Jack the Ripper was the name given to a serial killer active in .doc by tongxiamy

VIEWS: 7 PAGES: 14

									                                                        Jack the Ripper was the name given to a serial killer
                                                        active in London’s East End during the year of 1888.
                                                        The name originates from a letter written by someone
                                                        who claimed to be the killer published at the time of
                                                        the murders (Many researchers now believe that all of
                                                        the Ripper letters are fake.). Other aliases include
                                                        “The Whitechapel Murderer” or “Leather Apron.”
                                                        These killings occurred in Whitechapel, Aldgate, and
                                                        the City of London proper. At this time, the Industrial
                                                        Revolution was in full swing. The British Empire was
                                                        the premiere world power. But while England's model
                                                        of wealth and modernity radiated throughout the
                                                        world, Whitechapel District, in the East End of
                                                        London, hardly reflected this brilliant reality.
                                                        Whitechapel was a sprawling community composed
                                                        of what many considered the worst occupants of
                                                        London. Its boundaries were home to alcoholics,
                                                        beggars, prostitutes, and a large community of Jewish
                                                        immigrants who had fled Eastern Europe to escape
                                                        the growing Anti-Semite movement. Tens of
                                                        thousands of people lived, crammed within a
labyrinth of dark, filthy alleyways, forever overshadowed by fog. Whitechapel was the scene of three of
the Ripper victims’ violent deaths; those of Mary Ann Nichols, Mary Jane Kelly, and Annie Chapman.
          Among eleven case files archived by the police, the generally accepted Ripper victims are Mary
Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Katherine Eddowes, and Mary Jane Kelly. These five
women are regarded as the five canonical victims of Jack the Ripper. Other victims, the subject obviously
being open to speculation, are Emma Smith, Martha Tabram, Alice Mckenzie, and Frances Coles. Before
I go into the details of the victims, I must stress the difference between the “Ripper Murders” and the
“Whitechapel Murders.” Victims of the Whitechapel murders were not necessarily murdered by the
Ripper himself, but their murders took place in the district of Whitechapel and may or may not have been
in similar circumstances to the canonical murders.
          Emma Smith was murdered in April 1888. Following her murder, press reports published a story
on an unidentified woman found in Whitechapel, Christmas week of the previous year. (Researchers have
tried, in vain, to find more on this murder. Nothing has surfaced.) She was the first file in the Whitechapel
Murders, but is not necessarily to be considered a Ripper victim because almost no information is
available on her case. This is because her case-file, not unlike the mutilated brain of President Kennedy, is
missing. The little information that we have on her in is preserved in the BBC television special “Jack the
Ripper” airing in 1973. The information includes details of her lodgings, drinking habits, and a witness
report of her conversing with a man in Dark clothes and a white scarf at fifteen minutes after midnight on
the third of April. Finally, it told of her death at London Hospital under House Surgeon George Haslip,
after being robbed and attacked in Osborne Street, Whitechapel. The circumstances of her murder also set
her apart from the canonical victims, who were killed by a singular murderer, in a private setting. Along
with much of her case, Smith’s social standing is unknown; it is likely that she, like the other Ripper
victims, was a prostitute.
          Martha Tabram was the second victim of the Whitechapel murders. She was found at George-
Yard buildings, Whitechapel, with 39 stabs to her body, stumbled upon by a city cab-driver. She was 37,
and a prostitute.
          Mary Ann Nichols was 44 at the time of her death on August 31, 1888. She was the first of the
Whitechapel murders that was also recognized as the work of Jack the Ripper. She was a prostitute and an
alcoholic. Her murder, being in a chain of brutal murders in Whitechapel district, drew the public’s
attention to a brutal reality; a maniac was
on the loose in London. A name for the
killer surfaced, Leather apron; this was due
to a leather apron found in Nichols’
lodgings where the killer had cleaned his
knife.
          Annie Chapman (aka Dark Annie,
Annie Siffey, Sievey or Sivvey while her
real name was Annie Eliza Smith.) was a
Prostitute living in Whitechapel. She was
killed a week after Mary Ann Nichols,
causing an uproar in the media. According
to legend, two farthings and two rings
were found by her body. The significance of this
is unknown.
          Elizabeth Stride was 45 years old,
having come to London from Sweden several
years before. She reportedly made money by
sewing and charring (cleaning), and was an
occasional prostitute. She was found with her
