor for
the SELIC rate as resources would massively migrate to saving accounts from SELIC-investment
funds if interest rates were to fall below this floor (somewhere between 8.0% and 9.0%). This scheme
was then replaced by a new one in which savers will get 70% of the SELIC plus the same small
monetary correction in the case the SELIC is below 8.5% (the previous remuneration scheme will
remain in the case the SELIC is equal to or above 8.50%).
Even though this is a very positive measure from a structural point of view, it could create additional
pressures for the (legally non-independent) Central Bank and also extra risks in terms of inflation
(see the section below for more information on inflation).
In this environment, we expect the Central Bank to continue to adjust the SELIC downwards in the
next few months, when annual inflation will refrain from trending upwards (due to a large extent to
positive base effects). More precisely, we expect a 50bps cut to be delivered at the very end of May
and a final 25bps cut to be announced in July. The SELIC would then remain stable at 8.25% -50bps
less than the former all-time low- for a long period of time (see Chart 4).
In the short-term (the next few months) we see downside risks to this call meaning that a SELIC
below 8.25% and even below 8.0% should not be seen with surprise, especially if domestic activity
refrains from moderating or the global environment refrains from stabilizing. In the medium-term
(end of this year and beginning of 2013), however, the risks are to the upside as we should not rule
out a temporary and limited upward correction of the SELIC to keep inflation expectations under
control. In any case, in spite of eventual hikes, we expect the SELIC to continue trending downwards
in the long-term and real rates to be below the neutral one, which implies a risk in terms of inflation.
 A lax monetary policy will be a key element of what apparently will be Brazil’s macroeconomic
equilibrium in the next years: the stimulus from lower interest rates (and also from a weaker real)
will, to some extent, offset the impact of a less positive global environment, and a bigger fiscal effort
and slower credit growth will be required to keep inflation under control. The growth potential of
this new “model” will also depend on the Government’s ability to address structural problems which
are currently reducing the degree of competitiveness of the economy.



Growth and inflation have been surprising to the
downside, but we expect both to pick-up following the
adoption of a lax monetary policy
After having practically stagnated in the second half of the year following the impact of
countercyclical policies taken in the first semester and the deterioration of the external scenario,
available data shows that the economy recovered in the first quarter of the year. This recovery,
however, was at a slower-than-expected pace and we see, actually, downside risks to our 0.6%q/q
Q1 GDP forecast.
Supply – demand dichotomy continues to be evident: retail sales and labor market indicators
available for the first months of the year show that domestic demand remained relatively strong, at
least in comparison to supply, which remained weak as industrial production indicators show (See
Chart 5).




                                                                                                              Page 6
                                                                                                Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                Second Quarter 2012




The strength of domestic demand is explained by short-term factors, such as the 14% increase
in the minimum wage and the recent decline of both interest rates and inflation, and by more
structural factors, such as the investment opportunities generated by high commodity prices and
by the expansion of middle classes observed in the last years. The weakness of the supply side, on
the other hand, is due to problems such as the appreciation of the exchange rate, the tightness of
the labor market, poor infrastructure, and high tax burden.
Looking forward, we expect domestic demand to be supported by historically low interest rates
in the remainder of the year. We actually expect this support to increase and, therefore, GDP to
accelerate over the year, in line with the lagged impact of monetary policy on domestic activity.
After growing 0.6%q/q –or slightly less- in the first quarter of the year, GDP should grow around
1.5%q/q in the three remaining quarters. In addition to the support from monetary policy, labor and
credit markets will continue to play a positive role, exports will remain relatively dynamic (especially
because commodity prices will remain high and in spite of global turbulences) and the industrial
sector will contribute less negatively given the reduction of inventory levels.
In yearly terms, GDP is forecasted to grow 3.3% in 2012, slightly more than in 2011, when growth was
of 2.7%. In 2012 domestic demand should expand around 3.5%, driven by the expansion of fixed
investments (5.1%), private consumption (3.7%) and public consumption (1.7%). In 2013 we expect
economic activity to continue to recover so that the economy grows 4.3% and the output gap
-which will remain in negative terrain until then- closes (see Chart 6).

