IEEE WG dallas ck
Document Sample


IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
EEE P1609 Working Group Meeting Notice and Draft Agenda
Tuesday-Thursday, February 14-16, 2012
R2, 02/01/2012
Bay Club Hotel and Marina
2131 Shelter Island Drive
San Diego, CA 92106
619-224-8888
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-866 327 5544
Access code: 3344798#
[No WebEx for this meeting]
Meeting Dates and Times: 0900, Wednesday, February 14, 2012 to
1200N, Thursday, February 16, 2012
1.0 INTRODUCTION T. Kurihara
1.1.1 Introductions (name and company)
1.1.2 Local arrangements J. McNew
1.1.3 IEEE Patent Policy
1.1.4 WG Attendance and Attendance List
1.1.5 Identify Meeting Secretary
1.1.6 Modifications to draft agenda and approval of agenda
1.1.7 Review of draft minutes from December 2011 meeting, San Diego, CA
1.1.8 IEEE SA Standards Revision Procedure Changes
2.0 REVIEW OF ACTION ITEMS W. Whyte/J. Moring
Action Item Review – Status of open action items from previous meetings.
N.B. Objective to identify OPEN items and placement into this meeting agenda or to indicate
completed action and, not to discuss the technical merits at this point in the agenda.
ACTION ITEM ACTION DISPOSITION
201112-01 T. Kurihara to (1) contact IEEE Staff for withdrawal Done following the
procedures for trial-use standards noted; and (2) meeting. Submitted
ascertain if there is justification for keeping IEEE 1455- request to withdraw to
1999(2006) as an active standard. REVCOM. Expect to
be on March agenda
201112-02 J. Moring to revise and submit 1609.3Cor1 for Done. Recirculation
recirculation closed
201112-03 J. Moring to address comments, revise P1609.12 draft Done. Recirculation
and submit for 14-day recirculation ballot closed
201112-04 J. Kenney to prepare text on security checks for
P1609.12 and provide to J. Moring
201112-05 T. Kurihara to request input in the issue from Dr HJ Done. Requested at
Fischer on the ASN.1 encoding of the PSID. ETSI TC-ITS WG mtg
1
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
ACTION ITEM ACTION DISPOSITION
201112-06 J. Moring to revise the “private use” footnote according
to the discussion during the meeting.
201112-07 R. Gerges to assist in identifying an editor for the
proposed new work for P1609.5
201112-08 J. McNew to confirm the meeting arrangements and Done. December 19,
provide lodging reservation details to the WG before 2011. See details
January 10, 2012. below.
201201-00 All. Determine schedule and venue for meeting
following this one.
3.0 PROGRAM OF WORK
N.B.1 For those calling in, for general planning purposes and the discussions may start
earlier or later then noted.