throat savagely slit in Dutfield’s Yard, Berners
Street, St George’s in the East. What many do
not know, however, is that upon the same night,
Katherine Eddowes was also found, her
mutilated body discovered in a secluded corner
of Mitre Square by PC Edward Watkins. This
date is infamously known as “The Double
Event.”
          Mary Jane Kelly was approximately 25
years old, born in Ireland, and worked as a
prostitute after her lover, Joseph Barnett, lost his
job (he was later a suspect in the Ripper Case.). Her age and the speculation that Joseph Barnett was her
killer make her the most disputed of the canonical victims.
However, most students and authors believe she is included in the Ripper murders.
          The Ripper killed his victims by strangling them by the neck until they were unconscious, if not
dead. He then lowered them onto the floor and slit their throats. At this point, he made other mutilations
to the body, often removing organs. In the case of Elizabeth Stride, he removed her kidney, later allegedly
sending half of it in the post to George Lusk, the president of the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee with
a letter claiming that he ate the other half (The “From Hell” letter). From the circumstances of the
murders, in the street, in near total darkness, keeping on watch for others, and in very tight time
constraints, and the minimal damage done to the organs surrounding those that were removed, we can
conclude that the Ripper had measurably intimate knowledge of how to handle a knife (for lack of a better
description.).This knowledge of the Ripper’s modus operandi was not available to us through forensic
science until several years ago.
          It has been speculated, acknowledging the social standing of the Ripper victims, that he had a
moral grudge against prostitution, or possibly females in general. The true motive of the Ripper is as
mysterious as his identity. Another suggestion is, in the case of Joseph Barnett (more on him in a second)
that he killed the other women to frighten Kelly out of prostitution.
          As mentioned before, not much is known about the identity of the Ripper, he was never caught by
the police force which pursued him. Some suspects in this case include Joseph Barnett, Montague John
Druitt, Aaron Kominski, and George Chapman. Joseph Barnett was a former fish porter. He is known to
have been Mary Jane Kelly’s lover from 1887 to 1888. They apparently separated after a quarrel relating
to his work (this is also when most believe she returned to being a prostitute.). Detective Inspector
Frederick Abberline questioned Barnett after Mary Kelly’s murder, but he was later released without
charge. In the 1980s, author Bruce Paley suggested that he was a suspect, as Kelly’s spiteful ex-lover, and
committed the other murders to frighten Kelly into giving up prostitution. Another suggestion is that he
only killed Mary Jane Kelly (accounting for her obvious difference in age for the other victims), but
mutilated the body to look like a Ripper murder. Montague John Druitt was a barrister (From
Dictionary.com: A lawyer who is a member of one of the Inns of Court and who has the privilege of
pleading in the higher courts.) and schoolmaster in Blackheath, London (a position from which he was
dismissed in 1888). He committed suicide shortly after he was dismissed, his body found in the Thames
near Chiswick on New Year’s Eve. His suicide after the murder of Mary Jane Kelly forced Chief
Constable Melville Macnaghten to name him as a suspect in the Ripper case. He was dismissed as a
suspect by Inspector Abberline due to the fact that the only evidence against him was his coincidentally
timed suicide. Aaron Kominski was a Polish Jew, admitted to Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum in 1891
(three years after the Ripper murders). Kominski was named as a Ripper suspect by Melville Macnaghten
and Inspector Donald Swanson (in handwritten notes in the margins of Assistant Commissioner Sir
Robert Anderson’s memoirs) Sir Robert Anderson confirmed that a Polish Jew had been identified as
Jack the Ripper, but prosecution was not attempted because the witness (a Jew) would not testify against a
fellow Jew. Many researchers take this information skeptically, as it is contradicted by Melville
Macnaghten, saying that no one was ever identified as the Ripper. Kominski was regarded as harmless in
the asylum; his insanity consisted of auditory hallucinations and irrational fears (such as being fed by
other people and bathing). Seweryn Antonowicz Kłosowski, aka George Chapman, (no relation to victim
Annie Chapman) was a Polish immigrant who had come to England shortly before the time of the
murders. He assumed the name Chapman at some point between 1893 and 1894. Outside of the Ripper
case, he had poisoned three of his wives (for these crimes he was hanged in 1903). At the time of the
murders, he had taken residence in Whitechapel, London, working as a barber. He is believed by many to
be the favored suspect of Inspector Fredrick Abberline. Other researchers, however, disregard him as a
                                                   likely culprit on account of the drastic change in his
                                                   modus operandi; the five canonical victims had died due
                                                   to asphyxiation and/or blood loss while Kłosowski
                                                   killed his wives with poison. It is uncommon, while not
                                                   unheard of, for a serial killer to make such changes in
                                                   the way he kills his victims. And before we move on, I
                                                   would briefly like to assess the theory of “Jill the