Chart 5                                                 Chart 6
Activity Indicators (Index Jan 2011 = 100)              GDP and demand components (% growth)
  115                                                     12
  110
 105
                                                         10
 100                                                       8
   95
  90                                                       6
   85
                                                           4
  80
          May-11
           Jan-11

          Mar-11




          Jan-12
           Oct-11




          Mar-12
           Jun-11
           Apr-11




          Nov-11
          Aug-11
          Sep-11
            Jul-11
          Feb-11




          Feb-12
          Dec-11




                                                           2

                                                          0
               Retail Sales                                       GDP    GFCF    Priv     Pub       Exp    Imp
               Industrial Production                                             Cons.   Cons.
               Real Wages
                                                                  2011    2012(f)     2013(f)
               Unemployment Rate

Source: Bloomberg and IPEADATA                          Source: BBVA Research and Bloomberg



In line with the expected GDP acceleration, we expect inflation to be under more pressure in the
second half of the year than in the first. Positive base effects, which allowed inflation to fall from
more than 7.0% at the end of 2011 to 5.1% in April, will wane after May. We, therefore, see very limited
room for inflation to move under the 5.0% mark and regard as very unlikely the convergence with
the 4.5% target. More precisely, inflation should bottom in the end of the first semester, when it will
reach around 5.0%, to average 5.2% in the second semester, and then to close the year at 5.4%.
Inflation will continue under pressure next year: we forecast it to be at 5.9% by the end of 2013,
closer to the upper-limit of the inflation target (6.5%) than to the central target (4.5%) (see Chart 7).
Even though available evidence suggests that the pass-through from the exchange rate to domestic
inflation is relatively low in Brazil, the fact that the real will be at a more depreciated level than in the
past and also than we expected previously (see section below for more information on this issue)
will help to keep inflation under pressure. High commodity prices and inertia will also leave less
room for inflation to trend down.




                                                                                                                      Page 7
                                                                                                 Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                 Second Quarter 2012




Chart 7                                               Chart 8
Inflation (% y/y)                                     Inflation forecasts (%; end-of-period)
  8                                                      7
                                                                         5.9
  7                                                     6          5.4                     5.5
                                                                                     5.2                       5.2
  6
                                                         5                                               4.4
  5
                                                        4
  4
  3                                                      3

  2                                                      2
   1                                                     1
  0                                                     0
       May-11




       May-12




       May-13
        Jan-11
       Mar-11




       Jan-12
       Mar-12




       Jan-13
       Mar-13
       Nov-11




       Nov-12




       Nov-13
       Sep-11




       Sep-12
        Jul-11




        Jul-12




       Sep-13
        Jul-13                                                  BBVA Research      Consensus         Central Bank

                                                                2012      2013

Source: Research and Central Bank of Brazil           Source: BBVA Research and Central Bank of Brazil




Fiscal policy: committed to achieving the primary
surplus target, not necessarily to driving public demand
down
Uncertainties about the fulfillment of the fiscal target for 2012 (primary surplus of R$139.1bn, which
represents around 3.1% of GDP) waned after the government announced, some months ago, a
restriction of R$ 55bn (1.25% of GDP) of expenditures budgeted for the year. For achieving such
objective, however, more important than this move will be the apparent intention to use fiscal policy
to make room for the Central Bank to permanently bring down the SELIC and the capacity to
generate one-time, non-recurring revenue (for example, by granting airport service concessions to
the private sector).
Recent fiscal data also lead us to believe that the public sector will deliver the 3.1% primary surplus
result by the end of the year (as happened in 2011, but not in the two last years of Lula’s government):
net central government revenues expanded by 14.6% in the first quarter compared to the same
period last year, outlays increased by “only” 12.0%, and, as a consequence, the primary surplus of
the Central Government grew by 31.3% in the period. This helped the public sector (which is made-
up of the Central Government, Regional Governments, and state-owned companies) to present a
R$46bn primary surplus in the quarter, which represents one third of the target for the year.
We, therefore, expect the government to deliver the R$129.1bn primary surplus by the end of the
year, which is a positive step, especially if we take into account that this is an electoral year (regional
elections will be held in October). Nonetheless, meeting the target by generating one-time revenues
instead of adopting a more strict control of expenditures does not imply that fiscal policy will be
restrictive (we actually expect the Federal Government’s primary expenditures to grow 6.5% in
real terms this year). This issue suggests that the adoption of structural fiscal targets (adjusting
fiscal balances for economic conditions and one-time revenues or expenditures) could be more
appropriate than the use of nominal targets.
Anyway, the generation of a significant primary surplus will add to the positive impact that lower
interest rates will have on public accounts and will help the public sector to reduce its total deficit.
More precisely, we expect interest payments to fall from 5.7% of GDP in 2011 to 4.5% this year and,
therefore, total public sector deficit to drop from 2.6% of GDP in 2011 to 1.4% in 2012 (see Chart 9).