3.1 P1609.1 discussion threads and review of draft A. Malarky
Status of draft, review of comments, and plans for sponsor ballot
3.2 P1609.2 discussion threads and review of draft W. Whyte
Status of revised draft, review of comments, plans for sponsor ballot
3.2.1 ETSI TC-ITS WG5 IEEE 1609.2 security architecture, profile and mapping,
privacy and confidentiality, design and deployment guide proposal W. Whyte
3.3 Corrigenda to 1609.3-2010 status and planned REVCOM submission J. Moring
3.3.1 P1609.12 comment resolution (CR), status, and planned REVCOM submission
3.4 P1609.0 discussion threads, review of drafts J. Moring
Status of revised draft, review of comments, plans for sponsor ballot
3.5 SAE J2735, J2945.1, J2754, SRS and Design projects, and status J. Kenney
3.6 US ITS Program Information S. Sill
4.0 OLD BUSINESS
4.1 Update of certification program; test methods, coordination R. Roebuck
4.2 VSC and CAMP Project Updates J. Kenney
5.0 NEW BUSINESS
5.1 IEEE Standard 802.11-2007, amendment .11p and P802.11mb status C. Kain
5.2 Summary ETSI TC-ITS and ISO TC204 Meeting of importance to 1609 R. Roy
5.3 PSID allocation criteria and procedures (to be included in P1609.12 CR) J. Moring
5.4 IEEE Revision of Procedures (slide set shown at DySpan and P1900.n mtg) T. Kurihara
5.5 Ali Ghandour research update (Wednesday AM)
5.6 Use of WSMP “port numbers”
5.7 Harmonization Task Groups
6.0 FUTURE MEETINGS
6.1 Discuss and determine IEEE WG meetings after February 2012
6.2 Known and To Be Determined Meeting Dates (any other group meetings?)
2
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
DATE MEETING, VENUE, HOST
Feb 14-16 IEEE P1609 Working Group Meeting, San Diego (confirmed)
Feb 17 Closing date for IEEE REVCOM March meeting submissions
Mar 1-6, 9 ISO TC204 WG16 Meeting (1st-6th) and Plenary, Munich or Ulm; and ITU Joint Ad Hoc
Coordination Session (9th), Geneva (details TBD)
Mar 11-16 IEEE 802.11, Waikoloa, HI
Apr 16-20 ISO TC204 Plenary and WG meetings, Melbourne, Australia
Apr 23-27 ETSI TC-ITS Plenary and WG meetings, Sophia Antipolis, FR
Apr 27 Closing date for IEEE REVCOM June meeting submissions
May 8-10 IEEE P1609 Working Group Meeting (tentative)
May 13-18 IEEE 802.11, Atlanta, GA
Jun 19-21 ETSI TC-ITS WG meetings, Sophia Antipolis, FR
Jun 25-27 CEN TC278 WG16/ISO TC204 WG18 joint meeting, Dallas, TX
Jul 15-20 IEEE 802.11, San Diego, CA
Jul 19 IEEE RAC, San Diego, CA
Jul 20 Closing date for IEEE REVCOM September meeting submissions
Aug 8-9 IEEE P1609 Working Group Meeting (tentative)
Sep 16-21 IEEE 802.11, Indian Wells, CA
Oct 15 Closing date for IEEE REVCOM December meeting submissions
Oct 15-19 ISO TC204 Plenary, Moscow, CSR
Oct 15-19 ETSI TC-ITS WG Meeting and Plenary, Vienna, Austria
Oct 21-25 ITS World Congress, Vienna, Austria
Oct 31 Determine disposition of P1609.5 PAR (expires 12/2012)
Nov 11-16 IEEE 802.11, San Antonio, TX
*= indicates meetings for WG Chair not related to ITS and DSRC/WAVE (for 1609 meeting scheduling purposes)
*May 16-28, 2012; *Jun 17-Jul 7, 2012
7.0 ACTION ITEM REVIEW
8.0 ADJOURNMENT
3
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
December 2011 Meeting, San Diego, CA - DRAFT MINUTES
Introductions (name and company) for those in the room and on the WebEx (names were noted
on the WebEx screen).
Local arrangements were noted by J. McNew
IEEE Patent Policy was noted and voiced by the WG Chair
WG Attendance and Attendance List was circulated for each day of the meeting
Identify Meeting Secretary
Modifications to draft agenda and approval of agenda was completed
Review of draft minutes from September 27-28, 2011 meeting, Annapolis, MD, was noted and
any changes should be noted and discussed at the end of the meeting. There were no changes
noted. Approved as submitted.
IEEE SA Standards Revision Procedure Changes. Tom Kurihara (TK) discussed the new IEEE
policy concerning reaffirmation of existing standards. The review cycle is now 10 years instead
of 5. The stabilized standards category has been eliminated, which means there are no indefinite
standards. Standards have to be either revised or withdrawn. Tom said that IEEE continues to
make available standards that have been withdrawn, when anyone requests them. He also said
IEEE 1455 may be in grandfathered until 2014 (10 year anniversary).
All action items from previous meetings were completed during this meeting with the following
exceptions:
Richard Roy will provide to W. Whyte text on time precision for IEEE 1609.2
William Whyte will revise the IEEE 1609.2 draft with R. Roy input
Note: Both actions are considered OBE since a new draft has been posted after the meeting. If additional input is
determined to be needed, the input should reference the most recent draft. TMK
Justin McNew (JMcN) wanted to know next deadline for Project Authorization Request (PAR)
submission for a new standard. Tom said the New Standards Committee (NESCOM) and Review
Committee (REVCOM) closing date is Feb 17 is for their March 2012 meeting.
