Get documents about "310TH BIDS SUSTAINMENT TRAINING AFTER DEMOBILIZATION
Shared by: B4Z4B9U2
-
Stats
- views:
- 7
- posted:
- 5/21/2012
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 25
Document Sample
Army Reserve Force Programs:
“Structuring the Force to Start the Next 100 Years”
MR. JOHN DAVENPORT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
1
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Army Reserve Transformed
COORDINATION C2 TECHCON TDA
ADCON OPCON MTOE USARPAC USAREUR
HQDA
IMA (CSA)
FORSCOM
HRC
(St. Louis / Ft. Knox) ADCON
USARC
ADCON
NETCOM SIGNAL
COMMAND
TECHCON RRSC (4)
RSC (4) (THEATER) (-)
9th MSC 7th CSC
THEATER SIGNAL THEATER REGIONAL SUSTAINMENT
MED CMD AVIATION MIRC
ENGINEER COMMAND USACAPOC MP 1st MSC CMD
DEP SPT (2) COMMAND
COMMAND (2) (THEATER) COMMAND (THEATER) (1)
DSC
ENGINEER SIGNAL
SIGNAL OPERATIONAL AVIATION MP SUSTAINMENT
BRIGADE (4) BRIGADE CACOM (4) ARSC
CMD POST (2) BRIGADE BRIGADE (3) CMD (EXP) (7)
OPCON
1A TRADOC
CAC
TECHCON BATTLE CMD AR SPT
CMD (1A) READINESS AR MED TRAINING TRAINING TRAINING
STAFF
1A Div COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND
TRAINING TNG BDE COORD
(TASS) (IET) (LDR RDNS)
DIVISION (OPS)
(E)
(E) (E)
BCST AR RSG MAN OPS
SUST IET IET FUNC LT
TSD SPT SPT
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
2
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
RSC Regions
52,778 88th RRSC 43,436
Ft. McCoy, WI
Washington Maine
Minnesota
Montana North Dakota VT
NH
Oregon Wisconsin k
Y or MA
Idaho Michigan
63d RSC South Dakota w CT
Ne RI
Wyoming
Moffett Field, CA Nebraska
Iowa
In Ohio
Pennsy
lvania
NJ
99th RRSC
di
Illinois ana DE
MD
DC
Fort Dix, NJ
Kansas st
Colorado Missouri W e inia
g
Utah Vir Virgin
ia
Nevada
y
Kentuck a
Carolin
North
California e
Tennesse South
Arkansas
Oklahoma Carolina
New
Mississippi
Arizona Mexico Georgia
37,729 Lo
ui
Alabama 39,488
Texas sian
Fl
F
a
or
o
iida
da
(4) Regional Support Commands
• Regionally Focused
• Base Operation Support
• Facility Management 81st RRSC
• Management of AMSA & ECSs Ft. Jackson, SC
• Facility Input for Stationing
• Primary Facilitator for emergency and
temporary relocations
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
3
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
U.S. ARMY RESERVE
STREAMLINE C2 & SUPPORT
Military Intelligence
Readiness Command
-Integrate with NETCOM, IMA and HRC Army Reserve Medical Commands
-Command through operational HQs (3rd MDSC, 807th MDSC, AR-MEDCOM
-Reduce General Officer TDA HQs
-Training division structures to be zero-based 11th Aviation Command
200th Theater MP Command
88th Regional Support Command 99th Regional Support Joint Theater Engineer Commands
Command (412- East /416-West of MS River units)
Army Reserve Training Commands
(80th TASS, 84th LR, 108th TASS)
Civil Affairs and Psychological
Operations Command
335th Signal Command (Theater)
377th Theater Sustainment
63rd Regional Support Command 81st Regional Support Command Command (All Logistics units)
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
4
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Future ARC2 DRCs
4 Regional Support Commands 1 Battle Cmd Tng Division
11 Operational/Functional Commands 3 Training Commands
1 Training Support Command
88 RSC
200 MP CMD 99 RSC
416 TEC
807 MDSC
84 Tng Cmd MIRC
80 Tng Cmd
1A TNG SPT CMD
USARRC
11 AC (T)
USACAPOC
108 Tng Cmd
63 RSC
81 RSC
412 TEC
335 SC(T)
3 MDSC 7 Civ Spt
Cmd
9 MSC AR-MEDCOM
311 SC(T) 377 TSC
75 BCTD 1 MSC
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
5
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Tomorrow’s Army
Force Planning Construct
Steady State Surge
Active Partnering Homeland
Homeland Consequence
with USG Agencies Defense
Defense Management
Global
Deterrence
Interdiction
Train & Equip Stability Ops
Enabling
War on Terror //
War on Terror
Partners Irregular Warfare
Irregular Warfare
Info Ops
Transnational Foreign Internal Defense
Deterrence
WMD Elimination
AR continues to provide structure across
Forward Presence Major Combat /
Conventional
Strike the spectrum of conflict.