                                                                                                                       Page 8
                                                                                                    Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                    Second Quarter 2012




Chart 9                                                       Chart 10
Fiscal Results (% GDP)                                        Credit (% y/y)
   4                                                            60

   2                                                            50

  0                                                             40
                                                                30
  -2
                                                                20
  -4
                                                                10
  -6
                                                                 0
  -8




                                                                     Jan-09



                                                                     Jan-10
                                                                     Jan-08




                                                                     Oct-09



                                                                     Oct-10
                                                                     Oct-08




                                                                       Jul-11
                                                                     Apr-09



                                                                     Apr-10
                                                                     Apr-08




                                                                     Jul-09



                                                                      Jul-10
                                                                     Jul-08




                                                                      Jan-11



                                                                      Jan-12
                                                                      Oct-11
                                                                      Apr-11
           2008    2009    2010     2011    2012(f) 2013(f)
          Primary Surplus            Interest Payments                       Consumption        Corporate
          Total Fiscal Result                                                Real Estate        Total

Source: BBVA Research and Central Bank of Brazil              Source: Central Bank of Brazil




Macro-prudential policies:                                           flexibility               to     manage
macroeconomic conditions
As we have pointed out in our recent reports (see, for example, our Q1 2012 - Brazil Economic
Outlook), macro-prudential measures are expected to play a more important role in the future
macroeconomic management in Brazil. This is a consequence of the relative rigidity of other main
macroeconomic policies, at least in our base scenario in which global turbulences remain under
control: on the one hand the SELIC rate seems set to trend downwards and fiscal policy has limited
room for action given the commitment to the primary surplus target. The perception that macro-
prudential measures adopted in recent years had a significant impact on macroeconomic variables
adds to the view that this type of measures will be used more often in the future.
Therefore, it would not be surprising if in the next few months (or even in the next few days), macro-
prudential measures, such as the reduction of reserve requirements determined by the Central
Bank or of capital requirements on consumption credit, are announced to increase the dynamism
of credit markets and to make more room for banks to reduce their spreads. With respect to the
former, real estate, consumption and corporate credit have all slowed down recently and total credit
growth is around 17.0%, the slowest pace since the first half of 2010 (see Chart 10). This moderation
is related to the weakening of economic activity observed since mid-2011 and to the increase in the
share of non-performing loans (NPL), which is currently at 3.7% compared to 3.2% one year ago.
Regarding banking spreads, the Government has recently launched a crusade to force banks to
drive them down (Brazilian spreads are significantly high: 28% in annual terms according to the
most recent available data), in line with President Dilma’s goal of reducing domestic interest rates.
Even though the pressure to drive banking spreads down could have a negative impact on credit
supply, credit markets should rebound mildly in the second half of the year in line with the acceleration
of domestic activity which should help drive NPL down, and the eventual announcement of macro-
prudential measures.
Reducing banking spreads is a legitimate objective (not to say a necessity), but could negatively
impact the banking system and, therefore, the economy if it is not accompanied by measures such
as the reduction of the share of earmarked credit and of reserve requirements. The risks related to
cutting banking spreads are especially important for public banks, given their recent expansion and
their particular exposure to political pressures (see Box below for more information on this issue).
If in the short term macro-prudential measures will likely help support credit expansion and domestic
demand up, by the end of this year and over 2013 macro-prudential policies should then be used
to take some pressure off inflation. Macro-prudential policies, therefore, have an expansionary bias
in the short-term and an accommodative bias in the longer-term.


                                                                                                                          Page 9
                                                                                                                 Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                                 Second Quarter 2012




Current account: still under pressure in spite of the
resilience of commodity prices and the weakness of
the real
We have recently revised our commodity price forecasts up as they have been showing higher-than-
expected resilience against global stress. As a direct consequence, we now expect Brazil’s terms
of trade (the ratio between export and import prices) to drop 4% instead of 7% as we forecasted
earlier (see Chart 11).
The real, on the other hand, lost 7.5% with respect to the dollar since the beginning of the year
and 17.6% since the end of February. Although the global environment remains unstable, this
depreciation is due, to a large extent, to domestic factors.
First, the intervention in exchange markets has increased recently: on the one hand the Government
announced in March new measures to weaken the real (it extended some thresholds from which
external issuance would be exempt from paying the IOF tax) and the Central Bank, to some extent
relieved by positive surprises on inflation, accelerated its purchases of dollar even with the real at
much more depreciated levels (see Chart 12). These interventions supported the view that both the
Government and the Central Bank welcome an exchange rate in the 1.90 – 2.0 range.
Second, the aggressive reduction of the SELIC rate also weighed on markets and helped weaken
the real.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, there is currently a much less positive sentiment towards the
country due to a number of factors such as the increasing intervention in exchange markets, the
apparent higher tolerance with respect to inflation, the mounting signs of lack of competitiveness
of the industrial sector, the adoption of less orthodox trade measures, and the poor activity
performance in the last quarters. In line with this deteriorated view of the country (and also with the
external scenario), the BOVESPA index is 15% below the levels observed at the end of February, and
the country-risk measured by the EMBI+ is 15bps higher now.
                                                                      Chart 12
Chart 11                                                              Central Bank’s Dollar Purchases (USD million) and
Terms of Trade (Index: 1997 = 100)                                    Exchange Rate (end-of-period)
  140                                                                    12,000                                                    2.0
  120                                                                                                                              1.8
                                                                        10,000                                                     1.6
  100                                                                     8,000                                                    1.4
                                                                                                                                   1.2
   80                                                                    6,000                                                     1.0
                                                                                                                                   0.8
   60                                                                     4,000                                                    0.6
   40                                                                     2,000                                                    0.4
                                                                                                                                   0.2
   20                                                                            0                                                 0.0
                                                                                     May-11
                                                                                      Jan-11