There was discussion on scheduling the next IEEE 1609 meeting to accommodate comment
resolution for IEEE P1609.2 and to review any new PARs in time for the NESCOM and
REVCOM deadlines. The group decided to hold the next meeting February 14-16, 2012, in San
Diego, hosted by Kapsch TrafficCom. Thank you.
John Moring (JM) asked if we should deprecate the old trial use standards so people will not use
them. There is no full use standard that replaces the trial use IEEE 1609.1 (the scope and purpose
of IEEE 1609.1 has been changed). The trial use version of IEEE 1609.1 has references to IEEE
1455. Tom said he will take an action item to ask the IEEE staff to start the process to withdraw
the trial use standards IEEE 1609.3-2007 and IEEE 1609.4-20007. TK said he would take an
additional action item to check if the IEEE 1609.1 trial use standard has any usefulness and
whether it should be left alone. TK will contact the former Mark IV to see if any marketplace
products rely on it. Justin thought the trial use IEEE 1609.1 standard can be withdrawn. TK will
check to see if IEEE 1609.1 references IEEE 1455 before submitting it to the withdrawal
process. ACTION. TK to (1) contact IEEE Staff for withdrawal procedures for trial-use
4
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
standards noted; and (2) ascertain if there is justification for keeping IEEE 1455-1999(2006) as
an active standard.
TK said he inquired with USDOT about creation of a new standard for network management. He
said if he had an editor, then we could initiate a project for a network management standard.
JMcN thought that devices other than those covered by IEEE 1609.1 would just use Simple
Network Management Protocol Version 3 (SNMPv3). However, these devices would have to be
Internet Protocol (IP) addressable. JMcN said he would support a standard for an Extensible
Markup Language (XML)-based management system, but only if there was enough support and
contributions from the Working Group (WG).
SAE J2735, J2945.1 projects and status. John Kenney (JK) gave an update on SAE J-2735 and
SAE J-2945. He said that there is an USDoT contract with SAE as of October 1, 2011, to support
an editor. It is a task driven contract, but no task orders have been placed by USDoT. SAE is
waiting for the Crash Avoidance Metric Project (CAMP) to provide recommendations on
minimum performance standards for the Basic Safety Message (BSM) for inclusion into SAE J-
2945.1. JK expects that in the next few months recommendations will be taken to SAE. The first
version will be a recommended practice. There have been harmonization discussions with ETSI
TC-ITS WG1. Some recommendations on minimum performance requirements were provided
by CAMP for model deployment. JK doesn’t know if that information was forwarded to ETSI.
JK forwarded links to the VSC reports with data that includes performance as a function of
transmit power. Ramez Gerges (RG) wanted to know if there were major differences in position
accuracy between the new reports and the 2008 reports published by the VSC. JK was not
familiar with the positioning accuracy work that went into that document (second annual report).
JK also gave additional VSC updates. Vehicle to vehicle interoperability has 3 active tasks.
Scalability is primarily a study on congestion control. The VSC wants to test two approaches.
There are 3 phases of testing. The first phase, which included 50 vehicles, is over. They will test
100 vehicles in mid-January, and will conduct 200-vehicle testing in mid-March. The second
task is a security task William Whyte is working on related to the security infrastructure to and
from a Certificate Authority. The third task addresses minimum performance requirements. John
made a clarification that CAMP consists of just GM and Ford. CAMP sponsors projects with
USDOT that involve a consortium of OEMs. The VSC is one of them. The current consortium
(VSC 3) is doing the interoperability projects and model deployment support. It includes 8
OEMs.
Items 3.3, 3.3.1, and 3.4. JM gave a standards status report. He said there have been a lot of
inputs to IEEE P1609.0. There were agreements on contributions to a section addressing
international standards. The safety use case work is complete. There are new figures on the
protocol stack. JM does not have an updated draft. He is waiting on some additional
contributions. Jules Madey (JMa) will write section on certification. JM said the WG should
have a complete draft by the end of the next meeting. The draft standard might be able to go to
ballot shortly afterward.