Enabling Conventional
Partners Campaigns
Campaigns
Regional Reconstruction Major Influencers……
Deterrence
Information Ops • GWOT
• Persistent Conflict
Sizing Variables:
Frequency Number Scale /
• Stability Operations
Intensity Concurrency Ops Risks • Force Protection
Duration • Modularity
Policy Environment Partner
Capabilities
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
6
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Background
TAA 08-13
• Informed by QDR 2006
• Modeling based on “Most Demanding Day in the Army”
• “Roto-Add” analysis was based on OIF/OEF and OSD approved scenarios;
we did not build the force to meet full rotational requirements
Force Management Review 09-13
• Addressed QDR 2006 challenge - Global Demand > Strategy > Resourced Force
• Incorporated ARNG Rebalance initiative to convert Maneuver Brigades to
Mult-Functional Support Brigades
• Implemented Grow the Army Plan and established baseline for accelerating
end strength growth in support of restoring balance to the force by FY11
• Establish transition to new force planning construct
POM 10-15
• Based on GTA Plan
• Identified Force Management strategic choices
• Deferred Force Mix and Force Imbalance issues to TAA 10-15
TAA 08-13 Steady State Surge TAA 08-13
HLD/CS Homeland
Active Partnering Homeland Consequence
with USG Agencies Defense
Defense Management
Deter Global
Deterrence
Generating Force
Interdiction
in
-
On-going Train & Equip Stability Ops
sta
St
Ops War on Terror //
Su
ati
Enabling War on Terror HLD /
on
Partners Irregular Warfare
Irregular Warfare QDR/TAA HLS
Info Ops Warfight
Transnational Foreign Internal Defense Missions
Deterrence
WMD Elimination
MCO Major Combat /
Ma
Forward Presence
p
Strike
lo
in
Enabling Conventional Current
ve
Conventional
tai
Partners Operational
De
Campaigns
Campaigns
n
Demand
TRANSFORMATION Regional Reconstruction
Deterrence Access Train
Information Ops
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
7
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Grow the Army/FMR 09-13
• USAR grows 1K and right-sizes 16K of TDA and TTHS
• Builds a total of 60 Support Brigades
• Provides up to 12 Support Brigades per rotation under surge rate (1:4)
Pre Growth FY 2013 Post Growth FY 2013
Operating Force 128.5K +17.0K Operating Force 145.5K
Institutional (TDA) 56.0K (-) 7.5K* Institutional (TDA) 48.5K
FSA 184.5K +9.5K FSA 194.0K
TTHS 20.5K (-) 8.5K* TTHS 12.0K
Total Strength 205K + 1.0K Total Strength 206.0K
FSA: Force Structure Allowance * Re-invested in Operational Force TTHS: Trainees, Transients, Holdees, Students
Key Growth in Capabilities
• 1 CSB (ME) (3) • 1 Sustain Bde (9) • 2 ESCs (7)
• 15 CSSB HQs (30) • 6 Support Maint Cos (16)
• Engineer Rotational Depth • 15 Truck Cos (67)
• 2 BIDS Chemical Co (10) • Trans Rotational Depth
• QM Rotational Depth • 10 ICTC (16)
• AG Pers Services Units • 2 Army Field Support Bdes (3)
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
8
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
POM 10-15 Force Management Strategic Choices
How does the Army address the imbalance between
Operating Force, Generating Force, TTHS and End Strength?