                                                                                     Mar-11




                                                                                     Jan-12
                                                                                      Oct-11




                                                                                     Mar-12
                                                                                      Jun-11
                                                                                      Apr-11




                                                                                     Nov-11




                                                                                     Apr-12
                                                                                     Aug-11
                                                                                     Sep-11
                                                                                       Jul-11
                                                                                     Feb-11




                                                                                     Feb-12
                                                                                     Dec-11




    0
           2013(f)
            2006


            2009
             2010

           2012(f)
            2008
            2004
             2001
             1999


            2002


            2005
             1998




            2003



            2007
            2000




             2011
             1997




                                                                                           USD Purchases - millions (left)
                                                                                           Real/Dollar - end-of period (right)

Source: BBVA Research and IPEADATA                                    Source: Central Bank of Brazil and Bloomberg

Looking ahead, we expect the recovery of domestic activity and the relative strength of commodity
prices to support a moderate appreciation of the real. More precisely, we expect it to be in the 1.90-
2.0 range in the remainder of the year (see Chart 13)1 .



1: The new forecasts for the real were not included in our most recent Latin America Economic Outlook because its edition was closed on
May 11, before we released the new exchange rate forecasts.




                                                                                                                                          Page 10
                                                                                               Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                               Second Quarter 2012




Chart 13                                             Chart 14
Exchange Rate (Real per Dollar)                      Current Account (% GDP)
   2.10                                                 4
                                                        3
  2.00
                                                        2
  1.90                                                  1
  1.80                                                  0
                                                        -1
   1.70
                                                       -2
  1.60                                                 -3

   1.50                                                -4
                                                       -5
            Sep-11




           Sep-12
             Jul-11




            Jul-12




           Sep-13
            Jul-13
           May-11




           May-12




           May-13
            Jan-11
           Mar-11




           Jan-12
           Mar-12




           Jan-13
           Mar-13
           Nov-11




           Nov-12




           Nov-13
                                                                2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012(f)2013(f)

                                                                Trade Balance                Services Account
                                                                Income Account               Transfers
                                                                Current Account

Source: BBVA Research and Bloomberg                  Source: Central Bank of Brazil and Bloomberg



The impact of both a more depreciated currency and higher terms of trade on external accounts
will be positive, but we continue to expect the current account deficit to deteriorate (especially
in the second half of the year) due to the existing gap between domestic demand and domestic
supply (see Chart 14).



Main risk continue to come from the external
environment, but idiosyncratic risks are now higher
Our base scenario for the Brazilian economy described above is subject to some risks. The most
important one is the external risk. There are still many uncertainties hovering around Europe and
the chances of a disruption are clearly not negligible.
If this disruption materializes we might witness a credit crisis and a recession in Europe, a hard-
landing in the US, and a deceleration in China.
In this environment, the Brazilian economy would be significantly hit. GDP growth would be around
1.0% as result of i) the negative impact of a spike in global risk aversion on domestic demand, ii) a
sharp drop in commodity prices, iii) a reduction of external demand, and iv) the spreading of the
global financial stress to domestic financial markets.
A recession would be avoided by the adoption of a more expansive fiscal policy and by an additional
reduction of the SELIC rate. The adjustment to the new global environment would require not only
an accommodation of domestic activity, but also a more depreciated exchange rate.
Although the main risk to Brazil’s base scenario comes from abroad, local risks are now more
significant than in the past as the transition to a new macroeconomic equilibrium based on lower
interest rates and a more depreciated exchange rate bring challenges for economic policies,
especially in terms of inflation management.
Another local risk – also more relevant now than in the past – is related to the lack of competitiveness
of the industrial sector which could, on one hand, undermine growth perspectives and, on the other
hand, trigger the adoption of measures, such as the excessive expansion of public credit (see Box
below for more information on this issue), that add to the concerns about public sector intervention
in the economy and deteriorate the view about Brazil’s institutional environment.