5
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
JM said IEEE P1609.3 corrigendum1 has three technical issues. There is also a PAR change
request to expand the scope beyond the change in Annex G. The voting closes December 3 (it is
currently in IEEE Sponsor ballot). There have been only two comments so far. One is concerning
an incorrect latitude value in a figure. The second comment concerns a new error identified in
the safety extension to WAVE Short Message Protocol (WSMP) shown in a figure. It is a typo
that does not affect the content. JM plans to incorporate all comments and submit the standard
for a 14-day recirculation ballot. ACTION. JM to submit revised Cor1 for recirculation.
IEEE P1609.12 had a PAR change request due to a typographical error in the title. The ballot on
this standard closed November 12. There was 100% approval. There were 32 comments, 12 of
which were technical. On November 28, an updated comment resolution spreadsheet was
circulated. JM suggested a 14-day recirculation ballot after comments are resolved and
incorporated. ACTION. JM to address comments, revise P1609.12 draft and submit for 14-day
recirculation ballot.
JM proceeded to review the comment spreadsheet. There were several editorial comments. Two
Application Identifier (AID) values that are in place in Europe were not indicated in the draft.
John said he also needed to check referenced ISO standards. The two values will be added. The
PSID uses statement (indicating two uses) and how it is used by the WSMP needs clarification.
JK will write text to incorporate a third use concerning security checks. ACTION. JK to prepare
text on security checks for P1609.12. The responsibilities for a requestor of a Provider Service
Identifier (PSID) need clarification. William Whyte (WW) suggested that Special Service
Permissions (SSPs) need to be defined when the PSID is requested. The ITS-AID used in ISO
and ETSI documents have a separate data dictionary, so some of the language in the comment
concerning PSIDs may be out of scope.
JMcN requested a PSID for Commercial Vehicle automated inspection. He would like one in the
2-octet space. He said the SAE traveler information subcommittee was planning on adding
Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) information into the standards. JMcN made the request
because he wanted to avoid reopening IEEE P1609.12 for ballot to add just one value. JK
disagreed with JMcN’s request to have IEEE 1609 WG be the requesting agency for the
proposed PSID. JK said the requestor should be a private organization or an SDO developing
messages, data dictionaries, or applications specifically related to the PSID. The WG needs to
discuss procedure for applying for PSID and who qualifies for what length of PSID.
Item 3.2. William Whyte called in from Taipei. He spent the last 4 months resolving comments
primarily on text that describes process flows and validity, message definitions, certificate
management and message handling, and descriptions of primitives. The PICS pro forma and
Annex F were also updated. There is a certificate management service that is outside of security
services that has been defined in the new draft. WW asked the group if all geographic region
descriptions need to be supported in a WAVE Short Announcement (WSA). WW is requesting a
review of the security profiles by SAE. WW asked about the proper clauses for normative crypto
statements. JM said that Clause 5 information that relies on text in Clause 6 (to describe how it
works) could just reference those instances rather than having to create an additional clause. WW
also said there is a bug in the section on replay protection. The type byte that tells whether the
6
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
signed message has an internal or external payload is not signed. The byte could be read and a
signed external message could be replayed in a one shot attack. Due to the length of the IEEE
P1609.2 document, he recommended the recirculation ballot period should be 30 days, if it
occurs before the holidays, and 20 days, if it occurs afterwards. Comment resolution could occur
at the February 2012 meeting. WW thinks there should be a second recirculation ballot, so he
won’t make the March REVCOM meeting, but should make the submission date for the June
2012 meeting.
JM requested input from WW on IEEE P1609.12 on criteria (if any) for granting requests for
PSID allocations, and Kapsch’s request for a 2-byte PSID for commercial vehicle inspection.
WW commented that the organization that requests a PSID has to supply all of the information
including the SSP that is associated with PSID. JM thought that was over-reaching for IEEE
P1609.12 because the description of the SSP is in IEEE P1609.2. Carl Kain (CK) suggested the
standard should be self-contained, and that information that might be related in IEEE 1609.2
would not help someone who picks up IEEE 1609.12 to determine what is needed for a PSID.