Size of Army: CSA guidance - Hold force at GTA for POM 10-15;
use TAA to adjust structure and to set conditions for QDR
Manpower Allocation: CSA accepted 4.7K Mil-Civ requirement;
funding decision reserved until POM fully assessed
What does the Army need to do to adapt structurally
given an environment of persistent conflict?
Shift in Force Mix from High Intensity to Irregular Warfare: VCSA approved
retaining current BCT and Support Brigade mix in POM 10-15 except for selected
change packages to refine capabilities and capacities within end strength
Distribution of capabilities across COMPOs: VCSA approved retaining current
AC/RC balance in Operating Force capabilities within end strength for POM 10-15
Force Design Updates (FDUs): There are 69 FDUs pending HQDA approval;
VCSA approved incorporating 24 of 69 FDUs in POM 10-15 using change packages
(1.7K at ~$2B) – pending approval; VCSA directed 15 of remaining 45 be returned
to TRADOC for consideration of requirements bill-payers/offsets; results will be
reviewed by senior leaders for competition in TAA 10-15.
TAA 10-15 will be the Enterprise process for shaping force structure decisions
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
9
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
What the Program End Strength
Provides in POM 10-15…
Meets Grow the Army Operating Force objectives in all COMPOs
Reflects Army Initiative #1 (Accelerate manning and AC BCT growth)
Reflects approved Stationing and BRAC decisions
Retains AC Institutional Army above the 80K Grow the Army target
G-1 managing wedge; will be addressed in TAA 10-15 as we
balance the force within the Grow the Army End Strength
4.7K Mil-Civ funding is key issue in POM 10-15
Army End Strength Active ARNG USAR
1,111.6K 547.4K 358.2K 206.0K
TTHS TTHS 1%
TTHS TTHS 6%
7% 11% TDA
16%
TDA Operating
15% Force TDA Operating Operating TDA Operating
16% Force Force 24% Force
78% 73% 70%
89%
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
10
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
The Operating Force – FY2015
AC 46% 404.6K ARNG 37% 320.8K USAR 17% 145.6K HQ 3%
Headquarters 70% 29% 1% 24.6K 3% SOF
Maneuver BCTs 64% 36% 278.9K 32% 4.7%
CSS
Multi-Functional Spt Bdes 49% 45% 7% 101.6K 12% CBT
21%
29% 53% 18%
47%
Functional Spt Bde HQs 25.0K 3%
40% 55%
CS
EAB CBT 5% 44.4K 5%
24%
EAB CS 30% 42% 28% 171.0K 20% 6 ASCC HQs
3 Corps HQs
EAB CSS 26% 30% 44% 163.3K 19% 18 Div HQs
SOF / CA / PSYOP 59% 11% 30% 40.9K 5% 76 BCTs
97 Multi-Functional Bdes
Generating Force MTOE 64% 21% 15% 21.5K 2% 130 Functional Bde HQs
Mix and Composition will Change as Imbalance in AC Force Structure Allowance is addressed in TAA
HQ SOF HQ
SOF CBT 3%
4% 1.4% 2% HQ 0.1%
5.9%
CSS
CSS 17%
CA/PSYOPS CS
13%
CBT 8% 35%
CBT 52%
CS 60% CSS
17% CS
ACTIVE ARNG USAR 54%
28%
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
11
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Total Army Analysis Process
PHASE I : Requirements Generation Force Planning
Construct
Steady State Surge
External Directed Force
Quantitative Requirements Active Partnering Homeland Consequence
Guidance Analysis with USG Agencies
Global
Defense Management
Deterrence
Interdiction
National Military Strategy Modeling Directed Force Train & Equip Stability Ops
Enabling
War on Terror /
Strategic Planning Guidance Rotational Analysis Partners
Transnational
Irregular Warfare
Info Ops
Foreign Internal Defense
Deterrence
Scenarios and Vignettes Lessons Learned WMD Elimination
Forward Presence Major Combat /
Strike
Execution Orders Combatant Commander Input Enabling
Partners
Conventional
Campaigns
Training & Doctrine Force Design Input Regional
Deterrence
Reconstruction
Information Ops
Vice Chief of Staff Review & Approval
PHASE II : Resourcing and Approval
Approved by
Qualitative Recommended Feasibility Resourced
Secretary of
Analysis Force Review Force