                                                                                                                     Page 11
                                                                                                                                  Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                                                  Second Quarter 2012




Box: “The increasing power of public sector banks in Brazil: back to the past?”
Credit from public banks accounted for around 70%
                                                                  Chart 15
of total credit in Brazil at the end of the 80s. This was         Public Credit (% of Total Credit)
a consequence of both a chaotic macroeconomic
environment, characterized among other things by hyper-             80
inflation and fiscal crises, and a set of inadequate incentives     70
which, for example, allowed the political use of public banks       60
and inhibited the expansion of private banks.
                                                                    50
From the end of the 80s on, the share of public credit              40
declined significantly, especially after inflation and fiscal       30
problems were reigned in, a series of more appropriate              20
incentives were set, and some public banks were privatized.
                                                                    10
The share of public credit reached 34% in 2001 and                    0
remained practically stable until the end of 2008, when the




                                                                          Jan-04

                                                                          Nov-06



                                                                           Feb-11
                                                                          Feb-94




                                                                          Mar-01




                                                                          Apr-08
                                                                          Dec-96
                                                                          Sep-92




                                                                          Sep-09
                                                                          May-98
                                                                           Jul-95




                                                                          Jun-05
                                                                          Oct-99

                                                                          Aug-02
                                                                          Jun-88
                                                                          Nov-89
                                                                           Apr-91
Lehman Brothers crisis hit the country. At that time, private
credit decelerated due to an increase in risk aversion,
liquidity problems, and a significant deterioration of growth
                                                                  Source: Central Bank of Brazil
perspectives. In sharp contrast, public credit accelerated
from the end of 2008 on.                                          Chart 16

As public loans continued to expand at a more robust pace         Credit growth between 2007 and 2011 (%)
than private loans after the economy started to recover             350
from the external shock and even after overheating signs            300
emerged in 2010, public banks’ market share increased               250
significantly and reached 44% of total credit at the end of         200
2011, practically 10 p.p. more than their share in mid-2008         150
(See Chart 15).
                                                                    100
The expansion of public banks was widespread. It was not             50
only related to the expansion of the BNDES, the National              0
Development Bank, but also to the dynamism of public
                                                                                                                                               Foreign Banks
                                                                                                              Priv Banks
                                                                               Pub Banks




                                                                                                                           ITAU
                                                                                                CEF




                                                                                                                                    BRADESCO
                                                                                           BB




                                                                                                                                                               SANTANDER

                                                                                                                                                                           HSBC
                                                                                                      BNDES




commercial banks.
In the four years between December of 2007 and December
of 2011, the credit extended by public commercial banks
grew 199% while BNDES credit grew 178%. This compares
to a growth of 109% and 69%, respectively, in total credit        Source: Central Bank of Brazil
extended by domestic and foreign private banks.
Within public commercial banks, credit from Banco do Brasil       The over-expansion of public banks is also evident when
(BB) and Caixa Economica Federal (CEF), which together            other measures are considered, such as total assets and
account for 96% of public banks’ total assets, grew 152% and      capital. In the last four years, public commercial banks’
347%, respectively.                                               total assets increased 116% and BNDES’ total assets, 204%.
                                                                  Domestic and foreign private banks expansion was not
                                                                  as big: 96% and 51%, respectively. While, on the one hand,
                                                                  public commercial banks had their capital increased by
                                                                  96% between 2007 and 2011 and the BNDES by 144%, on
                                                                  the other hand, domestic and foreign private banks had
                                                                  their capital adjusted 69% and 112% up in the period.




                                                                                                                                                                           Page 12
                                                                                                                    Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                                    Second Quarter 2012