JMcN suggested references to other standards could be made in IEEE P1609.12 where needed.
JK said the wording reflects the SAE interpretation of a PSID, but is not necessarily consistent
with the ISO interpretation. There was significant discussion on what is needed by an
organization that requests a PSID in terms of defining any requirements related to its use.
JM took a straw poll to get a sense of the WG on whether to approve a 2 octet PSID value for
heavy vehicle wireless inspection. 8 members voted yes, three voted no, others present did not
vote.
Gloria Gwynne (GG) asked if approval of JMcN’s request would cause anyone to change their
vote from yes to no on the standard when it went to recirculation ballot. There were no
responses. JMcN said he may withdraw the request because the standards organization
performing the data set development is not as far along as he thought when he made the request.
Item 5.3.Ali Ghandour, a PhD student from American University of Beirut, gave a presentation
on simulation of IEEE 1609.4 for multi-channel vehicular ad-hoc networks. He claims there is no
model of IEEE Std 1609.4-2010 for full use of the control channel and service channel operation.
They have created a model that incorporates the channel switching function between control and
service channels. The model was created using NS2. The model and simulations have not yet
been published. If there is interest, contact Ali at aig04@aub.edu.lb.
Comment resolution resumed with several editorial corrections for IEEE P1609.12. IEEE contact
information is being added to provide a method of contacting the WG for anyone requesting a
PSID that needs to be added to the standard. There was a discussion of what is a “service class.”
A definition will be added to IEEE P1609.0, not IEEE P1609.12. Dick Roy (DR) supplied a
spreadsheet to show a mapping of the unaligned Packed Encoding Rule (PER), the Abstract
Syntax Notation (ASN.) declaration and the octet value of the PSID. JK asked if the explanation
should be in IEEE P1609.0 instead of IEEE P1609.12. JM said the PSID is defined in IEEE
1609.3-2010. JK thinks the comment from DR should include the context of the harmonization
of the ASN.1 encoding used in the “US versus Europe” for these values. TK will solicit input
from Dr. HJ Fischer on this issue. ACTION. TK to request input in the issue from Dr HJ
7
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
Fischer. TK will stress our schedule to him if he has any input. The term “Individual Address
Block (IAB)” was changed to “IAB identifier.” Wording on the IAB within the Vendor Specific
Action Frame was edited. JK had additional comments. JK wanted to know what “reserved for
private use” means for reserved values for ISO. This is not defined in the footnote that refers to
similar values allocated to IEEE 1609 WG. JM said he will clarify the footnote. ACTION. JM
will revise the “private use” footnote, and PSIDs 20-22 need editing for consistency. JM also
suggested clarifying that the role of the IEEE Registration Authority (RA) and the Registration
Authority Committee (RAC) that is no longer needed. TK said that IEEE 1609.3 trial use
standard may have to be withdrawn to satisfy this comment. TK’s action item to withdraw two of
the trial use standards should be sufficient.
TK said the core system requirements developed for USDOT may impact the IEEE 1609
standards since it incorporates the Certification Authority (CA) and certificate management
process being developed under contract for the Detroit demo in 2012.
Item 5.1. CK gave an update on IEEE 802.11mb TG activity. There was at least one change in
the TGmb process that impacts IEEE 1609 (name change of a primitive). There were a few
errors in IEEE Std 802.11p-2010 amendment that were fixed when the amendment was
incorporated into the base standard. The process for updating the base standard is being changed.