The Army and
Chief of Staff
Match Requirements to Structure Assess force supportability
Rebalance capabilities across the based on resources
3 Components (AC/ARNG/USAR) • Manning • Equipping Feeds
the Army’s
Influenced by Quadrennial • Sustaining • Training
Program Objective
Defense Review • Stationing
Memorandum
Informed by Senior Leader Guidance Prioritize & Adjust as required
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
12
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
CSA Guidance to Restore Balance in the Force
2008 - Current 2011 - Future
tore
Res iness Restore
d
Reatrategic Current & Readiness
+ S xibility
rent
Cur ands Fle
tain
ACP Future
Demands
+ Strategic
Flexibility
Dem Sus nteer Sustain
Voluorce Volunteer
F
Force
IMPERATIVES
• Sustain • Steady-State Achieved via Army
• Demand Exceeding Supply
• Prepare Force Generation Process
• Reset • Full Spectrum Readiness
• Counterinsurgency-Focused Force • Reconditioning and
• Accelerated Equipment Wear-Out • Transform
Recapitalization of Equipment
• Soldier and Family Stress • Better Facilities and Increased
Dwell Time for Soldiers
ORGANIZE
Strategy and Doctrinally-based force
• Army Modular Force Progress
• AC/RC Rebalance
• Mitigating Capability Shortfalls
• Meeting End Strength Targets
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
13
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Incorporating Force Management Strategic Choices in TAA 10-15
Objective: Balance Best Capabilities within Resources
Given: • Strategic Demand exceeds 20 BCTs per rotation
• AC Operating and Generating Force are not in Balance
• Additional Capabilities must be considered in TAA
Assumptions: • POM 10-15 program dollars remain constant
• GTA-approved End Strength remains constant
• Adjustments to “fix” persistent shortfalls complete
• RC Structure is “about right”; still need to address
ARNG Recruit Sustainment Program and USAR TTHS
• Can use Reset/Train cycle to offset AC TTHS program
shortfall and associated Operating Strength Deviation
• Additional capabilities will be considered on a
case-by-case basis in terms of design improvements;
capabilities critical to meet operational missions; and
impact on persistent shortfalls and AC/RC balance
TAA 10-15
Resourcing Options: • BCT capabilities and capacity
• EAB CS/CSS capabilities and capacity
• Institutional Army and TTHS efficiencies
• Set conditions for End Strength discussion in QDR 09
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
14
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
TAA 10-15 Key Objectives
Size of Army:
• Adapt the Force Planning Construct to the new Defense Strategy, informed by OA-08
• Validate the “Grow the Army” Force and BCT Mix
• Update Rules of Allocation and Log Planning Factors for Modularity
• Improve alignment of Support Brigade units to manage EAB capacity in ARFORGEN
• Update Force File; Publish ARSTRUC by Oct 08 to support PBR 11-15 and QDR 09
Manpower Allocation:
• Balance FSA between the Operating Force (OF) and Generating Force (GF)
• Address TTHS in all three COMPOs
• Re-establish COMPO 4 to recognize unresourced requirements
Shift in Force Mix from High Intensity to Irregular Warfare:
• Integrate ARFORGEN principles into requirements development and resourcing
• Build sufficient capacity in Stability Operations capabilities
• Address CA/PSYOP shortfalls
• Incorporate Global Force Management Process (DP99) in defining the force
• Review criteria for designation of Early Deployer requirements
Distribution of capabilities across COMPOs:
• Incorporate Recruit Sustainment Program (RSP) in the ARNG
• Review proposed reduction of TTHS Account in the USAR
• Minimize TAA 10-15 force management turbulence
Force Design Updates (FDUs):
• Consider additional capabilities critical to operational mission
• Determine optimal echelon for modular structure: “At what level?”