Although the expansion of public banks’ capital and assets          These concerns were reinforced by i) the fact that public
was also very robust in the last years, it was not as significant   credit remained very dynamic even after overheating
as the expansion of public credit, which suggests that the          signs emerged in 2010; ii) the continuous use of Treasury
balance of public banks deteriorated in comparison to the           (subsidized) resources to capitalize the BNDES (R$235bn
balance of private banks. The “not-so-significant” growth           -6.5% of GDP- between 2009 and 2011 and R$45bn
of public banks’ deposits -at least compared to domestic            -1.0% of GDP- in 2012); and, especially, iii), the very recent
private banks- suggests the same.                                   announcement that the two main public commercial banks
                                                                    (Banco do Brasil and Caixa Economica Federal) will cut their
The Basel Index for BB, CEF, and BNDES was 14.5, 13.3,
                                                                    interest rates to force a reduction of banking spreads in
and 21.5 in December of 2011, significantly higher than
                                                                    Brazil.
the minimum level required by the domestic regulator
(11.0%) and also than levels usually required internationally.
                                                                    Chart 17
These levels, however, are lower than four years ago and            Basel Index
also lower than the levels shown by foreign and domestic
private banks.                                                        35
                                                                      30
The analysis of other basic ratios, such as credit/assets,
                                                                      25
credit/capital and credit/deposits, reinforce the claim that
the situation of public banks is, in general, not as strong as        20
in 2007 and not as strong as the situation of private banks            15
(see Charts 17, 18, 19 and 20). This is direct consequence of         10
the very significant growth of public credit in the last years.         5
In other words, the expansion of public credit granted                  0
public banks a higher market share, but also more risks due




                                                                                                                     BRADESCO
                                                                                BB




                                                                                                                                 SANTANDER
                                                                                                             ITAU




                                                                                                                                             HSBC
                                                                                            CEF


                                                                                                     BNDES

to lower capitalization and higher leverage.
These facts do not imply that the financial situation of public
banks is weak. Rather the opposite. The balance sheets of                      2011        2007
public banks remain sound, and certainly much sounder
than decades ago. In some aspects their financial situation         Source: Central Bank of Brazil

is better than the situation of private banks: the share of non-
performing loans (NPL), for example, was 2.1 compared to            Chart 18
5.0% in domestic private banks, and 5.4% in foreign private         Credit / Asset ratio
banks at the end of 2011.
                                                                      0.6
The deterioration pictured above, however, suggests that
                                                                      0.5
problems could arise in the medium/long term if public
banks continue to grow at the pace seen in the last years,            0.4
especially if public banks are (politically) used to address          0.3
macroeconomic distortions.
                                                                      0.2
The decision to drive public credit up after the country               0.1
was negatively affected by global turbulences in 2008 was
one of the main counter-cyclical measures that allowed                  0
                                                                                                                      BRADESCO
                                                                                 BB




                                                                                                                                 SANTANDER




the country to reduce the impact of the external crisis and
                                                                                                             ITAU




                                                                                                                                             HSBC
                                                                                            CEF


                                                                                                     BNDES




to start a robust economic recovery already in 2009. In
spite of the positive support public credit provided to the
economy at the time, the political use of public banks to
                                                                               2011        2007
revive the economy generated concerns about the long
term performance of the public banking system and,                  Source: Central Bank of Brazil
therefore, of the banking system as whole.




                                                                                                                                              Page 13
                                                                                                                                 Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                                                 Second Quarter 2012




Chart 19                                                                      Chart 20
Credit / Capital ratio                                                        Credit / Deposits ratio (*)

  14                                                                             2.5
  12
                                                                                2.0
  10
   8                                                                             1.5
   6                                                                             1.0
   4
                                                                                0.5
   2
   0                                                                            0.0




                                                                                                                         ITAU
                                                                                                     CEF




                                                                                                                                   BRADESCO
                                                                                           BB




                                                                                                                                              SANTANDER


                                                                                                                                                          HSBC
                                                                                                               BNDES
                                                BRADESCO
            BB




                                                           SANTANDER
                                         ITAU




                                                                       HSBC
                       CEF


                                 BNDES




           2011        2007                                                               2011      2007

Source: Central Bank of Brazil                                                (*)BNDES wasnot included in the analysis as it does not get demand/time/term
                                                                              deposits. Source: Central Bank of Brazil
                                                                              Source: Central Bank of Brazil


The use of public credit to support the economy and the                       As outlined above, we see a risk in the excessive expansion
decision to reduce the lending rates charged by public                        of public banks, especially if it is politically driven. In addition
banks (which should not be followed – at least not with                       to causing a deterioration of public bank balance sheets
the same intensity - by private banks, in spite of increasing                 and exposing them (and, therefore, the whole system) to an
political pressures) suggest the likelihood that public                       eventual economic downturn, continued growth of public
financial institutions will continue to expand at a more                      banks could add to the concerns about the creation of a
dynamic pace than private institutions. It is, therefore, not                 credit bubble in Brazil. It could also reduce the room for the
unlikely that in the near future public banks will account for                Central Bank to bring the SELIC rate down to international
more than half of the credit market in Brazil, a situation that               levels, which is – paradoxically – one of the main objectives
resembles that of decades ago.                                                of this government.