Ripper.” Inspector Fredrick Abberline at one
point suggested that the Ripper may not be a
man at all, but a woman. This theory is backed
by the witness account of Mrs Caroline
Maxwell, who claimed to have seen Mary
Kelly two times after she had been declared
dead. William Stewart published Jack the
Ripper: A New Theory in 1939. He asked four
questions which supported the theory of a
female Ripper:
1. What sort of person was it that could move about at night without arousing the suspicions of his own
household or of other people that he might have met?

2. Who could walk through the streets in blood stained clothing without arousing too much comment?
(Remember, this is Whitechapel)

3. Who would have had the elementary knowledge and skill to have committed the mutilations?

4. Who could have been found by the body and yet given a satisfactory alibi for being there?

         While Jack the Ripper was not the world’s first serial killer, he was the first in history to create
such frenzy in worldwide media. This publicity was aided by the boost in circulation of inexpensive
newspapers. The true identity of Jack the Ripper is still shrouded in mystery, yet even today, many self-
proclaimed “Ripper-ologists” continue to research the case.
         The macabre nature of the murders drew the public’s attention to poor living conditions in the
East End, and in the two decades following the murders, the worst of London’s slums were demolished.
Some buildings survive, and a tour following the Ripper’s path through London is available to tourists.
Horror stories depict Jack the Ripper as phantasmal or monstrous, shown as a bogey-man-esque creature.
Later, in the 1920s and 1930s, his imaged morphed into that of an ordinary man in ordinary clothes,
preying on unsuspecting women. During the 1960s, the Ripper was known as “the Symbol of Predatory
Aristocracy”, dressed as a stereotypical English gentleman. The fictional world of “Ripper-ology” is
known to span everything from Sherlock Holmes to Japanese Erotic Horror. Recently, the British
Broadcasting Network (BBC) released Whitechapel, a new series detailing a serial killer who seemed to
be recreating the Ripper’s path through London.
         To discover the identity of Jack the Ripper, although the perpetrator is undoubtedly long dead,
would be a fulfilling task for any modern researcher to complete. What is amazing to me though is that
these events occurred 120+ years ago and people still fight for the truth. And the fighters aren’t just burly
old rich men with mustaches and tall men in deerstalker caps with magnifying glasses and pipes anymore;
today, the detectives are average people: people who are willing to spend three or four hours of their free
time lolling over the internet and library books. And there isn’t even much of a reward for their efforts,
sentiment, perhaps. I personally think they should be compensated for their efforts, but if the world was
fair, chances would be that the madman we call Jack the Ripper wouldn’t even exist.

								
To top