• Offset risk by addressing the force in multi-functional terms – Baskets of Tasks
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
15
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Institutional Army Transformation
Supporting the Operational Force
Resetting the Training Base
Forming Centers of Excellence
Training and Doctrine Command
Reorganizing Recruiting Command
Forming the Exportable Training Center
Supporting Warrior Care and Transition
Medical Command
Supporting GTA, BRAC, and restationing
1st Army – Training the RC (MOB)
Forces Command Moving FSF TT training mission from Riley to Polk
and forming a TDA Bde
Forming MSE at Fort Bliss
Forming Army Contracting Command
Army Materiel Command (ECC and ICC)
Transforming Logistics
Installation Management Command Transforming Garrisons
Supporting GTA, BRAC, and restationing
Transforming Institutional Army support to the
Army Reserve
AC (DP 57)
Supporting Warfighters with Equipment and Systems for
US Army Acquisition Support Center the Current fight and developing new systems for the
ARMY STAFF
Future; Supports ACP DP 124
HQDA Staff Adding new capabilities; AAWO, EW Biometrics,
Army Civilian University
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
16
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Army Reserve TAA 10-15 Strategy
• Army Reserve unit resourcing will be tied to valid TAA recognized requirements.
• No new force structure bills (good ideas) will be entertained without identified bill payers.
• Hold onto current C2 structure.
- build 2nd Theater Sustainment Command
• Focus investments on high value – dual use operating force units, that we can make ready.
• Expand AR rotational depth where feasible.
• Continue transition of legacy TDA structure to increase AR operating force capabilities.
• Properly size the TTHS.
• Refine stationing as a means to improve Soldier welfare and career progression.
The Army Reserve - Training Soldiers and Growing Leaders DAAR-FD
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
17
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Army Reserve Projected Force
OPERATING FORCE GENERATING FORCE
MTOE Strength TDA Augmentations Strength TDA Strength
Aviation 2,257 Aviation 1 Aviation 68
Band 702 Chemical 2 Engineer 492
Chemical 5,606 Engineer 23 Medical 8023
Engineer 23,886 Medical 21 Signal 451
Infantry 685 Signal 6 Adjutant General 28
Medical 16,659 Military Police 6 Military Police 52
Ordnance 2,290 Psychological Operations 371 Military Intelligence 132
Quartermaster 13,580 Maneuver Enhancement Brigade 4 Combat Electronics Warfare and Intelligence 2292
Signal 3,447 Civil Affairs 14 Information Operations 403
Adjutant General 3,454 Combat Service Support 70 Combat Service Support 2562
Finance 866 Grand Total 524 Division(IT) 16265
Chaplain 112 Training Support Division 10713
Armor 12,023 Headquarters 3965
Military Police 73 Small Arms 669
Judge Advocate 1,440 Grand Total 46603
Military Intelligence 2,462
Psychological Operations 4,199
Combat Electronics Warfare and Intelligence 1,160
Maneuver Enhancement Brigade 528
SPACE/MSL 249
Civil Affairs 7,295
Supply 3,567
Maintenance 3,233 ADDITION TO PROJECTION
Public Affairs 571
Army 141 • 4K IMA
Information Operations 712
Transportation 22,494 • ~12K TTHS
Combat Service Support
Acquisition Logistic/Tech Support
10,985
128 • ~TOTAL 16K Non-TPU
Grand Total 144,804
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
18
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Total Army Analysis 10-15/Key Events
Strategy Based on OA-08 Case 2 / Provide Baseline Force for QDR 09 and PBR 11-15
Requirements Phase Resourcing Phase
Key Dates MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP
6 19 30
OA-08 Study Analysis and Review
POM
Lock
Force
FMR / TAA IA-TAA Requirements Review IA-TAA Resourcing Review
IPR Point
GTA Brief M-Force
to ACP Lock Publish
TAA 10-15
POM ARSTRUC
SACS Submit Publish SACS TAA 10-15 Oct 08
Force FMR 09-13 Build
Build FFDB to JDS FFR
Lock ARSTRUC
30 Sep (T)
23 Jun (T) EOH
Rebalance Operating and Approval
VCSA FPR Rebalance Operating and
Generating Force, establish
Generating Force, establish
16 May
COMPO 4, conduct
19 Jun
COMPO 4, conduct
feasibility review, and set 24 Sep (T)
CSA Shaping feasibility review, and set
RQMTs conditions for PBR 11 Resourcing
Session GOSC conditions for PBR 11
GOSC
11 Jun
4-8 Aug 10 Sep (T)
RQMTs Resourcing
Resourcing
GOSC GOSC
CoC
14-18 Jul
3-4Jun
Resourcing
RQMTs Panels
CoC
DFM DFM
MCO-1 Ph I-III Modeling Rev Rotational Modeling Rev
Force Design Update Processing and Prioritization
Decision Forum
FFDB – Future Forces Database FPR – Force Program Review
FFR – Force Feasibility Review IA – Institutional Army G-37/FMF Lead
FMR – Force Management Review SACS – Structure and Composition System Joint Staff / OSD
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
19
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Summary of Change
Modular Conversion of MTOE units
DP 58 MACOM Organization (USARC becomes DRU)
DP 59 Standardize Institutional Army TDA
DP 74 Institutional Training Support
Army Reserve Federal Reserve Restructure Initiative
Force Management Review 09-13/Grow the Army
TTHS Rebalancing/Operational Force Growth
Emerging Mobilization Policy Changes (15/12, Dwell time)
DP 72 Activation of First and Fifth Army
Transfer of Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations units from
USASOC to USARC
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
20
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
A History in the Making
When planning for a year, Plant corn.