                                                                                                                                                            Page 14
                                                                                               Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                               Second Quarter 2012




Tables
Table 1
Macro Forecasts Yearly
                                                                  2010         2011            2012          2013
GDP (% y/y)                                                         7.6          2.7            3.3            4.3
Inflation (% y/y, eop)                                             6.0           6.5            5.4            5.9
Exchange Rate (vs. USD, eop)                                       1.66          1.87          1.90           1.88
Interest Rate (%, eop)                                            10.75          11.0          8.25           8.25

Private Consumption (% y/y)                                         7.0           4.1           3.7            3.9
Government Consumption (% y/y)                                      4.2          2.0             1.7           2.9
Investment (% y/y)                                                 21.5          4.8            5.2            8.7

Fiscal Balance (% GDP)                                             -2.5          -2.6           -1.4          -0.9
Current Account (% GDP)                                            -2.3          -2.2           -2.6           -3.4
Source: BBVA Research


Table 2
Macro Forecasts Quarterly
                               GDP (% y/y)    Inflation (% y/y)   Exchange Rate (vs. USD)        Interest Rate (%)
Q1 11                                   4.1                 6.3                         1.63                  11.75
Q2 11                                  3.3                  6.7                         1.56                 12.25
Q3 11                                  2.2                  7.3                         1.86                12.00
Q4 11                                  1.4                  6.5                         1.87                 11.00
Q1 12                                   1.3                 5.3                         1.83                  9.75
Q2 12                                   2.1                 5.1                         1.95                 8.50
Q3 12                                  4.0                  5.1                         1.89                  8.25
Q4 12                                  5.5                  5.4                         1.90                  8.25
Q1 13                                  5.8                 6.0                          1.88                  8.25
Q2 13                                  5.0                 6.0                          1.87                  8.25
Q3 13                                  3.8                 6.0                          1.89                  8.25
Q4 13                                  2.6                  5.9                         1.88                  8.25
Source: BBVA Research




                                                                                                                      Page 15
                                                                                                                                        Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                                                                        Second Quarter 2012




DISCLAIMER
This document and the information, opinions, estimates and recommendations expressed herein, have been prepared by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
(hereinafter called “BBVA”) to provide its customers with general information regarding the date of issue of the report and are subject to changes without prior
notice. BBVA is not liable for giving notice of such changes or for updating the contents hereof.
This document and its contents do not constitute an offer, invitation or solicitation to purchase or subscribe to any securities or other instruments, or to undertake
or divest investments. Neither shall this document nor its contents form the basis of any contract, commitment or decision of any kind.
Investors who have access to this document should be aware that the securities, instruments or investments to which it refers may not be appropriate for
them due to their specific investment goals, financial positions or risk profiles, as these have not been taken into account to prepare this report. Therefore,
investors should make their own investment decisions considering the said circumstances and obtaining such specialized advice as may be necessary. The contents
of this document is based upon information available to the public that has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable. However, such information has
not been independently verified by BBVA and therefore no warranty, either express or implicit, is given regarding its accuracy, integrity or correctness. BBVA accepts
no liability of any type for any direct or indirect losses arising from the use of the document or its contents. Investors should note that the past performance of
securities or instruments or the historical results of investments do not guarantee future performance.
The market prices of securities or instruments or the results of investments could fluctuate against the interests of investors. Investors should be aware
that they could even face a loss of their investment. Transactions in futures, options and securities or high-yield securities can involve high risks and are
not appropriate for every investor. Indeed, in the case of some investments, the potential losses may exceed the amount of initial investment and, in such
circumstances, investors may be required to pay more money to support those losses. Thus, before undertaking any transaction with these instruments,
investors should be aware of their operation, as well as the rights, liabilities and risks implied by the same and the underlying stocks. Investors should also be
aware that secondary markets for the said instruments may be limited or even not exist.
BBVA or any of its affiliates, as well as their respective executives and employees, may have a position in any of the securities or instruments referred to, directly or
indirectly, in this document, or in any other related thereto; they may trade for their own account or for third-party account in those securities, provide consulting
or other services to the issuer of the aforementioned securities or instruments or to companies related thereto or to their shareholders, executives or employees,
or may have interests or perform transactions in those securities or instruments or related investments before or after the publication of this report, to the extent
permitted by the applicable law.
BBVA or any of its affiliates´ salespeople, traders, and other professionals may provide oral or written market commentary or trading strategies to its clients that
reflect opinions that are contrary to the opinions expressed herein. Furthermore, BBVA or any of its affiliates’ proprietary trading and investing businesses may make
investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations expressed herein. No part of this document may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated
by any other form or means (ii) redistributed or (iii) quoted, without the prior written consent of BBVA. No part of this report may be copied, conveyed, distributed
or furnished to any person or entity in any country (or persons or entities in the same) in which its distribution is prohibited by law. Failure to comply with these
restrictions may breach the laws of the relevant jurisdiction.
In the United Kingdom, this document is directed only at persons who (i) have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within article
19(5) of the financial services and markets act 2000 (financial promotion) order 2005 (as amended, the “financial promotion order”), (ii) are persons falling within
article 49(2) (a) to (d) (“high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.”) Of the financial promotion order, or (iii) are persons to whom an invitation
or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of the financial services and markets act 2000) may otherwise lawfully be
communicated (all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”). This document is directed only at relevant persons and must not be acted on
or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is available only to relevant persons
and will be engaged in only with relevant persons.The remuneration system concerning the analyst/s author/s of this report is based on multiple criteria, including
the revenues obtained by BBVA and, indirectly, the results of BBVA Group in the fiscal year, which, in turn, include the results generated by the investment banking
business; nevertheless, they do not receive any remuneration based on revenues from any specific transaction in investment banking.
BBVA is not a member of the FINRA and is not subject to the rules of disclosure affecting such members.
“BBVA is subject to the BBVA Group Code of Conduct for Security Market Operations which, among other regulations, includes rules to prevent and avoid
conflicts of interests with the ratings given, including information barriers. The BBVA Group Code of Conduct for Security Market Operations is available for
reference at the following web site: www.bbva.com / Corporate Governance”.
BBVA is a bank supervised by the Bank of Spain and by Spain’s Stock Exchange Commission (CNMV), registered with the Bank of Spain with number 0182.
                                                                                    Brazil Economic Outlook
                                                                                    Second Quarter 2012