Amendments will now be added as soon as they are published rather than waiting for a group of
amendments to be finished. There was also activity in several other task groups that have
amendments in development that will possibly have an impact on IEEE Std 802.11p. Three more
amendments will be added in 2012, and there are at least two more task groups that are creating
drafts. There was also ITS activity in IEEE 802.22 WG (rural area networks using television
white space (TVWS)). They have a new set of ITS –related use cases. There was an IEEE 802.15
WG interest group formed on standards for positive train control. IEEE 802.11ah TG is
developing an amendment for Wi-Fi in the 802-928 MHz band and the impact to existing toll
tags is undetermined and unknown
Item 4.3 and 4.4.There was a discussion on using the PAR for IEEE P1609.5 for a network
management service standard (PAR expires in December 2012 and a request for extensions was
withdrawn based on NEXCOM push-back comments). The consensus was that a standard was
not needed for the On-Board Units (OBUs), but may be needed for management of the Road
Side Units (RSUs). GR would like to avoid going to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
for a Request for Comment (RFC) and would prefer to use IEEE P1609.5 to describe what is
needed. The PAR defines communications management services. JMcN says we may broaden
the PAR if needed. This may be an issue with IEEE since activity on developing this standard
has been dormant for so long. Also, there is no editor. The WG may be able to close out the old
PAR, initiate a new one, and reuse the same number. JMcN will bring this issue of funding an
editor to the Omni Air Consortium meeting next week. JMcN also asked GR to recommend an
editor. The recommendation will enable the WG to keep the PAR open for now. ACTION. RG
to assist in identifying an editor for the proposed new work. The standard would likely
incorporate device testing in addition to network management (including configuration). SNMP
can be used for some functions, but will likely not be sufficient (too simple). Also management
information will need to be secured.
8
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
Item 6. The next meeting is scheduled for February 14-16, 2012, in San Diego, CA, the same
venue as the November-December 2011 meeting. ACTION. JMcN to conform the meeting
arrangements and provide lodging reservation details to the WG before January 10, 2012.
Additional meetings in 2012 will be determined from meeting to meeting as the drafts are
completed, submitted for MEC (IEEE mandatory editorial review), and initiating Sponsor ballot,
and to meet the draft submission closing dates for approval to REVCOM and for new project
proposals to NESCOM.
ACTION ITEM ACTION DISPOSITION
201112-01 T. Kurihara to (1) contact IEEE Staff for withdrawal Done following the
procedures for trial-use standards noted; and (2) meeting. Submitted
ascertain if there is justification for keeping IEEE 1455- request to withdraw to
1999(2006) as an active standard. REVCOM for March
201112-02 J. Moring to revise and submit 1609.3Cor1 for
recirculation
201112-03 J. Moring to address comments, revise P1609.12 draft
and submit for 14-day recirculation ballot
201112-04 J. Kenney to prepare text on security checks for
P1609.12 and provide to J. Moring
201112-05 T. Kurihara to request input in the issue from Dr HJ
Fischer on the ASN.1 encoding of the PSID.
201112-06 J. Moring to revise the “private use” footnote according
to the discussion during the meeting.
201112-07 R. Gerges to assist in identifying an editor for the
proposed new work for P1609.5
201112-08 J. McNew to conform the meeting arrangements and Done. December 19,
provide lodging reservation details to the WG before 2011. See details
January 10, 2012. below.
February 14-16, 2012 Meeting Information. Venues same as December 2011 as noted in the
letterhead for the final agenda and draft minutes.
Room Rates are- Single $99, Double $99, Triple $109, Quad $119, Exe Suite $209, Suite $229
Group rate includes breakfast buffet served daily in the restaurant M - F from 6:30am - 10am.
Complimentary airport shuttle is available 6am – 11pm daily by calling 619-224-8888.
Please follow the instructions bellow to make reservations:
ONLINE RESERVATIONS
1. Click on this link: www.bayclubhotel.com
2. Click on the group logins link below the submit button.
3. Enter password KAPSCH1 (password is not case sensitive).
9
IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/
Intelligent Transportation Systems (VTS/ITS)
IEEE DSRC (Upper Layers) Working Group (P1609)
4. Enter the dates you would like to stay.
5. Select the room type you would like to request. (Please note: suites must be reserved by
phone.)
6. Enter personal information.
7. Please print your confirmation information for your records.
RESERVATIONS BY PHONE
Please call the Reservations Department toll-free at (800) 672-0800 and reference Kapsch
TrafficCom Inc.
- IEEE Patent Policy - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt
- Patent FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/faq.pdf
- Letters of Assurance Form - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/loa.pdf
- Affiliation FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationFAQ.html
- Anti-Trust FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf
- Ethics - http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs/about/CoE_poster.pdf
10
Get documents about "