When planning for a decade, Plant trees.
When planning for life, Train and Educate people. Chinese Proverbs
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
21
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
BACKUP SLIDES
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
22
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Rotational Capacity
FY 2015
AC • 76 BCTs RC
• 1.1M Soldiers
48 BCTs 28 BCTs
83 Support Bdes Ratio of 144 Support Bdes
BOG:Dwell
165.1K Troops: 24 BCTs; 76.8K Enablers 1:1 <1:4
29 BCTs / 134.5K Enablers // 241.4K Total
109.3K Troops: 16 BCTs; 49.9K Enablers 1:2 1:4
20 BCTs / 97.9K Enablers // 172.4K Total
78.7K Troops: 12 BCTs; 34.9K Enablers 1:3 1:5
Surge in Ready Pool: 15 BCTs / 74.6K Enablers // 130.7K Total
12 BCTs / 34.9K Enablers
Source: 7 Mar 08 Force File
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
23
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
Capabilities Under Consideration
Structure that may need to Grow
HQs Support Brigades EAB CBT/CS/CSS
Operating • U.S. Army Africa • CAB HQs • CRAM • CA / PSYOP
• BCTs • CAB Medevac Co • Patriot Bns (AC, ARNG, USAR)
Force
• Recon FDU • Fires Bde • Electronic • SMDC Depth
Warfare • Contingency
• SOAR • CA Bde
SOF • Ranger Regmt • Band IV Growth • Info Ops
Contracting
Generating • TRADOC (Training & Recruiting) • TRADOC
• FORSCOM
Force • FORSCOM (1st Army) 91% of growth
proposed is in • MEDCOM
• MEDCOM (WTUs and Medical Spt) 5 Commands • IMCOM
• HQDA
• AMC Contracting
• ARNG Recruit Sustainment Program (RSP)
Areas to consider for Off-sets
Not Enough to
• Re-look size of ASCC HQs off-set Potential
• Re-look size and composition of Corps / DIV HQs Growth
• Re-look SBCT Design; consider 2 Maneuver Bns
• Re-look Hvy and Inf BCT Designs; consider holistic review of all enablers
• Re-look Force Design Updates; take an enterprise view of incorporating changes
Other Areas to Assess
• Theater Structure • Mil-to-Civ Conversions
• Balance of BCTs and Enablers • DOTML-PF (other than Organization)
• AC/RC Balance
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
24
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
AR Stationing Process
• Army Reserve Force Programs (ARFP) is the proponent for all AR stationing actions
• O&F commands coordinate stationing actions through the RRC/RSC to USARC.
• AR stationing actions can only be implemented upon creation of a Permanent Order
(PO) by ARFP authorizing the relocation.
• Director, ARC will make notification to OCLL and determine timing of media
advisories/public release of information.
• Commanders must use discretion in releasing information pertaining to pending
stationing actions prior to creation of the PO.
• Processing time: 3 months – 2+ years
The Next 100 Years – Focusing the Operational Reserve DARR-FD
25
Mr. John Davenport, ARFP, 703.601.0641 As of: 27 Jun 08