This report has been produced by the Emerging Economies Unit:

Enestor Dos Santos
enestor.dossantos@bbva.com




BBVA Research
Group Chief Economist
Jorge Sicilia

Emerging Markets:                              Developed Economies:               Market & Client Strategy:
Alicia García-Herrero                          Rafael Doménech                    Antonio Pulido
alicia.garcia-herrero@bbva.com.hk              r.domenech@bbva.com                ant.pulido@grupobbva.com
  Cross-Country Emerging Markets Analysis        Spian                              Global Equity
  Álvaro Ortiz Vidal-Abarca                      Miguel Cardoso                     Ana Munera
  alvaro.ortiz@bbva.com                          miguel.cardoso@bbva.com            ana.munera@grupobbva.com
  Asia                                           Europe                             Global Credit
  Stephen Schwartz                               Miguel Jiménez                     Javier Serna
  stephen.schwartz@bbva.com.hk                   mjimenezg@bbva.com                 javier.serna@bbvauk.com
  Latam Coordination                             United States                      Global Interest Rates, FX
  Juan Ruiz                                      Nathaniel Karp                     and Commodities
  juan.ruiz@bbva.com                             nathaniel.karp@bbvacompass.com     Luis Enrique Rodríguez
      Argentina                                                                     luisen.rodriguez@grupobbva.com
      Gloria Sorensen                          Financial Systems & Regulation:
      gsorensen@bbva.com                       Santiago Fernández de Lis
                                               sfernandezdelis@grupobbva.com
      Chile
      Alejandro Puente                           Financial Systems
      apuente@bbva.com                           Ana Rubio
                                                 arubiog@bbva.com
      Colombia
      Juana Téllez                               Pensions
      juana.tellez@bbva.com                      David Tuesta
                                                 david.tuesta@bbva.com
      Peru
      Hugo Perea                                 Regulation and Public Policy
      hperea@bbva.com                            María Abascal
                                                 maria.abascal@bbva.com
      Venezuela
      Oswaldo López                            Global Areas:
      oswaldo_lopez@bbva.com
                                                 Financial Scenarios
  Mexico                                         Sonsoles Castillo
  Adolfo Albo                                    s.castillo@bbva.com
  a.albo@bbva.bancomer.com
                                                 Economic Scenarios
  Macroeconomic Analysis Mexico                  Juan Ruiz (i)
  Julián Cubero                                  juan.ruiz@bbva.com
  juan.cubero@bbva.bancomer.com
                                                 Innovation & Processes
                                                 Clara Barrabés
                                                 clara.barrabes@bbva.com




Contact details:
BBVA Research
Paseo Castellana, 81 – 7th floor
28046 Madrid (Spain)
Tel. + 34 91 374 60 00 and + 34 91 537 70 00
Fax. +34 91 374 30 25
bbvaresearch@bbva.com
www.bbvaresearch.com

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags: BBVA
Stats:
views:42
posted:6/10/2012
language:English
pages:17